Cutting the throttle body 'divider' in plenum?
#1
Pro
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Jyväskylä, FINLAND
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes
on
82 Posts
Cutting the throttle body 'divider' in plenum?
I have siamesed the openings into runners from the plenum and I also matched the throttle body and plenum to the gasket. This is what I have done already at the plenum side:
The throttle body from this:
into this:
Then, I found a different gasket for the TB; with the opening
So, is there any harm or downside, if I take out the visible aluminum outside the gasket, between the openings at the plenum side? Increased turbulence or less turbulence? I'm guessing less turbulence, but does anybody know?
I should lift the engine back into engine bay by the end of the week and I'd like to have 'everything' done before Friday. (There are other minor things yet to do... like installing lifters, pushrods, rockers, the intake manifold etc., but that all takes just a few hours, no biggie )
The throttle body from this:
into this:
Then, I found a different gasket for the TB; with the opening
So, is there any harm or downside, if I take out the visible aluminum outside the gasket, between the openings at the plenum side? Increased turbulence or less turbulence? I'm guessing less turbulence, but does anybody know?
I should lift the engine back into engine bay by the end of the week and I'd like to have 'everything' done before Friday. (There are other minor things yet to do... like installing lifters, pushrods, rockers, the intake manifold etc., but that all takes just a few hours, no biggie )
#2
I would think that divider/partician is necessary for the air metering for that center passage. Thats idle control air I believe, and removal could effect how well it can manage the idle.
I've never seen it totally removed. No benefit as far as flow...thats limited by the TB bore and what can possibly pass thru the baseplate and head runner. Even the ductwork ahead of the TB has something to say about how much and how fast the air flow is..
The plenum work does look good !
is that a stock TB? if it is, that would be the limiting factor for that engine.
Find a good 52mmTB. A 58 is pointless unless you have bored it to 400ci or more. Be prepared for some "tune" changes...
I've never seen it totally removed. No benefit as far as flow...thats limited by the TB bore and what can possibly pass thru the baseplate and head runner. Even the ductwork ahead of the TB has something to say about how much and how fast the air flow is..
The plenum work does look good !
is that a stock TB? if it is, that would be the limiting factor for that engine.
Find a good 52mmTB. A 58 is pointless unless you have bored it to 400ci or more. Be prepared for some "tune" changes...
Last edited by leesvet; 02-17-2013 at 05:27 PM.
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes
on
2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
Ive removed it plenty of time no problems. Did it help, who knows without back to back testing. Probably not is my guess
#4
Only the 85 - 88 intakes with CSI have that port that feeds air through a runner cast on the underside of plenum , down a tube on drv runner into holes in the ports of the base
Was deleted on the 89 - 92 non CSI intakes and the air from the IAC dumped out into the plenum directly behind the TB blades so obviously not related to idle control
#5
Pro
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Jyväskylä, FINLAND
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes
on
82 Posts
I've never seen it totally removed. No benefit as far as flow...thats limited by the TB bore and what can possibly pass thru the baseplate and head runner. Even the ductwork ahead of the TB has something to say about how much and how fast the air flow is..
The plenum work does look good !
is that a stock TB? if it is, that would be the limiting factor for that engine.
Find a good 52mmTB. A 58 is pointless unless you have bored it to 400ci or more. Be prepared for some "tune" changes...
The plenum work does look good !
is that a stock TB? if it is, that would be the limiting factor for that engine.
Find a good 52mmTB. A 58 is pointless unless you have bored it to 400ci or more. Be prepared for some "tune" changes...
And yes, I'll have it tuned, since there are some other modifications also, like bigger runners, porting every inch from plenum, runners and baseplate/intake manifold and gasket matching.
#6
Pro
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Jyväskylä, FINLAND
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes
on
82 Posts
Only the 85 - 88 intakes with CSI have that port that feeds air through a runner cast on the underside of plenum , down a tube on drv runner into holes in the ports of the base
Was deleted on the 89 - 92 non CSI intakes and the air from the IAC dumped out into the plenum directly behind the TB blades so obviously not related to idle control
#7
Race Director
In the first picture, the holes on the right just behind the gasket are for the EGR. There was a bump in front of them to create a venturi effect to suck in the exhaust gases.
My recollection is that the triangular-shaped opening between the throttle bores was for the cold start injector. Somebody else needs to verify this...
My recollection is that the triangular-shaped opening between the throttle bores was for the cold start injector. Somebody else needs to verify this...
#8
Race Director
Minirams don't have that divider. I would think it's not necessary. Only back to back testing will give the answer.
#9
As I stated above , was only used on the CSI equipped intakes so reasonable to assume it directed air there to dilute and distribute the fuel from the CS injector when cranking over
#10
Pro
Thread Starter
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Jyväskylä, FINLAND
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes
on
82 Posts
Just wanted to get the answers the easy way, if somebody would already have had some hard data...
Anyway, I'll probably just leave it as it is, at least for now. There are more important issues, which demand pretty urgent attention. For instance valve covers
#12
Race Director
I'd drop all work on the plenum divider immediately and address the valve cover problem. Those things are UUGGGLLLYYYY.
#13
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes
on
2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
Off an 89 no cold start injector.
Pretty sure it takes EGR gases from the small passages in the runner (and also from the base)
Its been awhile since Ive worked on one so the memory is foggy
Pretty sure it takes EGR gases from the small passages in the runner (and also from the base)
Its been awhile since Ive worked on one so the memory is foggy