looking to buy a radar detector
#61
Racer
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Woodland Hills Utah
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I'm also looking to buy. I haven't had one for 10 years or more, so all this is pretty new to me.
But I am very curious about the rave comments here for the Valentine One, yet a popular radar test site (http://www.radartest.com/article.asp?articleid=9090) gives top honors to the Bel rx65. I'd like to hear what you friends think of that test author's comments, where about the V1 he says,
"The Valentine One is a highly sensitive radar detector--good enough that I declared it the winner of my 2000 Automobile Magazine shootout--but it's no longer top dog by default. The world has changed since it was designed in 1991. The Apple IIsi also was hot stuff that year but Apple knew better than to continue selling the same box. They replaced it with smaller, faster, better models packed with advanced features.
"Valentine and their V1 seem locked in a time warp. Even the owner manual reflects 1980s thinking, replete with wildly outdated statements such as "X-band [is] most common for moving and stationary [radar]." Huh? 47 of the 50 state highway patrols abandoned it years ago."
But I am very curious about the rave comments here for the Valentine One, yet a popular radar test site (http://www.radartest.com/article.asp?articleid=9090) gives top honors to the Bel rx65. I'd like to hear what you friends think of that test author's comments, where about the V1 he says,
"The Valentine One is a highly sensitive radar detector--good enough that I declared it the winner of my 2000 Automobile Magazine shootout--but it's no longer top dog by default. The world has changed since it was designed in 1991. The Apple IIsi also was hot stuff that year but Apple knew better than to continue selling the same box. They replaced it with smaller, faster, better models packed with advanced features.
"Valentine and their V1 seem locked in a time warp. Even the owner manual reflects 1980s thinking, replete with wildly outdated statements such as "X-band [is] most common for moving and stationary [radar]." Huh? 47 of the 50 state highway patrols abandoned it years ago."
#62
My patent attorney friend screwed up. He was researching Escort, not Valentine. Your tax dollars at work... Although he said, maybe in defense of his error, that he thinks the Mike Valentine patent could be successfully challenged, but that is too technical for my money to go into here. However, a second antenna, pointed to the front, with a reflector housed above the unit would do the same job as V1's rear facer--and is NOT protected by Valentine's patent...in case one of our techies wants to come up with something new...
The Bel (same thing as the Escort, basically) STI has two antennae housings and 2 LNAs--they do not say which way they point. Many detectors have rear LASER "antennae," but I haven't found any one who claims a rear antenna for radar. It seems the clear rear vision is for laser pickup. Although I still seem to recall the old Passport having a rear antenna, from facts in evidence you are correct. Thanks for the correction to my post.
BTW, if you drive in VA, the Valentine's rear antenna will make it 4 times easier to pick up on a Spectre II radar detector detector from the rear. Something to keep in mind. Nothing is free...
The Bel (same thing as the Escort, basically) STI has two antennae housings and 2 LNAs--they do not say which way they point. Many detectors have rear LASER "antennae," but I haven't found any one who claims a rear antenna for radar. It seems the clear rear vision is for laser pickup. Although I still seem to recall the old Passport having a rear antenna, from facts in evidence you are correct. Thanks for the correction to my post.
BTW, if you drive in VA, the Valentine's rear antenna will make it 4 times easier to pick up on a Spectre II radar detector detector from the rear. Something to keep in mind. Nothing is free...
#63
Racer
I'm also looking to buy. I haven't had one for 10 years or more, so all this is pretty new to me.
But I am very curious about the rave comments here for the Valentine One, yet a popular radar test site (http://www.radartest.com/article.asp?articleid=9090) gives top honors to the Bel rx65. I'd like to hear what you friends think of that test author's comments, where about the V1 he says,
"The Valentine One is a highly sensitive radar detector--good enough that I declared it the winner of my 2000 Automobile Magazine shootout--but it's no longer top dog by default. The world has changed since it was designed in 1991. The Apple IIsi also was hot stuff that year but Apple knew better than to continue selling the same box. They replaced it with smaller, faster, better models packed with advanced features.
"Valentine and their V1 seem locked in a time warp. Even the owner manual reflects 1980s thinking, replete with wildly outdated statements such as "X-band [is] most common for moving and stationary [radar]." Huh? 47 of the 50 state highway patrols abandoned it years ago."
But I am very curious about the rave comments here for the Valentine One, yet a popular radar test site (http://www.radartest.com/article.asp?articleid=9090) gives top honors to the Bel rx65. I'd like to hear what you friends think of that test author's comments, where about the V1 he says,
"The Valentine One is a highly sensitive radar detector--good enough that I declared it the winner of my 2000 Automobile Magazine shootout--but it's no longer top dog by default. The world has changed since it was designed in 1991. The Apple IIsi also was hot stuff that year but Apple knew better than to continue selling the same box. They replaced it with smaller, faster, better models packed with advanced features.
"Valentine and their V1 seem locked in a time warp. Even the owner manual reflects 1980s thinking, replete with wildly outdated statements such as "X-band [is] most common for moving and stationary [radar]." Huh? 47 of the 50 state highway patrols abandoned it years ago."
Last edited by louloumax; 08-06-2007 at 06:07 PM. Reason: afterthought
#64
I'm also looking to buy. I haven't had one for 10 years or more, so all this is pretty new to me.
But I am very curious about the rave comments here for the Valentine One, yet a popular radar test site (http://www.radartest.com/article.asp?articleid=9090) gives top honors to the Bel rx65. I'd like to hear what you friends think of that test author's comments, where about the V1 he says,
"The Valentine One is a highly sensitive radar detector--good enough that I declared it the winner of my 2000 Automobile Magazine shootout--but it's no longer top dog by default. The world has changed since it was designed in 1991. The Apple IIsi also was hot stuff that year but Apple knew better than to continue selling the same box. They replaced it with smaller, faster, better models packed with advanced features.
"Valentine and their V1 seem locked in a time warp. Even the owner manual reflects 1980s thinking, replete with wildly outdated statements such as "X-band [is] most common for moving and stationary [radar]." Huh? 47 of the 50 state highway patrols abandoned it years ago."
But I am very curious about the rave comments here for the Valentine One, yet a popular radar test site (http://www.radartest.com/article.asp?articleid=9090) gives top honors to the Bel rx65. I'd like to hear what you friends think of that test author's comments, where about the V1 he says,
"The Valentine One is a highly sensitive radar detector--good enough that I declared it the winner of my 2000 Automobile Magazine shootout--but it's no longer top dog by default. The world has changed since it was designed in 1991. The Apple IIsi also was hot stuff that year but Apple knew better than to continue selling the same box. They replaced it with smaller, faster, better models packed with advanced features.
"Valentine and their V1 seem locked in a time warp. Even the owner manual reflects 1980s thinking, replete with wildly outdated statements such as "X-band [is] most common for moving and stationary [radar]." Huh? 47 of the 50 state highway patrols abandoned it years ago."
http://www.radardetector.net/viewtop...biassed+biased
http://www.radardetector.net/viewtopic.php?t=23628
http://www.guysoflidar.com/march-2007/sabotage.html
#65