C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is your C6 Vette better then…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2007, 09:03 PM
  #41  
framebender
Racer
 
framebender's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Apple Valley Mn
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I worked for a Chevrolet dealer in the late 60's and drove every fast Chev they built including the now popular mid 60's stingrays. The vettes back then were a real rattletrap. Bought a 69 z28 off the showfloor and have owned many camaros since. The c6 is hands down a great all around car for power, mileage, comfort, and driveability. Thr old stuff is great to look at , but I don't want to drive them.
Old 03-01-2007, 09:39 PM
  #42  
markabc6
Racer
 
markabc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Overland Park Kansas
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by capevettes
Progress is also a double edged sword. ... When the new cars are out of warranty they will be very expensive and difficult to fix.


But, they said the same thing about the v8, automatic transmission, power steering, 4v carb, electronic ign, cfi, computers, etc, etc... nearly every decade or so there is another new fangled gizmo to go out/give me trouble/too expensive...but we still "breed" the "need for speed"

It takes (lots of) money and knowledge to go fast.

Do I (still) love the old muscle cars (hell ya)…just as much as I will drool over the next gen of muscle not yet delivered.

to progress
Old 03-01-2007, 10:23 PM
  #43  
CessnaDriver
Melting Slicks
 
CessnaDriver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 2,198
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Christ I had a point and shoot 69 Camaro with a 454 stuffed in it and had much fun with it, cut my teeth on real power with that one, loved the sounds and looks, but time marches on.

Apples and oranges really.

But I will say this, a nice looking restored popular muscle car will turn heads more then a new Vette. Just the way it is.

Old 03-01-2007, 10:35 PM
  #44  
PAVette
Melting Slicks
 
PAVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Carlisle PA
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

69 Boss 302. Lots of great cars at the Convention Center....saw a few steals. Great show.
Old 03-01-2007, 11:00 PM
  #45  
toolking
Drifting
 
toolking's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 1,651
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Larry B.
I have had a number of hi performance cars over the years including BB corvettes. A stock C6 is far superior. Not only is it quicker and faster but you can live with it daily without it overheating. You can enjoy good working A/C. It idles nice. You don't have to adjust the carb every few days. No choke that is too rich or too lean. No points to burn out or adjust. The list is endless. Oops. I forgot to mention that it gets twice the mileage.
And it stops!
Old 03-01-2007, 11:19 PM
  #46  
Maui
Le Mans Master
 
Maui's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: The left Coast
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

Here's a picture of my first muscle car. 1970 Chevelle SS396 numbers matching.



Here's my new muscle car



The Chevelle was just raw power and handled like crap until I installed tubular suspension. It was a great car and I really miss it.

The C6 is so different. Speed with handling and comfort. What can I say?
Old 03-02-2007, 12:26 AM
  #47  
RBYCC
Drifting
 
RBYCC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Rehoboth Beach Delaware
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 6spdC6
My best muscle car was my new purchased 67 Dodge RT, 440, Vert, auto tranny. I did a lot of street racing in that era (67 -71) and my car was considered perty quick. It had lots of work done to it as I worked PT at a buddy’s speed shop. ( headers, ignition, Edelbrock intake with a 3310 Holly, head work, special no number Chrysler performance cam and valve springs, reworked Hemi auto tranny, 3.91 or 4.10 pumpkin and a bunch of other things. It was good for constant mid 12s at the 1/4 mile. It was the only car I owned and was driven year around.
In the last 10 years did some research and found do to its combination of colors (Kind of a bronze color, similar to DSOM of today) /options would have been a rare car, possibly 1 of.
Great car
I bought the 67 R/T in October of 67, only the hardtop....same color "turbine bronze metallic" with a black vinyl roof !!!
Stock it ran mid to high thirteens at 102mph. Heads, headers, 283/283 cam, worked torqueflite and a 4.10 or 4.56 gear got it to consistent mid to high twelves at 108mph. Had the disc brake option which was rare !!!!

C6 is a very fast and driveable car...muscle cars took a lot of "muscle" to drive !!!!!
Old 03-02-2007, 12:40 AM
  #48  
RBYCC
Drifting
 
RBYCC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Rehoboth Beach Delaware
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This was my most "muscular" of cars....same power to weight ratio as the Z06 but not as streetable !!!
Idled at 3000rpm
Ran high tens and 132mph with big tires and a 5.12 gear.
Only fifty of the light weight Hemi's built in 1964.

Sold it in 1972 for $3500.....if I only knew then what I know now


Old 03-02-2007, 01:18 AM
  #49  
07 Lemans Z51 Coupe
Pro
 
07 Lemans Z51 Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default You've touched a nerve

Back in the day I owned a Plymouth Satellite with a 383 and an AFB 4 barrel carbuerator that I think I still have some springs left over from.
I owned a 66 Mustang 289 Convertible, a 1959 Chevy wagon with a 348four barrel, and even rebuilt a slant six engine. I raced my old station wagons through the canyons, using the rear end slide to save time through the turns.

All of the modern sports cars I've owned have been far better cars than those, and the C6 is no exception. Fine car. But something has clearly been lost. I would no more try to fix my own cars these days than build a computer.

I'd never give up modern brakes or reliability. It is wonderful to drive over a mountain pass with the air conditioning on and not have the car overheat. And yet.......... there is a reason for nostalgia. Those were cars we could bond with, personalize without looking like bling posers, and we understood the "personality" of those cars.

I don't know how you can pass that along to your son. I did a lousy job of passing it along to my kids, since I was too worried about the vehicles to allow kids to turn wrenches. If I were to do it over again, I might buy a couple of fixer uppers, and just have the kids turn wrenches to see what the results would be.
Old 03-02-2007, 02:26 AM
  #50  
LAR
Intermediate
 
LAR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Fairbanks AK
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default The 'Good Old Days'

I grew up in the "sixties". My Mom's best friend from high school and her husband always had a Corvette. Starting with a C1. They would get a new one every couple of years. In 1967 they had a matching '67 yellow C2 and a 67' yellow Malibu. Both with 327's and 4-speeds. I would wet myself thinking about them. In 1968, when I was in 9th grade (14 yrs old) and starting to appreciate cars, I read a book called "The Red Car" by Don Stanford. (It is still in print). That book forever changed how I thought about cars. I knew then that I wanted a sports car. Anybody can go fast in a straight line; going around the curves is where the challenge is!

I learned to drive in 1969 in my neighbor's 1967 Impala convertible. A boat, to be sure, but it was cutting edge then with 'radial' tires, front and rear sway bars, Koni shocks, and a high performance 327 w/ a 4-speed. At one point it had a "Man-a-Fre" aluminum intake manifold w/ three 2bb carburetors on it and a high lift cam. It handled well and I learned to maneuver through the back hills roads fairly well. But it still was not a sports car.

Fast forward to today: My 1967 Camaro RS is my first love (after my Harley Sportster). I spent 2 1/2 years working out my plan for modifying it. When I realized (1) what it would cost to get it where I wanted and (2) that it still was not a Corvette, and (3) that it would actually depreciate in value as I made modifications to it, I decided to leave it close to stock and instead buy what I wanted. A Corvette.

In 2005 I started reading about the C6. Then I saw the Z06 and it was love at first sight all over again! I planned for a year to get my Z06 (my first Corvette) and in Feb 2006 I took delivery of my Red Z06. It was awesome!! I had the privilege of detailing it before it left the dealer's showroom floor. It was almost a spiritual experience.

Comparison? There is none! It is apples and oranges. Two different animals. The Camaro is raw and visceral. It gets up and goes! But it could never keep up with the Z06 either in a straight line or around the corners. The Vette is totally comfortable and refined with all the high tech gadgets and electronics that I thought I didn't want. Now, I wouldn't trade my C6 for anything!!

Both cars look great on my wife but the Camaro actually turns more heads. All three of my (adult) sons want the RS. They like the Vette but there is something about the '67 that just grabs your attention. And a lot of that is from the younger folks.

But pick any area (acoustics, gas mileage, technology, comfort, safety, etc.) and the C6 comes out the winner. I drive them for different reasons. Just remember the Camaro is 40 years old now. The Camaro originally came with 14 inch wheels; the Z06 comes with 14 inch disc brakes! Now I have to admit I have been pondering an LS7 in the RS....
Old 03-02-2007, 08:29 AM
  #51  
6spdC6
Team Owner
 
6spdC6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Northern NYs Adirondack Mountains,http://www.visitsacandaga.com.
Posts: 34,641
Received 146 Likes on 109 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RBYCC
I bought the 67 R/T in October of 67, only the hardtop....same color "turbine bronze metallic" with a black vinyl roof !!!
Stock it ran mid to high thirteens at 102mph. Heads, headers, 283/283 cam, worked torqueflite and a 4.10 or 4.56 gear got it to consistent mid to high twelves at 108mph. Had the disc brake option which was rare !!!!
:
You had a nice car.
As I stated I had some rare options. I also had the KH disc brakes & console with a floor shift for the HEMI auto tranny (early car), bucket seats, clock. I found out there were only 200 Verts made in 67 so the chances that my car was a 1 of are quite good.
The special no part number cam was arranged threw the late Dick Landy.
My speed shop owning buddy had a couple of NHRA record cars and I met Mr.Landy at quite a few meets. We talked about my car and he gave me quite a few pointers, That cam I had never officially existed ,and trying to get it drove the parts manger crazy at the dealership. From what D.L. said best bet that cam was a prototype for a six pack motor.

Have a good one, Dave
Old 03-02-2007, 08:49 AM
  #52  
RBYCC
Drifting
 
RBYCC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Rehoboth Beach Delaware
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 6spdC6
You had a nice car.
As I stated I had some rare options. I also had the KH disc brakes & console with a floor shift for the HEMI auto tranny (early car), bucket seats, clock. I found out there were only 200 Verts made in 67 so the chances that my car was a 1 of are quite good.
The special no part number cam was arranged threw the late Dick Landy.
My speed shop owning buddy had a couple of NHRA record cars and I met Mr.Landy at quite a few meets. We talked about my car and he gave me quite a few pointers, That cam I had never officially existed ,and trying to get it drove the parts manger crazy at the dealership. From what D.L. said best bet that cam was a prototype for a six pack motor.

Have a good one, Dave
Dave
Same options here...Believe the cam was the 283/283 duration.
Jere Stahl did the headers and the heads and tune were done by Tony Pizzi (ex-Bill Jenkins and owner of the "world's fastest Z-28" )
If you look at my other post with the max performance hemi, the hemi was a second tier factory car. Used to get my parts direct from Dick Maxwell at Chrysler performance and they would come after use from the first tier guys like Dick Landy, Butch Leal, and Ronny Sox.
The R/T was actually the tow car for my Hemi. One of the first ones produced and from the dealer who sponsored the Hemi. Eventually turned it into a SS/FA !

Those were the days....but the C6 is scary fast for a street car !!!
Ed A.
Old 03-02-2007, 09:16 AM
  #53  
nalto
Racer
 
nalto's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Brandon Mississippi
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I restored a 1971 boss 351 Mach 1 mustang it was red with black hood. I bought it from the UPS driver that delivered to my area for $300. It had major engine damage(nocking rod, spun bearing) and gutted interior. How does it compare to my C6? Well first and foremost the Mach 1 was a tank! it handled extreemly poorly and stoped poorly. But stomp the go pedal and it got fun in a hurry. still not near as fast as the C6 though, but it was all we had back then.
Old 03-02-2007, 09:26 AM
  #54  
rjr2007
Melting Slicks
 
rjr2007's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The old cars are very nice But there is always something to fix on them.
Old 03-02-2007, 09:46 AM
  #55  
NOVAVETTE
Burning Brakes
 
NOVAVETTE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Conshohocken (Suburb of Philadelphia) PA
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Below is a picture of my first 'Vette which I started driving in 1985.
It wasn't exactly fast or muscle car, but it did get me hooked on Chevy Hatchbacks.
So much so, that fast forward to 2007 and I am now the proud owner of a much quicker (and better looking) Z06.
Funny, but when I was 16, my first 'Vette did look kind of sporty to me.


Old 03-02-2007, 10:19 AM
  #56  
anothercrisis
Burning Brakes
 
anothercrisis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08
Default

Originally Posted by Dave@Kerbeck.com
But the fact that you knew how to all of that made you a driver! You were part of the car. There are far too many people in today's world who simply get in a car, turn a key (or press a button) and drive no knowing anything else about their cars.

I think the those people who grew up knowing how to do things to their cars made for better drivers. People like that, even today, pay attention to their cars, not their cell phones etc!

All three of my kids (2 girls and a boy) already know the rules...you don't get your license till you can drive a stick and an automatic, you can change a tire, check fluids and do an oil change. Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I think it makes a difference!
I agree. I love the old muscle cars, but partly because I knew how they worked. I remember setting the points on one vehicle on the side of the road with a matchbook cover as the feeler gauge! The cover was the perfiect setting...as I remember .015....
I think I was more a part of the car. I knew what was wrong when something went bump or crack.

It doesn't take long on these boards to understand that the generation after mine (and later) sometimes doesn't really understand what makes the car go and how GENERALLY things work. A few posts like ..."why does my engine squeal when I rev it....?", tells you that under the hood is a foreign place for some.

I don't in any way mean these comments as a flame; just observation. These same folks could lose me on a computer or other techno toy very quickly. I say this as my VCR ....yes VCR ......flashes 12:00 !!!

I am saying and agreeing that things have changed and I like the old muscle cars, but I try to understand why it is not the same for everyone. I think the Vette in the end is much more driveable and is much more car, but the techno stuff has left me as well as many others behind.

anothercrisis
Old 03-02-2007, 04:07 PM
  #57  
RBYCC
Drifting
 
RBYCC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Rehoboth Beach Delaware
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NOVAVETTE
Below is a picture of my first 'Vette which I started driving in 1985.
It wasn't exactly fast or muscle car, but it did get me hooked on Chevy Hatchbacks.
So much so, that fast forward to 2007 and I am now the proud owner of a much quicker (and better looking) Z06.
Funny, but when I was 16, my first 'Vette did look kind of sporty to me.
Lou

Looks like you couldn't resist getting back into a Vette!!!
Your wheels are still looking good.

Ed A.


Get notified of new replies

To Is your C6 Vette better then…

Old 03-02-2007, 07:47 PM
  #58  
Gman in NC
Melting Slicks
 
Gman in NC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Kernersville NC
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 75 Posts

Default

I think what made the muscle cars of the 60s and early 70s (I had a 70 Dodge Charger 500) was the lack of good suspension, tires, and brakes. You could get quite a thrill in those things at a lot less speed than the C6. The C6 sure is better all around.
Old 03-02-2007, 08:56 PM
  #59  
Corvette ED
Le Mans Master
 
Corvette ED's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2000
Location: Pottsville, PA. USA Home Of America's Oldest Brewery Yuengling
Posts: 9,064
Received 2,239 Likes on 1,033 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by loflite
Like said earlier, it is apples and oranges. I own and drive a numbers matching '69 427 tri-power corvette which I love. It puts a great smile on my face everytime a fire it up. Sounds real tough and mean. Certainly tougher than a new C6. My new stock '07 will clean it's clock. No competition. Which would I drive on a 100+ mile trip?, the '07 no doubt. Much nicer, reliable, and quicker. The '69 sounds and looks tougher, but doesn't come close. I drive it for completely different reasons than the new one.
I have a 75 L-82 Yellow Convertible that is fun to drive but doesn't compare to the new Vettes. The only thing better about the old cars to the new ones is they aren't loosing money every year that you own them.
Old 03-02-2007, 09:24 PM
  #60  
John Bravo
Racer
 
John Bravo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Wantagh New York
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave@Kerbeck.com
…your old muscle cars?

Here’s why I ask. This past weekend was the annual Atlantic City Antique and Muscle Car Show and Auction. Like every year, I took my eleven year old son. We were walking around looking at the cars and taking pictures and having a good time.

Here’s the rub. Whenever I went to admire a real muscle car like a Buick GS Stage 1, a Yenko Camaro, GTO Judge or, heaven forbid, a Barracuda (gasp) my son would say the same thing. He would say things like, “Yeah, but the C6 is lighter with good tires”, or, “Yeah, but it could never hang with the Z06” or, when looking at a new Saleen, he commented, “The SS will blow that car away!”

I guess someday, he’ll take his son to a show and show him a 2007 Z06 and his son will talk about some new car that is way better, but it still makes me wonder.

After selling Corvettes for going on 13 years, I know that most of my customers had a muscle car when growing up, still have their muscle car, or are trying to find/restore their favorite muscle car.

So, what muscle car did you drive and how does you C6 compare? If you have any pictures of your old Heavy Metal, post it up so everyone can share!
I still have an original 70ss Chevelle but mostly choose to drive my vette when I get a chance. Muscle cars are now big investments and the thought of blowing the numbers matching motor or rear is just scary to me.


Quick Reply: Is your C6 Vette better then…



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.