G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio?
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio?
Hello All,
Does anyone have a feel for the differences in performance I will notice between a 2000 Corvette Coupe with the G92 Performance axle ratio vs. a 2000 Corvette without it? I am looking at a used Vette without the G92 option and wondering how much performance I lose and in what capacities? Any thoughts or input would be greatly appreciated!! :confused:
Does anyone have a feel for the differences in performance I will notice between a 2000 Corvette Coupe with the G92 Performance axle ratio vs. a 2000 Corvette without it? I am looking at a used Vette without the G92 option and wondering how much performance I lose and in what capacities? Any thoughts or input would be greatly appreciated!! :confused:
#3
Race Director
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 17,925
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Elite Member
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Re: G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio? (Buckmaster)
Unless you want to brag to your friends about the great gas mileage your C5 gets...............order the 3.15! I had the 2.73's in mine and it was a dog :smash:
#4
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Houston,Tx. USA
Posts: 5,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio? (Acorn-Glen)
Get the 3:15........My'98 came with the 2:73's and that's the only thing
I'm not happy with. You CAN get some mileage like 27 mpg driving 70.
80-85 at 2000 rpm; but 3:15 would be the best IMO.
I'm not happy with. You CAN get some mileage like 27 mpg driving 70.
80-85 at 2000 rpm; but 3:15 would be the best IMO.
#5
Safety Car
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: Virginia Beach Virginia
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio? (Chopper Larry)
Opt for the 3.15 rear...GM would prefer you get the 2.73 and help them meet CAFE (fuel economy) standards. I had a 2.59 standard rear for my automatic '94 C4 and Camaros/Firebirds used to eat me for lunch from a stoplight.
[Modified by Mark S., 10:53 AM 12/7/2001]
[Modified by Mark S., 10:53 AM 12/7/2001]
#7
Instructor
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio? (Acorn-Glen)
I had an 01 coupe with the G92(3.15) option :D
I have an 02 vert with std. 2.73 :cry
There is a difference in SOTP performance. so if you are not planning on changing out the rearend, like I am, then you need to find a car with the G92 option.
Jim
I have an 02 vert with std. 2.73 :cry
There is a difference in SOTP performance. so if you are not planning on changing out the rearend, like I am, then you need to find a car with the G92 option.
Jim
#8
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Recovering from a tragic boating accident in Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 8,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CI 5-6-7-8-9-10 Vet
Re: G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio? (R BONUS)
I agree with what he said...because I got his 01 Coupe. :yesnod: :lol:
#9
Instructor
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio? (RedHot)
Trust me Red Hot there is a difference.
But next week the 3.73's go in! :jester
Then hopefully there will be a big difference going the other way.(gonna light them Goodyears up!) :D
Jim
But next week the 3.73's go in! :jester
Then hopefully there will be a big difference going the other way.(gonna light them Goodyears up!) :D
Jim
#10
Race Director
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: GARDENA Ca, State Of Konfusion
Posts: 15,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
Re: G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio?
I got real lucky, the dealer screwed up and messed up my order and gave me the standard 2.73 instead of the 3.15. I was mad :mad but, it turned out to be a blessing. I changed it out for the 3.42, Oh what a difference I love it
#11
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Orland Park Illinois
Posts: 3,123
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'07
Re: G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio? (Acorn-Glen)
My '98 Coupe came w/ a 2.73. Great mileage, but no good off the line. If you're planning to swap rearend for a 3.42 (like I did), the 2.73 doesn't matter. Otherwise, go w/ the 3.15. Good luck...
#12
Re: G92 Performance axle Ratio vs. 2.73 Axle Ratio? (Acorn-Glen)
If it's going to be a street driver, it doesn't matter IMHO. If you're going to occasionally drag race it, the 3.15 is mandatory.