American Heritage

2012 C6z06 Carbon Edition

611rwhp/585rwtq on E85
588rwhp/546rwtq on 91

Mods:
AHP Stage 1.5 (116) LS7 cam
AHP CNC Ported Package 4 LS7 Heads
AHP Ported MSD LS7 Intake Manifold
Nick Williams 102 Throttle Body
Billy Boat 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers
Halltech 103 Cold Air Intake
DW65 Fuel Injectors
DSX Flex Fuel Sensor Kit

This thing Pulls Amazingly hard, Sounds wicked at idle and like a pure Beast as wide open throttle and best of all... She drives like a dream with no packing lot bucking or highway surging. She is going to need every bit of her 345 888R rear tires to hold this power

For anyone looking for a very reliable and good driving 600+rwhp setup for their C6z06 this is a Tested and Proven Package!!!!

Idle Clip followed by some Dyno Graphs (and yes its the correct SAEJ1349 (2004) correction Factor!

E85 Dyno Graphs:



91 Dyno Graphs:



She is one Bad Girl, LOL!!!

https://americanheritageperformance.com/

pierrel

Looks and sounds great! I'm guessing happy customer!

harryk387

Haha I came in to this thread and looked at the numbers and thought, wow those are my exact numbers! Then I realized, hey that’s my car!

Just picked it up today and didn’t really get to open her up yet, but even on the drive home the throttle response is already so much better than before. Can’t wait to take it out this weekend to really see the improvements with the new E85 tune, MSD manifold and the NW throttle body. Thanks again Kohle!

CorvetteFan1953

I wonder what it would run on 93!

harryk387

Also, correction, I’ve only got the 116 “baby” cam and still got these great numbers!

JABCAT

Nice numbers. If it's a 2012, it's not a Carbon Edition Z06 as those were only 2011 & they also don't have the black roof.

Apocolipse

Are you sure?

harryk387

Yup, 100%.

And correct, mines a 2011 not 2012

SPDKLZ1

On a realistically calibrated dynojet I bet this heads/cam setup with the 116 cam would make around 550-560rwhp on 93 octane. In one of LMR's somewhat recent videos I think Steven said 93 octane is good for about 20 hp over 91 octane.

Apocolipse

Usually - the biggest difference can be seen at peak torque when you have more octane since that is the highest cylinder pressure of the run. Up top maybe an extra deg or two which only makes only a little difference…unless the engine is severely octane limited. Then it’s a bigger difference.

Dbl_D718

Kohle shared this on Instagram too and labeled it as a 112 cam build. I wonder where the miscommunication is. I'm interested because I'm really torn between the 116 and 112 cams. Being on the fence is the only reason I haven't placed an order yet. I'd love to hear a driving review from you, whichever cam it is!

SPDKLZ1

If 116 cams with low/no overlap made upwards of 600 rwhp and 550 rwtq dynojet sae nobody would be buying big donkey-di** cams unless they just wanted the aggressive lope.

Dbl_D718

I understand that this was tuned on a hub dyno that's a little generous, my own Corvette was tuned there once. I'm not really concerned about the numbers, I'm mostly interested in a review of the driving manners with their 112 cam.

SPDKLZ1

JayZo6 has their 112 cam with 13.5 degrees of overlap compared to the 116 with zero degrees of overlap and he said he likes it a lot. He said it's about 25-30% rougher at idle than the stock cam and can cruise in 6th at 60 mph pretty easily. With milled heads, LTs, fast intake, ported stock tb, Halltech 103 and LS9 clutch he made 545 hp and 527 tq dynojet sae on 91 octane.

Apocolipse

Exactly why I have a feeling this isn’t a 116. Powerband looks like my old k501 and not my current “116” equivalent (stage 1 from cammotion -6 overlap)

harryk387

It’s for sure a 116 cam ( at least that’s what I asked for and what’s on my invoice ) so unless the 112 cam was accidentally put in, these numbers are based off the 116

Drives basically like stock to me and I’m very picky when it comes to driveability and did a lot of research before choosing which cam to go with.

American Heritage

Correct Harry you have the 116 cam in your car... I pulled the original build sheet for your job and confirmed that.
Somehow I got mixed up when I posted this on here and on our social and put 112 cam instead of 116 cam, my apologies.

Great to hear you love the build and the 116 cam. I always tell folks it drives as close to stock as any aftermarket camshaft can. Honestly with a good tune on the car it behaves almost incidental to stock, until you put your foot into the gas that is... LOL
How are you liking the additional power from the ported MSD and 102TB?
Any feedback on the E85 vs 91 trims?

https://americanheritageperformance.com/

harryk387

haven’t yet been able to push it all that hard yet, hoping to find some nice open roads this weekend. But right off the bat there’s a noticeable difference in throttle response with the larger throttle body and the MSD we added. I have a Pedal Commander still connected and when I left the shop I legitimately thought you guys may have accidentally put the Pedal Commander in the “sport” setting with how much better the throttle response was

Apocolipse

Why have a pedal commander when you got a tube done? They can modify those tables for you in the tune and can sell that pedal pusher.

harryk387

Straight ignorance. Found out that could be done after I bought the pedal commander.