2006 M6 in the 10s with A&A Si Trim
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
2006 M6 in the 10s with A&A Si Trim
Decided to take the C6 to the track tonight. Just had an A&A supercharger kit & clutch installed last week at Leading Edge Performance. I finished the break-in on the clutch two days ago, so I really didnt have much seat time with the new set-up.The car was originally built as an aggressive cam-only set up, but I recently got the urge to up the power.
Mods:
A&A Si Trim, #9
Custom NA Cam
Texas Speed 1 7/8 headers
Hoosier 315/17
91 octane
Non-Z51 (long gears)
Dyno: 653rwhp/559 rwtq
Times:
The conditions were less than ideal (even for LVMS), as the DA was an awful 3600ft when I ran and there was a 15-20mph headwind.
Pass 1: Pass 2:
60f- 1.566 1.556
330- 4.466 4.490
1/8- 6.901 6.929
mph- 101.34 101.68
1000ft- 8.962 8.993
1/4- 10.724 10.748
mph- 128.68 129.06
Yes, this is what a 650rwhp blower car runs in vegas. (For reference my C6Z with 530rwhp runs 10.90s @ 126.5 with a 1.60 60ft, in similar air). I envy those with sub- 1000ft DAs
My shifting was good, but not great as I felt i was a little slower than usual. So, there was a little left on the table, but not much judging by the ET/MPH/60ft. With skinnies and better air in the winter....we shall see.
I want to thank Garth and Stewart at Leading Edge Performance for the hard work and dedication they put into this build. I also appreciate the effort made to get the car back to me in time to race this weekend.
Videos:
Mods:
A&A Si Trim, #9
Custom NA Cam
Texas Speed 1 7/8 headers
Hoosier 315/17
91 octane
Non-Z51 (long gears)
Dyno: 653rwhp/559 rwtq
Times:
The conditions were less than ideal (even for LVMS), as the DA was an awful 3600ft when I ran and there was a 15-20mph headwind.
Pass 1: Pass 2:
60f- 1.566 1.556
330- 4.466 4.490
1/8- 6.901 6.929
mph- 101.34 101.68
1000ft- 8.962 8.993
1/4- 10.724 10.748
mph- 128.68 129.06
Yes, this is what a 650rwhp blower car runs in vegas. (For reference my C6Z with 530rwhp runs 10.90s @ 126.5 with a 1.60 60ft, in similar air). I envy those with sub- 1000ft DAs
My shifting was good, but not great as I felt i was a little slower than usual. So, there was a little left on the table, but not much judging by the ET/MPH/60ft. With skinnies and better air in the winter....we shall see.
I want to thank Garth and Stewart at Leading Edge Performance for the hard work and dedication they put into this build. I also appreciate the effort made to get the car back to me in time to race this weekend.
Videos:
#5
Burning Brakes
Nice 60 foot man!
My car puts down similar power, but is a z51 car. Here in Chicago I am running a 10.6 at 138mph, but can only cut 1.7 60's.
I am hoping slicks over drag radials will help fix my 60 foot problem.
My car puts down similar power, but is a z51 car. Here in Chicago I am running a 10.6 at 138mph, but can only cut 1.7 60's.
I am hoping slicks over drag radials will help fix my 60 foot problem.
#7
Advanced
Thread Starter
On a side note, I would kill for that mph. Very nice
#8
Advanced
Thread Starter
I do a quick-slip with a progressive increase in throttle. The second pass I actually slipped a little too quick and it bogged after the 60ft. I am pretty happy though considering only two hits on the set-up. I doubt i will even run it again, as it is my daily driver with 70k miles.
Yeah, when the atmosphere you're in is not up to spec... gotta bring your own! Which is why N20 is going on the Z
Last edited by XDemonX; 03-17-2014 at 06:31 PM.
#9
Tech Contributor
Nicely done!! It's not so easy to get a high powered manual car off the line and down the track and you were moving. Way to go!
#10
Advanced
Thread Starter
Thanks Joe, definitely appreciated. The long first gear definitely raises some challenges, but its a little more tolerable at least with forced induction.
#11
Burning Brakes
Should solve my problems.
#12
Tech Contributor
They are serious business. You need bias skinnies up front too. Don't try to run bias rear and regular street radial fronts at your MPH it will sway something fierce at the big end.
#13
Burning Brakes
Thank you for the heads up. I have heard both sides to having to/not having to run skinnies up front. I have a buddy in a Supra that runs the same tire with radials up front and traps 155+ in the quarter without issues.
#14
Tech Contributor
I have seen where people just grind down the OEM a-arms to run them. Typically it is just a notch that is required to clear.
Thank you for the heads up. I have heard both sides to having to/not having to run skinnies up front. I have a buddy in a Supra that runs the same tire with radials up front and traps 155+ in the quarter without issues.
Thank you for the heads up. I have heard both sides to having to/not having to run skinnies up front. I have a buddy in a Supra that runs the same tire with radials up front and traps 155+ in the quarter without issues.
Do trust my words on the following:
Let's be clear - herding a 1000 rwhp 155 mph Supra down the ¼ mile is a point and pray operation...they wouldn't know if the rear was swaying or not as it sways no matter what you do! I never, ever ever run those guys. I will wait at the light until they are done and have a 10 second reaction time, I don't care as the chances of them coming into my lane are too great.
On a Vette, I promise you, you will get swaying at 90+ mph and it's really scary - I did it for a set of bias ply slicks (they don't last long)....I never had a problem but I realized later that if I'd needed to make an emergency move (once I had to dodge a fox running across the track) and that rear was already swaying, I would FOR SURE end up in the wall.
My strongest advice for you is don't be stupid like I was. Get some skinnies. I got lucky but don't be stupid like I was!
#15
Advanced
Thread Starter
I have seen where people just grind down the OEM a-arms to run them. Typically it is just a notch that is required to clear.
Thank you for the heads up. I have heard both sides to having to/not having to run skinnies up front. I have a buddy in a Supra that runs the same tire with radials up front and traps 155+ in the quarter without issues.
Thank you for the heads up. I have heard both sides to having to/not having to run skinnies up front. I have a buddy in a Supra that runs the same tire with radials up front and traps 155+ in the quarter without issues.
If for no other reason, I'd run the skinnies for the extra .1-.2 they will give you. If you've already invested this much anyway, I'd say $400 for that much gain is a great ROI. Since you'd already be buying them, just do the non radial, they're lighter anyway
#16
Tech Contributor
I agree with Joe G., as it can be a handful on a manual car at those speeds. That being said,
If for no other reason, I'd run the skinnies for the extra .1-.2 they will give you. If you've already invested this much anyway, I'd say $400 for that much gain is a great ROI. Since you'd already be buying them, just do the non radial, they're lighter anyway
If for no other reason, I'd run the skinnies for the extra .1-.2 they will give you. If you've already invested this much anyway, I'd say $400 for that much gain is a great ROI. Since you'd already be buying them, just do the non radial, they're lighter anyway
#17
Burning Brakes
I see Weld RT-S only come in a 17x5 as the smallest. Would it be alright to run a a M&H 28.00 x 4.50-17, Bias-Ply on this wheel? Or should I go with the 26.00 x 4.50-17?
Rear wheels again 28 x 10.50-15.
#18
Tech Contributor
Since your car is a non z-51, you have standard brakes which have no drilled rotors, this GTO spares at 17" will fit perfectly. I got mine for $75 each and I'm still running the temporary tires with no problem.
#19
Burning Brakes
I actually do have a z51 car, but I have z06 brakes on it currently. The rears are getting switched out to c5 base brakes in order to do the conversion.
#20
Tech Contributor
I put on stock c5 brakes for weight savings on my car instead.