C6 Forced Induction/Nitrous C6 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Pulley Upgrades, Intercoolers, Wet and Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TVS2650: gains with a 112mm TB over the 102?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2020, 09:30 AM
  #1  
Random84
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Random84's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 3,602
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default TVS2650: gains with a 112mm TB over the 102?

Any of you have experience swapping out your 102mm throttle body for a larger unit, such as the 112 from NW/Kong?

I have a 400" with AllPro heads, appropriately sized cam with a Kong2650 and Flex fuel. The last dyno I did wasn't a clean pull (some knock retard) but it was 840 RWHP on 93. I figure I'm close to 900 on E85. This is a CTSV Wagon (ergo my posting here), and I have the NW102 now but have been hunting down some reduced engine power issues that I suspect are throttle body related.

If I have to replace the TB, I'm asking if anyone with a decent build has positive or negative experiences with the 112 from Kong/Nick Williams?
Old 11-07-2020, 05:36 PM
  #2  
old motorhead
Le Mans Master
 
old motorhead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 6,521
Received 1,343 Likes on 951 Posts

Default

Have you checked to make sure you need a bigger throttle body? If you have no vacuum at WOT at max RPM between the throttle body and the blower, going bigger will only drain your back account. If you have a little vacuum and plan to spin the blower faster, then yeah, fit that bigger one.

Dayum! Sounds like a fun ride. Do you have the snout big enough to accept the 112?
The following 2 users liked this post by old motorhead:
CI GS (11-08-2020), schpenxel (11-10-2020)
Old 11-09-2020, 08:22 PM
  #3  
Random84
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Random84's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 3,602
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thats a good point- but I don't believe I have a pre-TB MAP sensor... just post-rotors. But I could be wrong so I will have to investigate.

Its a Kong 2650 so yes, it is ready to go for a 112.

I'd still love to hear from people who made the swap for what that's worth. They're out there... but i see few posts on it. Perhaps that's the answer!


Originally Posted by old motorhead
Have you checked to make sure you need a bigger throttle body? If you have no vacuum at WOT at max RPM between the throttle body and the blower, going bigger will only drain your back account. If you have a little vacuum and plan to spin the blower faster, then yeah, fit that bigger one.

Dayum! Sounds like a fun ride. Do you have the snout big enough to accept the 112?

Last edited by Random84; 11-09-2020 at 08:23 PM.
Old 11-09-2020, 09:55 PM
  #4  
0JUICED1
Former Vendor
 
JUICED1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Location: ST. CHARLES IL
Posts: 26,514
Received 347 Likes on 286 Posts
Default

We've had some issues with them so far but others may have had better luck.
The following users liked this post:
Random84 (11-11-2020)
Old 11-10-2020, 11:17 AM
  #5  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by Random84
- but I don't believe I have a pre-TB MAP sensor... just post-rotors. !
He's not saying anything about a pre TB MAP sensor. The point is to measure the resistance between the TB and the rotors, which is, in fact, the normal MAP reading. If you're already at atmospheric pressure at WOT, then there is no resistance and a bigger TB won't do anything. You're already getting all the air you're going to get in that scenario. Whether that's the reality for your setup, I have no idea.

Last edited by schpenxel; 11-10-2020 at 11:17 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by schpenxel:
Random84 (11-11-2020), ~STOLEN~ (11-17-2020)
Old 11-11-2020, 09:12 AM
  #6  
Random84
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Random84's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 3,602
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
He's not saying anything about a pre TB MAP sensor. The point is to measure the resistance between the TB and the rotors, which is, in fact, the normal MAP reading. If you're already at atmospheric pressure at WOT, then there is no resistance and a bigger TB won't do anything. You're already getting all the air you're going to get in that scenario. Whether that's the reality for your setup, I have no idea.
My MAP sensor reads 233kPa when I give it full beans - that's my "normal" reading. I'm showing my ignorance here, but although I'm pretty sure this blower comes with 3 MAP sensors in factory form, ("Baro" and "MAP" plus another?) - I am not seeing the third active sensor in HP Tuners; which I suspect is the one you're referring to. I am guessing "Baro" is the pre-throttle body sensor, the "MAP" sensor is post rotor for boost - any guesses on what the third would be called?
Old 11-12-2020, 08:45 AM
  #7  
CI GS
Le Mans Master
 
CI GS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,375
Received 1,110 Likes on 780 Posts

Default

What oldmotorhead and schpenxel are saying is that you need to measure vacuum right in front of the throttle body at WOT.
There is no sensor for that. You will need to measure vacuum, with a vacuum gauge, in the intake tract in front of the throttle body.
If you see that it’s pulling vacuum there, then the throttle body is a restriction.
If the throttle body is a restriction, then you will pick up horsepower from upgrading to a bigger throttle body. How much will depend on the restriction.
The easiest way to do this is on a dyno, with a handheld gauge. I didn’t have that luxury, so I had to redneck engineer (duct tape) a vacuum gauge under my hood and aim a Go Pro at it to record what the gauge was showing at WOT during a test pass. I saw 3-4in. Hg, so I upgraded from my stock 90mm to a 102mm on my 2300 TVS Heartbeat setup and picked up ~1.5psi, iirc.
I have no doubt that you will benefit from a 112 on a 2650. Best guy to ask is Kong himself. He should know.
The following 4 users liked this post by CI GS:
blackdak318 (11-19-2020), Chiselchst (11-15-2020), Random84 (11-17-2020), ~STOLEN~ (11-17-2020)
Old 11-17-2020, 09:14 AM
  #8  
Random84
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Random84's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 3,602
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thanks! yes, I had intended to Greg and ask, since there are conspicuously no "one user picked up X.XXX HP with our new 112mm TB!" on the website.

As it turns out, I am at the limit of my fuel system on E73 so it's become a moot point for this year.

Get notified of new replies

To TVS2650: gains with a 112mm TB over the 102?




Quick Reply: TVS2650: gains with a 112mm TB over the 102?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 AM.