C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C7 article from a bit of a different perspective

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2013, 11:01 AM
  #41  
BlueOx
Race Director
 
BlueOx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,776
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by USAFPILOT
except those aren't to protect the animals on the tracks, it was there to prevent the train from a derailment. I am going to look at the Vette's nose the same way. In fact I think we should sharpen them up a bit.
Just glue some blades to them...Mad Max style!
Old 01-23-2013, 11:08 AM
  #42  
VADanno
Instructor
 
VADanno's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 152
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I like that idea! When you hit a deer while driving on "fun roads", the fangs will butcher it for you. Just throw the meat in the back and keep going! "Nice buck! What did you use? 7mm Mag?" "No, C7"
Old 01-23-2013, 12:07 PM
  #43  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by USAFPILOT
pedestrians need to look both ways before they cross the effing street. Washington is OUT OF CONTROL!!!
Started in Europe with the ECE regs. The real reason the C6 was designed without pop up headlights. Headlight change wasn't a change for the sake of change because of a change in styling taste, as BlueOx believes. There was a driving change in the C6's headlights and it wasn't because everyone hated pop up headlights.

Most of the front end styling of today's cars are to meet the new pedestrian safety regs, not because of a random "fad" in styling.
Old 01-23-2013, 12:15 PM
  #44  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

One thing that is confusing(to me) is the engine compartment photo showing the hood extractor duct. I was under the impression that the air entered the grille, passed through the condenser and radiator and then was ducted to the outside through the duct and the vent in the hood.

It sure looks like I can see the back side of the aluminum radiator and also the fan shroud, below the duct. To me the system does not look like a sealed system but air flows through the condenser and radiator and then into the engine compartment.

From that photo I can't see what the duct actually does.
Old 01-23-2013, 12:16 PM
  #45  
granracing
Cruising
Thread Starter
 
granracing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The real reason the C6 was designed without pop up headlights.
Could be wrong but we were told that it was a request of the AMLS race team. One of the designers went into this a bit and made sense to me.
Old 01-23-2013, 12:33 PM
  #46  
BlueOx
Race Director
 
BlueOx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,776
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by granracing
Could be wrong but we were told that it was a request of the AMLS race team. One of the designers went into this a bit and made sense to me.
Totally correct.
Old 01-23-2013, 12:56 PM
  #47  
prinzSD455
Safety Car
 
prinzSD455's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Antioch Ca
Posts: 3,721
Received 110 Likes on 69 Posts
Finalist 2020 C4 of the Year - Unmodified

Default

Great read and helps explain some of the things I observed on the car and wondered what purpose they served. It sounds like every surface on the exterior was carefully thought out and serves a purpose as well. I do agree there may be a little too many surface lines on the hood. In the reveal I counted 11 and thought that it was excessive. The most interesting part for me is the ability for line workers to adjust the door panel so they fit better with the dashboard. I am lusting after the C7 even more now. Great job GM and thanks to the OP for your insights.
Old 01-23-2013, 01:04 PM
  #48  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlueOx
Totally correct.
C5R did not have pop up headlights. In most classes, race cars are able to make mods, like the headlights on the C5R and even back before your time, the original mid sixties Grand Sports did not have pop up headlights, as the buckets were stationary and covered by a Plexiglas cover.

While a race team may have asked GM for non pop headlights, the ECE regs is the reason they are history.
Old 01-23-2013, 01:06 PM
  #49  
lateapex911
4th Gear
 
lateapex911's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
One thing that is confusing(to me) is the engine compartment photo showing the hood extractor duct. I was under the impression that the air entered the grille, passed through the condenser and radiator and then was ducted to the outside through the duct and the vent in the hood.

It sure looks like I can see the back side of the aluminum radiator and also the fan shroud, below the duct. To me the system does not look like a sealed system but air flows through the condenser and radiator and then into the engine compartment.

From that photo I can't see what the duct actually does.
Hey- I wrote the piece Dave linked. 'Yea, it's a bit confusing and very difficult to capture with a camera...but the hood extractor does indeed link to the radiator. But it only covers a third (the upper third) of the rads surface. the other 2/3s is what you saw, with a conventional fan etc.

This is entirely due to the dual purpose nature of the car. Unlike the racer, this one will likely be sitting in bumper to bumper beach traffic and the like, so thats a major concern. Ducting the entire rad up would still require fans, but now theres a reliability problem with possible snow and ice and leaves and twigs and whatever getting down there and snarling the fan.

While 98% of owners garage the car and never drive it in such conditions, GM has to be prepared for the one guy that does, then ignores the warnings and tries damaging the engine.

On the pop ups, it was definitely a "request" from the Pratt and Miller guys to clean up the aero, and GM decided that with that much money going to the program it would be dumb to keep the pop ups. made for another "race tie in" story. it might also be related to ped regs, but that wasn't mentioned in my talk with Tadge.

Last edited by lateapex911; 01-23-2013 at 01:08 PM.
Old 01-23-2013, 01:06 PM
  #50  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by prinzSD455
Great read and helps explain some of the things I observed on the car and wondered what purpose they served. It sounds like every surface on the exterior was carefully thought out and serves a purpose as well. I do agree there may be a little too many surface lines on the hood. In the reveal I counted 11 and thought that it was excessive. The most interesting part for me is the ability for line workers to adjust the door panel so they fit better with the dashboard. I am lusting after the C7 even more now. Great job GM and thanks to the OP for your insights.
Women spend tens of millions to get rid of the creases so they will look "good' and then GM feels adding a bunch of creases looks "good".
Old 01-23-2013, 01:14 PM
  #51  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lateapex911
Hey- I worte the peice Dave linked. 'Yea, it's a bit confusing and very difficult to capture with a camera...but the hood extractor does indeed link to the radiator. But it only covers a third (the upper third) of the rads surface. the other 2/3s is what you saw, with a conventional fan etc.

This is entirely due to the dual purpose nature of the car. Unlike the racer, this one will likely be sitting in bumper to bumper beach trafffic and the like, so thats a major concern. Ducting the entire rad up would still require fans, but now theres a reliability problem with possible snow and ice and leaves and twigs and whatever getting down there and snarling the fan.

While 98% of owners garage the car and never drive it in such conditions, GM has to be prepared for the one guy that does, then ignores the warnings and tries damaging the engine.

On the pop ups, it was definitely a "request" from the Pratt and Miller guys to clean up the aero.
That's what I thought...more form then function. Odd that a C6 Z06 and ZR1 can stay planted at 200 MPH without the duct/extractor and now the C7 needs it to stay planted at 190 MPH.

I also see that the vents in the rear fenders require supplement electric fans to provide cooling when the car is not in motion(which occurs a lot on a street driven car). C6 Z06 and ZR1 had transmission and differential cooling without additional fans being needed. Just more stuff to go wrong.
Old 01-23-2013, 01:41 PM
  #52  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
That's what I thought...more form then function. Odd that a C6 Z06 and ZR1 can stay planted at 200 MPH without the duct/extractor and now the C7 needs it to stay planted at 190 MPH.
Planted is a relative term. If I had to guess, the C7 in Z51 form will produce downforce or will be lift neutral unlike the Z06 and ZR1.


I also see that the vents in the rear fenders require supplement electric fans to provide cooling when the car is not in motion(which occurs a lot on a street driven car). C6 Z06 and ZR1 had transmission and differential cooling without additional fans being needed. Just more stuff to go wrong.
That they did. But you can see why GM decided to move the coolers to the rear like people have been doing to C5/C6 raecars for years. Better weight distribution and it eliminates all the cooling lines that have to run from the front to the back of the car. That was big reason why the center console in the C6Z's cars throw off so much heat.

Last edited by Kappa; 01-23-2013 at 02:00 PM.
Old 01-23-2013, 01:48 PM
  #53  
Quick Silver Z
Team Owner

 
Quick Silver Z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Right Corner Pocket of Illinois
Posts: 32,265
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,005 Posts
No-IL Events Coordinator
2020 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C6 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
2018 C6 of Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24


Default

Back away from the car old man, it's NOT for you!

Old 01-23-2013, 02:30 PM
  #54  
RC000E
Le Mans Master
 
RC000E's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: My interests are mobile
Posts: 6,937
Received 346 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Every bit of new information that comes out simply reveals the thought and preparation that went into this car. I thank ALMS so much for what it has done for us as Corvette owners, and for the platform itself.

It's great to see GM making big strides with a car that was already so good to begin with.
Old 01-23-2013, 02:33 PM
  #55  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,060
Received 3,791 Likes on 1,140 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
That's what I thought...more form then function.
Not at speed it won't be. At speed on a track it'll be perfectly functional as a heat evac system. Even if only 1/3 of the radiator is exposed to the airflow: it's the TOP 1/3 (hey.. heat rises, doesn't it?) of it.

Might be time for you to head back to the C6 and C5 sections Joe. Just a thought...

jas
Old 01-23-2013, 03:06 PM
  #56  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jvp
Not at speed it won't be. At speed on a track it'll be perfectly functional as a heat evac system. Even if only 1/3 of the radiator is exposed to the airflow: it's the TOP 1/3 (hey.. heat rises, doesn't it?) of it.

Might be time for you to head back to the C6 and C5 sections Joe. Just a thought...

jas
Yeah, they don't highlight this stuff for no reason. I think GM is pretty proud of the aero work they've done lately.

Name:  1yFWdGVl.jpg
Views: 3
Size:  36.5 KB

Old 01-23-2013, 03:46 PM
  #57  
Gmumd48
Racer
 
Gmumd48's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: American in Germany 1 Hour to the ring fast
Posts: 476
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks nice write up

I see so much thread jacking! I personally listed a 73 911S that is quite valuable and part of my collection to buy two of these ( Probably wait for the second one to be a Vert )

I really hope the seats are as good as they say before it was the seats and the squirrely ride over rough tarmac that made me get rid of the 08 C-6

I am hyped

Get notified of new replies

To C7 article from a bit of a different perspective

Old 01-23-2013, 03:54 PM
  #58  
granracing
Cruising
Thread Starter
 
granracing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The seats are nice. I've been in several new cars with supposidly nice sporty seats, and hate them. The Caddy CTS-V Recaro seats come to mine. I wouldn't have a problem going on a long ride in the Vette sport seats, no less the touring version.

And feel free to thread jack away!
Old 01-23-2013, 04:41 PM
  #59  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
Planted is a relative term. If I had to guess, the C7 in Z51 form will produce downforce or will be lift neutral unlike the Z06 and ZR1.



That they did. But you can see why GM decided to move the coolers to the rear like people have been doing to C5/C6 raecars for years. Better weight distribution and it eliminates all the cooling lines that have to run from the front to the back of the car. That was big reason why the center console in the C6Z's cars throw off so much heat.
Are you aware that the C7 has the exhaust pipes running in the center console, unlike below the cover plate like the C6. They decided to do that to clean up the bottom on the car to reduce drag and to control the heat they are using some of the "magic" NASA heat shielding.

On the C7, are they ducting the air from the top of the fender and then down to the transmission and differential and then back up to the top of the rear fascia so it can exit next to the taillights, or are they mounting heat exchangers in the ducting and running coolant lines between the transmission/differential and the heat exchangers?

Seems to me if they routed the air through a long duct, up and down and around some corners, it would create more air drag, not less.

Sounds like a lot of work to eliminate few feet of tubing running down inside the center console.

As I keep saying, why is GM trying to re-invent the wheel? The Z06/ZR1 is not suffering from excessive lift at 200 MPH , much less the speeds we run our cars at. Where can I run my stock Z06 at to be able to hit 200 MPH? I've run at Talladega and only managed 162 MPH. BEZ06 ran his ZR1 at Talladega and hit 168 MPH. Neither of us lost control of our cars because of front/rear lift making the car's unstable at those speeds. I saw base C6's running at 150 MPH and they have less down force then the Z06/ZR1 and not a single one went airborne.
Old 01-23-2013, 05:29 PM
  #60  
jvp
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jvp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,060
Received 3,791 Likes on 1,140 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer

Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
As I keep saying, why is GM trying to re-invent the wheel? The Z06/ZR1 is not suffering from excessive lift at 200 MPH , much less the speeds we run our cars at.
Pssst. Joe. It's also for....

COOLING!!!!

For crying out loud, man.

jas


Quick Reply: C7 article from a bit of a different perspective



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM.