[ZR1] Will there be a C7 ZR1 or end of era?
#2
The Consigliere
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,261
Received 5,457 Likes
on
2,274 Posts
We may see a vette that equals or even betters the performance of the current ZR1. But IMO the days of big inch, high horsepower vettes will end when the C6 bows out.
Any performance gains over today will come via lighter weight, traction improvements, driveline changes, and possibly electric motor assist.
The 2016 CAFE limits and forthcoming tailpipe CO2 limits will force a reduction in the size of these engines. Again, future vettes may have equal or better performance, but they will have a far different "soul" than the current ZR.
Any performance gains over today will come via lighter weight, traction improvements, driveline changes, and possibly electric motor assist.
The 2016 CAFE limits and forthcoming tailpipe CO2 limits will force a reduction in the size of these engines. Again, future vettes may have equal or better performance, but they will have a far different "soul" than the current ZR.
#3
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: High Mountains of New Mexico
Posts: 3,268
Received 1,391 Likes
on
683 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2015 C3 of the Year Finalist
I think you will see nothing but Toyota-type tuners and 6 and 4 bangers, and maybe even a hybrid baby Vette. Little tinnie hi-rev engnes that sound like a sewing machine, sad but that is where the Obamacars are going due to excessive, and unnecessary CAFE regs.
#4
Race Director
We may see a vette that equals or even betters the performance of the current ZR1. But IMO the days of big inch, high horsepower vettes will end when the C6 bows out.
Any performance gains over today will come via lighter weight, traction improvements, driveline changes, and possibly electric motor assist.
The 2016 CAFE limits and forthcoming tailpipe CO2 limits will force a reduction in the size of these engines. Again, future vettes may have equal or better performance, but they will have a far different "soul" than the current ZR.
Any performance gains over today will come via lighter weight, traction improvements, driveline changes, and possibly electric motor assist.
The 2016 CAFE limits and forthcoming tailpipe CO2 limits will force a reduction in the size of these engines. Again, future vettes may have equal or better performance, but they will have a far different "soul" than the current ZR.
this is very likely the future for all high performance vehicles.
The C6-based ZR1 (and Z06) may indeed be the "swan-song" of their generation...
#5
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Sounds right....
Hold on to your ZR1s.
The Ford GT had a drop from its MSRP after 2005-2006 to as low $120K, then it steadily rose back up to above MSRP $149K for USED examples; and mint low miles ones are >$175K
I realize over 4,038 ZR1s will be produced....but still view it as a future classic just like Viper ACR and Ford GT.
Hold on to your ZR1s.
The Ford GT had a drop from its MSRP after 2005-2006 to as low $120K, then it steadily rose back up to above MSRP $149K for USED examples; and mint low miles ones are >$175K
I realize over 4,038 ZR1s will be produced....but still view it as a future classic just like Viper ACR and Ford GT.
#6
Premium Supporting Vendor
If I was a betting man I would put money on a 700hp C7 ZR1 or equivalent in 2015-2016. I'm just speculating though.
#7
Le Mans Master
If the C6 ZR1 made Chevrolet money, there will be a faster C7 ZR1. And I think the ZR1 has been profitable for Chevrolet/GM.
It will not be a 6.2 supercharged V8, but I could easily see a 3100lb, 680hp supercharged direct injected 5.5L V8 that revs out to 7000-7500rpm with a dual-clutch transmission (and a six-speed manual option). Yum.
It will not be a 6.2 supercharged V8, but I could easily see a 3100lb, 680hp supercharged direct injected 5.5L V8 that revs out to 7000-7500rpm with a dual-clutch transmission (and a six-speed manual option). Yum.
#8
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 10,087
Received 3,836 Likes
on
1,156 Posts
"Ask Tadge" Producer
Before GM will be able to put future R&D into hyper-fast Corvettes, they're going to have to be able to guarantee big sales numbers of the base car, since it is less expensive and can therefore sell in greater numbers. The current economical outlook isn't all that pleasant, but hopefully things will improve.
I'd be very surprised to see a C7 ZR1. I expect to see a base car that'll nip at the heels of the existing C6 Z06, and a faster version with a supercharged engine that GM sets up for track AND GT duty.
jas
#9
Melting Slicks<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/3k-4k.gif" border="0">
If past trends are any indications, and as mentioned by JVP above, I would not expect any sort of 'special' C7 for the initial year. If the C7 is a 2013 year model, I'd guess no higher performance model until 2014 at the earliest. I'd also venture that the next election may well have a large effect on what we do or do not see in the realm of performance cars overall.
#10
By the standards of prior generations of Corvettes the standard LS3 is the most powerful ever built. That makes the Z06 and ZR1 ULTRA performance when compared to prior generations.
So, even if performance dropped back a bit from the ZR1 what difference would it make in practical terms? If you're stuck in stop and go traffic 430hp or 638hp either way you can't use the power.
I have a hunch the Corvette is going toward a low volume halo car in the future. This would be along the lines of the Viper with NO standard entry level models at prices the average guy just might manage. The entire C6 line is selling something like 40% the units sold annually over the past 25+ years.
People talk about 3100 lbs as a "light car".....it is but only in a relative sense when looking at the brick on four wheels ( new Camaro ) or cars like the Challenger or CTS-V that are 4000 lbs or more.
Some guys are probably looking for even wider tires on the C7....wider? Heavier wheels? Make em two feet wide whatever.
One comment here mentioned that the era of "big inch"engines is over or soon to be. News flash, for those of us old enough the era of big inch engines ended about 1973...we called em "big blocks". The Z06 poses mightily as a "big block 427" but we all know it's a small block.
The ZR1 has a small block engine. So the V8 gets smaller...so it's 5.5l....so what? That's a small block too. Back in the day we had fast small blocks in all sizes, 283, 302, 327, 350.....some of you don't even recognize all these numbers. We also had 396, 427 and the hog 454...those were "big V-8s".
Basically I'd say what difference does it make what the hp of the C7 is or the displacement? Does that matter? What matters is acceleration, handling, and stopping.
The C6 is firmly a "small block V8" generations. No more big blocks. But....LOTS more hp than the much larger V8s of the past. Lots of reasons for this most of you know em well.
Personally I think the C7 should be lighter, shorter, narrower, and have tires that are not so wide. A place to put the front plate could be nice too.
So, even if performance dropped back a bit from the ZR1 what difference would it make in practical terms? If you're stuck in stop and go traffic 430hp or 638hp either way you can't use the power.
I have a hunch the Corvette is going toward a low volume halo car in the future. This would be along the lines of the Viper with NO standard entry level models at prices the average guy just might manage. The entire C6 line is selling something like 40% the units sold annually over the past 25+ years.
People talk about 3100 lbs as a "light car".....it is but only in a relative sense when looking at the brick on four wheels ( new Camaro ) or cars like the Challenger or CTS-V that are 4000 lbs or more.
Some guys are probably looking for even wider tires on the C7....wider? Heavier wheels? Make em two feet wide whatever.
One comment here mentioned that the era of "big inch"engines is over or soon to be. News flash, for those of us old enough the era of big inch engines ended about 1973...we called em "big blocks". The Z06 poses mightily as a "big block 427" but we all know it's a small block.
The ZR1 has a small block engine. So the V8 gets smaller...so it's 5.5l....so what? That's a small block too. Back in the day we had fast small blocks in all sizes, 283, 302, 327, 350.....some of you don't even recognize all these numbers. We also had 396, 427 and the hog 454...those were "big V-8s".
Basically I'd say what difference does it make what the hp of the C7 is or the displacement? Does that matter? What matters is acceleration, handling, and stopping.
The C6 is firmly a "small block V8" generations. No more big blocks. But....LOTS more hp than the much larger V8s of the past. Lots of reasons for this most of you know em well.
Personally I think the C7 should be lighter, shorter, narrower, and have tires that are not so wide. A place to put the front plate could be nice too.
#11
By the standards of prior generations of Corvettes the standard LS3 is the most powerful ever built. That makes the Z06 and ZR1 ULTRA performance when compared to prior generations.
So, even if performance dropped back a bit from the ZR1 what difference would it make in practical terms? If you're stuck in stop and go traffic 430hp or 638hp either way you can't use the power.
I have a hunch the Corvette is going toward a low volume halo car in the future. This would be along the lines of the Viper with NO standard entry level models at prices the average guy just might manage. The entire C6 line is selling something like 40% the units sold annually over the past 25+ years.
People talk about 3100 lbs as a "light car".....it is but only in a relative sense when looking at the brick on four wheels ( new Camaro ) or cars like the Challenger or CTS-V that are 4000 lbs or more.
Some guys are probably looking for even wider tires on the C7....wider? Heavier wheels? Make em two feet wide whatever.
One comment here mentioned that the era of "big inch"engines is over or soon to be. News flash, for those of us old enough the era of big inch engines ended about 1973...we called em "big blocks". The Z06 poses mightily as a "big block 427" but we all know it's a small block.
The ZR1 has a small block engine. So the V8 gets smaller...so it's 5.5l....so what? That's a small block too. Back in the day we had fast small blocks in all sizes, 283, 302, 327, 350.....some of you don't even recognize all these numbers. We also had 396, 427 and the hog 454...those were "big V-8s".
Basically I'd say what difference does it make what the hp of the C7 is or the displacement? Does that matter? What matters is acceleration, handling, and stopping.
The C6 is firmly a "small block V8" generations. No more big blocks. But....LOTS more hp than the much larger V8s of the past. Lots of reasons for this most of you know em well.
Personally I think the C7 should be lighter, shorter, narrower, and have tires that are not so wide. A place to put the front plate could be nice too.
So, even if performance dropped back a bit from the ZR1 what difference would it make in practical terms? If you're stuck in stop and go traffic 430hp or 638hp either way you can't use the power.
I have a hunch the Corvette is going toward a low volume halo car in the future. This would be along the lines of the Viper with NO standard entry level models at prices the average guy just might manage. The entire C6 line is selling something like 40% the units sold annually over the past 25+ years.
People talk about 3100 lbs as a "light car".....it is but only in a relative sense when looking at the brick on four wheels ( new Camaro ) or cars like the Challenger or CTS-V that are 4000 lbs or more.
Some guys are probably looking for even wider tires on the C7....wider? Heavier wheels? Make em two feet wide whatever.
One comment here mentioned that the era of "big inch"engines is over or soon to be. News flash, for those of us old enough the era of big inch engines ended about 1973...we called em "big blocks". The Z06 poses mightily as a "big block 427" but we all know it's a small block.
The ZR1 has a small block engine. So the V8 gets smaller...so it's 5.5l....so what? That's a small block too. Back in the day we had fast small blocks in all sizes, 283, 302, 327, 350.....some of you don't even recognize all these numbers. We also had 396, 427 and the hog 454...those were "big V-8s".
Basically I'd say what difference does it make what the hp of the C7 is or the displacement? Does that matter? What matters is acceleration, handling, and stopping.
The C6 is firmly a "small block V8" generations. No more big blocks. But....LOTS more hp than the much larger V8s of the past. Lots of reasons for this most of you know em well.
Personally I think the C7 should be lighter, shorter, narrower, and have tires that are not so wide. A place to put the front plate could be nice too.
I dont understand why people correlate displacement with horsepower, yes its easier to produce more horsepower from a big displacement motor, but its not mandatory. Very efficient motors can produce equal or more power and both consume much less fuel and be "greener" at the same time no need for the compromise. Technologies such as direct injection, being one.
Dual clutch transmissions not will not only shift perfectly everytime at 50ms without slipping the life out if the clutch, the non-existent lag in acceleration during normal driving + the ability to pack in up to 8 gears make it ideal for performance, fuel economy and emissions.
While a supercharged small displacement engine would theoretically consume less fuel than an equal powered naturally aspirated engine (all else equal), turbos win the challenge, and especially with DCT cars turbo lag during shifts is non existent anymore.
A zonda R for example, which is an extreme example, makes MUCH more power-to-weight than the 1200HP veyron. There are other things than horsepower, weight, traction, gearing. I certainly dont want to see a new vette with a first gear ratio that goes up to a 70mph just to get less than decent traction.
#12
A car that can go neck to neck with a Porsche GT2 RS, the next Enzo, Gallardo replacement, the new Mclaren MP4 and the upcoming Viper just to mention somes.
But to go over 638 hp they need to improve the rear traction either by weight distribution, better tires or better suspension.
Last edited by ivanjo11; 07-15-2011 at 08:48 PM.
#13
I pretty much agree with what OregonC6 said.
Also, I do believe that the C6 ZR1 will be the highest-horsepower Corvette to ever be built by GM, but that does not necessarily mean that it will always be the fastest, or best performing. A sub-3,000 lb Corvette would be downright amazing. I have no idea how they would accomplish that, but I'm sure they could pull it off somehow.
I might be wrong, but I think he means an attractive place to put the plate. A white license plate on the front of a C6 reminds me of Mater from the movie "Cars".
Also, I do believe that the C6 ZR1 will be the highest-horsepower Corvette to ever be built by GM, but that does not necessarily mean that it will always be the fastest, or best performing. A sub-3,000 lb Corvette would be downright amazing. I have no idea how they would accomplish that, but I'm sure they could pull it off somehow.
I might be wrong, but I think he means an attractive place to put the plate. A white license plate on the front of a C6 reminds me of Mater from the movie "Cars".
#14
thats already there, but youd have to drill the bracket in the center of the front fascia.
I dont understand why people correlate displacement with horsepower, yes its easier to produce more horsepower from a big displacement motor, but its not mandatory. Very efficient motors can produce equal or more power and both consume much less fuel and be "greener" at the same time no need for the compromise. Technologies such as direct injection, being one.
Dual clutch transmissions not will not only shift perfectly everytime at 50ms without slipping the life out if the clutch, the non-existent lag in acceleration during normal driving + the ability to pack in up to 8 gears make it ideal for performance, fuel economy and emissions.
While a supercharged small displacement engine would theoretically consume less fuel than an equal powered naturally aspirated engine (all else equal), turbos win the challenge, and especially with DCT cars turbo lag during shifts is non existent anymore.
A zonda R for example, which is an extreme example, makes MUCH more power-to-weight than the 1200HP veyron. There are other things than horsepower, weight, traction, gearing. I certainly dont want to see a new vette with a first gear ratio that goes up to a 70mph just to get less than decent traction.
I dont understand why people correlate displacement with horsepower, yes its easier to produce more horsepower from a big displacement motor, but its not mandatory. Very efficient motors can produce equal or more power and both consume much less fuel and be "greener" at the same time no need for the compromise. Technologies such as direct injection, being one.
Dual clutch transmissions not will not only shift perfectly everytime at 50ms without slipping the life out if the clutch, the non-existent lag in acceleration during normal driving + the ability to pack in up to 8 gears make it ideal for performance, fuel economy and emissions.
While a supercharged small displacement engine would theoretically consume less fuel than an equal powered naturally aspirated engine (all else equal), turbos win the challenge, and especially with DCT cars turbo lag during shifts is non existent anymore.
A zonda R for example, which is an extreme example, makes MUCH more power-to-weight than the 1200HP veyron. There are other things than horsepower, weight, traction, gearing. I certainly dont want to see a new vette with a first gear ratio that goes up to a 70mph just to get less than decent traction.
#15
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Apr 2011
Location: Indio (near Palm Springs) Ca
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
I don't think u will see anything close to what we have now for at least 10 years, there is just too many issues going on with upcoming government regulations, state of the auto industries, the green movement, economy.
They might piece something together, but won't be anything close, the current ZR1 was hatched from a time when excess and gluttony was mainstream. It's not like that anymore, and for that time to come around again, it won't be for another 10-15 years...glad I got mine when I had the chance...
They might piece something together, but won't be anything close, the current ZR1 was hatched from a time when excess and gluttony was mainstream. It's not like that anymore, and for that time to come around again, it won't be for another 10-15 years...glad I got mine when I had the chance...
#16
Racer
By the standards of prior generations of Corvettes the standard LS3 is the most powerful ever built. That makes the Z06 and ZR1 ULTRA performance when compared to prior generations.
So, even if performance dropped back a bit from the ZR1 what difference would it make in practical terms? If you're stuck in stop and go traffic 430hp or 638hp either way you can't use the power.
I have a hunch the Corvette is going toward a low volume halo car in the future. This would be along the lines of the Viper with NO standard entry level models at prices the average guy just might manage. The entire C6 line is selling something like 40% the units sold annually over the past 25+ years.
People talk about 3100 lbs as a "light car".....it is but only in a relative sense when looking at the brick on four wheels ( new Camaro ) or cars like the Challenger or CTS-V that are 4000 lbs or more.
Some guys are probably looking for even wider tires on the C7....wider? Heavier wheels? Make em two feet wide whatever.
One comment here mentioned that the era of "big inch"engines is over or soon to be. News flash, for those of us old enough the era of big inch engines ended about 1973...we called em "big blocks". The Z06 poses mightily as a "big block 427" but we all know it's a small block.
The ZR1 has a small block engine. So the V8 gets smaller...so it's 5.5l....so what? That's a small block too. Back in the day we had fast small blocks in all sizes, 283, 302, 327, 350.....some of you don't even recognize all these numbers. We also had 396, 427 and the hog 454...those were "big V-8s".
Basically I'd say what difference does it make what the hp of the C7 is or the displacement? Does that matter? What matters is acceleration, handling, and stopping.
The C6 is firmly a "small block V8" generations. No more big blocks. But....LOTS more hp than the much larger V8s of the past. Lots of reasons for this most of you know em well.
Personally I think the C7 should be lighter, shorter, narrower, and have tires that are not so wide. A place to put the front plate could be nice too.
So, even if performance dropped back a bit from the ZR1 what difference would it make in practical terms? If you're stuck in stop and go traffic 430hp or 638hp either way you can't use the power.
I have a hunch the Corvette is going toward a low volume halo car in the future. This would be along the lines of the Viper with NO standard entry level models at prices the average guy just might manage. The entire C6 line is selling something like 40% the units sold annually over the past 25+ years.
People talk about 3100 lbs as a "light car".....it is but only in a relative sense when looking at the brick on four wheels ( new Camaro ) or cars like the Challenger or CTS-V that are 4000 lbs or more.
Some guys are probably looking for even wider tires on the C7....wider? Heavier wheels? Make em two feet wide whatever.
One comment here mentioned that the era of "big inch"engines is over or soon to be. News flash, for those of us old enough the era of big inch engines ended about 1973...we called em "big blocks". The Z06 poses mightily as a "big block 427" but we all know it's a small block.
The ZR1 has a small block engine. So the V8 gets smaller...so it's 5.5l....so what? That's a small block too. Back in the day we had fast small blocks in all sizes, 283, 302, 327, 350.....some of you don't even recognize all these numbers. We also had 396, 427 and the hog 454...those were "big V-8s".
Basically I'd say what difference does it make what the hp of the C7 is or the displacement? Does that matter? What matters is acceleration, handling, and stopping.
The C6 is firmly a "small block V8" generations. No more big blocks. But....LOTS more hp than the much larger V8s of the past. Lots of reasons for this most of you know em well.
Personally I think the C7 should be lighter, shorter, narrower, and have tires that are not so wide. A place to put the front plate could be nice too.
Yawn
#17
Race Director
If there eventually is a C7 ZR1, it won't be a repeat of the C6 ZR1. Performance is destined to be redefined in terms of weight to power ratios with decreasing engine displacements to develop high power and ingenuous weight reductions for the overall cars. Not a bad thing for our future world we now find ourselves in.
#19
Melting Slicks
I honestly think the CAFE rules will not be much of an issue for the Corvette. The coupe already gets better than 30mpg on the highway. Plus, the CAFE is an average of a manufacturer's entire lineup. The Cruze gets great mileage, with an even more fuel efficient diesel model arriving next year. The Equinox SUV gets 32mpg. They continue to get better all the time. I think a new Vette lineup similar to the one we have now, with direct injection implemented, would be just fine.
#20
Race Director
...
The ZR1 has a small block engine. So the V8 gets smaller...so it's 5.5l....so what? That's a small block too. Back in the day we had fast small blocks in all sizes, 283, 302, 327, 350.....some of you don't even recognize all these numbers. We also had 396, 427 and the hog 454...those were "big V-8s"...
The ZR1 has a small block engine. So the V8 gets smaller...so it's 5.5l....so what? That's a small block too. Back in the day we had fast small blocks in all sizes, 283, 302, 327, 350.....some of you don't even recognize all these numbers. We also had 396, 427 and the hog 454...those were "big V-8s"...
I, too, remember them all, and not just the Chevy offerings... Buick/Pontiac/Oldsmobile; Ford; all Mopar...
what a great performance era to have lived-through and grown-up in...
of course, the cars today are much more highly refined, better tires, brakes & suspension,
better (but complicated) electronics...
but those raw-power V8s from the '60s & '70s set the "adventure" bar quite high...
and all were obtainable to anyone willing to work for it...none were so exotically priced to make the same just a fantasy.
Last edited by Gary '09 C6; 07-16-2011 at 01:44 PM. Reason: sp