When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
because of what DomG quoted from the R&T article that stated:
"3311lbs"
Yeah and he also originally said 6.6L and 450 HP. He later corrected to 6.2L but I'll bet 450 HP is at least 20 HP off. I don't think this guy has a clue.
Are those renderings or photos? I thought maybe something would be different but this looks like the same car that Jalopnik posted back in 2011. The front looks ok. But im still not feeling the rear end.
Liking it better and better. Don't think these are photos. Why would they take photos and make it look like a kids drawing? These days they make drawings and computer renders look like actual photos( like the trinity car). Doesn't make sense to make a photo look like a bad drawing. They do touch up photos but to make them look better NOT like a child drew them. I do think they are drawings of the actual car
To me the back end looks like the result of a bad party weekend where a Camaro, CTS-v, and a Pontiac Aztec had a threesome...don't like it at all...the rest is not bad though.