C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Shhhhh Don't Tell GM but I Got A Chance To Drive A C7 Yesterday...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2013, 05:55 AM
  #101  
Big Dan 427
Safety Car
 
Big Dan 427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Location: Danbury CT
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kdepew
I agree with alot of others that the rear is horrible. I guess we have Tom Peters and Ed W. to blame for that. Someone on this thread suggested those responsible for the rear should be fired. I think Tom and Ed should be looking for new jobs (hopefully jobs that don't involve the design of sports cars).

I am surprised that it seems like GM thinks all the complaints are just because they didn't use round taillights. I don't think the actual taillights look bad. I think the rest of the back is attrocious. The mascara vents are rediculous. The black diffuser going so high up on the back is horrible. The rear is just bad. I definitely think that rear could be a deal breaker for alot of potential buyers. For the most part I like the look of the C7. The one thing I don't think I could ever live with is the rear.

GM designed a polarizing rear end. I know they say they wanted to take a risk, but I can't believe they are happy with how polarizing that rear is (of course they will never admit it). If they knew the response would be what it has been, I don't think it would look the way it does. If they really think it is all just traditionalist who want round rear lights (which I understand those who would have liked round rear lights), then I think they are missing the point. It is an ugly rear and would still be ugly whether it had round, square, or whatever shaped rear lights.

If enough people don't like it and it hurts sales, maybe GM will eventually take the complaints serious and redesign it. It wouldn't be hard to come up with something better. It would be unusual to get a significant redesign mid-life, but it is unusual for the Corvette team to put out anything like that rear.

I'm sure there are initial complaints with every generation design, but I don't think the complaints about the rear of this car are like those on previous generations. There are various complaints about other aspects of the design, but I think the general opinion is positive on most of the car. There are those who state they like the rear. There are those that state the rear has grown on them. However, there are also ALOT of people who absolutely hate that rear. Someone at GM approved the design of the Pontiac Aztec. That was a failure. While the C7 Corvette is no Pontiac Aztec, I think the rear styling is almost as bad.
Couldn't have said it better!!
Old 08-20-2013, 06:33 AM
  #102  
Rebel 1
Drifting
 
Rebel 1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Bristol raceway area
Posts: 1,443
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The C6 IMO is one of the most beautiful Vettes ever produced. That C7 abomination ranks under the C4. Maybe GM will offer something better in a year or two.
Old 08-20-2013, 06:48 AM
  #103  
R&L's C6
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
R&L's C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2010
Posts: 17,889
Received 1,254 Likes on 708 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rebel 1
The C6 IMO is one of the most beautiful Vettes ever produced. That C7 abomination ranks under the C4. Maybe GM will offer something better in a year or two.


But this is looking pretty damn good too....

Attachment 47733295

Last edited by R&L's C6; 09-30-2013 at 06:38 AM.
Old 08-20-2013, 08:43 AM
  #104  
vet55
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
vet55's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 12,874
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by matthewelle
Da Supervettes crew is promoting this as a solution to the C7 rear woes:
Now this is what I'm talkin' 'bout.
True American innovation at work!
Ask and ye' shall receive.

You soften those edges a little
more to take away the BMW
flare and you've got it!

Why couldn't GM do that?
Old 08-20-2013, 08:59 AM
  #105  
Mad*Max
Race Director
 
Mad*Max's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 15,947
Received 1,501 Likes on 817 Posts
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021

Default

Originally Posted by Rebel 1
The C6 IMO is one of the most beautiful Vettes ever produced. .
Old 08-20-2013, 09:44 AM
  #106  
JC7
Safety Car
 
JC7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: So. California
Posts: 4,573
Received 34 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Try cleaning the black by the tail lights, looks cheap to me! The rear COULD HAVE BEEN A HIT! Bottomline a REAL MISS!!! Butt Ugly to me!
Old 08-20-2013, 09:48 AM
  #107  
direct007
Melting Slicks
 
direct007's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 3,249
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,026 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by matthewelle
Da Supervettes crew is promoting this as a solution to the C7 rear woes:
This is 1000% better. It isn't just the tailights, but the whole backend that doesn't flow with the rest of the car. The tail end in this pic would deft solve the issues.
Old 08-20-2013, 10:24 AM
  #108  
not08crmanymore
Team Owner
 
not08crmanymore's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: queensbury ny
Posts: 57,309
Received 138 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

The problem with this is that unfortunately it only looks good from a side view..why?BECAUSE the rear abomination is not seen.If it were just the rear end that was the problem that would be one thing, but it's the car as a whole that just does not work.Unless one buys it and always looks at it from the side view,one can't miss the butt ugly car that it is.Not to mention that it's only 460 HP...7.5 LBS per hp.Nowhere near enough of a jump to overcome the cosmetic butcher job.
Old 08-20-2013, 10:33 AM
  #109  
SkyTopp
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
SkyTopp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by not08crmanymore
The problem with this is that unfortunately it only looks good from a side view..why?BECAUSE the rear abomination is not seen.If it were just the rear end that was the problem that would be one thing, but it's the car as a whole that just does not work.Unless one buys it and always looks at it from the side view,one can't miss the butt ugly car that it is.Not to mention that it's only 460 HP...7.5 LBS per hp.Nowhere near enough of a jump to overcome the cosmetic butcher job.
The rear end styling of C7 is Vile looking compared to the rest of the design. I can't imagine how that tail got approved for production. The C7 makes me sad when I look at it from the rear.
Old 08-20-2013, 10:54 AM
  #110  
Hameister
Le Mans Master
 
Hameister's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,750
Received 165 Likes on 98 Posts
2015 C6 of the Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by not08crmanymore
...Not to mention that it's only 460 HP...7.5 LBS per hp.Nowhere near enough of a jump to overcome the cosmetic butcher job.
Sorry, but every time I hear someone complain that 460 HP is not enough, it gives me a chuckle.

And, adding that 460 HP isn't enough to overcome the rear end, gives me a real ol' fashioned belly laugh.

Hey, I'm not a fan of the *** end of the thing either, but come on...let's keep things in perspective.
Old 08-20-2013, 11:15 AM
  #111  
VatorMan
Team Owner

 
VatorMan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Gaithersburg Maryland
Posts: 42,280
Received 44 Likes on 27 Posts
CI 6-7-8 Veteran
St. Jude's Donor '06-'10-'11, '15

Default

You guys are old.

Old 08-20-2013, 12:11 PM
  #112  
WinnipegC5
Instructor
 
WinnipegC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba
Posts: 108
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think the c5 Z (exterior) is the best looking vette to date. But that’s just my opinion.

I am in the market for a c6 Z for the performance upgrades and somewhat of a better interior. The c7 interior looks amazing. It’s about time gm stepped up their game in the interior department. It actually looks like a interior designed for a supercar. As long as they don’t put the same interior in their 2014 cobats, they have two thumbs up from me.
Old 08-20-2013, 12:25 PM
  #113  
not08crmanymore
Team Owner
 
not08crmanymore's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: queensbury ny
Posts: 57,309
Received 138 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Sorry, but every time I hear someone complain that 460 HP is not enough, it gives me a chuckle.

And, adding that 460 HP isn't enough to overcome the rear end, gives me a real ol' fashioned belly laugh.

Hey, I'm not a fan of the *** end of the thing either, but come on...let's keep things in perspective.
If you read what I wrote in the context it was written you'd see that what I said was that 460 hp isn't enough of a jump to overcome the ugly factor of the whole car not just the rear end. Enjoy your old fashioned belly laugh..
Old 08-20-2013, 03:02 PM
  #114  
Boomer111
Race Director
 
Boomer111's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Bay Area Ca.
Posts: 14,999
Received 191 Likes on 151 Posts

Default

All I have to say is the view from the rear is a deal breaker for me from the initial viewing.

Not crazy about the dash either.

The interior uppgrade in materials nice as are the seats.

I am sure it will be accepted as it gets seen on the streets more.

But the rear is really bad....
Old 08-20-2013, 06:02 PM
  #115  
jb_va2001
Melting Slicks
 
jb_va2001's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: DC Metro
Posts: 2,861
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
DC Area Events Coordinator

Default

Originally Posted by SkyTopp

... [snip] ...

If I could drive it blind folded I don't think I could really tell the difference between C6 and C7.

... [snip] ...
That one sentence pretty much sums it up.

People will buy a C7 if they like the styling better (some will), they want to be the first kid on the block with the new Corvette (many will in 2014), some will succumb to the GM marketing hype, or it might just the the right timing in their life. (They are simply in the market for a new Corvette and all the leftover C6 have been sold.)
Old 08-20-2013, 06:09 PM
  #116  
Aviator
Le Mans Master
 
Aviator's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Decatur GA
Posts: 7,226
Received 287 Likes on 127 Posts
Cruise-In I Veteran
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran

Default

How did this become a thread about the looks of the C7, when it's about a troll who says he drove a C7 with no proof?
Old 08-20-2013, 06:15 PM
  #117  
ladder13
Melting Slicks
 
ladder13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Woke County, NC
Posts: 3,367
Received 798 Likes on 386 Posts

Default

Anyone keeping track of the negative posters? Will they be in the C7 section in a few years?

Get notified of new replies

To Shhhhh Don't Tell GM but I Got A Chance To Drive A C7 Yesterday...

Old 08-20-2013, 06:29 PM
  #118  
ProfessorDeath
Safety Car
 
ProfessorDeath's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,138
Received 165 Likes on 108 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13-'14

Default

Originally Posted by vet55
Why couldn't GM do that?
Because to me, that rear end is worse than the 4 semi-vertical taillights from another thread. Truly disgusting.

The C7 rear end is not ideal, I think we can all agree, but it is not a make-or-break proposition for what is sure to be a hit sports car.

Personally, I will have a C7 at some point in the future, but right now it's just an unnecessary expense.

(to no one in particular)If you prefer your C6, that's fine too, but don't come in bashing/praising the C7, demanding others respect your opinions, then turn around and bash their own opinions, essentially perpetrating the same offense you just took issue with, simply because they differ from yours. It's very childish, and only serves to withdraw any semblance of wit or intelligent conversation.

Last edited by ProfessorDeath; 08-20-2013 at 06:36 PM.
Old 08-20-2013, 06:40 PM
  #119  
Purdue
Melting Slicks
 
Purdue's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: ---Phoenix, AZ --- Boiler Up, Hammer Down!
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ladder13
Anyone keeping track of the negative posters? Will they be in the C7 section in a few years?
^^This
Old 08-20-2013, 09:00 PM
  #120  
kdepew
Instructor
 
kdepew's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Posts: 213
Received 43 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ladder13
Anyone keeping track of the negative posters? Will they be in the C7 section in a few years?
In a few years will we see there have been a higher percentage of black C7 Corvettes sold than at any point in history because black helps hide some of the C7 rear ugliness?

Last edited by kdepew; 08-20-2013 at 09:47 PM.


Quick Reply: Shhhhh Don't Tell GM but I Got A Chance To Drive A C7 Yesterday...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.