C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2002, 08:29 AM
  #1  
MY1Fast99C5
Pro
Thread Starter
 
MY1Fast99C5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Wichita Falls Tx
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars?

I have a 160 in my car now and when I dynoed the last run I made my most HP. It seems like when the car starts warming up I start making more HP.This same thing happened in my 00ws6 w/160 thermostat.

Is it possible that I have my car toooo cool? I am running about 180 on the highway and 189 in stop and go traffic in the good ol 100 degree Tx days. But I dont run my car during the day and at night I run in the mid 180s. Any info is appreciated.
Old 07-29-2002, 09:33 AM
  #2  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default Re: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars? (MY1Fast99C5)

I hate to sound negative, but when this thread is all said and done, you will not know any more than you do now. This has been pretty well covered many times in the past, and there is no conclusive evidence that the thermostats make any difference in horsepower.

I have made a number of runs at the dragstrip, and I'm a very consistent driver. I find no difference in my times when I start at temps below 200, or when I start with the temp at 230.
Old 07-29-2002, 10:11 AM
  #3  
carpe dm
Le Mans Master
 
carpe dm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 8,205
Received 36 Likes on 35 Posts

Default Re: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars? (MY1Fast99C5)

It really won't make much difference; you have to have a way to turn the fans on earlier. :yesnod:
Old 07-29-2002, 02:47 PM
  #4  
Phil97SVT
Le Mans Master
 
Phil97SVT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Maryland Maryland
Posts: 5,577
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars? (MY1Fast99C5)

I have a Hypertech 160 with an underdrive pulley and fan temps set at 185/210. The car runs a consistent 180-185.
Phillip
Old 07-29-2002, 03:34 PM
  #5  
jimman
Le Mans Master
 
jimman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 1999
Location: Imperial Beach CA
Posts: 7,695
Received 47 Likes on 30 Posts

Default Re: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars? (MY1Fast99C5)

Here is the other thread. I won't suggest anything because I got the, you know what kicked out me for even suggesting leaving well enough alone.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=348007
Old 07-29-2002, 03:47 PM
  #6  
Cybercowboy
Team Owner
 
Cybercowboy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Blacker than the blackest black, times infinity.
Posts: 71,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stealthy Puma Member
Cruise-In IV Veteran

Default Re: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars? (MY1Fast99C5)

From a strictly thermodynmics point of view, a gasoline engine is another type of heat engine. Heat engines are more efficient when the difference between their internal temperature and the outside temperature increases. Beyond that, you can't directly relate efficiency to more power in a real-world case. BTW, as far as heat engines go the gasoline engine is very inefficient. It typically runs at about 5% efficiency. A fridge is much more efficient and typically runs at 300% or better. It really does. :)
Old 07-29-2002, 04:17 PM
  #7  
RHILL
Le Mans Master
 
RHILL's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: A FEW CLICKS NORTH OF THE CANAL
Posts: 5,925
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars? (jschindler)



I hate to sound negative, but when this thread is all said and done, you will not know any more than you do now. This has been pretty well covered many times in the past, and there is no conclusive evidence that the thermostats make any difference in horsepower.

I have made a number of runs at the dragstrip, and I'm a very consistent driver. I find no difference in my times when I start at temps below 200, or when I start with the temp at 230.

This is how I feel too.... Don't try and make it rocket science :cheers:
Old 07-29-2002, 08:18 PM
  #8  
C5-VERT
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
C5-VERT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 6,070
Received 280 Likes on 213 Posts
Cruise-In IV Veteran

Default Re: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars? (RHILL)

I say do it if you are curious and see if you like it. If you don't you are only out 20 minutes of your time and $60. That should cover just about all of the thermostat posts! :yesnod: :cheers:
Old 07-29-2002, 09:09 PM
  #9  
Godspeed
Melting Slicks
 
Godspeed's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 3,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Senior Member
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran

Default Re: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars? (MY1Fast99C5)

The cooler your engine is running the more agressive timing you can run without getting knock. This is why hypertech sells the HPP3 and t-stat together. They reprogram the fuel and ignition curve to take advantage of the lower temps.

Using LS1 Edit I have been to get ~10RWHP out of my using the same principle with a 160 tstat and lower fan on temperatures.

Old 07-29-2002, 09:48 PM
  #10  
batsallover
Le Mans Master
 
batsallover's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 7,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars? (MY1Fast99C5)

I have run 160 degree thermostats for years now in my Monte Carlo Z34 and now my Vert. Friends have them in their Saleen and SS. I just turned 110,000 miles in my 95 Monte with the 160. IMHO....a cooler engine runs better and improves longevity. As for HP....don't start a :boxing . Lot's of members will chime in with their opinions. And you know opinions are like......nevermind. :lol:

Get notified of new replies

To 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars?




Quick Reply: 160 Thermostat Vs 172 Vs 180 Which is better for our cars?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM.