C7 Shortfall
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Beavercreek Ohio Currently own: 1958 Silver Blue Corvette
Posts: 824
Received 758 Likes
on
253 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
C7 Shortfall
I just read the Car and Driver Jan 2013 article, "Corvette, Declassified" - so disappointing....
All these supposedly great engine modifications. Excuse me but the state-of-the-art is for for twin turbos. For comparison, turn 2 pages in the magazine and they flaunt the lethal Audi S6 with a 420-hp, twin -turbo 4.0 liter V8 that goes from 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.
Square, Camaro taillights - you've GOTTA be kidding me!
Six speed auto transmission - the standard is 8 speeds my friends...
Flat, boring rear window, useless rear-side windows, it's a very sad day for corvettes!!!
The last paragraph in the C7 article says this is "arguably the most attractive, relevant Corvette since the 1963-67 "midyear" Sing Ray."
Really?! Give me a break!!
All these supposedly great engine modifications. Excuse me but the state-of-the-art is for for twin turbos. For comparison, turn 2 pages in the magazine and they flaunt the lethal Audi S6 with a 420-hp, twin -turbo 4.0 liter V8 that goes from 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.
Square, Camaro taillights - you've GOTTA be kidding me!
Six speed auto transmission - the standard is 8 speeds my friends...
Flat, boring rear window, useless rear-side windows, it's a very sad day for corvettes!!!
The last paragraph in the C7 article says this is "arguably the most attractive, relevant Corvette since the 1963-67 "midyear" Sing Ray."
Really?! Give me a break!!
#3
Racer
Answers in BOLD.
All these supposedly great engine modifications. Excuse me but the state-of-the-art is for for twin turbos. For comparison, turn 2 pages in the magazine and they flaunt the lethal Audi S6 with a 420-hp, twin -turbo 4.0 liter V8 that goes from 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.
Buy the ZR version with bi-turbos
Square, Camaro taillights - you've GOTTA be kidding me!
Nobody has seen exactly what the lights will look like. Until 1/13/13 keep your opinions to yourself.
Six speed auto transmission - the standard is 8 speeds my friends...
8 speed auto, or 7 speed manual standard on the C7.
Flat, boring rear window, useless rear-side windows, it's a very sad day for corvettes!!!
Nobody has seen exactly what the rear hatch or side windows will look like. Until 1/13/13 keep your opinions to yourself.
The last paragraph in the C7 article says this is "arguably the most attractive, relevant Corvette since the 1963-67 "midyear" Sing Ray."
Really?! Give me a break!!
Anyone that can make that comment without fully seeing the vehicle in person, isn't worth ink printed on the paper.
Buy the ZR version with bi-turbos
Square, Camaro taillights - you've GOTTA be kidding me!
Nobody has seen exactly what the lights will look like. Until 1/13/13 keep your opinions to yourself.
Six speed auto transmission - the standard is 8 speeds my friends...
8 speed auto, or 7 speed manual standard on the C7.
Flat, boring rear window, useless rear-side windows, it's a very sad day for corvettes!!!
Nobody has seen exactly what the rear hatch or side windows will look like. Until 1/13/13 keep your opinions to yourself.
The last paragraph in the C7 article says this is "arguably the most attractive, relevant Corvette since the 1963-67 "midyear" Sing Ray."
Really?! Give me a break!!
Anyone that can make that comment without fully seeing the vehicle in person, isn't worth ink printed on the paper.
#4
Race Director
I just read the Car and Driver Jan 2013 article, "Corvette, Declassified" - so disappointing....
All these supposedly great engine modifications. Excuse me but the state-of-the-art is for for twin turbos. For comparison, turn 2 pages in the magazine and they flaunt the lethal Audi S6 with a 420-hp, twin -turbo 4.0 liter V8 that goes from 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.
Square, Camaro taillights - you've GOTTA be kidding me!
Six speed auto transmission - the standard is 8 speeds my friends...
Flat, boring rear window, useless rear-side windows, it's a very sad day for corvettes!!!
The last paragraph in the C7 article says this is "arguably the most attractive, relevant Corvette since the 1963-67 "midyear" Sing Ray."
Really?! Give me a break!!
All these supposedly great engine modifications. Excuse me but the state-of-the-art is for for twin turbos. For comparison, turn 2 pages in the magazine and they flaunt the lethal Audi S6 with a 420-hp, twin -turbo 4.0 liter V8 that goes from 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.
Square, Camaro taillights - you've GOTTA be kidding me!
Six speed auto transmission - the standard is 8 speeds my friends...
Flat, boring rear window, useless rear-side windows, it's a very sad day for corvettes!!!
The last paragraph in the C7 article says this is "arguably the most attractive, relevant Corvette since the 1963-67 "midyear" Sing Ray."
Really?! Give me a break!!
#7
Racer
#8
Put on all the turbos you want but I'd rather put my money on an equally powered car that's naturally aspirated. In other words, I'd much rather spend $95k on a 640hp NA V10 Viper than I would on a 640hp twinturbo V8 Viper, for instance. There's a reason why Ferrari and Lamborghini stick to naturally aspirated engines. The GTR and Volkswagen S6/S7 can go to hell for all I care. I wish my 640 had an NA engine. Oh well, at least the 'stang and z4 do. And my C7 will too
#9
Le Mans Master
I just read the Car and Driver Jan 2013 article, "Corvette, Declassified" - so disappointing....
All these supposedly great engine modifications. Excuse me but the state-of-the-art is for for twin turbos. For comparison, turn 2 pages in the magazine and they flaunt the lethal Audi S6 with a 420-hp, twin -turbo 4.0 liter V8 that goes from 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.
Square, Camaro taillights - you've GOTTA be kidding me!
Six speed auto transmission - the standard is 8 speeds my friends...
Flat, boring rear window, useless rear-side windows, it's a very sad day for corvettes!!!
The last paragraph in the C7 article says this is "arguably the most attractive, relevant Corvette since the 1963-67 "midyear" Sing Ray."
Really?! Give me a break!!
All these supposedly great engine modifications. Excuse me but the state-of-the-art is for for twin turbos. For comparison, turn 2 pages in the magazine and they flaunt the lethal Audi S6 with a 420-hp, twin -turbo 4.0 liter V8 that goes from 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.
Square, Camaro taillights - you've GOTTA be kidding me!
Six speed auto transmission - the standard is 8 speeds my friends...
Flat, boring rear window, useless rear-side windows, it's a very sad day for corvettes!!!
The last paragraph in the C7 article says this is "arguably the most attractive, relevant Corvette since the 1963-67 "midyear" Sing Ray."
Really?! Give me a break!!
#10
Drifting
Member Since: Feb 2012
Location: CHARLOTTE NC
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Being a first time corvette owner as of last nov.2011 (preowned 2009 Z06) I have become a serious lover of these automobiles. Dolar for Dollar nothing can touch these cars!!!! I spent a good bit of $ at KATECH to make my car something very special to me, And i could not be happier. Cyber-Grey with 9000 miles. I have said this before in an earlier post. I truely believe the new corvette will be a awesome car!!!
#11
Race Director
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Cape Cod, Mass.
Posts: 18,776
Received 4,574 Likes
on
2,166 Posts
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C8 of the Year Finalist Unmodified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
2019 C1 of Year Winner (performance mods)
2017 Corvette of the Year Finalist
2016 C2 of Year
2015 C3 of Year Finalist
All right, that does it for me, I'm buying the Audi
#12
Burning Brakes
Jumping to such conclusions before you've even seen the C7 is pretty, umm, ridiculous, don't you think??
I was disappointed to see the hidden headlights go when the C6 came out, but I love the C6 (especially wide-body models) now. I'll probably love the C7.
Final note: I'd much rather have a NA engine than a turbo if it was up to me. The best example I can think of is the Ferrari 458 vs. the McLaren. The Ferrari sounds incredible at high revs (as does the C6 Vette in my opinion). The McLaren is a very similar car to the Ferrari on paper, but it has a microscopic engine with twin-turbos on it, and it doesn't sound nearly as good. To me, a car has to look good, drive well, but also sound like a proper sports car.
I was disappointed to see the hidden headlights go when the C6 came out, but I love the C6 (especially wide-body models) now. I'll probably love the C7.
Final note: I'd much rather have a NA engine than a turbo if it was up to me. The best example I can think of is the Ferrari 458 vs. the McLaren. The Ferrari sounds incredible at high revs (as does the C6 Vette in my opinion). The McLaren is a very similar car to the Ferrari on paper, but it has a microscopic engine with twin-turbos on it, and it doesn't sound nearly as good. To me, a car has to look good, drive well, but also sound like a proper sports car.
#17
Le Mans Master
Seriously?......you have to remind us that we AREN'T getting the most awesome meanest looking Stingray in history??????
Thanks ALOT!
When the body kit comes out for the REALLY awesome Stingray, I'm gonna be building it!
Thanks ALOT!
When the body kit comes out for the REALLY awesome Stingray, I'm gonna be building it!
Last edited by sfc rick; 12-15-2012 at 03:14 PM.
#19
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Western NYS
Posts: 1,041
Received 554 Likes
on
204 Posts
2022 C7 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2018 C7 of Year Finalist
How can any intelligent person rate a car before actually seeing what it looks like and what it is capable of. You're under a month away, just wait before you end up eating crow...