C4 FRAME TECH. Talk about frame specs and flex solutions...
#41
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Posts: 18,393
Received 775 Likes
on
556 Posts
I started to do the torsion math numbers, but then I noticed there's no arm length mentioned (just force and degrees). I assume it to be the Newton force at one meter, so I ran some numbers and got 2768 lb-ft/degree, using the original number of 214kN/rad.
Please correct me if I misunderstood something in the postings.
Please correct me if I misunderstood something in the postings.
#42
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
Thread Starter
My suspension model is pretty decent.
In order to do what you want with the frame model, I'd have to get in and hollow it out, it's a solid, to the wall thicknesses on the car. Which is not constant, not to mention the overlapping pieces.
I really just use it to see if I have the mount locations correct.
In order to do what you want with the frame model, I'd have to get in and hollow it out, it's a solid, to the wall thicknesses on the car. Which is not constant, not to mention the overlapping pieces.
I really just use it to see if I have the mount locations correct.
#43
Safety Car
I started to do the torsion math numbers, but then I noticed there's no arm length mentioned (just force and degrees). I assume it to be the Newton force at one meter, so I ran some numbers and got 2768 lb-ft/degree, using the original number of 214kN/rad.
Please correct me if I misunderstood something in the postings.
Please correct me if I misunderstood something in the postings.
I just crunched the numbers for lb-ft per degree of rotation, and I apologize for my earlier post. It doesn't have anything to do with the wheelbase, I meant the track of the car. Here goes...
kN per radian of rotation: 214
degrees per radian: 57.29578
kN per degree rotation: 3.735005
lbf per degree rotation: 839.6625
front track (in): 57.7
front track (ft): 4.808333
front moment arm (ft): 2.404167 (=track/2)
torque per degree rotation: 2018.689 ft-lbs
Someone correct this if I'm wrong. Seems very far out of line with the posted C3 specs, but then again the C3 is basically the C2 chassis, so pretty old...
#44
Race Director
This is not the technical answer you are looking for. Only my seat of the pants experience. I installed the Vette2Vette torsion bars a few days ago and tourqued them down good and tight. I did a test run on a local twisty 2-lane blacktop road that has about 8 of the "30mph" curves (per the peed limit signs)> I have run this road several times with my previously owned 60,000 mile stock suspension 87 vert that has the standard X brace along with a GM hardtop that I modified to fit.
I also ran this with a 40,000 mi LT4 vert with no hardtop and F45 selective handling turned to the max setting.
I ran this road 2 days ago with my 110,000 91 coupe with the targa top off. It has the FX3 selective ride option and I had the switch turned to the max setting.
My impression was that the 91 took the curves faster than the 94 which took them faster than the 87. With the torque of the L98 engines at the speed I was running the LT4 did not really make a difference. Handling did. The tires were new on the 91 and 87 but were not high performance skins. The tires on the LT4 nice, meaty GS D3s with only about 5,000 miles on them.
I drove the 91 over a set of double railroad tracks that I must negotiate on my way to and from work daily. I was suprised that the 91 did not rattle over these tracks like it used to do. It feels tight and drives like a much newer car. I love these rods!
It took me under an hour to install these. There are brackets that use 4 bolts to attach to the front X brace threaded holes that are drilled on all 86-96 coupes and convertibles. The rear brackets use the bolt that attaches the lower dog bone.
Here are some pics. The car was only about 18" off the floor so I had a hard time getting good shots.
The kit:
Front bracket in place:
Rear bracket in place:
Installed (pic is not the best):
Here is a pic of the pre production model on a ZR1 I look during Bloomington Gold:
It appears that the low point of the installation is at the rear brackets. I measured with the car on jack stands and the distance at the rear bracket is the same distance to the floor as the front portion of the Y pipe. Since my rear Y pipe has no scrapes on it I assume that it never has dragged on anything. I do have 18" C5 wheels on the back now so it may sit a little higher than the stock 17" wheels do.
Disclaimer: I do not receive any commission on any of these that or sold and I am not an employee of the manufacturer. Jeff over at the Corvette Guru forum is putting together a group purchase. He is the owner of the ZR1 in the picture.
I just want to say that this 110,000 mile coupe drives tight and like a new car even with the hatch roof off.
I also ran this with a 40,000 mi LT4 vert with no hardtop and F45 selective handling turned to the max setting.
I ran this road 2 days ago with my 110,000 91 coupe with the targa top off. It has the FX3 selective ride option and I had the switch turned to the max setting.
My impression was that the 91 took the curves faster than the 94 which took them faster than the 87. With the torque of the L98 engines at the speed I was running the LT4 did not really make a difference. Handling did. The tires were new on the 91 and 87 but were not high performance skins. The tires on the LT4 nice, meaty GS D3s with only about 5,000 miles on them.
I drove the 91 over a set of double railroad tracks that I must negotiate on my way to and from work daily. I was suprised that the 91 did not rattle over these tracks like it used to do. It feels tight and drives like a much newer car. I love these rods!
It took me under an hour to install these. There are brackets that use 4 bolts to attach to the front X brace threaded holes that are drilled on all 86-96 coupes and convertibles. The rear brackets use the bolt that attaches the lower dog bone.
Here are some pics. The car was only about 18" off the floor so I had a hard time getting good shots.
The kit:
Front bracket in place:
Rear bracket in place:
Installed (pic is not the best):
Here is a pic of the pre production model on a ZR1 I look during Bloomington Gold:
It appears that the low point of the installation is at the rear brackets. I measured with the car on jack stands and the distance at the rear bracket is the same distance to the floor as the front portion of the Y pipe. Since my rear Y pipe has no scrapes on it I assume that it never has dragged on anything. I do have 18" C5 wheels on the back now so it may sit a little higher than the stock 17" wheels do.
Disclaimer: I do not receive any commission on any of these that or sold and I am not an employee of the manufacturer. Jeff over at the Corvette Guru forum is putting together a group purchase. He is the owner of the ZR1 in the picture.
I just want to say that this 110,000 mile coupe drives tight and like a new car even with the hatch roof off.
Last edited by corvetteronw; 07-06-2010 at 12:05 AM.
#46
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
Thread Starter
^I don't know what either of those things are^. Can you post a link or two? EDIT: I see. They look like this:
That may help a little...but I can't see it helping anything forward of the back of the seat. IMO, the real problems start at the back of the seat and go forward. The rocker/floorpan is terrible, proven by what happens when you remove the roof.
I had forgotten about the lever arm length. I don't believe that was clarified anywhere. You assume 1 meter (not a bad assumption)...StealthLT4 thinks the arm is at the lower ball joint...I don't know. Anyone else have an idea?
That may help a little...but I can't see it helping anything forward of the back of the seat. IMO, the real problems start at the back of the seat and go forward. The rocker/floorpan is terrible, proven by what happens when you remove the roof.
I started to do the torsion math numbers, but then I noticed there's no arm length mentioned (just force and degrees). I assume it to be the Newton force at one meter, so I ran some numbers and got 2768 lb-ft/degree, using the original number of 214kN/rad.
Please correct me if I misunderstood something in the postings.
Please correct me if I misunderstood something in the postings.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; 07-06-2010 at 12:31 AM.
#47
I don't know what either of those things are. Can you post a link or two?
I had forgotten about the lever arm length. I don't believe that was clarified anywhere. You assume 1 meter (not a bad assumption)...StealthLT4 thinks the arm is at the lower ball joint...I don't know. Anyone else have an idea?
I had forgotten about the lever arm length. I don't believe that was clarified anywhere. You assume 1 meter (not a bad assumption)...StealthLT4 thinks the arm is at the lower ball joint...I don't know. Anyone else have an idea?
http://dougrippie.com/?p=930
R/D racing st frame second to bottom of this page
http://www.r-dracing.com/stframe1.htm
Last edited by Charleston2012; 07-06-2010 at 12:29 AM.
#48
Safety Car
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
11 Posts
If these rods were to be stitch welded (with small strips of plate steel every 8" or so) to the pinched seams, they would really tie the front and rear high strength steel frame sections together creating a very strong "perimeter frame".
Last edited by GKK; 07-06-2010 at 03:22 AM.
#49
Melting Slicks
here is a thread that I started about developing a "real" chassis stiffening brace.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c4-t...of-the-c4.html
I'd still like to see something similiar to this for a c4....
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c4-t...of-the-c4.html
I'd still like to see something similiar to this for a c4....
Last edited by mnstrlt1; 07-06-2010 at 01:54 AM.
#50
Le Mans Master
Edit: Stealth beat me to it:
Last edited by Aurora40; 07-06-2010 at 07:04 AM.
#51
The people who say not so much, are usually the ones that don't have them, because they can't see, or understand in their own mind why it might work.
Any, and all bracing I have put on my own car has made improvements, and or changes in handling, but mostly rigidity.
I have a vert, but if I get the chance at a R&D X frame brace I am putting that on just to see the difference. It looks a lot more sturdy than the stock one. The stock one is flimsy when not attached at all points.
I am expecting bigger changes when I put my 8 point roll bar in.
Any, and all bracing I have put on my own car has made improvements, and or changes in handling, but mostly rigidity.
I have a vert, but if I get the chance at a R&D X frame brace I am putting that on just to see the difference. It looks a lot more sturdy than the stock one. The stock one is flimsy when not attached at all points.
I am expecting bigger changes when I put my 8 point roll bar in.
#52
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Posts: 18,393
Received 775 Likes
on
556 Posts
Imagine if you held the rear two suspension mounting points stationary, and put the front of the car in a "jig" that supported the weight (did not allow vertical or horizontal motion), but allowed it to rotate around the car's forward axis (the axis going from the rear to the front). Then you push with 214 kN of force on one of the front suspension mounting points straight up or down, and the car would rotate one radian (57*). Obviously it would snap before it got this far, but you get the picture.
...
...
I believe you've mistaken me for someone else.
Regarding your calculations, I have to disagree. We're only discussing frames here. Track width does not enter into the picture. We are twisting the frame at the wheelbase points, as this is where the forces are inputted into the structure. Additionally, it would make no sense that the rating would be 214kN/radian and at some moment arm other than one meter. That's why I posted the 2700 ft-lbf/degree calculation. I'm looking for feedback on why these numbers may be inaccurate, given the torsion info on the first page.
Last edited by 69427; 07-06-2010 at 10:40 AM. Reason: Added content.
#55
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
Thread Starter
Road racers use cages, which I don't want. I already had a C6 and didn't like it. I moved the other direction; "down" (?) I guess you'd call it. I'm happier for it though so...
I don't. Chop the hoop and put ins a Cross car brace and you're probably pretty close to a 'Vert.
I don't. Chop the hoop and put ins a Cross car brace and you're probably pretty close to a 'Vert.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; 07-06-2010 at 05:42 PM.
#56
Drifting
Appears the front brackets would interfere with a stock or RD Xbrace. Can you comment on that?
I have a stock X on my coupe. I welded plates into the rear pockets to give me enough thickness to drill holes & tap them. I also boxed a good part of the stock stamped X itself. Anyone who has one will know they are a stamped into a modified W shape & it was easy enough to lay a strip of sheet metal along the bottom of the W shape & weld it in. The resulting tube/box really made it stronger. I also obtained the bolt/straps that lay/go through the floorboards & added another strip of sheet metal strip between it & the two inner seat mounting bolts to help tie it all together.
I have a stock X on my coupe. I welded plates into the rear pockets to give me enough thickness to drill holes & tap them. I also boxed a good part of the stock stamped X itself. Anyone who has one will know they are a stamped into a modified W shape & it was easy enough to lay a strip of sheet metal along the bottom of the W shape & weld it in. The resulting tube/box really made it stronger. I also obtained the bolt/straps that lay/go through the floorboards & added another strip of sheet metal strip between it & the two inner seat mounting bolts to help tie it all together.
#57
Le Mans Master
Appears the front brackets would interfere with a stock or RD Xbrace. Can you comment on that?
I have a stock X on my coupe. I welded plates into the rear pockets to give me enough thickness to drill holes & tap them. I also boxed a good part of the stock stamped X itself. Anyone who has one will know they are a stamped into a modified W shape & it was easy enough to lay a strip of sheet metal along the bottom of the W shape & weld it in. The resulting tube/box really made it stronger. I also obtained the bolt/straps that lay/go through the floorboards & added another strip of sheet metal strip between it & the two inner seat mounting bolts to help tie it all together.
I have a stock X on my coupe. I welded plates into the rear pockets to give me enough thickness to drill holes & tap them. I also boxed a good part of the stock stamped X itself. Anyone who has one will know they are a stamped into a modified W shape & it was easy enough to lay a strip of sheet metal along the bottom of the W shape & weld it in. The resulting tube/box really made it stronger. I also obtained the bolt/straps that lay/go through the floorboards & added another strip of sheet metal strip between it & the two inner seat mounting bolts to help tie it all together.
#58
Instructor
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: clarendon hills il
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How did you do it?
Appears the front brackets would interfere with a stock or RD Xbrace. Can you comment on that?
I have a stock X on my coupe. I welded plates into the rear pockets to give me enough thickness to drill holes & tap them. I also boxed a good part of the stock stamped X itself. Anyone who has one will know they are a stamped into a modified W shape & it was easy enough to lay a strip of sheet metal along the bottom of the W shape & weld it in. The resulting tube/box really made it stronger. I also obtained the bolt/straps that lay/go through the floorboards & added another strip of sheet metal strip between it & the two inner seat mounting bolts to help tie it all together.
I have a stock X on my coupe. I welded plates into the rear pockets to give me enough thickness to drill holes & tap them. I also boxed a good part of the stock stamped X itself. Anyone who has one will know they are a stamped into a modified W shape & it was easy enough to lay a strip of sheet metal along the bottom of the W shape & weld it in. The resulting tube/box really made it stronger. I also obtained the bolt/straps that lay/go through the floorboards & added another strip of sheet metal strip between it & the two inner seat mounting bolts to help tie it all together.
#59
Drifting
will post some this evening w/ I get home. I just made cardboard templates to fit the pockets in the back, cut out the steel (1/8" thick), grind till it fit in the pocket. Then mig welded around the edge. Bought the alum spacers that go in the rear from local stealer... cut them in half (thickness as my steel buildup takes space) Used holes in rear of X brace with alum spaces to mark holes to drill in some 1/4" thick by 1.5" wide steel strap. Drilled straps to size on metric tap to match front bolts. Used front bolts & small jacks to temp install X brace, this held the straps in place. Welded straps onto steel in pockets I had welded in earlier. Drilled holes the rest of the way through the steel plates. Tap holes for bolts. 4 corners are now ready to go.
Took me awhile to track down the straps that go through the floor boards... They & the X brace came from a vette wrecking yard... remove seats, remove carpet. Drill holes in floor from the bottom through existing holes in the X-brace. When I put the straps w/ the studs through the holes in the floorboards from the top I felt there wasn't much there that I was bolting too. Residue on the straps indicated they had been expoxied into place on the car they came out of. The floorboards are pretty much the same material as body panels. So, I took some sheet metal strips about 3" wide & that was able to hit the inner seat mounting studs & I think one of the bolt/studs now going down through the floor into the X.
Anyone who welds or a competent welding shop should be able to box your X brace itself.
Shape is a bit like this, end view if cut: |-|_|-| The top horizontal part of course doesn't sit down like that, but best you can do w/ the keyboard. I welded a strip along the entire top/middle... so now like this |-|=|-| imagine the = sign being further (up & down) apart of course.
I also put a wider plate along then entire bottom along the front half of each arm of the X only, as I tend to scrape them over things more often. Just to give it a skid plate but that also boxed in the outer two channels as well. All told, the front halves of my X brace are 3 tubes now & really tightened things up. Although just having the X in the first place helped on its own. But like everyone else here, I wanted more. I didn't use as heavy of metal as the X itself, that would have been more weight & prob. overkill. I ground the welds down to look nicer & then painted the whole thing. Oh, I used some welding paint on the inside side of the metal making the box before welding in to help against corrosion.
Going to try something else here w/ keyboard
|--| |--|
| |_| | before
|--|--|--|
| |__| | after part 1: upper middle welded in
|--|--|--|
|__|__|__| after part 2: now welded in bottoms as well w/ 1 full width piece.
Took me awhile to track down the straps that go through the floor boards... They & the X brace came from a vette wrecking yard... remove seats, remove carpet. Drill holes in floor from the bottom through existing holes in the X-brace. When I put the straps w/ the studs through the holes in the floorboards from the top I felt there wasn't much there that I was bolting too. Residue on the straps indicated they had been expoxied into place on the car they came out of. The floorboards are pretty much the same material as body panels. So, I took some sheet metal strips about 3" wide & that was able to hit the inner seat mounting studs & I think one of the bolt/studs now going down through the floor into the X.
Anyone who welds or a competent welding shop should be able to box your X brace itself.
Shape is a bit like this, end view if cut: |-|_|-| The top horizontal part of course doesn't sit down like that, but best you can do w/ the keyboard. I welded a strip along the entire top/middle... so now like this |-|=|-| imagine the = sign being further (up & down) apart of course.
I also put a wider plate along then entire bottom along the front half of each arm of the X only, as I tend to scrape them over things more often. Just to give it a skid plate but that also boxed in the outer two channels as well. All told, the front halves of my X brace are 3 tubes now & really tightened things up. Although just having the X in the first place helped on its own. But like everyone else here, I wanted more. I didn't use as heavy of metal as the X itself, that would have been more weight & prob. overkill. I ground the welds down to look nicer & then painted the whole thing. Oh, I used some welding paint on the inside side of the metal making the box before welding in to help against corrosion.
Going to try something else here w/ keyboard
|--| |--|
| |_| | before
|--|--|--|
| |__| | after part 1: upper middle welded in
|--|--|--|
|__|__|__| after part 2: now welded in bottoms as well w/ 1 full width piece.
Last edited by Trog; 07-06-2010 at 07:27 PM.