C6 Replacement Tires
04-26-2010, 10:19 AM
#1
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
Member Since: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C6 Replacement Tires
I own a 2006 Z51 with the original Goodyear F1 Supercar tires. With 17K miles, I am looking to replace the tires. I would like to retain my original wheels & still have runflats & the air pressure monitoring feature.
Is there an alternate tire choice you would recommend that will not ride as harsh and not take away from the performance characteristics of my Z51 setup?
Is there an alternate tire choice you would recommend that will not ride as harsh and not take away from the performance characteristics of my Z51 setup?
04-26-2010, 10:51 AM
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 46,111
Received 2,485 Likes
on
1,947 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
"In honor of jpee"
to back up what norm just wrote above, I put on the mich. pilot sport ps2s just about 2K miles ago. they seem quite good. they aren't inexpensive, but neither are the goodyear sc's. just remember that tires, esp the goodyears, get harder and louder as they age. so what you're experiencing now is not how the tires started out. nor did mine.
with the window down and riding in a quiet environment, I found these tires to be about the same noise level. so far, they grip at least as well as the goodyear SCs they replaced, but I haven't started pushing the car hard in turns.
with the window down and riding in a quiet environment, I found these tires to be about the same noise level. so far, they grip at least as well as the goodyear SCs they replaced, but I haven't started pushing the car hard in turns.
04-26-2010, 10:58 AM
#5
Melting Slicks
I believe the last tires I got from TR were about $40+ via UPS to my door. You can have them drop shipped to any installer and TR makes recommendations in many areas. Of course shipping costs depend on how far. Actually Costco was close in price but didn't install runflats.
04-26-2010, 11:06 AM
#6
Team Owner
I believe the last tires I got from TR were about $40+ via UPS to my door. You can have them drop shipped to any installer and TR makes recommendations in many areas. Of course shipping costs depend on how far. Actually Costco was close in price but didn't install runflats.
04-26-2010, 11:08 AM
#7
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 46,111
Received 2,485 Likes
on
1,947 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
"In honor of jpee"
That's interesting, Norm, about Costco. I think Chris (cclive) had Costco just install his recently. Maybe they've changed their policy, or it's store by store.
I believe the last tires I got from TR were about $40+ via UPS to my door. You can have them drop shipped to any installer and TR makes recommendations in many areas. Of course shipping costs depend on how far. Actually Costco was close in price but didn't install runflats.
04-26-2010, 11:25 AM
#9
Team Owner
The guys at Costco just put on my new Michelin A/S Plus's and they did a great job with no problems. The only thing they said was that it was a bear getting the old GYs off the rims...but they said any R/F tire is hard to remove...not as hard to install.
$14 per tire for mounting, balancing, and the road hazard warranty.
$14 per tire for mounting, balancing, and the road hazard warranty.
04-26-2010, 11:33 AM
#10
I put on Michelin AS Plus and I'm really happy with the way they ride. They are an all season tire, so they aren't going to be as sticky as a summer tire, but they have a 40K mile predicted tread life on them.
05-19-2010, 11:11 AM
#12
Burning Brakes
I put Michelin Run-Flats on my C-5 and it was a different car - much better feel, ride, and tracking.
I realize this is the C-6 forum and I do now have a C-6 (2010).
I almost put Michelin tires on the C-6 at delivery - I now wish I did.
I realize this is the C-6 forum and I do now have a C-6 (2010).
I almost put Michelin tires on the C-6 at delivery - I now wish I did.
05-19-2010, 12:12 PM
#14
Drifting
Firestone Firehawk Wide Ovals. Get the price from tire rack, then call a firestone store tell them the price. 9 times out of 10 they will price match. That way you don't have to pay for shipping (although it's not really that much). 
05-19-2010, 12:19 PM
#15
05-19-2010, 12:22 PM
#16
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 46,111
Received 2,485 Likes
on
1,947 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
"In honor of jpee"
I read the test and, while I think it is an indicator of how tires compare, it's still not an apples to apples comparison for at least a few reasons.
First, the Michelins were not the ZP or runflats, a feature that does change tire characteristics a little.
Second, the tire size tested was a 17 inch, all around.
And third, it wasn't a staggered-size, front-to-rear tire test which changes how both ends gain or lose traction.
Still, it's about the only information in writing that we have so far.
First, the Michelins were not the ZP or runflats, a feature that does change tire characteristics a little.
Second, the tire size tested was a 17 inch, all around.
And third, it wasn't a staggered-size, front-to-rear tire test which changes how both ends gain or lose traction.
Still, it's about the only information in writing that we have so far.
05-19-2010, 12:23 PM
#17
I read the test and, while I think it is an indicator of how tires compare, it's still not an apples to apples comparison for at least a few reasons.
First, the Michelins were not the ZP or runflats, a feature that does change tire characteristics a little.
Second, the tire size tested was a 17 inch, all around.
And third, it wasn't a staggered-size, front-to-rear tire test which changes how both ends gain or lose traction.
Still, it's about the only information in writing that we have so far.
First, the Michelins were not the ZP or runflats, a feature that does change tire characteristics a little.
Second, the tire size tested was a 17 inch, all around.
And third, it wasn't a staggered-size, front-to-rear tire test which changes how both ends gain or lose traction.
Still, it's about the only information in writing that we have so far.
Well stated
05-19-2010, 12:28 PM
#18
NCM Member
I got (4) Firestone Firehawk Wide Ovals RFT last week and I can't begin to tell you what better riding tires they are. And not half the noise. And 1/2 the price od the Goodyear supercar tires.
05-19-2010, 07:58 PM
#19
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,954
Received 2,054 Likes
on
1,364 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Most C6 owners who buy the Mich PS2 ZP rave about the tire, but they are usually comparing them to an old, worn out, hard-as-rocks set of Supercars.
There was one member who posted a comparison of his almost new Supercars to his new PS2 ZP's, but i can't find the thread with his comments. Can anyone find the link?
There was one member who posted a comparison of his almost new Supercars to his new PS2 ZP's, but i can't find the thread with his comments. Can anyone find the link?
05-19-2010, 08:27 PM
#20
Racer
Just got off tire rack site looking for front tires for my 2005 ( 2nd set) with 59,772 miles.
Of the UTOG codes the Michelin had the best for RF's at 500, AA, A and a 93Y weight and speed code. The survey results was interesting and labeled them M's quitter than the GY SC's I now have on the front. The price was $259 ea and road hazard of #31.08/tire.
From Delaware to Florida shipping was $73.
BTW I have 27,000 miles on my front GY SC's. Tire pressure makes all the difference.
Hope this helps.
Mike
Of the UTOG codes the Michelin had the best for RF's at 500, AA, A and a 93Y weight and speed code. The survey results was interesting and labeled them M's quitter than the GY SC's I now have on the front. The price was $259 ea and road hazard of #31.08/tire.
From Delaware to Florida shipping was $73.
BTW I have 27,000 miles on my front GY SC's. Tire pressure makes all the difference.
Hope this helps.
Mike