The LC-1 is nice because it's fully programmable, and you can specify the output range, which helps when developing a correct transfer function. The NGK is said to be more accurate, though.
__________________
2006 Z06 • WCCH Heads • Ragin Racin Punisher cam • RPS LSX BC2 (Billet Carbon) twin-disc clutch • C5 axles • LG Super Pro long tubes • Halltech intake • ported throttle body/intake manifold • MGW shifter • tuned myself via HP Tuners
Location: Brentwood World's first A6 in the 9's (including N/A, blower, turbo and nitrous cars) 9.950@139.267 CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteLightning_
any pros/cons with one over the other? i cant seem to find any direct comparison between the 2..
thanks in advance.
The LC1 is a total POS. Do a search on the HP Tuners forum and you'll see tons of complaints about it. I've had my NGK for about two years now and have never had any issues with it and I also pull it out of my car frequently to tune other people's cars - it really is that easy to wire up properly.
The LC-1 is a great wideband if your only using it in your own car and the down side is it doesnt come with a screen to read AFR so you have to rely on Hp tuners reading it correctly. The NGK AFX is a great wideband and very accurate, plus you can move it from car to car.
The LC-1 is a great wideband if your only using it in your own car and the down side is it doesnt come with a screen to read AFR so you have to rely on Hp tuners reading it correctly. The NGK AFX is a great wideband and very accurate, plus you can move it from car to car.
Ian
The only downer to the NGK AFX (in my opinion) is that the display is programmed for 14.4 to be stoich instead of 14.7, but it doesn't matter much if you set up your scanning software to read the signal.
Corvette Store
Wideband lc1 vs ngk
