[Z06] Larger oil tank
#1
Larger oil tank
Doing some upgrades on my Z with coilovers etc and began to read on the oil starvation on early Zs.
Found no good conclusion.
There seem to be 2 good tanks to swap to:
-LPE which require a trade in, as I live in sweden the shipping is expensive to make this good.
-2008 and up stock tank which seem to have only an extra canister on the side.
Is there any other modifications on the inside?
I am used to aluminium welding and therefor I could enlarge my stock tank on the side as the LPE to gain a larger oil capacity at a very low price.
Another easy solution would be to weld a pipe near the bottom and add and extra tank on the inside as on the 08+ tank with a air supply in the top as on the 2008.
Is there any problems with this?
Also there seems to be a good Aviaid insert which is good in price and is said to work with the stock tank but I have not seen anyone use this with the Stock tank, why?
Found no good conclusion.
There seem to be 2 good tanks to swap to:
-LPE which require a trade in, as I live in sweden the shipping is expensive to make this good.
-2008 and up stock tank which seem to have only an extra canister on the side.
Is there any other modifications on the inside?
I am used to aluminium welding and therefor I could enlarge my stock tank on the side as the LPE to gain a larger oil capacity at a very low price.
Another easy solution would be to weld a pipe near the bottom and add and extra tank on the inside as on the 08+ tank with a air supply in the top as on the 2008.
Is there any problems with this?
Also there seems to be a good Aviaid insert which is good in price and is said to work with the stock tank but I have not seen anyone use this with the Stock tank, why?
#2
Drifting
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Las Vegas Nevada
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 125 Likes
on
70 Posts
The larger oil tanks started in 09 (maybe some late 08s). I have an 08 and it does not have the extra capacity.
For the price the LPE is a good deal along with Aviaid tank baffle. If I wasn't under warranty, that is the way I'd go.
I think that if someone is going to the trouble/expense of adding the Aviaid insert, they upgrade the size too.
Jim
For the price the LPE is a good deal along with Aviaid tank baffle. If I wasn't under warranty, that is the way I'd go.
I think that if someone is going to the trouble/expense of adding the Aviaid insert, they upgrade the size too.
Jim
#3
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,131
Received 8,960 Likes
on
5,346 Posts
It isn't necessary to do the upgrade if you aren't subjecting the car to long (4 or 5 seconds) high G left hand turns. All LS engines have this issue and the smaller dry sump was supposed to solve it but the car still kept pumping all of the oil into the upper part of the engine and basically running out of oil for the bearings. With the larger oil capacity the problem has been minimized but maybe not eliminated if you turned left for a longer time period at high Gs (eg: running a skid pad) it might still run out of oil.
Bill
Bill
#5
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,131
Received 8,960 Likes
on
5,346 Posts
Bill
#7
Thought about this and my theory based on that the system works to 90%.
-I cant see that the baffle in the pan actually can make a difference when the pump has higher oil supply. Sure I can make the system better but I see no need for it.
-A blueprinted pump just has bigger capacity, when this problem occur I guess the tank I almost empty or have none "restored" oil running through the internal baffles. Therefor the pump does nothing to resolve this issue but probably can provide better lubrication in normal conditions.
-The bigger tank on the other hand must be the crucial part, the oilpump gets its oil only from the tank when putting pressure in the engine. This is the one big solution I think.
-The internal baffles in the tank could provide faster restoration of the used oil from the engine and reduce cavitation and could be a help.
I think a bigger thank volume is the only thing really necessary and that the other products make the system better but are not crucial.
Even tough this is not necessary I will weld on a canister on my tank during the winter adding some extra oil to the system. This based on if it is made from pure aluminium.
-I cant see that the baffle in the pan actually can make a difference when the pump has higher oil supply. Sure I can make the system better but I see no need for it.
-A blueprinted pump just has bigger capacity, when this problem occur I guess the tank I almost empty or have none "restored" oil running through the internal baffles. Therefor the pump does nothing to resolve this issue but probably can provide better lubrication in normal conditions.
-The bigger tank on the other hand must be the crucial part, the oilpump gets its oil only from the tank when putting pressure in the engine. This is the one big solution I think.
-The internal baffles in the tank could provide faster restoration of the used oil from the engine and reduce cavitation and could be a help.
I think a bigger thank volume is the only thing really necessary and that the other products make the system better but are not crucial.
Even tough this is not necessary I will weld on a canister on my tank during the winter adding some extra oil to the system. This based on if it is made from pure aluminium.
#8
Race Director
It isn't necessary to do the upgrade if you aren't subjecting the car to long (4 or 5 seconds) high G left hand turns. All LS engines have this issue and the smaller dry sump was supposed to solve it but the car still kept pumping all of the oil into the upper part of the engine and basically running out of oil for the bearings. With the larger oil capacity the problem has been minimized but maybe not eliminated if you turned left for a longer time period at high Gs (eg: running a skid pad) it might still run out of oil.
Bill
Bill
#9
Team Owner
Actually, the 10.5 qt reservoir capacity in the Z06 came about as a result of the second oil pump in the ZR1/LS9. Because of the LS9's oil squirter's, the LS9's oil pump pumps ~20% more oil per minute. To prevent the LS9 oil pump from possibly pumping the reservoir dry, GM increased the capacity of the reservoir by ~23%. The Z06 benefited from this change as GM wisely decided to standardize the reservoir, and then also used the same reservoir on the dry sump LS3.
#10
Dumb question here.... I'm still not sure how turning left for long periods of high G is worse than right? If your turning right (and as the oiling system is on the right side of the car) wouldn't it run dry as well especially as the oiling system is now all the way over on the other side of the car. Wouldn't the pump clear the sump regardless of direction?
Disclaimer, I'm not familiar of the inner-workings of the dry sump system for oil returns & pressures etc.
Disclaimer, I'm not familiar of the inner-workings of the dry sump system for oil returns & pressures etc.
#11
Le Mans Master
Dumb question here.... I'm still not sure how turning left for long periods of high G is worse than right? If your turning right (and as the oiling system is on the right side of the car) wouldn't it run dry as well especially as the oiling system is now all the way over on the other side of the car. Wouldn't the pump clear the sump regardless of direction?
Disclaimer, I'm not familiar of the inner-workings of the dry sump system for oil returns & pressures etc.
Disclaimer, I'm not familiar of the inner-workings of the dry sump system for oil returns & pressures etc.
#15
#16
At the minimum, use the LPE tank. The extra capacity will insure you don't run dry & kill your bearings. Cheap insurance. I use this (with the Aviad baffle insert) and do not have any problems with long sweepers.
If you have the choice, go ahead & use the baffled oil pan too. The main problem is the factory design allows high G forces when turning left to draw oil away from the scavenge pump & allow the storage tank to run dry in long left hand sweepers, especially if you are an advanced group driver on R-compounds. The extra capacity is just a work around to avoid running dry for an extra few seconds, but it seems to work fine.
If you have the choice, go ahead & use the baffled oil pan too. The main problem is the factory design allows high G forces when turning left to draw oil away from the scavenge pump & allow the storage tank to run dry in long left hand sweepers, especially if you are an advanced group driver on R-compounds. The extra capacity is just a work around to avoid running dry for an extra few seconds, but it seems to work fine.
#17
You play hard, get the ARE!
Last edited by SilveradoSS500; 08-11-2012 at 05:45 PM.