C7 Prediction - Jalopnik close
#22
I predict that the baseline C7 "version of the 6.2L engine" will in fact have a displacement < 6.2 liters.
Although if it incorporates displacement on demand (cylinder deactivation), it could possibly retaim the full 6.2 liters.
Although if it incorporates displacement on demand (cylinder deactivation), it could possibly retaim the full 6.2 liters.
Last edited by 235265283...; 08-06-2012 at 01:36 PM.
#23
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: Manassas VA
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well...
1. Price Point - base model will likely be built to price point around $50k or so. Weight reduction is expensive - extensive use of carbon fiber, aluminum, titanium etc is quite costly. Ask me how I know...
2. Now, if the C7 was going to be appreciably smaller (which it appears NOT to be) and making considerably LESS power (again appears it will make a bit more) than #1 would not be as important. But a similar sized vehicle, requiring a strong beefy drivetrain and large wheels/tires will require very expensive components to drive weight down (unless you would like to live without A/C, etc.)
Let's not forget that tightening safety emisions requirements add weight - witness the extra two cat converters now required on the 2013's.
I would expect to see a 460-470 h/p 3200 base C7 - a small, but noticeable step forward in performance at a low 50's msrp, for a decently optioned (not loaded) model. I think the new tranny's will be as important contributor to any enhanced performance, as much as any increased power will be.
Just trying to keep it real...
#24
Team Owner
Weigh in at 3000 lbs is simply not realistic, especially if they are continuing use of current 6.2 motor adapted for DI. Why?
Well...
1. Price Point - base model will likely be built to price point around $50k or so. Weight reduction is expensive - extensive use of carbon fiber, aluminum, titanium etc is quite costly. Ask me how I know...
2. Now, if the C7 was going to be appreciably smaller (which it appears NOT to be) and making considerably LESS power (again appears it will make a bit more) than #1 would not be as important. But a similar sized vehicle, requiring a strong beefy drivetrain and large wheels/tires will require very expensive components to drive weight down (unless you would like to live without A/C, etc.)
Let's not forget that tightening safety emisions requirements add weight - witness the extra two cat converters now required on the 2013's.
I would expect to see a 460-470 h/p 3200 base C7 - a small, but noticeable step forward in performance at a low 50's msrp, for a decently optioned (not loaded) model. I think the new tranny's will be as important contributor to any enhanced performance, as much as any increased power will be.
Just trying to keep it real...
Well...
1. Price Point - base model will likely be built to price point around $50k or so. Weight reduction is expensive - extensive use of carbon fiber, aluminum, titanium etc is quite costly. Ask me how I know...
2. Now, if the C7 was going to be appreciably smaller (which it appears NOT to be) and making considerably LESS power (again appears it will make a bit more) than #1 would not be as important. But a similar sized vehicle, requiring a strong beefy drivetrain and large wheels/tires will require very expensive components to drive weight down (unless you would like to live without A/C, etc.)
Let's not forget that tightening safety emisions requirements add weight - witness the extra two cat converters now required on the 2013's.
I would expect to see a 460-470 h/p 3200 base C7 - a small, but noticeable step forward in performance at a low 50's msrp, for a decently optioned (not loaded) model. I think the new tranny's will be as important contributor to any enhanced performance, as much as any increased power will be.
Just trying to keep it real...
7 gears forward (if it happens) can go A LONG way in increasing highway (and even city) fuel economy.
#25
Just an FYI...here is Tom Peters, GM Performance Design Director on his approach to design. I'm guessing he is very involved with the C7. You can see some of the hood venting of the C7 rendering looks very similar to the ZL1..maybe even the rear fender vents of the C7 may work similarly - just guessing. Great video!
http://www.lsxtv.com/news/videozl1-w...or-tom-peters/
http://www.lsxtv.com/news/videozl1-w...or-tom-peters/
Last edited by BlueOx; 08-06-2012 at 03:30 PM.
#26
Drifting
Although I do not expect 3000lbs. it is not THAT hard to believe. Widely accepted to be true, it is rumored that all C7 levels will get an aluminum frame. The Z06 aluminum frame weighs 136 lbs. less than the steel frame. So... 3200 (base Vette) - 136 = 3064. I have lifted the seats out of my Vette and have a hard time believing GM could not extract 10 lbs. or so from each of those beasts. 3064-20=3044. Now I'm not going to nickel and dime the rest of the car to get the 44 lbs. for y'all, but that is exactly the kind of thing engineers at GM are paid to do. If 3000 is the goal, it is well within reach without throwing thousands of dollars of carbon fiber at the car... in my less than informed opinion.
-D
-D
#27
Safety Car
It's safe to say that Omega's rear bumper mold shown in the video will be used for years of C7 production. But now that that the taillamps are a large assembly that drops into the bumper, the taillamp design could be changed for different models/years.
#28
Safety Car
Whoever creates the first set of round aftermarket taillights is going to make a fortune!!!
#29
I have faith that the corvette team will give us at least 500 hp. If the base C6 matched the outgoing C5 ZO6 in horsepower, why is it so hard to believe that the base C7 will match the outgoing C6 ZO6? What am I missing here???
In my opinion, if the C7 does not come out of the gate with at least 500hp, not only will it be a huge disaapointment, but also an absolute embarassment. Afterall, couldn't the corvette team simply put in a detuned LS9 or an LSA from a CTS-V. It just seems really rediculous, at least to me, for the corvette team to not achieve the 500 hp figure with all the tools they have in their arsenal, especially given the hp wars going on in the industry right now where hp figures have gone through the roof.
I don't believe it for a second. The C7 WILL have at least 500 hp.
#30
#31
Melting Slicks
Expect the performance C7 engines and higher HP to appear in 2015 & 2016. Plenty will buy a fairly tame C7 in 2013 to have the new Corvette. Many of those 2013 buyers will trade up for more C7 HP later.
Last edited by jb_va2001; 08-06-2012 at 05:45 PM.
#32
Drifting
I read many posts on this forum where people are stipulating that they believe hp figures for the C7 will be between 450-485 hp. Is it just me or does this estimate seem low? I am wondering why people feel this way?? Why would the corvette team only increase our HP by 50 or so? Afterall, at this rate, pretty soon we will be out gunned (horsepower wise) by a 5.0 Mustang GT!!!
I have faith that the corvette team will give us at least 500 hp. If the base C6 matched the outgoing C5 ZO6 in horsepower, why is it so hard to believe that the base C7 will match the outgoing C6 ZO6? What am I missing here???
In my opinion, if the C7 does not come out of the gate with at least 500hp, not only will it be a huge disaapointment, but also an absolute embarassment. Afterall, couldn't the corvette team simply put in a detuned LS9 or an LSA from a CTS-V. It just seems really rediculous, at least to me, for the corvette team to not achieve the 500 hp figure with all the tools they have in their arsenal, especially given the hp wars going on in the industry right now where hp figures have gone through the roof.
I don't believe it for a second. The C7 WILL have at least 500 hp.
I have faith that the corvette team will give us at least 500 hp. If the base C6 matched the outgoing C5 ZO6 in horsepower, why is it so hard to believe that the base C7 will match the outgoing C6 ZO6? What am I missing here???
In my opinion, if the C7 does not come out of the gate with at least 500hp, not only will it be a huge disaapointment, but also an absolute embarassment. Afterall, couldn't the corvette team simply put in a detuned LS9 or an LSA from a CTS-V. It just seems really rediculous, at least to me, for the corvette team to not achieve the 500 hp figure with all the tools they have in their arsenal, especially given the hp wars going on in the industry right now where hp figures have gone through the roof.
I don't believe it for a second. The C7 WILL have at least 500 hp.
As far a Corvette is concerned, GM doesn't care what Mustang does. The Mustang is a lower level car. I have never, ever read anything from anyone at GM that had Mustang and Corvette in the same sentence. Now Porsche? That's a whole nother story.
Let Camaro worry about Mustang.
#33
#34
Melting Slicks
For many years the Corvette was available with engines from mild to wild , and when that was not possible they were only available with mild engines. My last Corvette was a Z06 that I would be very hesitant to let just about anyone drive let alone my sister or daughter. If all our fantasies come true and 500hp on the base becomes a reality I think a valet key would be a must. If I were a betting man the real number may be closer to 450 than 500.
#35
Advanced
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: near Saint Louis Missouri
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would even venture to say that they may come out with an initial mid to high 400s for hp. Then (as they did in 08 with 30hp increase) bump it towards or slightly above 500hp.This would make 470hp make sense in a lot of ways.
#36
Instructor
I find it amazing that everyone has a friend that works for GM or has seen the new Corvette every time a refresh is done. Let's be realistic anyone that is working on the new corvette will not risk their awesome job by telling someone about GM's top secret car.
#38
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
I would agree with your statement in general, of course.
#39
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
But on the other hand, after I asked my initial question, it appeared that the person was willing to give me more info than I was expecting, and I did not really push much because I did not want to appear rude or pushy.
I did ask what engine would be put into it and he said a version of the 6.2L engine. I then threw out the DI part and he seemed to agree.
I personally am not too worried about the HP thing. I will be shocked if the base coupe has less than 475 to start with. For me, that won't make or break the thing. Probably why I did not think to ask that question. But it would have been a good thing. I am guessing this person would possibly not know or care about what the base engine in the car is, though, so I was mostly concerned about looks.
#40
I think the HP number itself is grossly over-hyped. I personally don't care so much about the actual number as much as the car's performance. If GM improves on things like suspension, weight, aerodynamics, and transmission to the point where the car has C6Z06~ish performance stats, does it really matter how much horsepower the engine is putting out, or how much displacement it has?