LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Riverside CA
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower
I know that this topic has been beaten to death, but I figured that I would post my results for all of the new guys that are considering the LS6 intake. I had dynoed my car about one month earlier with all the mods seen below but the intake and a shorty x-pipe(i.e. exit28 X-pipe weld in unit). Anyways, I ended up going from 319/ 327 to 329/ 337. That's 10 rear wheel hp or about 12 at the flywheel which is what most produts are measured by. Overall I was pretty happy to be putting out 330 hp with so little mods, especially after my last car, a '97 Cobra, could barely muster 260 with exhaust and other light mods. Hope that helps.
#2
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (MyFirst)
Did you remove the cats with the X-pipe?
Also how do you know how much power was from the intake and not the X-pipe?
Good power nonetheless but I just don't see how you can say it was all from the intake.
Also how do you know how much power was from the intake and not the X-pipe?
Good power nonetheless but I just don't see how you can say it was all from the intake.
#3
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Irvine CA
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (MyFirst)
:cheers:
We have the same car and I knew it made a difference when installed. A little more tuning with the Predator this weekend would probably help more coz the intake makes you run a little lean, IMHO.
We have the same car and I knew it made a difference when installed. A little more tuning with the Predator this weekend would probably help more coz the intake makes you run a little lean, IMHO.
#5
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Riverside CA
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (aurik)
You guys might want to look at the x-pipe at exit28motorsports.com to see what I'm talking about. It's only about 18" long. It is not the offroad pipe, but rather only replaces the H part in the exhaust. I did it to reduce the "popping" that the LS1 is known for when decelerating. It was advertised as being worth 4-5 hp, but in reality I don't that it's worht anything. I bought it to reduce the popping and interior exhaust noise. My intake made 10 rear wheel horsepower as per the dyno because I can't see how the x-pipe would really help the flow seeing how my car is still relatively stock.
#7
Le Mans Master
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (BrightRed C5 SWFL)
Hey, it may have been beaten to death, but, it's good to know. That's the only mod I still want to add and I was wondering if it was worth it. Ten RWHp is pretty good! :cheers: The only thing is will I have to get my Powerloader redone???
#8
Pro
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Somewhere in the Mid West
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (Mike Campbell)
For those of you that installed the LS6 intake, did you use 2 coolant pipes or just one? I heard that you should use 2 pipes for better flow. If so, then are there 2 different part # between the front and rear pipes or are they the same? :confused:
#9
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Riverside CA
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (MyFirst)
I used the sinlge coolant blocker thing that came with the kit from LMPerformance.com. I figured if that is how GM did it than it can't be harmful. I realize that there is some flaw in that thinking, but I think you get the idea.
#10
Race Director
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Lynnfield MA
Posts: 15,701
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In VI Veteran
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (MyFirst)
:cool: Nice to know! :cheers:
#11
Safety Car
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (MyFirst)
I had dynoed my car about one month earlier with all the mods seen below but the intake and a shorty x-pipe(i.e. exit28 X-pipe weld in unit). Anyways, I ended up going from 319/ 327 to 329/ 337. That's 10 rear wheel hp or about 12 at the flywheel which is what most produts are measured by.
Ed
[Modified by C5XTASY, 6:10 PM 11/13/2002]
#12
Race Director
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: GARDENA Ca, State Of Konfusion
Posts: 15,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (C5XTASY)
Congrats :cheers:
I want to find my 10hp, I need it at the track! :lol: :yesnod:
Along with the addition of so many mods, I need a new dyno to start off again fron sratch.
[Modified by wallstAL, 12:03 AM 11/14/2002]
I want to find my 10hp, I need it at the track! :lol: :yesnod:
Along with the addition of so many mods, I need a new dyno to start off again fron sratch.
[Modified by wallstAL, 12:03 AM 11/14/2002]
#13
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Manchester NH
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (C5XTASY)
I had dynoed my car about one month earlier with all the mods seen below but the intake and a shorty x-pipe(i.e. exit28 X-pipe weld in unit). Anyways, I ended up going from 319/ 327 to 329/ 337. That's 10 rear wheel hp or about 12 at the flywheel which is what most produts are measured by.
I don't doubt what you say, but have seen this before, and there's something I just don't understand. If adding that intake is good for 10 rwhp by itself, why does GM claim only 5 flywheel hp (and that's with a different cam and MAF) from 2000 to 2001? If it's that easy to slap on another 10 rwhp, I'd like to do it myself. As I said, not doubting your numbers, I just don't understand it. :confused: I'm hoping someone can explain. Thanks!
Ed
[Modified by C5XTASY, 6:10 PM 11/13/2002]
I don't doubt what you say, but have seen this before, and there's something I just don't understand. If adding that intake is good for 10 rwhp by itself, why does GM claim only 5 flywheel hp (and that's with a different cam and MAF) from 2000 to 2001? If it's that easy to slap on another 10 rwhp, I'd like to do it myself. As I said, not doubting your numbers, I just don't understand it. :confused: I'm hoping someone can explain. Thanks!
Ed
[Modified by C5XTASY, 6:10 PM 11/13/2002]
#14
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (MyFirst)
The zo6 intake is used on the newer LS1's and they raised the hp from 345 to 350. If you still have your cats you may still have gotten 2 or 3 from your xpipe. When you remove the cats with an off-road xpipe we are getting apprx 20rwhp and similar torque and you can feel the difference when you drive away and you can certainly hear the difference.
#15
Safety Car
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (C5XTASY)
there's something I just don't understand. If adding that intake is good for 10 rwhp by itself, why does GM claim only 5 flywheel hp (and that's with a different cam and MAF) from 2000 to 2001?
#16
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (MyFirst)
Also aside from what has been mentioned, it is probably much cooler now then it was a month ago when the first pulls were done. :cheers:
#17
☠☣☢ Semper Ebrius ☢☣☠
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (1g1yy)
Also aside from what has been mentioned, it is probably much cooler now then it was a month ago when the first pulls were done. :cheers:
#18
Drifting
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (Scissors)
The factory loss of power may have something to do with the Pup converters prior to the Cats...maybe. I've heard that somewhere, but I believe they pulled the pup converters in '03. (Let's see what discussion this info creates)
#19
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Riverside CA
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (SpyRacing)
Basically it boils down to GM rating the 01's + conservatively. They also put in a milder cam in 2001. I purposely dynoed my car BOTH times on cool days in order to get a realistic comparison and they are both uncorrected so that's not a factor. The dyno measure PEAK horsepower, not the curve horsepower.
"The simplest explanation I can offer is that the car in question was running rich or needed some type of tuning before the LS6 intake, and the intake change ended up correcting the tuning. If this is indeed what happened, it's possible that some cars could even lose power by switching to the LS6 intake (in the absence of tuning)." I'm going to call you on this one because this is a ridiculous statement! Any time you allow more air into an engine it's going to respond by producing more hp and trq. Now you will make more hp if the vehicle is tuned correctly, but you're looking at minimal results unless a major change is made to the engine, e.g. new heads and cam. Sorry but I couldn't let that go without responding. :rolleyes:
"The simplest explanation I can offer is that the car in question was running rich or needed some type of tuning before the LS6 intake, and the intake change ended up correcting the tuning. If this is indeed what happened, it's possible that some cars could even lose power by switching to the LS6 intake (in the absence of tuning)." I'm going to call you on this one because this is a ridiculous statement! Any time you allow more air into an engine it's going to respond by producing more hp and trq. Now you will make more hp if the vehicle is tuned correctly, but you're looking at minimal results unless a major change is made to the engine, e.g. new heads and cam. Sorry but I couldn't let that go without responding. :rolleyes:
#20
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Manchester NH
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: LS6 intake dynoed at 10 rear wheel horsepower (MyFirst)
Basically it boils down to GM rating the 01's + conservatively. They also put in a milder cam in 2001. I purposely dynoed my car BOTH times on cool days in order to get a realistic comparison and they are both uncorrected so that's not a factor. The dyno measure PEAK horsepower, not the curve horsepower.
"The simplest explanation I can offer is that the car in question was running rich or needed some type of tuning before the LS6 intake, and the intake change ended up correcting the tuning. If this is indeed what happened, it's possible that some cars could even lose power by switching to the LS6 intake (in the absence of tuning)." I'm going to call you on this one because this is a ridiculous statement! Any time you allow more air into an engine it's going to respond by producing more hp and trq. Now you will make more hp if the vehicle is tuned correctly, but you're looking at minimal results unless a major change is made to the engine, e.g. new heads and cam. Sorry but I couldn't let that go without responding. :rolleyes:
"The simplest explanation I can offer is that the car in question was running rich or needed some type of tuning before the LS6 intake, and the intake change ended up correcting the tuning. If this is indeed what happened, it's possible that some cars could even lose power by switching to the LS6 intake (in the absence of tuning)." I'm going to call you on this one because this is a ridiculous statement! Any time you allow more air into an engine it's going to respond by producing more hp and trq. Now you will make more hp if the vehicle is tuned correctly, but you're looking at minimal results unless a major change is made to the engine, e.g. new heads and cam. Sorry but I couldn't let that go without responding. :rolleyes:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zero...112202#4112202
If you have time to search more thoroughly, I'm sure you'll find similar posts with some bigger numbers.
While increased airflow will generally produce more power, intakes need to be matched with cams to properly exploit any airflow gains. The two LS1 cams are similar enough that you're not likely going to lose power by switching to an LS6 intake, but stranger things have happened. Search around and you will find posts in which a Blackwing or Vortex was added to a stock car and resulted in idle surging and other problems. Increased airflow is a good thing, but it doesn't always have the effects you expect or hope for.
Please keep in mind the word 'possible' is quite different from the word 'likely'.
Perhaps you could share more details about your dyno testing with us? Are the before and after numbers both SAE corrected (your last post suggests not - unless you factor in the exact weather conditions, you're not being very scientific)? How many miles were on the car at each test? LS1's are known to continue to increase output up until 20k miles.....
I'm not sure what you think 'curve horsepower' is, but I was referring to examining the horsepower output across the entire rpm range, as opposed to just looking at peak output. With minor mods, peak horsepower is usually indicative of what the rest of the horsepower curve looks like, but examining what is happening at lower rpms is important with regards to a car's driveability.
Lastly, please realize I'm not trying to start a peeing match with you, and I'm definitely not trying to convince you that you're not happy with your LS6 intake! Among other things, if you ever decide to replace your cam/heads, that intake will make a big difference. Good debate is one of the best aspects of this forum.
:cheers: :cheers: :cheers: