[Z06] Interesting Observations - Michelin Pilot Sport vs Goodyear SC's
#1
Tech Contributor
Thread Starter
Interesting Observations - Michelin Pilot Sport vs Goodyear SC's
Guys:
While researching new tires for my 04 Z06 (When it comes time to get new tires) , I found an interesting fact between the Michelin Pilot Sport times and the Goodyear Eagle Supercar tires.
Comparing only stock Z06 tire sizes below... (tirerack.com)
1.) Goodyear = 8/32nd tread depth, Michelin = 10/32 tread depth
Might get better tire life from Michelin...
2.) Both are rated at 220 AA A tread wear. Both should wear at the same rate.
3.) Rear Goodyear = 33lbs / Front Goodyear = 29lbs
Rear Michelin = 30lbs / Front Michelin = 26lbs
That equates to 12lbs total reduction of rotating mass on the wheels !!
4.) Rear Goodyear = $295 / Front Goodyear = $253
Rear Michelin = $354 / Front Michelin = $249
What I take from this is that the Michelin tires would last longer (assuming my driving habits stay the same )and would help to reduce rotating mass ! I might feel weight reduction. It would just cost me $102 more to buy the Michelin tires than the Goodyears.
Your thoughts ?
Is anyone running the Michelin Pilot Sports in the factory Z06 sizes ?
How do you find they compare ?
Toque
While researching new tires for my 04 Z06 (When it comes time to get new tires) , I found an interesting fact between the Michelin Pilot Sport times and the Goodyear Eagle Supercar tires.
Comparing only stock Z06 tire sizes below... (tirerack.com)
1.) Goodyear = 8/32nd tread depth, Michelin = 10/32 tread depth
Might get better tire life from Michelin...
2.) Both are rated at 220 AA A tread wear. Both should wear at the same rate.
3.) Rear Goodyear = 33lbs / Front Goodyear = 29lbs
Rear Michelin = 30lbs / Front Michelin = 26lbs
That equates to 12lbs total reduction of rotating mass on the wheels !!
4.) Rear Goodyear = $295 / Front Goodyear = $253
Rear Michelin = $354 / Front Michelin = $249
What I take from this is that the Michelin tires would last longer (assuming my driving habits stay the same )and would help to reduce rotating mass ! I might feel weight reduction. It would just cost me $102 more to buy the Michelin tires than the Goodyears.
Your thoughts ?
Is anyone running the Michelin Pilot Sports in the factory Z06 sizes ?
How do you find they compare ?
Toque
#2
Drifting
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never tried them on my Z...
I raced on them for a couple of seasons. One thing I will say about Michelin tires is the traction is outstanding and the wet grip is incredible. However, when they break lose on you - good luck. In the words of a world champion, "traction, traction, traction... SPIT!"
I raced on them for a couple of seasons. One thing I will say about Michelin tires is the traction is outstanding and the wet grip is incredible. However, when they break lose on you - good luck. In the words of a world champion, "traction, traction, traction... SPIT!"
#3
Get Some!
They are good tires. The reason for the reduced tread depth is the same reason racers shave tires. A tall tread block "wiggles" under hard cornering and braking. I went form the F1 to Toyos and went to the track, it was a big difference, I didn't like the Toyos for the track until they had considerable wear on them.
Also, I added this post and your info to #18 of the FAQ sticky.
Also, I added this post and your info to #18 of the FAQ sticky.
Last edited by LTC Z06; 08-18-2005 at 01:19 PM.
#4
Tech Contributor
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by MAJ Z06
They are good tires. The reason for the reduced tread depth is the same reason racers shave tires. A tall tread block "wiggles" under hard cornering and braking. I went form the F1 to Toyos and went to the track, it was a big difference, I didn't like the Toyos for the track until they had considerable wear on them.
Toque
#5
Get Some!
Originally Posted by Toque
But for a casual driver such as myself.... I might not notice that right?
Toque
Toque
#6
Drifting
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Thompson Falls MT
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Toque
Guys:
2.) Both are rated at 220 AA A tread wear. Both should wear at the same rate.
Toque
2.) Both are rated at 220 AA A tread wear. Both should wear at the same rate.
Toque
#7
Dogface
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: At the Beach, FL
Posts: 25,969
Received 120 Likes
on
60 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15, '17
I think the 220 is supposed to be a standard.
Here is what the Tire Rack says:
Treadwear Grades
UTQG Treadwear Grades are based on actual road use in which the test tire is run in a vehicle convoy along with standardized Course Monitoring Tires. The vehicle repeatedly runs a prescribed 400-mile test loop in West Texas for a total of 7,200 miles. The vehicle can have its alignment set, air pressure checked and tires rotated every 800 miles. The test tire's and the Monitoring Tire's wear are measured during and at the conclusion of the test. The tire manufacturers then assign a Treadwear Grade based on the observed wear rates. The Course Monitoring Tire is assigned a grade and the test tire receives a grade indicating its relative treadwear. A grade of 100 would indicate that the tire tread would last as long as the test tire, 200 would indicate the tread would last twice as long, 300 would indicate three times as long, etc.
The problem with UTQG Treadwear Grades is that they are open to some interpretation on the part of the tire manufacturer because they are assigned after the tire has only experienced a little treadwear as it runs the 7,200 miles. This means that the tire manufacturers need to extrapolate their raw wear data when they are assigning Treadwear Grades, and that their grades can to some extent reflect how conservative or optimistic their marketing department is. Typically, comparing the Treadwear Grades of tire lines within a single brand is somewhat helpful, while attempting to compare the grades between different brands is not as helpful.
So the above statement while true everyone drives there cars differently, and your milage may vary on treadware anyway so get the tire that works for your type of driving.
Here is what the Tire Rack says:
Treadwear Grades
UTQG Treadwear Grades are based on actual road use in which the test tire is run in a vehicle convoy along with standardized Course Monitoring Tires. The vehicle repeatedly runs a prescribed 400-mile test loop in West Texas for a total of 7,200 miles. The vehicle can have its alignment set, air pressure checked and tires rotated every 800 miles. The test tire's and the Monitoring Tire's wear are measured during and at the conclusion of the test. The tire manufacturers then assign a Treadwear Grade based on the observed wear rates. The Course Monitoring Tire is assigned a grade and the test tire receives a grade indicating its relative treadwear. A grade of 100 would indicate that the tire tread would last as long as the test tire, 200 would indicate the tread would last twice as long, 300 would indicate three times as long, etc.
The problem with UTQG Treadwear Grades is that they are open to some interpretation on the part of the tire manufacturer because they are assigned after the tire has only experienced a little treadwear as it runs the 7,200 miles. This means that the tire manufacturers need to extrapolate their raw wear data when they are assigning Treadwear Grades, and that their grades can to some extent reflect how conservative or optimistic their marketing department is. Typically, comparing the Treadwear Grades of tire lines within a single brand is somewhat helpful, while attempting to compare the grades between different brands is not as helpful.
So the above statement while true everyone drives there cars differently, and your milage may vary on treadware anyway so get the tire that works for your type of driving.
Last edited by dwjz06; 08-18-2005 at 04:00 PM. Reason: spelling
#9
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Roll 20's...
Posts: 24,317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Replied on z06vette, but I'll repeat it here. I'm getting ready to slap some Michelin Pilot Sport PS2's on mine. Going with 275 front, 315 rear. Looking forward to seeing how they handle. I've got a road trip planned for labor day, and if I remember I'll come back and post results.
#10
Team Owner
Originally Posted by prospero63
Replied on z06vette, but I'll repeat it here. I'm getting ready to slap some Michelin Pilot Sport PS2's on mine. Going with 275 front, 315 rear. Looking forward to seeing how they handle. I've got a road trip planned for labor day, and if I remember I'll come back and post results.
I like this possibility? I just checked Tire Rack and they will fit a 10.5" wheel width. If I keep the Z these will be my next tires. I had Michelins on my 99 and loved them.
Tom
#11
Pro
One of our club member is running 315 Pilots on his rear wheels and he loves them. He said the grip is much better, he had less wheel hop at the strip and they are quieter than the SC.