3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma.
#1
Race Director
Thread Starter
3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma.
I have a 3.42 rear MN6.
There are 2 ways to make my car quicker.
1. Add more HP
2. Add 3.73 Rear
My question is this...
How much HP would it take to equal the thrust of the 3.73 Rear. And how much would that HP cost (not NOS)
Then I could compare the cost of adding more HP or changing the rear.
I realize that there is no HP gain with a rear change and it's not measureable on a Dyno. But who cares, quicker is quicker. as the old saying goes..."Horsepower sells cars, Torque wins races" :D
There are 2 ways to make my car quicker.
1. Add more HP
2. Add 3.73 Rear
My question is this...
How much HP would it take to equal the thrust of the 3.73 Rear. And how much would that HP cost (not NOS)
Then I could compare the cost of adding more HP or changing the rear.
I realize that there is no HP gain with a rear change and it's not measureable on a Dyno. But who cares, quicker is quicker. as the old saying goes..."Horsepower sells cars, Torque wins races" :D
#2
Team Owner
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: S.W. Ohio. . . . . . NRA Life Member
Posts: 54,199
Received 173 Likes
on
107 Posts
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (chuckster)
There are a couple reasons why I am taking the axle ratio change versus mods to the engine:
1. GM Warranty. It would very difficult for a dealer to notice the axle ratio change. Although the M-M Warranty Act should protect you anyway, I don't want to take the risk.
2. Does not add stress to the engine with increased HP. No fear of a check engine light, no need for a MAFT; or ECM reprog on the MN6.
3. Rear carrier exchange is all done from underneath; no need for anyone to get under the hood... lean over the side and scratch the paint.
These reasons are for my mindset, and you may have other reasons to avoid an axle ratio change. Yes; I am taking the "safe" route :)
1. GM Warranty. It would very difficult for a dealer to notice the axle ratio change. Although the M-M Warranty Act should protect you anyway, I don't want to take the risk.
2. Does not add stress to the engine with increased HP. No fear of a check engine light, no need for a MAFT; or ECM reprog on the MN6.
3. Rear carrier exchange is all done from underneath; no need for anyone to get under the hood... lean over the side and scratch the paint.
These reasons are for my mindset, and you may have other reasons to avoid an axle ratio change. Yes; I am taking the "safe" route :)
#3
Team Owner
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (Mike Mercury)
Mike,
I agree completely with your 3 points and they've been pointing me toward the rear end change also. But, on point 2 regarding the PCM, I thought I previously read that on an MN6 no PCM change is necessary, but in this thread there might be a suggestion that there could be PCM issues: http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=177865
Chuckster -- thanks for this post. I am trying to make the exact same decision, but so far there's not too many folks who seem to have timed comparos on acceleration before and after just the 3.73s (some did other mods at the same time).
[Modified by SteveL2, 12:26 PM 11/13/2001]
I agree completely with your 3 points and they've been pointing me toward the rear end change also. But, on point 2 regarding the PCM, I thought I previously read that on an MN6 no PCM change is necessary, but in this thread there might be a suggestion that there could be PCM issues: http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=177865
Chuckster -- thanks for this post. I am trying to make the exact same decision, but so far there's not too many folks who seem to have timed comparos on acceleration before and after just the 3.73s (some did other mods at the same time).
[Modified by SteveL2, 12:26 PM 11/13/2001]
#4
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (SteveL2)
That post about the PCM reprogram was from L.A.P.D., but it wasn't clear whether it was intended for the M6 or the auto. Hopefully, they will respond and clear this up. I don't know why you would need to mess with the PCM on an M6.
#5
Melting Slicks
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (George Cooper)
From what I understand you will need a PCM reprogram with either the auto or MN6.
I have been toying around with the idea of 3.73 gears for the Hardtop. I am very happy with my simple mods I have done and don't want to affect any drivability. I'm even happy with the stock exhaust! Although the Z06 catback would be nice!
Going to a 3.73 would give a virtual 2.95 first gear doing away with the pathetic 2.66 gear we are saddled with. The reason why the Z06 has such great acceleration is the 2.97 first gear.
From what I have heard Motive Gear is supposed to come out with a 3.42, 3.73, 3.90, and 4.10 gears for the C5. West Coast Corvette has the dibs on this product but their contract will expire from them in 6 months. The gears from Motive Gear are the ring & pinion type which will be MUCH less expensive than the whole rear section that you must buy.
Motive Gear promises they will just as quiet as the OEMs but your installer MUST be good at installing gears because any misalignment will result in noisy gears (ie howling).
I hope these gears are much less expensive than the whole carrier...
I have been toying around with the idea of 3.73 gears for the Hardtop. I am very happy with my simple mods I have done and don't want to affect any drivability. I'm even happy with the stock exhaust! Although the Z06 catback would be nice!
Going to a 3.73 would give a virtual 2.95 first gear doing away with the pathetic 2.66 gear we are saddled with. The reason why the Z06 has such great acceleration is the 2.97 first gear.
From what I have heard Motive Gear is supposed to come out with a 3.42, 3.73, 3.90, and 4.10 gears for the C5. West Coast Corvette has the dibs on this product but their contract will expire from them in 6 months. The gears from Motive Gear are the ring & pinion type which will be MUCH less expensive than the whole rear section that you must buy.
Motive Gear promises they will just as quiet as the OEMs but your installer MUST be good at installing gears because any misalignment will result in noisy gears (ie howling).
I hope these gears are much less expensive than the whole carrier...
#8
Team Owner
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (chuckster)
Chuckster -- forgive me if this is common knowledge, or if I'm getting this all wrong, but here's a thought. I just came across a post elsewhere, and not related to vettes, but it defined torque, at the peak of HP, as:
peak torque = (peak HP) * tranny gear size * rear end gear size
So, it sounds like the biggest "fun" out of this rear swap is insured so long as the rear end size goes up by a bigger factor than the peak HP goes down. In other words, I've read on other posts that the 3.73 gears actually make HP go down, but I think it's only on the order of less than 3%. On the other hand, a swap in gears from stock 3.42 up to 3.73 is an increase of 9%. As a result, peak torque goes up. This should explain Mike's excitement, provided I didn't get it totally wrong.
Peace.
:cheers:
[Modified by SteveL2, 3:30 PM 11/13/2001]
peak torque = (peak HP) * tranny gear size * rear end gear size
So, it sounds like the biggest "fun" out of this rear swap is insured so long as the rear end size goes up by a bigger factor than the peak HP goes down. In other words, I've read on other posts that the 3.73 gears actually make HP go down, but I think it's only on the order of less than 3%. On the other hand, a swap in gears from stock 3.42 up to 3.73 is an increase of 9%. As a result, peak torque goes up. This should explain Mike's excitement, provided I didn't get it totally wrong.
Peace.
:cheers:
[Modified by SteveL2, 3:30 PM 11/13/2001]
#9
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 7,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (George Cooper)
The reluctor for the speedo pickup is located on the rearend.
An Auto requires PCM programming to adjust for shifting and torque control I beleive.
the MN6 requies no such programming.
An Auto requires PCM programming to adjust for shifting and torque control I beleive.
the MN6 requies no such programming.
#10
Pro
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC, USA
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (chuckster)
I'd add HP. The lower gear is only going to cause wheel spin. You will ultimately need HP/TQ to win a race. I believe SW uses the 3.42 rear gear.
#11
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 7,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (vette-crazy)
I'd add HP. The lower gear is only going to cause wheel spin. You will ultimately need HP/TQ to win a race. I believe SW uses the 3.42 rear gear.
HP (power) is what wins races. Not torque. HP is a function of Torque and RPM.
#12
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (TAL)
From what I understand you will need a PCM reprogram with either the auto or MN6.
When in doubt do both,......I think someone else said that also :lol: :lol:.
Good luck with the hardest part....the decision :cheers: !
#13
Team Owner
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (vette-crazy)
I'd add HP. The lower gear is only going to cause wheel spin. You will ultimately need HP/TQ to win a race. I believe SW uses the 3.42 rear gear.
[Modified by SteveL2, 8:37 PM 11/13/2001]
#14
Race Director
Thread Starter
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (chuckster)
Um... The original question was...How much HP = the 3.73 gears. Wheel spin Schmeel spin....I'll get drag slicks. :D
I am looking for thrust. I am sure I will do a cam eventually but..
Lets say I install the Hammer cam right now. Will I run the 1/4 as fast or faster than If I did the 3.73 :confused:
[Modified by chuckster, 9:44 PM 11/13/2001]
I am looking for thrust. I am sure I will do a cam eventually but..
Lets say I install the Hammer cam right now. Will I run the 1/4 as fast or faster than If I did the 3.73 :confused:
[Modified by chuckster, 9:44 PM 11/13/2001]
#15
Safety Car
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 4,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (chuckster)
I want 4.10's, not those cheesy 3.73's :D (JK). But really, 4.10's would be the ultimate kick butt setup for street/strip :).
#16
Burning Brakes
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (chuckster)
Nobody has mentioned Heat and Noise. Most of the more horspower mods increase the heat around the engine (ie in the drivers seat) and the increase in noise from headers, less restrictive exhaust, etc. The gears are completely non noticable except you jump off the line quicker than the other "stock" guy.
Maybe we are talking about "Quicker" vrs "Faster". Win in the 60, lose in the 1/4. For my street only money - I take quiet quickness.
Maybe we are talking about "Quicker" vrs "Faster". Win in the 60, lose in the 1/4. For my street only money - I take quiet quickness.
#17
Race Director
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (chuckster)
How much do 3.73's affect top end? I personally would prefer more horsepower. Good luck with whatever decision you make.
#18
Team Owner
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (SteveL2)
I read a thread on the viper forum where an owner of both a Z06 and a viper asked if others agreed with his observation that stock for stock the Z06 hung with the viper through 2nd gear. Setting aside the barrage of nasties that ensued arguing Z06 vs Viper overall, it seemed the consensus was that the Z06 gearing was highly beneficial until about 70 mph. If this is true (and I haven't a clue if it is), wouldn't the 3.73 greatly help the non-Z06 at least until the 70 mph range? In other words, sure, added HP is wonderful, but when you say it wins races, does that mean really from about 70 mph on up? Thanks for any elaboration. :cheers:
[Modified by SteveL2, 8:37 PM 11/13/2001]
[Modified by SteveL2, 8:37 PM 11/13/2001]
#19
Supporting Vendor
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (chuckster)
Gota call yesterday on 3.73, 3.90 and 4.09 gears available. Looks like the pricing will be about $1500 a set . Is anyone interested? :eek: :eek:
#20
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 7,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran
Re: 3.73 Rear End or More HP?????? That's the dilemma. (COH PAUL)
Gota call yesterday on 3.73, 3.90 and 4.09 gears available. Looks like the pricing will be about $1500 a set . Is anyone interested? :eek: :eek:
West coast corvettes tried to do the rebuilt factory rearends, with 3.90's which had to be shoehorned in. Most the concern was reliability because after 3.73 the gear sizing and number of teeth really begin to degrade strength. 4.09s?? How in the world? is this in a stock sized getrag carrier?
The great thing about the 3.73's. The only ones built and put together by getrag for performance purposes with hardened components are the ones you see in group purchases. And price is for the whole unit. Np exchange.
What is the offer you are talking about? Exchange? Just rebuilt with different gears?