Centri SC or Turbo for street car???
#23
Le Mans Master
No war at all but you answered the question by stating the mods of each vehicle. You said you ran two stock bottom end turbo cars and I am sure they did not make anywhere near the power you are making(671rwhp/564rwtq). If you have the gears, etc. we are not comparing apples to apples. You racing them from 40 to 170 is like you racing me 40 to 170. No race at all. With the current economy you guys should not be wasting gas on races that are not good.
Nice car VegasRed! I Really like how it rolls into the powerband!
#25
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 2001
Posts: 18,682
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12
No war at all but you answered the question by stating the mods of each vehicle. You said you ran two stock bottom end turbo cars and I am sure they did not make anywhere near the power you are making(671rwhp/564rwtq). If you have the gears, etc. we are not comparing apples to apples. You racing them from 40 to 170 is like you racing me 40 to 170. No race at all. With the current economy you guys should not be wasting gas on races that are not good.
I know my car is not the fastest one out there but it has yet to let me down. The day it will, I will make it faster
#27
Safety Car
You are making a lot of power for stock bottom end. Please tell me you are on race gas. Also, for those cars to have lag something is wrong. The APS kit come with some small turbos and even on a 346ci car it should hit full boost pretty damn quick. The Cerra Kit I dont know too much about. You said the APS car had 3.73 and still had a lot of lag? Something does not add up. Either the owner of the car has a really bad boost leak or he started the 40mph race off in 3rd or 4th gear.
Last edited by Vince99FRC; 04-09-2008 at 08:36 PM.
#28
Race Director
I had a STS on a forged 346 and now have a paxton with 8 ribs on the same motor. Now ecs blower cam vs. turbo cam (yet they're closely spec'd)
The car makes wicked midrange over the sts setup. As in I haven't been able to use much of the power due to traction.......even with the drag pack on it at 30 psi. The car was skating, i was puckering.
The car makes wicked midrange over the sts setup. As in I haven't been able to use much of the power due to traction.......even with the drag pack on it at 30 psi. The car was skating, i was puckering.
#29
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan
Posts: 7,078
Received 1,817 Likes
on
1,085 Posts
#31
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: LAS VEGAS NV
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes
on
61 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08
either way.. i have seen about 8 s/c cars at the track and ALL have a hard time with 550 rwhp to 700rwhp breaking 125 mph.. not sure if its the driver or elevation.. but there are few on this forum who have dynoed around 550 and ran 122 at best.. and few who have 680-700rwhp from what they told me and i saw them run 126, 128 .. yes elevation on s/c hurts more then turbos.. but still..
nothing against s/c as i have never owned one.. but from a few people who have had both they say Twin turbo all the way.. and you never see people go from turbo for s/c.. its Always the other way...
#33
Team Owner
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Elmhurst, IL (West Suburb of Chicago) & Home of MEGA Horsepower
Posts: 26,714
Received 584 Likes
on
399 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06
Thanks for all the responses guys.
I'm really leaning towards turbos now.
Someone already made a point to be honest about the application, and quite frankly I can't remember the last time I got in a stop light race, er, exhibition of speed. I am constantly expressing my vehicles on the highway however and I rarely ever go to the track.
I should just trust my instincts that the turbo will be more exciting based on my pervious rides in turbo cars.
I have a P1SC'd C4 right now and it pulls hard but you have to wait for it. I like it an all, but it's no turbo car.
I'm really leaning towards turbos now.
Someone already made a point to be honest about the application, and quite frankly I can't remember the last time I got in a stop light race, er, exhibition of speed. I am constantly expressing my vehicles on the highway however and I rarely ever go to the track.
I should just trust my instincts that the turbo will be more exciting based on my pervious rides in turbo cars.
I have a P1SC'd C4 right now and it pulls hard but you have to wait for it. I like it an all, but it's no turbo car.
My advice is follow your gut and heart, and if this tells you to go with a twin turbo C5, then you should hold out until the right one comes along and they come along quite often around here (as do the high HP centri. supercharged cars).
Also, you have to look at the complete package of the car from the engine builder, tuner, drivetrain, driveline, workmanship of work done, was the car beat/flogged on often, raced, street driven, or well maintained, and whether the car is having issues (i.e.- down in compression) etc, etc.!
Be patient Grasshopper, the economy, time, and prices for highly modded C5 all work to your advantage (and it certainly is a buyer's market)!
#34
Race Director
#35
Le Mans Master
I agree with you about buying a car DONE. you save quite a bit of the cost, just be careful and really check out the car.
I bought a TTiX tiger shark and had it converted to an automatic to take out some of the drivetrain shock. car will make 800 at the wheels but unless you are on slicks 600 is more than enough as it's about the limit you can hook even on nittos which are very streetable (335/18)
another perspective about centrifical blowers, on a street car one of the reasons blower cars work so well is that the power is very progressive and more "linear", a bit easier to control.
with the turbos, the car comes on boost and the torq curve bulges up pretty fast, which can be a bit harder to control. don't be afraid of a 3.45 gear, the turbos LIKE the load and you can plant the torq easier.
to finally answer your question is very simple, since you are looking for a complete car go drive BOTH. find one that is set up right, either method will make all the power you can handle and then some.
both are very exciting, I prefer turbos for the sound and "torque swell" you feel getting into boost. it's quite addictive.
but I have ridden around in centrifical blower cars that are hellaciously fast, reliable, and cheaper to build. done right they are just as exciting at a cheaper price point.
enjoy!
I bought a TTiX tiger shark and had it converted to an automatic to take out some of the drivetrain shock. car will make 800 at the wheels but unless you are on slicks 600 is more than enough as it's about the limit you can hook even on nittos which are very streetable (335/18)
another perspective about centrifical blowers, on a street car one of the reasons blower cars work so well is that the power is very progressive and more "linear", a bit easier to control.
with the turbos, the car comes on boost and the torq curve bulges up pretty fast, which can be a bit harder to control. don't be afraid of a 3.45 gear, the turbos LIKE the load and you can plant the torq easier.
to finally answer your question is very simple, since you are looking for a complete car go drive BOTH. find one that is set up right, either method will make all the power you can handle and then some.
both are very exciting, I prefer turbos for the sound and "torque swell" you feel getting into boost. it's quite addictive.
but I have ridden around in centrifical blower cars that are hellaciously fast, reliable, and cheaper to build. done right they are just as exciting at a cheaper price point.
enjoy!
#36
I haven't had a belt issue in 2 years since I redesigned my F1R system using the ECS 8 rib bracket. Belt issues were resolved years ago, so I don't know why turbo guys keep harping on "belt issues". The only centri/Maggie cars that have belt issues are ones that aren't setup right....usually alignment issues.
Last edited by HIGHRPM; 04-10-2008 at 12:16 PM.
#38
Melting Slicks
Without quoting and arguing about which is better ect, here's my .02
It's all about what you have to spend!
I have an 800rwhp D1 car that is a down right land rocket and saved me at least $4,000 by not going turbo. To accomplish the same thing and have spent less is what my goal was.
I don't have any belt issues and it drives like a cammed vette.
If money is no object I would have gone with turbos. That's not saying I'm not happy with the blower. In fact I like blowing away turbo guys with my lil ol D1.
It's all about what you have to spend!
I have an 800rwhp D1 car that is a down right land rocket and saved me at least $4,000 by not going turbo. To accomplish the same thing and have spent less is what my goal was.
I don't have any belt issues and it drives like a cammed vette.
If money is no object I would have gone with turbos. That's not saying I'm not happy with the blower. In fact I like blowing away turbo guys with my lil ol D1.
#39
Race Director
Although by far not one of the most powerful cars in this section of the forum. Here is a dyno graph of my LPE TT Vert. It has a pretty nice torque curve, and is possibly the easiest street driven manual car I have ever owned.
#40
Team Owner
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Elmhurst, IL (West Suburb of Chicago) & Home of MEGA Horsepower
Posts: 26,714
Received 584 Likes
on
399 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06
I haven't had a belt issue in 2 years since I redesigned my F1R system using the ECS 8 rib bracket. Belt issues were resolved years ago, so I don't know why turbo guys keep harping on "belt issues". The only centri/Maggie cars that have belt issues are ones that aren't setup right....usually alignment issues.
1000%, I have had my D1 with a 6 rib on for 12,750 miles and my current forged set-up with ECS 8 Rib bracket on for 900 miles, WITH 0 FREAKING BELT ISSUES!