What will make a LS3 more hp per liter if keeping it n/a?
#1
What will make a LS3 more hp per liter if keeping it n/a?
I just started thinking how Honda got 120hp per liter out of the S2000 with no supercharger or turbo. That's pretty high compared to the LS3 which is about 70. I realize one is DOHC and other is OHV, but what things can be done to help boost the hp/l of the LS3? Currently I can think of lighter pistons, rods, valves, valve springs, and even bigger exhaust and headers....anything else?
#3
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Nov 2014
Location: Back Woods Tennessee
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And don't forget lift & duration. It wouldn't hurt to release the strangle hold the EPA has placed on the internal engine either, lest the tree huggers raise their ugly stump.
#4
Burning Brakes
I f you don't mind having to redline the engine for a spirited drive you will like the Honda, for normal driving I found the S2000 unexciting. For me torque is my friend,suiting my style of driving better. I believe the internal friction of a v-8 reduces hp per liter. It will be interesting to see how bad Honda whips the other F1 power plants in 2015 Though!
#5
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2014
Location: Below the bottom of Berby Hollow, NYS
Posts: 21,631
Received 1,136 Likes
on
882 Posts
"Volumetric efficiency" is the phrase I learned in auto class in the '60s.
The more efficiently you can get the fuel-air mixture into and the exhaust out of the cylinders the better: fewer bends in the ports, perhaps more than two valves per cylinder, higher compression, a more efficient combustion chamber, better exhaust scavenging, better cam, the right spark at the right time in the right place, etc.
And everything must be designed together as a package, which I suspect is a lot easier to do today than it used to be.
EDIT: Back in the day, one horse per cube was considered a good goal for a street engine. Today, obviously, that has all gone out the window thanks to greater volumetric efficiency.
The more efficiently you can get the fuel-air mixture into and the exhaust out of the cylinders the better: fewer bends in the ports, perhaps more than two valves per cylinder, higher compression, a more efficient combustion chamber, better exhaust scavenging, better cam, the right spark at the right time in the right place, etc.
And everything must be designed together as a package, which I suspect is a lot easier to do today than it used to be.
EDIT: Back in the day, one horse per cube was considered a good goal for a street engine. Today, obviously, that has all gone out the window thanks to greater volumetric efficiency.
Last edited by Bruze; 11-23-2014 at 03:33 PM.
#6
I f you don't mind having to redline the engine for a spirited drive you will like the Honda, for normal driving I found the S2000 unexciting. For me torque is my friend,suiting my style of driving better. I believe the internal friction of a v-8 reduces hp per liter. It will be interesting to see how bad Honda whips the other F1 power plants in 2015 Though!