C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS3 vs LS2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2010, 10:00 PM
  #1  
blueyeszr1
Account suspended by request 6 Oct 2017
Thread Starter
 
blueyeszr1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default LS3 vs LS2

I am in the process of buying another Corvette due to losing mine in the recent flooding in TN. I want an 08 because of the LS3 but I have found a very nice 07 for a few thousand less.
Can some of you LS3 owners that have had an LS2, tell me if there is that much of a difference in the engine. I know the LS3 has more HP, but a friend told me from a driving experence, that he did not notice that much difference.
Thanks
Old 05-22-2010, 10:04 PM
  #2  
Epic_C6
Pro
 
Epic_C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you are talking only engine to engine then no there is not that much difference between the LS2 and LS3. I had a 2005 and now have a 2008 and I can tell a little difference but nothing huge. There were a couple things they changed in 2008 other than going to the LS3 like the manual transmission shifting, air intake, and a few other things. If it were me I would buy an LS3 unless you found a great deal on an LS2.
Old 05-22-2010, 10:52 PM
  #3  
66yellowstingray
Racer
 
66yellowstingray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Location: Garner NC
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't the LS3s dyno 40 whp or so more than the LS2s? Most stock LS2s seem to dyno around 345 or so. LS3s around 380?? I seem to recall LS3s getting to the 400 whp mark with just headers/tune. No way in hell an LS2 can reach that with just headers/tune. I don't see how 40 whp can be unnoticeable. Personally, I would get a LS3.

With that being said I love my 07. I plan on doing intake (already have), stage 2 ported IM, ported TB, Vararam TB spacer, longtubes, and tune JUST to match a stock LS3 in dyno numbers (385 or so). An LS3 with those same mods is much more beastly.
Old 05-22-2010, 11:04 PM
  #4  
lkelliott
Drifting
 
lkelliott's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Chino Hills CA
Posts: 1,827
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I have seen dyno numbers for a stock 08 LS3 with a manual transmission and pulling the air cleaner. The dyno chart showed 398 hp at the rear wheels. The transfer loss for the driveline is around 15% so the actual crank horsepower is close to 460hp stock.

The LS2 will not come close to that on any good day so buy the LS3.
Old 05-22-2010, 11:26 PM
  #5  
MADinAK
Le Mans Master

 
MADinAK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Eagle River AK
Posts: 5,335
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10,'14

Default

Originally Posted by lkelliott
I have seen dyno numbers for a stock 08 LS3 with a manual transmission and pulling the air cleaner. The dyno chart showed 398 hp at the rear wheels. The transfer loss for the driveline is around 15% so the actual crank horsepower is close to 460hp stock.

The LS2 will not come close to that on any good day so buy the LS3.

Let's just pull that ol' pesky serpentine belt and factory exhaust manifold while we're at it. The 430/436 rating is a certified rating - can't remember SAE #. Look up what this means and you'll see GM can't stretch the thruth on HP ratings.


Old 05-22-2010, 11:44 PM
  #6  
carjo
Burning Brakes
 
carjo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Lakewood Ranch Florida
Posts: 1,127
Received 29 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Get the LS3. They have other improvements worth having: shorter throw shifter, better steering and chassis, etc. The extra power won't hurt either.
Old 05-23-2010, 12:03 AM
  #7  
bps999
Pro
 
bps999's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the hp diff. is there, but it's not huge. I think we can trust GM that it is 30hp, or 36hp with optional exhaust, at the crank... I don't think the other changes are huge either. It comes down to which is a better deal. I would pay 2k more just for the fact that an 08 is one year newer, and on top of that I would pay at least 2k to have the LS3 over the LS2. So, for an 07 to make sense, assuming mileage and options etc. are the same, I would want it to be at least 4k cheaper than an 08.
Old 05-23-2010, 12:09 AM
  #8  
0Andrew6@TheDoubleAA
Former Vendor
 
Andrew6@TheDoubleAA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: League City Texas
Posts: 12,288
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Houston Events Coordinator
St. Jude Donor '11-'12, '14
I believe in the Beer Fairy
Default

Originally Posted by 66yellowstingray
Don't the LS3s dyno 40 whp or so more than the LS2s? Most stock LS2s seem to dyno around 345 or so. LS3s around 380?? I seem to recall LS3s getting to the 400 whp mark with just headers/tune. No way in hell an LS2 can reach that with just headers/tune. I don't see how 40 whp can be unnoticeable. Personally, I would get a LS3.

With that being said I love my 07. I plan on doing intake (already have), stage 2 ported IM, ported TB, Vararam TB spacer, longtubes, and tune JUST to match a stock LS3 in dyno numbers (385 or so). An LS3 with those same mods is much more beastly.
My LS3 was at 381 stock RWHP. After the EnglandGreen Dyno/tune I was at 400.1 at the wheels. All that I've had done was the CAI and I don't think that makes much of a difference on a Dyno Tune. LS3 is just a BAMF motor.

All that being said I've never owned an LS2 but have a buddy that has one and seems my automatic LS3 will smooth out power his LS2 standard.
Old 05-23-2010, 12:11 AM
  #9  
GotVett?
Race Director
 
GotVett?'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: JawJa
Posts: 14,007
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

I have an '07 and it's my vette but what the heck . . . get the LS3 just because.
Old 05-23-2010, 02:08 AM
  #10  
TexasMadMan
Melting Slicks
 
TexasMadMan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita Falls Tx
Posts: 2,966
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I went with an 07 and saved about $7k-8k on the price VS an 08.

For that kind of money you can buy a lot of horsepower.
Old 05-23-2010, 02:55 AM
  #11  
res0n0xg
Racer
 
res0n0xg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MADinAK
Let's just pull that ol' pesky serpentine belt and factory exhaust manifold while we're at it. The 430/436 rating is a certified rating - can't remember SAE #. Look up what this means and you'll see GM can't stretch the thruth on HP ratings.



call it what you will there chief, just because you don't have an LS3, don't knock it. LS2's dyno 330-350rwhp. LS3's dyno 370rwhp-mid 390's, that's 40-50rwhp difference on many different dyno's across the country. Most LS2's after intake/long tubes/tune only get to 380-390rwhp, which is what LS3's make at the wheels stock. Look it up.



I dyno'd over 390rwhp bone stock in my 08 c6 through the AUTOMATIC.
Old 05-23-2010, 02:57 AM
  #12  
WestCoastCarNut
Advanced
 
WestCoastCarNut's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Monterey CA
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Most LS2s dyno around 340 to the wheels and most LS3s dyno around 380 to the wheels. The LS2 is a good motor, but the LS3 is a better motor. With the '08 you also get a better steering rack, carbon interior console, short throw shifter, X-pipe NPP exhaust option and I am probably forgetting a couple other things.
Old 05-23-2010, 08:51 AM
  #13  
C6Buddy
Racer
 
C6Buddy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would go with the cheapest one you can find. The LS3 should have been at 500HP mark. 30-40 HP is not enough IMHO for spending a bit more money.
Old 05-23-2010, 09:17 AM
  #14  
StanNH
Le Mans Master
 
StanNH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Bluffton, SC
Posts: 6,362
Received 1,221 Likes on 411 Posts

Default

I'm personally not too concerned with the numbers. Having owned both a 2005 and a 2009, I can tell you that there is little felt difference between the two. My LS2 felt great and pulled nicely through all gears. My LS3 feels very much the same with perhaps a bit more pull in the higher gears. Reported/recorded tenths of a second differences in 0-60 or quarter mile times mean nothing unless you're into racing.

My LS2 got about 1-2 mpg better full economy, but that's about the only measurable difference I can see. I don't track my car so I don't have any numbers to back up my impressions, just "seat of the pants" feel. From a construction point of view, the LS3 is supposed to be the more robust design.

There were other changes in the 2008 and 2009 model years which further refined the car; such as a smoother shifting manual gear box and slightly better steering, but these were not OMG! upgrades, just minor improvements. Generally it's a good idea to get the latest model year if you're buying used, but there really are no "bad" years for the C6 providing the car has been well maintained and all TSB's and recalls taken care of.

Last edited by StanNH; 05-23-2010 at 09:20 AM.
Old 05-23-2010, 09:20 AM
  #15  
GARYFINN
Team Owner

 
GARYFINN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: S/W ,Fla-Ohio State Football isn't a matter of life or death,Its Much More serious than that
Posts: 51,040
Received 1,142 Likes on 592 Posts

Default

LS3 Period !!!!!
Old 05-23-2010, 09:29 AM
  #16  
AFVETTE
Team Owner
 
AFVETTE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Swansea IL
Posts: 20,076
Received 41 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Best advice I have been given and give. Buy the newest vette you can afford and stop worrying about the other guy. You'll go broke "Jonesing".

Tom
Old 05-23-2010, 09:39 AM
  #17  
jimmie jam
Le Mans Master
 
jimmie jam's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: FORT LAUDERDALE FL
Posts: 6,360
Received 568 Likes on 345 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C6Buddy
I would go with the cheapest one you can find. The LS3 should have been at 500HP mark. 30-40 HP is not enough IMHO for spending a bit more money.
yes 30-40 HP is alot. however, you have to put it is proper perspective. take 250HP add 30-40 - BIG difference. add the same to 400HP, not so much. i can't see that 10% or less additional HP is noticed in the seat of your pants, just can't. of course LS3 owners will have a different opinion...because they have to .

purchase the best car that you can find for the money. my 07 is a great car....so are the 08's.

Get notified of new replies

To LS3 vs LS2

Old 05-23-2010, 09:52 AM
  #18  
haljensen
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
haljensen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

The LS3 starts out stock where a bolt on modded LS2 ends up. LS2 + $3,000+ in mods = LS3.
Old 05-23-2010, 09:55 AM
  #19  
66yellowstingray
Racer
 
66yellowstingray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Location: Garner NC
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Again, 30 - 40 whp is a big difference I don't care what anyone says. I own a LS2 and I'm saying get a LS3. Yeah, if its a 4K - 7K difference then obviously that needs to be considered. However, I'm probably going to spend close to 2K to get that 30 - 50 whp that "doesn't matter" .

Every LS2 that gets longtubes/tune raves about the power increase. Thats about 30 whp increase. So how does the LS3 not feel different with its 30 - 40 whp advantage??
Old 05-23-2010, 10:29 AM
  #20  
peter pan
Life Time NCM #2196

Support Corvetteforum!
 
peter pan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Converse TX
Posts: 81,771
Received 1,099 Likes on 810 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AFVETTE
Best advice I have been given and give. Buy the newest vette you can afford and stop worrying about the other guy. You'll go broke "Jonesing".

Tom
Get the one you can afford and newest one after that


Quick Reply: LS3 vs LS2



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.