C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cat back vs. Full exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2009, 03:15 PM
  #1  
trae1997
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
trae1997's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cat back vs. Full exhaust

Kinda confused
i just got finished reading a article that
says catback systems are better for cars that are stock.
It says that you get about 15 to 20 hp gain out of cat back and that headers and exhaust will not produce to much more than that if you are keeping the motor stock or close to stock.
So what i want to know is if there is anyone out there with a 1997 to 2000 c5 a4 that has a stock motor who has done both catback and full exhaust ( i.e. Headers and exhaust ) and what gave the best bang for the buck
Old 04-18-2009, 03:39 PM
  #2  
ZZOOM06
Drifting
 
ZZOOM06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Alamosa CO
Posts: 1,419
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by trae1997
Kinda confused
i just got finished reading a article that
says catback systems are better for cars that are stock.
It says that you get about 15 to 20 hp gain out of cat back and that headers and exhaust will not produce to much more than that if you are keeping the motor stock or close to stock.
So what i want to know is if there is anyone out there with a 1997 to 2000 c5 a4 that has a stock motor who has done both catback and full exhaust ( i.e. Headers and exhaust ) and what gave the best bang for the buck
You won't get much if anything out of just a catback, however, long tube headers will give you some measurable horsepower/torque, especially if you get the car tuned after installing them.
Old 04-18-2009, 03:46 PM
  #3  
trae1997
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
trae1997's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanxs
thats what i figured. With all the toys i have had in the past i just figured that was the standard rule all though none of those moters we even close to being stock
Old 04-18-2009, 05:37 PM
  #4  
AU N EGL
Team Owner
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

The word "catback" is widely mis used. they really mean Mufflers.

it is the Long Tubs, with high flow cats, smooth x-pipe and low restrictive mufflers or no mufflers that provide a bit more hp
Old 04-18-2009, 05:50 PM
  #5  
itzza427
Le Mans Master
 
itzza427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Belleville Il
Posts: 7,602
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The popular #s kicked around for "cat back" is more like 5 to 10 actual ponies! When you add the "bang for your buck",,kinda muddles the water as there are tons of used cat backs out there that can be picked up for $400-500. You are talking some pretty big bucks for long tubes,high flows and X pipe which give a bit of pause for the cause. They are cheaper than SC or turbos though!!

Get notified of new replies

To Cat back vs. Full exhaust




Quick Reply: Cat back vs. Full exhaust



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 PM.