Weiand Street Warrior
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: St. Paul MN
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Weiand Street Warrior
I see that the new Weiand Street Warrior intake is now available. They claim 30+ hp (it doesn't say rwhp) over the LS6 manifold. Has anyone tried one of these yet? Looks pretty impressive. It takes both the 78mm and 90mm throttle body.
Last edited by verano29; 01-10-2009 at 01:08 PM.
#2
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Right Corner Pocket of Illinois
Posts: 32,329
Received 1,506 Likes
on
1,014 Posts
No-IL Events Coordinator
2020 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C6 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
2018 C6 of Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
#4
#5
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: St. Paul MN
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: St. Paul MN
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#8
Former Vendor
C'mon Verano.....L-e-a-r-n from diversified input of your own ten page threads not to mention your own real world experiences.
The Warrior (on paper) certainly looks to best the fast in the low RPM ranges (due to its much longer, smaller runners), but a FAST will trounce it upstairs due to just the opposite (shorter, higher flowing larger runners).
And it really still isnt available btw....at least last I checked.
Im actually looking forward to its ultimate release as it does have some applications that make it worthy of consideration, but for guys looking for the best peak power numbers, track times, and "run from a roll" street events, the FAST still will take top honors.
-Tony
Last edited by Tony Mamo @ AFR; 01-10-2009 at 09:39 PM.
#9
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: St. Paul MN
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I knew you couldn't resist the urge to push one of your $2k+ intakes.
Again, check the threads...100% of the only info available suggests that the BBK performs as well or better than the fast. You, yourself admitted that you have never touched a BBK.
My own real world experiences? Oh that's right...the last time I posted my combo:
A4 SS3600, 3.42
Vortex CAI
BBK
Dart Pro 1 205
Comp Cams 228/230 .571/.573 112lsa
Shorty headers
etc.
produced 353 rwhp....and you blamed those modest numbers on the BBK
Well a couple of months later I did actually revisit the dyno with the following additional mods:
a)Removal of the NOS plate (which was obstructing air flow)
b)Ported TB
c)Smooth coupler
d)Oversize air bridge
e)Rev limiter set to 6600rpm
f)It was a bit cooler (88degrees on the previous run and 72 on this run)
The results....393@~6400
Now what do we have to say about the BBK? Wait until I switch to a ported BBK TB, real headers, and an X pipe...I'm going to bust right through that 400rwhp mark! Would a ported fast give me better numbers...maybe like 3-5rwhp...not worth it.
Seems to be available everywhere...at least they are taking orders
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu5S5i2...id/0/SFV/32401
http://www.ls1speed.com/cont.cfm?cid=C0000807
http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...15+400053+1007
30+ hp/torque is more than both Fast and BBK claim....and it's only $600.
My own real world experiences? Oh that's right...the last time I posted my combo:
A4 SS3600, 3.42
Vortex CAI
BBK
Dart Pro 1 205
Comp Cams 228/230 .571/.573 112lsa
Shorty headers
etc.
produced 353 rwhp....and you blamed those modest numbers on the BBK
Well a couple of months later I did actually revisit the dyno with the following additional mods:
a)Removal of the NOS plate (which was obstructing air flow)
b)Ported TB
c)Smooth coupler
d)Oversize air bridge
e)Rev limiter set to 6600rpm
f)It was a bit cooler (88degrees on the previous run and 72 on this run)
The results....393@~6400
Now what do we have to say about the BBK? Wait until I switch to a ported BBK TB, real headers, and an X pipe...I'm going to bust right through that 400rwhp mark! Would a ported fast give me better numbers...maybe like 3-5rwhp...not worth it.
The Warrior (on paper) certainly looks to best the fast in the low RPM ranges (due to its much longer, smaller runners), but a FAST will trounce it upstairs due to just the opposite (shorter, higher flowing larger runners).
And it really still isnt available btw....at least last I checked.
And it really still isnt available btw....at least last I checked.
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu5S5i2...id/0/SFV/32401
http://www.ls1speed.com/cont.cfm?cid=C0000807
http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...15+400053+1007
30+ hp/torque is more than both Fast and BBK claim....and it's only $600.
#10
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: St. Paul MN
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A ported fast 90 and 90mm tb is going to push $2k...yikes. You can pick up a BBK for ~$400 and a ported TB for ~$100......huge savings. I bet on the high end the ported fast 90/90 combo would only offer a 5-7hp advantage over a bbk/ported tb. IMO...not worth it. Pick up a ported 80mm bbk TB for around ~$500 and I'm guessing the FAST advantage would further diminish. BTW a BBK intake can be ported/polished as well.
#11
Drifting
A ported fast 90 and 90mm tb is going to push $2k...yikes. You can pick up a BBK for ~$400 and a ported TB for ~$100......huge savings. I bet on the high end the ported fast 90/90 combo would only offer a 5-7hp advantage over a bbk/ported tb. IMO...not worth it. Pick up a ported 80mm bbk TB for around ~$500 and I'm guessing the FAST advantage would further diminish. BTW a BBK intake can be ported/polished as well.
#12
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09
It's pointless to argue over which intake is the best. They all serve their purpose...what works for one won't for another...whats cheap for one is not for another...
It's especially pointless to argue about a metal vs. composite intake comparison as well.
Now back to the Street Warrior. I was waiting as well. Ordered the FAST 92 instead because I got tired of the excuses. I said it once and I will say it again...the Street Warrior is indeed the "Chinese Democracy" of intakes in that you wait for years for the damn thing to come out, more than likely when it does come out it will probably suck anyway. /rant
It's especially pointless to argue about a metal vs. composite intake comparison as well.
Now back to the Street Warrior. I was waiting as well. Ordered the FAST 92 instead because I got tired of the excuses. I said it once and I will say it again...the Street Warrior is indeed the "Chinese Democracy" of intakes in that you wait for years for the damn thing to come out, more than likely when it does come out it will probably suck anyway. /rant
#13
Race Director
All talk of the Weind manifold is just another internet hand job. They "introduced" it 15 months ago and they still have no realistic release date. The release just keeps getting pushed farther and farther out.
FAST has published an April release date for the L92/LS3 100mm+ intake. We'll see if they do the same thing Weind has done.
FAST has published an April release date for the L92/LS3 100mm+ intake. We'll see if they do the same thing Weind has done.
#14
It's pointless to argue over which intake is the best. They all serve their purpose...what works for one won't for another...whats cheap for one is not for another...
It's especially pointless to argue about a metal vs. composite intake comparison as well.
Now back to the Street Warrior. I was waiting as well. Ordered the FAST 92 instead because I got tired of the excuses. I said it once and I will say it again...the Street Warrior is indeed the "Chinese Democracy" of intakes in that you wait for years for the damn thing to come out, more than likely when it does come out it will probably suck anyway. /rant
It's especially pointless to argue about a metal vs. composite intake comparison as well.
Now back to the Street Warrior. I was waiting as well. Ordered the FAST 92 instead because I got tired of the excuses. I said it once and I will say it again...the Street Warrior is indeed the "Chinese Democracy" of intakes in that you wait for years for the damn thing to come out, more than likely when it does come out it will probably suck anyway. /rant
Nice analogy Kevin! Bob
#15
Race Director
A ported fast 90 and 90mm tb is going to push $2k...yikes. You can pick up a BBK for ~$400 and a ported TB for ~$100......huge savings. I bet on the high end the ported fast 90/90 combo would only offer a 5-7hp advantage over a bbk/ported tb. IMO...not worth it. Pick up a ported 80mm bbk TB for around ~$500 and I'm guessing the FAST advantage would further diminish. BTW a BBK intake can be ported/polished as well.
#16
I knew you couldn't resist the urge to push one of your $2k+ intakes.
Again, check the threads...100% of the only info available suggests that the BBK performs as well or better than the fast. You, yourself admitted that you have never touched a BBK.
My own real world experiences? Oh that's right...the last time I posted my combo:
A4 SS3600, 3.42
Vortex CAI
BBK
Dart Pro 1 205
Comp Cams 228/230 .571/.573 112lsa
Shorty headers
etc.
produced 353 rwhp....and you blamed those modest numbers on the BBK
Well a couple of months later I did actually revisit the dyno with the following additional mods:
a)Removal of the NOS plate (which was obstructing air flow)
b)Ported TB
c)Smooth coupler
d)Oversize air bridge
e)Rev limiter set to 6600rpm
f)It was a bit cooler (88degrees on the previous run and 72 on this run)
The results....393@~6400
Now what do we have to say about the BBK? Wait until I switch to a ported BBK TB, real headers, and an X pipe...I'm going to bust right through that 400rwhp mark! Would a ported fast give me better numbers...maybe like 3-5rwhp...not worth it.
Seems to be available everywhere...at least they are taking orders
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu5S5i2...id/0/SFV/32401
http://www.ls1speed.com/cont.cfm?cid=C0000807
http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...15+400053+1007
30+ hp/torque is more than both Fast and BBK claim....and it's only $600.
Again, check the threads...100% of the only info available suggests that the BBK performs as well or better than the fast. You, yourself admitted that you have never touched a BBK.
My own real world experiences? Oh that's right...the last time I posted my combo:
A4 SS3600, 3.42
Vortex CAI
BBK
Dart Pro 1 205
Comp Cams 228/230 .571/.573 112lsa
Shorty headers
etc.
produced 353 rwhp....and you blamed those modest numbers on the BBK
Well a couple of months later I did actually revisit the dyno with the following additional mods:
a)Removal of the NOS plate (which was obstructing air flow)
b)Ported TB
c)Smooth coupler
d)Oversize air bridge
e)Rev limiter set to 6600rpm
f)It was a bit cooler (88degrees on the previous run and 72 on this run)
The results....393@~6400
Now what do we have to say about the BBK? Wait until I switch to a ported BBK TB, real headers, and an X pipe...I'm going to bust right through that 400rwhp mark! Would a ported fast give me better numbers...maybe like 3-5rwhp...not worth it.
Seems to be available everywhere...at least they are taking orders
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu5S5i2...id/0/SFV/32401
http://www.ls1speed.com/cont.cfm?cid=C0000807
http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...15+400053+1007
30+ hp/torque is more than both Fast and BBK claim....and it's only $600.
Oh the good ole' days have returned, Mamo, myself, and verano all in one epic thread lol.
that Heat sink is slowing you down man im telling you, Ive been there and done that with the lsx intakes..LS1, ls6, weiand metal, and now the fast. spending allot of cash that you could spend on a fast on a bbk snake oil 80mm to put on a looser intake you could have just purchased the fast.
That metal manifold gets so hot you can cook and keep your food warm on it. I touched mine once and it burned the hell out of me can you argue that that doesnt do something to the air?
I guarantee you if you sold your bbk for 300 and kept your money for that snake oil throttle body you could purchase a fast on ebay. Leaving those worthless shorties on and NO other changes I guarantee you will break 400 hp with the fast addition.
I cant tell you exactly what it made because I didnt dyno it in afterwards,But It felt pretty good after the change, much better than the ls1 to ls6 change. Im shooting for 600rwhp on some spray here in a month or two im almost done with the setup Ill post up what I get.
Look up Febuary 2008 issue of Chevy High performance Tony is featured inside there and Read that article. Youll learn his advice isnt opinnions they are harsh reality and fact
Last edited by vettekidc5; 01-11-2009 at 11:38 AM.
#17
Former Vendor
Verano....
The only thing this thread proves is that you are getting in your own way in regards to furthering your education in this hobby....
And for the record, I didnt even mention my porting....you did.
A stock FAST will walk all over a BBK as will a stock LS6 intake by a few HP as well. Your air inlet temps are probably thirty degrees higher in that manifold than they would be in the same manifold constructed from plastic. Power output will change by 1% for every 10 degrees move in the incoming air charge. Start crunching the numbers....
I'm done with this thread but I will keep an eye on it purely for entertainment value.
-Tony
PS....I have no problem with the new Warrior design (as I also previously mentioned) as it will have applications that make some sense, but is it available now.....NO.....and will it ultimately dethrone the FAST for the guys looking for the big numbers....also NO....end of story.
The only thing this thread proves is that you are getting in your own way in regards to furthering your education in this hobby....
And for the record, I didnt even mention my porting....you did.
A stock FAST will walk all over a BBK as will a stock LS6 intake by a few HP as well. Your air inlet temps are probably thirty degrees higher in that manifold than they would be in the same manifold constructed from plastic. Power output will change by 1% for every 10 degrees move in the incoming air charge. Start crunching the numbers....
I'm done with this thread but I will keep an eye on it purely for entertainment value.
-Tony
PS....I have no problem with the new Warrior design (as I also previously mentioned) as it will have applications that make some sense, but is it available now.....NO.....and will it ultimately dethrone the FAST for the guys looking for the big numbers....also NO....end of story.
Last edited by Tony Mamo @ AFR; 01-11-2009 at 02:21 PM.
#18
Melting Slicks
A ported fast 90 and 90mm tb is going to push $2k...yikes. You can pick up a BBK for ~$400 and a ported TB for ~$100......huge savings. I bet on the high end the ported fast 90/90 combo would only offer a 5-7hp advantage over a bbk/ported tb. IMO...not worth it. Pick up a ported 80mm bbk TB for around ~$500 and I'm guessing the FAST advantage would further diminish. BTW a BBK intake can be ported/polished as well.
FAST will also have a much better resale value so the net cost differential is really not that much.
#19
Race Director
I knew you couldn't resist the urge to push one of your $2k+ intakes.
Again, check the threads...100% of the only info available suggests that the BBK performs as well or better than the fast. You, yourself admitted that you have never touched a BBK.
My own real world experiences? Oh that's right...the last time I posted my combo:
A4 SS3600, 3.42
Vortex CAI
BBK
Dart Pro 1 205
Comp Cams 228/230 .571/.573 112lsa
Shorty headers
etc.
produced 353 rwhp....and you blamed those modest numbers on the BBK
Well a couple of months later I did actually revisit the dyno with the following additional mods:
a)Removal of the NOS plate (which was obstructing air flow)
b)Ported TB
c)Smooth coupler
d)Oversize air bridge
e)Rev limiter set to 6600rpm
f)It was a bit cooler (88degrees on the previous run and 72 on this run)
The results....393@~6400
Now what do we have to say about the BBK? Wait until I switch to a ported BBK TB, real headers, and an X pipe...I'm going to bust right through that 400rwhp mark! Would a ported fast give me better numbers...maybe like 3-5rwhp...not worth it.
Seems to be available everywhere...at least they are taking orders
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu5S5i2...id/0/SFV/32401
http://www.ls1speed.com/cont.cfm?cid=C0000807
http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...15+400053+1007
30+ hp/torque is more than both Fast and BBK claim....and it's only $600.
Again, check the threads...100% of the only info available suggests that the BBK performs as well or better than the fast. You, yourself admitted that you have never touched a BBK.
My own real world experiences? Oh that's right...the last time I posted my combo:
A4 SS3600, 3.42
Vortex CAI
BBK
Dart Pro 1 205
Comp Cams 228/230 .571/.573 112lsa
Shorty headers
etc.
produced 353 rwhp....and you blamed those modest numbers on the BBK
Well a couple of months later I did actually revisit the dyno with the following additional mods:
a)Removal of the NOS plate (which was obstructing air flow)
b)Ported TB
c)Smooth coupler
d)Oversize air bridge
e)Rev limiter set to 6600rpm
f)It was a bit cooler (88degrees on the previous run and 72 on this run)
The results....393@~6400
Now what do we have to say about the BBK? Wait until I switch to a ported BBK TB, real headers, and an X pipe...I'm going to bust right through that 400rwhp mark! Would a ported fast give me better numbers...maybe like 3-5rwhp...not worth it.
Seems to be available everywhere...at least they are taking orders
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu5S5i2...id/0/SFV/32401
http://www.ls1speed.com/cont.cfm?cid=C0000807
http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...15+400053+1007
30+ hp/torque is more than both Fast and BBK claim....and it's only $600.
This doesn't seem to be proof of the BBK's value at all. Only 393 with H/C/intake is pretty tepid, even with the A/T. OTOH, I'm not a big believer in "heat soak" robbing power in street use. The velocity of air moving will mitigate most of these problems, with the exception of periods of extended low speed use, IMH, and unscientific O. The BBK manifold is just a poor design, from an air flow perspective. Since that's what creates power..... The only reason to use a metal intake is for show car good looks, when polished.
#20
This doesn't seem to be proof of the BBK's value at all. Only 393 with H/C/intake is pretty tepid, even with the A/T. OTOH, I'm not a big believer in "heat soak" robbing power in street use. The velocity of air moving will mitigate most of these problems, with the exception of periods of extended low speed use, IMH, and unscientific O. The BBK manifold is just a poor design, from an air flow perspective. Since that's what creates power..... The only reason to use a metal intake is for show car good looks, when polished.
Its not a sham its indeed true