Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

[Z06] Some Real World Stats for the C7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2013, 11:42 AM
  #1  
Ultra_Miner
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Ultra_Miner's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Some Real World Stats for the C7

Automobile magazine has a first drive review of the new Stingray. Here are a few stats from the article:
Price: $51,995/$69,775 (base/as tested)
Powertrain Engine: 16-valve OHV Displacement: 6.2 liters (376 cu in) Power: 460 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 465 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Transmission: 7-speed manual
Drive: Rear-wheel Chassis / Steering: Electrically assisted Front Suspension: Control arms, transverse leaf spring Rear Suspension: Control arms, transverse leaf spring
Brakes: Vented discs, ABS
Tires: Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP Tire sizes F, R: 245/35R-19 (89Y), 285/30R-20 (95Y)
Measurements L x W x H: 177.0 x 73.9 x 48.6 in
Wheelbase: 106.7 in Track F/R: 62.8/61.6 in
Weight: 3402 lb
Weight dist. F/R: 50/50%
0-60 mph: 4.1 sec
Top Speed: 185 mph (est.)
EPA mileage: 17/29 mpg (est.)

Looks like they weigh about 300 lbs more than us, about the same 0-60 and mpg. Glad to know my 11 year old Chevy with a 350 can still hang! and at half the price! Rock on C5 Z06!
Old 07-25-2013, 01:10 PM
  #2  
Masterofsod
Intermediate
 
Masterofsod's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow! More evidence that the C5 Z06 is a phenomenal car! When you think about bang per $ you just can't beat it!
Old 07-25-2013, 01:12 PM
  #3  
dangerz
Melting Slicks
 
dangerz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 3,086
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10

Default

Originally Posted by Masterofsod
Wow! More evidence that the C5 Z06 is a phenomenal car! When you think about bang per $ you just can't beat it!
Numbers don't tell the whole story. Don't get me wrong, I love my c5z, but there's no doubt in my mind that stock for stock the c7 is going to teach us a lesson or two around the track.
Old 07-25-2013, 02:46 PM
  #4  
vant
Burning Brakes
 
vant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dangerz
Numbers don't tell the whole story. Don't get me wrong, I love my c5z, but there's no doubt in my mind that stock for stock the c7 is going to teach us a lesson or two around the track.
That may or may not be true. But I can't wait to find out for myself.
Old 07-25-2013, 03:06 PM
  #5  
Ultra_Miner
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Ultra_Miner's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sure the new suspension should be better. But as you can see they are saying 1.07 g on the skid pad for the C7 vs. C5Z06 at what .98 to 1 g.
Then braking I believe they say 60 to 0 107', vs. 104' for the C5Z. Just goes to show you the guys that engineered our cars did a phenomenal engineering job using 11 year old technology. Still relevant in todays terms. Gotta love it.
Old 07-25-2013, 03:13 PM
  #6  
racebum
Race Director
 
racebum's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 15,978
Received 153 Likes on 146 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ultra_Miner
Sure the new suspension should be better. But as you can see they are saying 1.07 g on the skid pad for the C7 vs. C5Z06 at what .98 to 1 g.
Then braking I believe they say 60 to 0 107', vs. 104' for the C5Z. Just goes to show you the guys that engineered our cars did a phenomenal engineering job using 11 year old technology. Still relevant in todays terms. Gotta love it.
has almost nothing to do with tech and everything to do with tires

the supercar the c5z spec'd on will get its *** handed to it by the michelin pss

put a c5z on the pss in 305 30 19 and 265 35 18 and i'm sure it could meet or beat those numbers. it's a lighter car
Old 07-25-2013, 03:38 PM
  #7  
Ultra_Miner
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Ultra_Miner's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's what I'm saying, 11 year old tech, the GY Supercar tire, and they still pulled those specs. I agree put modern tires on the C5Z and watch out. Oh and all the light weight talk GM has out about the C7 and they still get a car that is 300 lbs. heavier. If I were a C5Z GM engineer I would be very proud of myself, you guys did a helluva job, thank you!

Also I find it funny when Chevy announced the price of the C7 at +/- $55,000 and all the cars the reviewers are getting are closer to $70,000 as tested.
Old 07-25-2013, 03:45 PM
  #8  
joenationwide
Racer
 
joenationwide's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Leesburg VA
Posts: 300
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ultra_Miner
That's what I'm saying, 11 year old tech, the GY Supercar tire, and they still pulled those specs. I agree put modern tires on the C5Z and watch out. Oh and all the light weight talk GM has out about the C7 and they still get a car that is 300 lbs. heavier. If I were a C5Z GM engineer I would be very proud of myself, you guys did a helluva job, thank you!

Also I find it funny when Chevy announced the price of the C7 at +/- $55,000 and all the cars the reviewers are getting are closer to $70,000 as tested.
The new C7 starts at $51k. The Z51 package is only $2800. So thats $54k. The $70k cars are loaded with all the leather and plush BS.

The C5Z was a phenomenal car when it launched, and still is. Its also the best performance value out there. But the C7 is still a leap in technology and performance from the C5Z. Remember we are comparing a C7 non Z06 to the C5 Z06. The C7 Z06 should be something.
Old 07-25-2013, 03:49 PM
  #9  
Driver220
Pro
 
Driver220's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2012
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 560
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

If you watch the motortrend review, they pulled 1.11g on the skidpad o_O
Old 07-25-2013, 04:41 PM
  #10  
envyz06
Melting Slicks
 
envyz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: Denton Texas
Posts: 2,215
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Both are great cars, but still c5z bang for your buck is unmistakable.
Old 07-25-2013, 05:35 PM
  #11  
DARRYLZO6
Drifting
 
DARRYLZO6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: Always in my lane.
Posts: 1,438
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ultra_Miner
Automobile magazine has a first drive review of the new Stingray. Here are a few stats from the article:
Price: $51,995/$69,775 (base/as tested)
Powertrain Engine: 16-valve OHV Displacement: 6.2 liters (376 cu in) Power: 460 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 465 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Transmission: 7-speed manual
Drive: Rear-wheel Chassis / Steering: Electrically assisted Front Suspension: Control arms, transverse leaf spring Rear Suspension: Control arms, transverse leaf spring
Brakes: Vented discs, ABS
Tires: Michelin Pilot Super Sport ZP Tire sizes F, R: 245/35R-19 (89Y), 285/30R-20 (95Y)
Measurements L x W x H: 177.0 x 73.9 x 48.6 in
Wheelbase: 106.7 in Track F/R: 62.8/61.6 in
Weight: 3402 lb
Weight dist. F/R: 50/50%
0-60 mph: 4.1 sec
Top Speed: 185 mph (est.)
EPA mileage: 17/29 mpg (est.)

Looks like they weigh about 300 lbs more than us, about the same 0-60 and mpg. Glad to know my 11 year old Chevy with a 350 can still hang! and at half the price! Rock on C5 Z06!
Not only that but with minor mods,headers, CAI, and tuning, a stock C7 will be in my rearview mirror for sho!!!
Old 07-25-2013, 06:04 PM
  #12  
racebum
Race Director
 
racebum's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 15,978
Received 153 Likes on 146 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by joenationwide
The new C7 starts at $51k. The Z51 package is only $2800. So thats $54k. The $70k cars are loaded with all the leather and plush BS.

The C5Z was a phenomenal car when it launched, and still is. Its also the best performance value out there. But the C7 is still a leap in technology and performance from the C5Z. Remember we are comparing a C7 non Z06 to the C5 Z06. The C7 Z06 should be something.
leap in tech yes

leap in performance? how exactly are we measuring performance?

c5z is what? 300lbs lighter and has a very similar frame and suspension layout?

where's the performance leap? the only reason the text numbers look good is that michelin pss, well, unless you're looking at straight line stuff which is just a hp contest

would love to see a c7 on goodyear supercars. anyone want to guess what the slalom and skidpad would be?

as for price the only other 20k car i can think of that competes with the c5z for track terrorist is the evo 8/9
Old 07-25-2013, 06:35 PM
  #13  
joenationwide
Racer
 
joenationwide's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Leesburg VA
Posts: 300
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by racebum
leap in tech yes

leap in performance? how exactly are we measuring performance?

c5z is what? 300lbs lighter and has a very similar frame and suspension layout?

where's the performance leap? the only reason the text numbers look good is that michelin pss, well, unless you're looking at straight line stuff which is just a hp contest

would love to see a c7 on goodyear supercars. anyone want to guess what the slalom and skidpad would be?

as for price the only other 20k car i can think of that competes with the c5z for track terrorist is the evo 8/9
Well the C5Z is not really track ready without upgrading the radiator and adding an EOC and diff cooler, and probably a trans cooler too. The C7 Z51 comes with all these things stock plus a dry sump. Better radiator cooling and reduces front and rear end lift for better aero. And it comes with 2 pc floating rotors. Also comes with better bolstered seats. And a 7 speed close ratio gearbox, so now you can use more than 3-4th gear on track. Right there says to me it is track ready. The performance leap is dramatic from c5 to c7. It's minor from c5z to c7 z51, but I'd have to think there will be no contest compared to the c7z.
Old 07-25-2013, 08:19 PM
  #14  
skyavonee
Melting Slicks
 
skyavonee's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,334
Received 112 Likes on 78 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by joenationwide
Well the C5Z is not really track ready without upgrading the radiator and adding an EOC and diff cooler, and probably a trans cooler too.
You can run these cars pretty damn hard in 20-minute HPDE sessions without aftermarket cooling.

Originally Posted by joenationwide
The performance leap is... minor from c5z to c7 z51, but I'd have to think there will be no contest compared to the c7z.
No need to jump ahead two generations; there's no contest between the C5Z and C6Z. Obviously the C7Z will stomp us, whenever it's released.
Old 07-25-2013, 09:35 PM
  #15  
racebum
Race Director
 
racebum's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 15,978
Received 153 Likes on 146 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by joenationwide
Well the C5Z is not really track ready without upgrading the radiator and adding an EOC and diff cooler, and probably a trans cooler too. The C7 Z51 comes with all these things stock plus a dry sump. Better radiator cooling and reduces front and rear end lift for better aero. And it comes with 2 pc floating rotors. Also comes with better bolstered seats. And a 7 speed close ratio gearbox, so now you can use more than 3-4th gear on track. Right there says to me it is track ready. The performance leap is dramatic from c5 to c7. It's minor from c5z to c7 z51, but I'd have to think there will be no contest compared to the c7z.
we'll have to see

GM doesn't have a good record of making cars that are track ready.

the c5z can run a 15 minute session stock

the dry sump is a big deal if you run slicks

we'll have to see how this all goes for the c7. would surprise me if GM spent the money to actually do this to any effective degree

the seats and transmission are kind of cool but the main reason i would think people would upgrade are

1. cosmetics
2. it's new
Old 07-26-2013, 09:03 AM
  #16  
PushinTheLimit
Burning Brakes
 
PushinTheLimit's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Crossville TN
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Overall, the C7 is a better car than the C5Z. The brakes, the interior, the cooling mods, among other things is a nice upgrade. But the added weight keeps the C5Z competitive with it.

What I would like to see is take a bone stock C7, C6 LS3, C6 LS2, C6 Z06, C5 Z06 and a C5 LS1, all with the same tires and go run a track like VIR or Road Atlanta and see what kind of lap times can be run in them back to back. And don't use the VIR Grand Course since that's not what is normally raced on. This would give a good indication of how each car compares to one another IMO.
Old 07-26-2013, 09:33 AM
  #17  
amlarson2001
Pro
 
amlarson2001's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Newport MN
Posts: 726
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

The other big thing with the new C7 is it will be much easier to drive fast for any skill level driver. The tech they have there is going to make the car more fun for everyone. Base c7 is not the track car like our Z's. The only reason I will be keeping my 02 is because I cant afford a new C7. And remember your car was 50k when you bought it new. The fact that they can keep the base price just over 50k is amazing considering its been 10+ years.

Get notified of new replies

To Some Real World Stats for the C7

Old 07-26-2013, 12:24 PM
  #18  
JeremyGSU
Drifting
 
JeremyGSU's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Ocala FL
Posts: 1,464
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by skyavonee
You can run these cars pretty damn hard in 20-minute HPDE sessions without aftermarket cooling.
I suppose but I think this is going to very greatly by what track you are at. You'll also probably get it hot as hell which isn't good for it. Prior to my radiator at Sebring in May and June I was hitting 235-245 water in about 15 minutes in my '04 Z. Even with my Doug Rippie oil cooler I still hit 255-260 oil depending on the temp and how long I go.

IMO, the C5 Z will be close to competitive with a C7 in a straight line but fall short in handling and braking. The brakes are just too small with not enough cooling stock and I think the C7 has handling improvements over the C5 as well. The interior and tech is also leaps and bounds over the C5.

Still, it's amazing that for my car nearly being 10 years old the performance is still amazing even today. Most other model cars have been vastly surpassed by their new generations. The C5 Z is still hanging in there.

Last edited by JeremyGSU; 07-26-2013 at 12:31 PM.
Old 07-26-2013, 02:40 PM
  #19  
LSxFTMFW
Instructor
 
LSxFTMFW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Location: Sarasota FL
Posts: 166
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by PushinTheLimit

What I would like to see is take a bone stock C7, C6 LS3, C6 LS2, C6 Z06, C5 Z06 and a C5 LS1, all with the same tires and go run a track like VIR or Road Atlanta and see what kind of lap times can be run in them back to back. And don't use the VIR Grand Course since that's not what is normally raced on. This would give a good indication of how each car compares to one another IMO.
This would be awesome.
Old 07-26-2013, 03:18 PM
  #20  
tbrent
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
tbrent's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: KcMo.
Posts: 3,431
Received 65 Likes on 51 Posts
2018 C5 of Year Winner

Default

Coulda swore I just saw it confirmed somewhere that there won't be a C7Z... Maybe I'm wrong. But if there IS one hopefully they will scrap that god awful back side for a Z06 specific one... YIKES Looks part Camaro part Decepticon


Quick Reply: [Z06] Some Real World Stats for the C7



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 AM.