Anyone ever seen supercharging using electric fan compressor?
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
Anyone ever seen supercharging using electric fan compressor?
It seems to me that a powerful electric motor and fan could be incorporated into the air intake housing. Maybe make the housing a little bigger to accommodate the electric motor.
There are some amazingly powerful (and small) electric motors out there nowadays, so would this work?
Even if you could only get a few pounds of boost, so what? The installation would be super-easy and the cost should be minimal. A small boost can provide impressive additional horsepower.
Plus, the compressor fan would only come on when you hit the go-pedal. A simple variable resistor could be wired directly into the throttle, or the fan motor could read the signal from the TPS (throttle positioning sensor).
Anyway, it seems like such a cheap and easy solution to add moderate boost. Am I crazy?
-
There are some amazingly powerful (and small) electric motors out there nowadays, so would this work?
Even if you could only get a few pounds of boost, so what? The installation would be super-easy and the cost should be minimal. A small boost can provide impressive additional horsepower.
Plus, the compressor fan would only come on when you hit the go-pedal. A simple variable resistor could be wired directly into the throttle, or the fan motor could read the signal from the TPS (throttle positioning sensor).
Anyway, it seems like such a cheap and easy solution to add moderate boost. Am I crazy?
-
Last edited by Chevy-SS; 12-21-2008 at 11:21 AM.
#2
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Shreveport/Bossier Louisiana
Posts: 7,121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08
It seems to me that a powerful electric motor and fan could be incorporated into the air intake housing. Maybe make the housing a little bigger to accommodate the electric motor.
There are some amazingly powerful (and small) electric motors out there nowadays, so would this work?
Even if you could only get a few pounds of boost, so what? The installation would be super-easy and the cost should be minimal. A small boost can provide impressive additional horsepower.
Plus, the compressor fan would only come on when you hit the go-pedal. A simple variable resistor could be wired directly into the throttle, or the fan motor could read the signal from the TPS (throttle positioning sensor).
Anyway, it seems like such a cheap and easy solution to add moderate boost. Am I crazy?
-
There are some amazingly powerful (and small) electric motors out there nowadays, so would this work?
Even if you could only get a few pounds of boost, so what? The installation would be super-easy and the cost should be minimal. A small boost can provide impressive additional horsepower.
Plus, the compressor fan would only come on when you hit the go-pedal. A simple variable resistor could be wired directly into the throttle, or the fan motor could read the signal from the TPS (throttle positioning sensor).
Anyway, it seems like such a cheap and easy solution to add moderate boost. Am I crazy?
-
JK man, but really, I dont see it being worthwhile.
#4
Team Owner
I would asume it would need to be progressive or are you wanting 2000 RPM and "BLAST" 12 PSI Electric blower all the way to 7000 RPM?
I would much rather do TT's but as they say anything is possible!
Thanks,Matt
I would much rather do TT's but as they say anything is possible!
Thanks,Matt
#5
Drifting
Thread Starter
LOL, u guys are cruel. But think about how much fan speed and pressure something like this 3HP mini-starter could produce with proper gearing.
Honestly, I can't believe no one is exploring this type of compressor more carefully. You could mount it virtually anywhere. The connections would be simple.
If you are one of those that buy into the Vararam concept, then this is more of the same.
I'm gonna email this idea to Vararam and see what they think.
-
Honestly, I can't believe no one is exploring this type of compressor more carefully. You could mount it virtually anywhere. The connections would be simple.
If you are one of those that buy into the Vararam concept, then this is more of the same.
I'm gonna email this idea to Vararam and see what they think.
-
#6
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Niagara Falls NY
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
[QUOTE=madmatt9471;1568278336]I would asume it would need to be progressive or are you wanting 2000 RPM and "BLAST" 12 PSI Electric blower all the way to 7000 RPM?
Ya.And you could add a BAP for more boost
Sorry Chevy-SS.I couldn't resist.
Ya.And you could add a BAP for more boost
Sorry Chevy-SS.I couldn't resist.
#7
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Chicagoland Area IL
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
It seems to me that a powerful electric motor and fan could be incorporated into the air intake housing. Maybe make the housing a little bigger to accommodate the electric motor.
There are some amazingly powerful (and small) electric motors out there nowadays, so would this work?
Even if you could only get a few pounds of boost, so what? The installation would be super-easy and the cost should be minimal. A small boost can provide impressive additional horsepower.
Plus, the compressor fan would only come on when you hit the go-pedal. A simple variable resistor could be wired directly into the throttle, or the fan motor could read the signal from the TPS (throttle positioning sensor).
Anyway, it seems like such a cheap and easy solution to add moderate boost. Am I crazy?
-
There are some amazingly powerful (and small) electric motors out there nowadays, so would this work?
Even if you could only get a few pounds of boost, so what? The installation would be super-easy and the cost should be minimal. A small boost can provide impressive additional horsepower.
Plus, the compressor fan would only come on when you hit the go-pedal. A simple variable resistor could be wired directly into the throttle, or the fan motor could read the signal from the TPS (throttle positioning sensor).
Anyway, it seems like such a cheap and easy solution to add moderate boost. Am I crazy?
-
All you could reasonably expect as far as gains is just a bit more then a good cold air induction system, or something on the order of a 20 hp gain.
Now I'm not sure if you are looking at something like electric ducted fans, which are rated in lbs/force or thrust which is different then boost which is usually PSI (lbs/in^2). The problem with fans is they flow allot of air with minimal pressure rise.
Oh, before I forget there are companies that are experimenting with electric assist turbos to reduce lag, but that is assist not run. Then there was/is a company that did try a supercharger but it can only be used in small burst and required additional batteries that added allot of weight. To my knowledge best power density is 125-140 watts/kg for batteries and that is the main reason we are not driving electric cars...
Mike
Last edited by Skunkworks; 12-21-2008 at 12:56 PM.
#9
Drifting
Thread Starter
Well no but performance improvements would be minimal... most superchargers consume 40+ hp (1 hp =746 watts) so that's 29,840 watts, now in amps (a = w / v) 2587 a or amps required at 12 v. That's way beyond what can reasonably be managed in a automotive electrical system...
All you could reasonably expect as far as gains is just a bit more then a good cold air induction system, or something on the order of a 20 hp gain.
Now I'm not sure if you are looking at something like electric ducted fans, which are rated in lbs/force or thrust which is different then boost which is usually PSI (lbs/in^2). The problem with fans is they flow allot of air with minimal pressure rise.
Oh, before I forget there are companies that are experimenting with electric assist turbos to reduce lag, but that is assist not run. Then there was/is a company that did try a supercharger but it can only be used in small burst and required additional batteries that added allot of weight. To my knowledge best power density is 125-140 watts/kg for batteries and that is the main reason we are not driving electric cars...
Mike
All you could reasonably expect as far as gains is just a bit more then a good cold air induction system, or something on the order of a 20 hp gain.
Now I'm not sure if you are looking at something like electric ducted fans, which are rated in lbs/force or thrust which is different then boost which is usually PSI (lbs/in^2). The problem with fans is they flow allot of air with minimal pressure rise.
Oh, before I forget there are companies that are experimenting with electric assist turbos to reduce lag, but that is assist not run. Then there was/is a company that did try a supercharger but it can only be used in small burst and required additional batteries that added allot of weight. To my knowledge best power density is 125-140 watts/kg for batteries and that is the main reason we are not driving electric cars...
Mike
Mike,
thanks for the info. I am suggesting small amount of boost, nowhere near the amounts that a full-on SC or TC can accomplish. Short durations of heavy amperage draw could be taken up with a capacitor, couldn't they? I mean, let's face it - how long is anyone actually going at WOT (wide open throttle) on their street-driven cars?
Dave
#10
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Chicagoland Area IL
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Mike,
thanks for the info. I am suggesting small amount of boost, nowhere near the amounts that a full-on SC or TC can accomplish. Short durations of heavy amperage draw could be taken up with a capacitor, couldn't they? I mean, let's face it - how long is anyone actually going at WOT (wide open throttle) on their street-driven cars?
Dave
thanks for the info. I am suggesting small amount of boost, nowhere near the amounts that a full-on SC or TC can accomplish. Short durations of heavy amperage draw could be taken up with a capacitor, couldn't they? I mean, let's face it - how long is anyone actually going at WOT (wide open throttle) on their street-driven cars?
Dave
If people don't think outside the box then we wouldn't have any innovation. Why don't you think about what mass flow and PSI you would be looking for, then I'll run some numbers and give power required in either watts of hp.
As far as capacitors yes there are some improvements but power density watts/kg or pound is lower then batteries, like 1/5, maybe better with ultra capacitors, but they have low operating voltages and have to be charge balanced. Oh and very expensive, you would likely be into it over $1000 (capacitors only) just to sustain a very short burst...
This is a complex subject but at the very least you would require a second alternator to handle charging... also it would be advisable to raise voltage to say 48 v to reduce current demand.
Also what technology you looking at, axial or centrifugal? If axial you will need some serious tip speeds (800+ ft/s) to get even a modest 1-2 psi of boost.
Mike
Last edited by Skunkworks; 12-21-2008 at 02:02 PM. Reason: typo
#12
Drifting
Thread Starter
If second alternator was required, then I would have to say - forget it. May as well add SC or TC at that point. For short bursts, I gotta believe a stock alternator would suffice. For sustained driving, then this idea might not be best.
Voltage could be played with, but the system would have to be simple and easy to install. Once it starts getting complex, then you may as well do SC or TC.
I emailed Vararam with the idea. I'll be interested to see if they've explored this at all. They are very quick to tout the natural SC effect (at speed) of their CAI.
Dave
#13
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Port Arthur, Texas 77642
Posts: 8,475
Received 331 Likes
on
241 Posts
If second alternator was required, then I would have to say - forget it. May as well add SC or TC at that point. For short bursts, I gotta believe a stock alternator would suffice. For sustained driving, then this idea might not be best.
Voltage could be played with, but the system would have to be simple and easy to install. Once it starts getting complex, then you may as well do SC or TC.
I emailed Vararam with the idea. I'll be interested to see if they've explored this at all. They are very quick to tout the natural SC effect (at speed) of their CAI.
Dave
Voltage could be played with, but the system would have to be simple and easy to install. Once it starts getting complex, then you may as well do SC or TC.
I emailed Vararam with the idea. I'll be interested to see if they've explored this at all. They are very quick to tout the natural SC effect (at speed) of their CAI.
Dave
IMHO and FTR, Vararam is a good design for supplying an abundance of cool outside air to help our engines run cooler and stronger (no chance of gulping any air heated by proximity of inlet to engine)
Merry Christmas
#14
#15
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Chicagoland Area IL
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Mike
Last edited by Skunkworks; 12-21-2008 at 08:09 PM.
#16
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Chicagoland Area IL
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
FWIW, I was reading a thread about Vararam yesterday in another section and someone chimed in that for the Vararam to actually compress air your car would have to be traveing at 300 mph whoaaa I'm not certain of the accuracy of that statement (Mike, what say you?), but it seems to relate back to a statement by Mike earlier in this thread.
The SR 71 (picture above) used its jet engines only to get up to speed then it was bypassed via 5 butterfly valve and compressed air sent to afterburner or re-heat stage. The cone on engine inlet moved in and out to create desired pressure. It was a hybrid engine, when subsonic it was a jet engine, supersonic it was a ram jet, over simplified.
If you want to read up on ram jets refer to following http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramjet .
Don't have info handy but would be at least a few PSI (likely more) by 300 MPH using ram air compression.
Mike
Last edited by Skunkworks; 12-21-2008 at 08:32 PM.
#17
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Port Arthur, Texas 77642
Posts: 8,475
Received 331 Likes
on
241 Posts
Yes you do compress with speed...
The SR 71 (picture above) used its jet engines only to get up to speed then it was bypassed via 5 butterfly valve and compressed air sent to afterburner or re-heat stage. The cone on engine inlet moved in and out to create desired pressure. It was a hybrid engine, when subsonic it was a jet engine, supersonic it was a ram jet, over simplified.
If you want to read up on ram jets refer to following http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramjet .
Don't have info handy but would be at least a few PSI (likely more) by 300 MPH using ram air compression.
Mike
The SR 71 (picture above) used its jet engines only to get up to speed then it was bypassed via 5 butterfly valve and compressed air sent to afterburner or re-heat stage. The cone on engine inlet moved in and out to create desired pressure. It was a hybrid engine, when subsonic it was a jet engine, supersonic it was a ram jet, over simplified.
If you want to read up on ram jets refer to following http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramjet .
Don't have info handy but would be at least a few PSI (likely more) by 300 MPH using ram air compression.
Mike
FWIW...I have always been an avid enthusiast of the SR 71's, to me they represented the pinnacle of high performance up until their retirement. If memory serves me correctly, due to use of construction materials by design they leaked fuel untill the fuselage was heated to operating temperature by air friction at high speeds...or something like that
#18
Drifting
Thread Starter
Interesting vid on the leaf blower, thanks for posting that link. It seems there is substantial power to be gained, even with the small amount of actual boost that comes from something like a leaf blower. Granted, lots of variables and things to consider, but you gotta be impressed by the proven dyno results and the sheer simplicity of the experiment.
#19
Melting Slicks
Thanks Mike
FWIW...I have always been an avid enthusiast of the SR 71's, to me they represented the pinnacle of high performance up until their retirement. If memory serves me correctly, due to use of construction materials by design they leaked fuel untill the fuselage was heated to operating temperature by air friction at high speeds...or something like that
FWIW...I have always been an avid enthusiast of the SR 71's, to me they represented the pinnacle of high performance up until their retirement. If memory serves me correctly, due to use of construction materials by design they leaked fuel untill the fuselage was heated to operating temperature by air friction at high speeds...or something like that
#20
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Greater Detroit Metro MI, when I'm not travelling.
Posts: 6,149
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
It seems to me that a powerful electric motor and fan could be incorporated into the air intake housing. Maybe make the housing a little bigger to accommodate the electric motor.
There are some amazingly powerful (and small) electric motors out there nowadays, so would this work?
Even if you could only get a few pounds of boost, so what? The installation would be super-easy and the cost should be minimal. A small boost can provide impressive additional horsepower.
Plus, the compressor fan would only come on when you hit the go-pedal. A simple variable resistor could be wired directly into the throttle, or the fan motor could read the signal from the TPS (throttle positioning sensor).
Anyway, it seems like such a cheap and easy solution to add moderate boost. Am I crazy?
-
There are some amazingly powerful (and small) electric motors out there nowadays, so would this work?
Even if you could only get a few pounds of boost, so what? The installation would be super-easy and the cost should be minimal. A small boost can provide impressive additional horsepower.
Plus, the compressor fan would only come on when you hit the go-pedal. A simple variable resistor could be wired directly into the throttle, or the fan motor could read the signal from the TPS (throttle positioning sensor).
Anyway, it seems like such a cheap and easy solution to add moderate boost. Am I crazy?
-
A *small* supercharger like my Vortech is drawing 75horsepower at peak boost. 75HP = 55950Watts.
From your alternator, at 12Volts, that would amount to a current draw of 4700Amperes, and that is assuming a 100% efficient motor...
Now, a Corvette alternator is rated at 110Amps...
So, if you could get your engine to drive 42 alternators, you would then be able to drive an electric motor big enough to run a supercharger... There is a catch though... Have you ever seen a 75HP fan? I don't have a picture of one, but here is a 25HP one:
It is being hoised by a forklift because the motor alone weights 280LBS
You could probably overdrive 2 of those to run a Vortech and flow 1000CFM.
A small computer fan as you suggested would actually come apart in the intake stream and damage your engine.
Just to keep up with your engine's airflow requirements you would need an electric motor consuming several times what your alternator can provide...
I am all for thinking outside the box, but this is one of those ridiculous ideas you see on Ebay catching suckers, and it really doesn't belong in this forum...
Last edited by PowerLabs; 12-22-2008 at 10:27 PM.