C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gotta love technology

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:18 PM
  #1  
tusc6
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
tusc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 74
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Gotta love technology

An excerpt from Car and Driver regarding the 1979 L82 option Corvette.
Jump ahead 34 years and we have twice the hp and mileage in a far better handling car.

"The 60-series tires' one saving grace is straight-line traction. The mighty L82 engine (225 horsepower this year), backed up with the biggest gear money can buy (3.70 to 1), had all it could do to break these tires loose off the line. Wind it up, snap off a one-two shift, and you're at 60 mph in 6.6 seconds. Even with a fairly green engine, our test car easily buzzed its tach needle smartly to the redline in top gear, or 127 mph. Enjoy these disrespectful bursts of speed while they last, because next year the Corvette must follow corporate mandates with a speedometer that plays dumb after 80 mph."

I would like to see a 3.70 axle option on the C7!
Old 01-24-2013, 02:21 PM
  #2  
rcallen484
Race Director
 
rcallen484's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tusc6
An excerpt from Car and Driver regarding the 1979 L82 option Corvette.
Jump ahead 34 years and we have twice the hp and mileage in a far better handling car.

"The 60-series tires' one saving grace is straight-line traction. The mighty L82 engine (225 horsepower this year), backed up with the biggest gear money can buy (3.70 to 1), had all it could do to break these tires loose off the line. Wind it up, snap off a one-two shift, and you're at 60 mph in 6.6 seconds. Even with a fairly green engine, our test car easily buzzed its tach needle smartly to the redline in top gear, or 127 mph. Enjoy these disrespectful bursts of speed while they last, because next year the Corvette must follow corporate mandates with a speedometer that plays dumb after 80 mph."

I would like to see a 3.70 axle option on the C7!
Yep, some of us here have this perspective and some of us don't
Old 01-24-2013, 02:26 PM
  #3  
BeaZt
Le Mans Master
 
BeaZt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14
Default

Originally Posted by rcallen484
Yep, some of us here have this perspective and some of us don't
Old 01-24-2013, 02:47 PM
  #4  
85scott
Burning Brakes
 
85scott's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tusc6
An excerpt from Car and Driver regarding the 1979 L82 option Corvette.
Jump ahead 34 years and we have twice the hp and mileage in a far better handling car.
Let's also remember that high-tech 2014 now costs about four times the base price of what a 1979 Corvette did. So is it really that much better?

And yeah much of that price increase was caused by Big Gov.
But IMO, cars lean too much on tech now. And not nearly enough concern is shown for price. And not just Corvettes, but all kinds of cars.

I know I'd gladly trade all the new apps & gadgets on the C7, for lower tech & an LS7 as the standard hammer instead.
Old 01-24-2013, 02:49 PM
  #5  
tuxnharley
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
tuxnharley's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 13,962
Received 1,937 Likes on 1,183 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rcallen484
Yep, some of us here have this perspective and some of us don't

Meaning that you want a 3.70:1 axle option................?

Actually, my C6 already has twice the mileage and virtually twice the HP of a '79. The C7 takes that even further!

Old 01-24-2013, 02:50 PM
  #6  
chiefttp
Safety Car

 
chiefttp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,109
Received 88 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

My 81 has an L-81 putting out a whopping 190 HP!!! But she looks so good!!!
Old 01-24-2013, 02:52 PM
  #7  
Zymurgy
Moderator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Zymurgy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: DFW Area TX
Posts: 35,599
Received 15,067 Likes on 6,169 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 85scott
Let's also remember that high-tech 2014 now costs about four times the base price of what a 1979 Corvette did. So is it really that much better?

And yeah much of that price increase was caused by Big Gov.
But IMO, cars lean too much on tech now. And not nearly enough concern is shown for price. And not just Corvettes, but all kinds of cars.

I know I'd gladly trade all the new apps & gadgets on the C7, for lower tech & an LS7 as the standard hammer instead.
Inflation alone accounts for over 3x of that 4x increase.
Old 01-24-2013, 02:53 PM
  #8  
rcallen484
Race Director
 
rcallen484's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 85scott
Let's also remember that high-tech 2014 now costs about four times the base price of what a 1979 Corvette did. So is it really that much better?

And yeah much of that price increase was caused by Big Gov.
But IMO, cars lean too much on tech now. And not nearly enough concern is shown for price. And not just Corvettes, but all kinds of cars.

I know I'd gladly trade all the new apps & gadgets on the C7, for lower tech & an LS7 as the standard hammer instead.
You honestly don't understand that the C6 costs the same in today's dollars as the C3 did in 1979 dollars? Really?
Old 01-24-2013, 03:02 PM
  #9  
termigni
Cruising
 
termigni's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 85scott
Let's also remember that high-tech 2014 now costs about four times the base price of what a 1979 Corvette did. So is it really that much better?

And yeah much of that price increase was caused by Big Gov.
But IMO, cars lean too much on tech now. And not nearly enough concern is shown for price. And not just Corvettes, but all kinds of cars.

I know I'd gladly trade all the new apps & gadgets on the C7, for lower tech & an LS7 as the standard hammer instead.
i don't mean to be disrespecful but please go check how much average salary was back then and now.
Old 01-24-2013, 04:01 PM
  #10  
rcallen484
Race Director
 
rcallen484's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tuxnharley
Meaning that you want a 3.70:1 axle option................?

Actually, my C6 already has twice the mileage and virtually twice the HP of a '79. The C7 takes that even further!

Remember the hardcore guys who put a 4:56 rear end in their ride?
Old 01-24-2013, 04:23 PM
  #11  
tusc6
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
tusc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 74
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcallen484
Remember the hardcore guys who put a 4:56 rear end in their ride?
0-60 in 4 flat, and the 1/4 mile in 18 seconds and 60 mph 'cause that's all she'd do!

Get notified of new replies

To Gotta love technology




Quick Reply: Gotta love technology



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.