Stock LS3 Dyno (Video included)
#1
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Stock LS3 Dyno (Video included)
I bought this car on the 17th of December 2011. It is a 2008 six-speed with factory npp exhaust. Posting it incase anyone is in the market or interesting in a C6. Dyno numbers aren't everything but it was cool to see what kind of power it makes before I start modding it. I'll take it to the track sometime soon.
http://youtu.be/P_xRRXkFbdw
http://youtu.be/P_xRRXkFbdw
#6
Sr.Random input generator
#7
Go Canes!
408 rwhp is a great number to start at!! It took me a lot to get there in my ls2 a6. Congrats!!
Last edited by davidtcpa; 01-05-2012 at 07:39 AM. Reason: Damn iPad typing
#10
Instructor
#12
Go Canes!
#14
Safety Car
Yea, something does not seem right. I have an 08 manual with LT headers, Custom ECS tune, Callaway CAI, 160 t-stat and polished and ported TB and I put down 424 at the rear wheels. My stock numbers were ~375. I think either it is a very friendly dyno, uncorrected or work has been done to this car.
#15
Pro
LS3 dry sump engine HP
I have seen several LS3 manual transmission car put down 390 +/-RWHP in Dynojet Dynos. Our Corvette Club conducts an annual Dyno Shootout every December. http://www.vegasvettes.com/Events/20.../1112Dyno.html An LS3 dry sump Corvette dynoed at 403 RWHP and 392 TQ (factory tune). That surprised most of us. The other Corvettes dynoed within their expected range, so I don't think it was a happy dyno. There was a lengthy discussion in the general Corvette Forum section about the LS3 dry sump hand built engines. Do they produce more HP and if so why? better built, the dry sump, or a combination? http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-c...lt-engine.html
#16
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Yes it is stock. All it has is the factory npp on it. This isn't my first rodeo with LS cars so I know when one is stock. Standard correction the hp number was 416. These numbers are SAE corrected. I'll post the dyno sheet for the doubters.
#17
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Here you go guys. Hopefully you can see them.
#19
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 13,256
Received 3,089 Likes
on
2,078 Posts
2021 C6 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Yup .. And SAE Corrected (SAE-J1349) should be the only numbers that anyone would care about regarding a dyno pull.
SAE Corrected makes the playing field all the same no matter how hot or cold the ambient conditions are, or how high or low you are in altitude.
About the only thing that mucks-up the numbers is what type of dyno was used ... "Mustang" dynos seem to always show lower numbers than the "Dynojet".
SAE Corrected makes the playing field all the same no matter how hot or cold the ambient conditions are, or how high or low you are in altitude.
About the only thing that mucks-up the numbers is what type of dyno was used ... "Mustang" dynos seem to always show lower numbers than the "Dynojet".
#20
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Tampa FL (formerly Justinjor)
Posts: 5,022
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
9 Posts
Tech Contributor
St. Jude Donor '11-'12-'13-'14
Dynojet numbers can still be skewed though. The weather station can be tricked with hot air from a blow dryer and/or a damp rag.
I'm not saying any of this happened, but just because it says "SAE Smoothing: 5" in the corner does not remove the scrutiny of the unusually high dyno numbers.
Again, take it to the track and post up with how it does. I'd love to see it
I'm not saying any of this happened, but just because it says "SAE Smoothing: 5" in the corner does not remove the scrutiny of the unusually high dyno numbers.
Again, take it to the track and post up with how it does. I'd love to see it