C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

any LS3 owners using a catch can?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2008, 07:41 AM
  #21  
Ben Diss
Le Mans Master<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/5k-6k.gif" border="0">
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Ben Diss's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Posts: 5,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by TTRotary
OK, I decided to try a slightly different system. The car has H&C. Tried no catch cans, result was plenty of oil in the intake, real quick. BTW, I am sure these cars burp oil bone stock, I just think no one notices. [snip]
Got of picture of all that?
Old 08-27-2008, 07:42 AM
  #22  
Ben Diss
Le Mans Master<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/5k-6k.gif" border="0">
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Ben Diss's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Posts: 5,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

I guess what I'm missing in all this, is why it's important to provide vacuum to the valley cover and valve cover tubes? Why is vacuum needed in the crank case?
Old 08-27-2008, 09:02 AM
  #23  
AintQik
Drifting
 
AintQik's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Its supposed to help the rings seat but I have seen no blow by or oil usage with valley pan capped off. I know its is supposed to have vacuum but I don't like ingesting oil.

Mike, on the 4 or so cars I've seen the cans were catching oil. Just an ounce or so. My car is driven hard but the others were daily drivers. Bone stock they eat oil.
Old 08-27-2008, 10:10 AM
  #24  
haljensen
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
haljensen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ben Diss
I guess what I'm missing in all this, is why it's important to provide vacuum to the valley cover and valve cover tubes? Why is vacuum needed in the crank case?
You don't need vacuum in the crankcase, you need neutral pressure. Thats why there are 2 air feeds to the crankcase. The line from the valley cover to after the TB is vacuum to remove blow by and to satisfy Emission regulations by routing the blowby to the combustion chamber, the line from the valve cover to before the TB is for "make up" air in case the intake vacuum creates negative pressure in the crankcase.

In an ideal situation you wouldn't need to vent the crankcase but ALL motors leak combustion gases past the rings into the crankcase. Before Emmision Laws motors just used breathers to relieve blowby. Now we have Positve Crankcase Ventilation (PCV) using intake vacuum to route the blowby into the cylinders to burn it instead of just dumping it into the atmosphere.

With the crankcase pressurized either positive from blowby or negative from intake vacuum there's resistance to the piston movement. Resistance of piston movement is not good, it causes loss of usable power.
Old 08-27-2008, 11:17 AM
  #25  
Ben Diss
Le Mans Master<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/5k-6k.gif" border="0">
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Ben Diss's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Posts: 5,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by haljensen
You don't need vacuum in the crankcase, you need neutral pressure. Thats why there are 2 air feeds to the crankcase. The line from the valley cover to after the TB is vacuum to remove blow by and to satisfy Emission regulations by routing the blowby to the combustion chamber, the line from the valve cover to before the TB is for "make up" air in case the intake vacuum creates negative pressure in the crankcase.

In an ideal situation you wouldn't need to vent the crankcase but ALL motors leak combustion gases past the rings into the crankcase. Before Emmision Laws motors just used breathers to relieve blowby. Now we have Positve Crankcase Ventilation (PCV) using intake vacuum to route the blowby into the cylinders to burn it instead of just dumping it into the atmosphere.

With the crankcase pressurized either positive from blowby or negative from intake vacuum there's resistance to the piston movement. Resistance of piston movement is not good, it causes loss of usable power.

Thanks!
Old 08-27-2008, 01:01 PM
  #26  
PeterM
Burning Brakes
 
PeterM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: NY NY
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Catch Oil Bone Stock

Originally Posted by TTRotary
I am sure these cars burp oil bone stock, I just think no one notices.

This is fact, as I'd noticed oil in the throttlebody while installing the Vararam (300 miles on the car).
Old 08-27-2008, 01:31 PM
  #27  
TTRotary
Race Director
 
TTRotary's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,381
Received 404 Likes on 160 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ben Diss
Got of picture of all that?
I can take pics when I'm back in town friday, if someone will host them.
Old 08-27-2008, 01:42 PM
  #28  
TTRotary
Race Director
 
TTRotary's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,381
Received 404 Likes on 160 Posts

Default

Just to clarify the whole vacuum issue...our cars normally do not run crank vacuum at all, as Haljensen has pointed out. Air is pulled through the motor by intake vacuum, but it always flows.

Racers and engine builders, however, like to run case vacuum, because it pulls the rings tight against the cylinder walls, producing better sealing and therefore more power. It also reduces blow-by, an especialy serious issue on FI cars, and especially for the LS engines, which use low-tnesion rings for reduced friction and fuel economy.

Cool, just cap off or restrict your crank intake to produce some crank vacuum, right? Not quite. While this setup works fine while the engine is in part-throttle, your case vacuum will disappear by the time you want it most, at WOT, because the intake is not longer generating vacuum. So, while running some vacuum on a Corvette may provide fuel economy benefits at part throttle, it will not do anything to improve power at WOT. Also, the vacuum neeeds to be mild, as the various engine seals were not designed for excessive pressure or vacuum.

Race engines solve the problem by simply running a vacuum pump, so they have crank vacuum all the time. Lack of crank ventilation and oil contamination is not a concern since oil is changed frequently, after every race.

I'd be curious to know what setup the C5Rs run.
Old 08-27-2008, 08:13 PM
  #29  
Bruno0825
Instructor
 
Bruno0825's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: North Arlington NJ
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cartek can works and looks great!
Old 08-27-2008, 09:35 PM
  #30  
Ben Diss
Le Mans Master<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/5k-6k.gif" border="0">
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Ben Diss's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Posts: 5,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by TTRotary
I can take pics when I'm back in town friday, if someone will host them.
I can host them for you. PM me when ready.
Old 08-28-2008, 01:45 PM
  #31  
TTRotary
Race Director
 
TTRotary's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,381
Received 404 Likes on 160 Posts

Default

Will do. You'll hear from me tomorrow eve. Thanks.



Quick Reply: any LS3 owners using a catch can?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 AM.