HCI build, 1 7/8” vs 2” headers
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
HCI build, 1 7/8” vs 2” headers
How’s it going guys, so I tried searching but couldn’t find a specific answer. About how much power would I be leaving on the table by staying with 1 7/8” headers vs 2” on a basic HCI car?
build details:
2006 z06
Ported/ milled heads
Hi Ram
NW 102
RPM B3
10% ud
E85
Thanks in advance!
build details:
2006 z06
Ported/ milled heads
Hi Ram
NW 102
RPM B3
10% ud
E85
Thanks in advance!
#3
thing knower
whichever you decide on.... make sure its American Racing Headers (ARH) their quality is uncompromising.... its more expensive but the cost is 100% worth it...
-drew
-drew
The following 3 users liked this post by drewz06:
#5
Race Director
I went from Pfadt Tri-Y 1 7/8" headers to ARH 2", both with catted x-pipe in the dyno runs below, headers the only difference. If it had been ARH to ARH it would have been a better comparison if you are a first time header buyer on your build. The pickup in torque at 2500 RPM was very noticeable in daily street driving and made it much easier from startup to traffic speed on my McLeod RXT 1000 trwin disk clutch and billet steel flywheel. Pretty much full HCI build with Katech K501 cam:
#6
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 13,256
Received 3,090 Likes
on
2,078 Posts
2021 C6 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Jeeeze ... I feel bad now
I have a set of Pfadt 1 3/4" headers on my GS . .
I have a set of Pfadt 1 3/4" headers on my GS . .
#7
Race Director
#8
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 13,256
Received 3,090 Likes
on
2,078 Posts
2021 C6 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Well, my GS is supercharged.
When I had the 1 3/4" headers installed, I never thought I would boost the car sometime later on.
Had I of known that, I would have installed 1 7/8" headers in the first place (2" pipe headers were not available back in 2013 when I had the headers put in).
.
When I had the 1 3/4" headers installed, I never thought I would boost the car sometime later on.
Had I of known that, I would have installed 1 7/8" headers in the first place (2" pipe headers were not available back in 2013 when I had the headers put in).
.
Last edited by Turbo6TA; 11-17-2020 at 08:03 AM.
#9
Melting Slicks
Unless you have have a good exhaust system with merge collectors it's really not going to matter, BUT if you did, the 2" headers would lose power over the 1-7/8". How can I say this with such certainty? Let me give you a couple of real life examples.....on my full tilt SBE LS7 I had 1-3/4" to 1-7/8" equal-lengty headers with 3-1/2" merge collectors making 660 RWHP NA. I built a set of "engineered" equal-length 1-7/8" to 2" to 2- 1/8" triple stepped headers with 4" merge collectors (and 4" exhaust vs the previous 3-1/2") and the power only went up 20 RWHP to 680!
My point is, I had Roman at Burns Stainless create the design for my headers.....he could have obviously used any size but he didn't!
My point is, I had Roman at Burns Stainless create the design for my headers.....he could have obviously used any size but he didn't!
#10
Instructor
Thread Starter
I guess I should have specified that I already have a set of LG 1 7/8 headers on the car currently. Just seeing if the cost to get a new set is justified. Thanks for the replies!
#11
Melting Slicks
#13
6th Gear
I just bought some 1 7/8" ARH long tubes for my c6z (536whp/484lbft) after weeks of trying to decide between 1 7/8" and 2". I'm swapping out my AHP 116 cam and just ordered an RPM B3, hoping to hit 600whp. After speaking extensively with Sal at ARH, he convinced me that 2" was absolutely unnecessary until 800+whp. He said 1 7/8" would actually make more power on an NA 600whp build. With that said, however, I wonder if I should've just said "screw it" and ordered the 2" headers. Any thoughts?
The following users liked this post:
Nowanker (11-18-2020)
#14
Race Director
I just bought some 1 7/8" ARH long tubes for my c6z (536whp/484lbft) after weeks of trying to decide between 1 7/8" and 2". I'm swapping out my AHP 116 cam and just ordered an RPM B3, hoping to hit 600whp. After speaking extensively with Sal at ARH, he convinced me that 2" was absolutely unnecessary until 800+whp. He said 1 7/8" would actually make more power on an NA 600whp build. With that said, however, I wonder if I should've just said "screw it" and ordered the 2" headers. Any thoughts?
Last edited by AzDave47; 11-18-2020 at 09:12 AM.
#15
Melting Slicks
My builder, Cordes Performance Racing, down in the Valley of the Sun, almost exclusively uses ARH 2" on any build at 550 rwhp or above. While not a comparison of ARH 1 7/8" to ARH 2", see my post #5 above. I am running Billy Boat Fusion Extreme mufflers. The dyno run was one day to the next with just the headers changed. As far as I know this is the closest back to back header dyno comparison posted on this forum
The following users liked this post:
18JamesS (11-23-2020)
#17
Melting Slicks
Pro Mechanic
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Ex DPRK, now just N of Medford, OR
Posts: 2,926
Received 742 Likes
on
547 Posts
I just bought some 1 7/8" ARH long tubes for my c6z (536whp/484lbft) after weeks of trying to decide between 1 7/8" and 2". I'm swapping out my AHP 116 cam and just ordered an RPM B3, hoping to hit 600whp. After speaking extensively with Sal at ARH, he convinced me that 2" was absolutely unnecessary until 800+whp. He said 1 7/8" would actually make more power on an NA 600whp build. With that said, however, I wonder if I should've just said "screw it" and ordered the 2" headers. Any thoughts?
I'm in the same boat as the OP. Already have H/C/I and LG 1 7/8 headers. Planning to up the cam and intake, and add some compression. At 505 now, expecting ~550.
If ARH says 1 7/8" is good at that level, I won't swap them out.
#20
Race Director