C6 Forced Induction/Nitrous C6 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Pulley Upgrades, Intercoolers, Wet and Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

RWHP gains of adding longtubes to SC setup?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2016, 08:09 PM
  #1  
schpenxel
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default RWHP gains of adding longtubes to SC setup?

Has anyone gone from Z06 manifolds/cats to longtubes on a FI setup? I'm seeing about 12psi right now on an ECS kit.. still on factory Z06 exhaust system with cats. Considering longtubes.

Does anyone have before/after numbers without any other changes? What were the gains?

The Z06 setup looks like it would flow pretty well, but wondering how much I'm leaving on the table without long tubes.
Old 05-29-2016, 09:55 PM
  #2  
1MEANGS
Melting Slicks
 
1MEANGS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,041
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
Has anyone gone from Z06 manifolds/cats to longtubes on a FI setup? I'm seeing about 12psi right now on an ECS kit.. still on factory Z06 exhaust system with cats. Considering longtubes.

Does anyone have before/after numbers without any other changes? What were the gains?

The Z06 setup looks like it would flow pretty well, but wondering how much I'm leaving on the table without long tubes.
I think after 600 wheel you could really benefit from making the car breath better... I have the Pfadt 1 3/4 stepped headers and there a work of art & treated me well. Gonna have them for sell now if your interested.
Old 05-29-2016, 10:34 PM
  #3  
Detoxx03
Safety Car
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,150
Received 377 Likes on 245 Posts

Default

Mine didn't pick up any peak numbers but it shifted my powerband up in the mid-higher rpm range.
Old 05-29-2016, 11:39 PM
  #4  
greatgonzer
Racer
 
greatgonzer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Posts: 429
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

I am stock headers with Cam and ported heads running ECS kit. I made 650wheel HP.

My buddy has my exact same setup, except he's running headers and milled out the ECS restriction plate a couple of mm. He's pushing 745 wheel hp on that setup.
Old 05-29-2016, 11:46 PM
  #5  
schpenxel
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Good info
Old 05-30-2016, 09:10 AM
  #6  
grocerygetter
Burning Brakes
 
grocerygetter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 995
Received 97 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

I tested this without cats on a 2010 camaro. Car made low 600whp before headers with stock ls3 manifold and cat delete. We added kooks headers and gained 5%. I could pulley down for way less money and get that. I think once you add a cam, it's not a bad idea to do headers. But the ls7 manifolds out flow the ls3 manifolds.
I use ls7 manifold, z06 x pipe, then custom 3" the rest of the way out the back (auto car....had to be built).

Last edited by grocerygetter; 05-30-2016 at 09:12 AM.
Old 05-30-2016, 09:32 AM
  #7  
schpenxel
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Good info. Yeah, 30rwhp doesn't really seem worth it. The Z06 manifolds do look like they'd flow pretty decent. Maybe longtubes matter less on FI setups?
Old 05-30-2016, 10:57 AM
  #8  
Detoxx03
Safety Car
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,150
Received 377 Likes on 245 Posts

Default

The lack of restriction makes it worth it. Don't buy LT's for peak power gains.

Last edited by Detoxx03; 05-30-2016 at 10:58 AM.
Old 05-30-2016, 11:04 AM
  #9  
schpenxel
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Wouldn't a lack of restriction make more than a few % difference in power? Or is there another advantage? I have had a person or two tell me they can run more timing without any issues when using LT's, I'd assume from getting hot gases out of the cylinders better but I don't really know
Old 05-30-2016, 11:57 AM
  #10  
Spoolin8
Racer
 
Spoolin8's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: MO
Posts: 277
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Your reducing backpressure, thus reducing heat.
Old 05-30-2016, 01:55 PM
  #11  
grocerygetter
Burning Brakes
 
grocerygetter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 995
Received 97 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Yeah....but we are at a balancing point at 650-750whp from what I have learned. To make boost you have to have something to push against. That's why changing to a cat less long tube will typically drop boost. I'll stick to the plan on my car and not get long tubes unless I go with a major cam change. My combo is rockin for now...don't want to screw it up. We have a local 1kft track and on a 1.4 60' I'm running 8.3 at 126mph. That's good for a 9.8/9.9 in the 1320' with my 2.56gear.

Last edited by grocerygetter; 05-30-2016 at 01:58 PM.
Old 05-30-2016, 02:10 PM
  #12  
schpenxel
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Boost is just a measure of restriction. Boost going down because of less restriction doesn't mean less power or airflow goes down, it just means less restriction.

I'm going to get mine on a dyno and see where I'm at first. Even if I do eventually do LT's I want before/after #'s to see if it was even worth it
Old 05-30-2016, 04:57 PM
  #13  
grocerygetter
Burning Brakes
 
grocerygetter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 995
Received 97 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Right...I think of it this way, if I put them on and drop boost but still make the same power it's easier on the engine but hard on my pocket book. But, if I pulley down to put the boost back at the number before I could have just dropped another pulley size and saves time and or labor. Lol
But an aggressive cam changes things on whether or not the longtubes have a lot of value or not.
Old 05-30-2016, 05:12 PM
  #14  
schpenxel
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

I've got a fairly mild cam, I think anyways. 220/240, around 600 lift, 117+3. If I were doing it over again I'd probably go a little bit more aggressive on the cam but I'm not doing that job again anytime soon.

Ah well, sounds like not having LT's isn't the end of the world. I'll get some dyno time lined up first then go from there
Old 05-31-2016, 07:17 PM
  #15  
Lateforwork
Advanced
 
Lateforwork's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Grand Rapids MI
Posts: 52
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'm interested in the results since I picked up a all Stock GS with an A&A Blower. Was considering LT, Meth and a smaller pulley. Let me know what you come up with.
Old 05-31-2016, 08:25 PM
  #16  
LSX228R
Pro
 
LSX228R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2014
Posts: 546
Received 88 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Mine was at 540rwhp (mustang dyno). Saw a few of the same exact setup with long tubes and they did 560rwhp. Made more power everywhere I believe. Def sounded better lol

Last edited by LSX228R; 05-31-2016 at 08:26 PM.
Old 05-31-2016, 09:00 PM
  #17  
grocerygetter
Burning Brakes
 
grocerygetter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 995
Received 97 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LSX228R
Mine was at 540rwhp (mustang dyno). Saw a few of the same exact setup with long tubes and they did 560rwhp. Made more power everywhere I believe. Def sounded better lol
Fact! sounds better for sure!

Get notified of new replies

To RWHP gains of adding longtubes to SC setup?

Old 05-31-2016, 09:01 PM
  #18  
grocerygetter
Burning Brakes
 
grocerygetter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 995
Received 97 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lateforwork
i'm interested in the results since i picked up a all stock gs with an a&a blower. Was considering lt, meth and a smaller pulley. Let me know what you come up with.
meth+boost=a lot more power
Old 06-01-2016, 10:27 AM
  #19  
Nosferatu333
Burning Brakes
 
Nosferatu333's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Posts: 907
Received 40 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

The sound change going to lts is worth it alone. It's incredible if your into that thing. Couple that with the power increase makes it a no brainer for me. Going further the weight reduction from the cast manifolds makes it an all around must have upgrade. They look great as well. Get the damn lts.
Don't let money influence you. The kit cost about 6k add install and tune, clutch and your looking 10kish. Great power added for sure but offset the weight penalty of the kit. All things considered the price of lts isn't bad.
The following users liked this post:
aviator46 (08-28-2016)
Old 06-01-2016, 10:51 AM
  #20  
schpenxel
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Speaking of which.. I've been meaning to add up what I've spent so far but haven't gotten to it yet. I'm not sure if I really want to or not even though I'm sure I've spent less than most

Ok ok you talked me into it, maybe I'll do LT's

Last edited by schpenxel; 06-01-2016 at 10:51 AM.


Quick Reply: RWHP gains of adding longtubes to SC setup?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 PM.