C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Experienced tune help needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2014, 05:44 PM
  #41  
MrWillys
Drifting
 
MrWillys's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 1,736
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

For the moment run this with the flowrate dropped down to 21.1. This should richen it up a bit.

http://www.scotthansen.net/christian95sburn1.bin

If you like, go to my links page and download Datamaster. You can use it 20 times for free. I also built a page on how to use it. Email me the datamaster file and I'll tune your fuel maps. I'm ignorant of TunerPro, and keep telling myself I need to figure it.
Old 05-05-2014, 02:08 AM
  #42  
tunedport85inject
Drifting
 
tunedport85inject's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

great guy MRWillys ,i have to work on my 85 she has the opposite issue she's very rich at all rpm range idle, mid, and highway speed 108 blms,i've lowered my fuel pressure and now she went to 114 -116,and 118 idle.FP was in the 40-41 psi (a little bit high for an 85 she runs 35-38 psi stock cuz 24lb injcs).i suspect this rich condition it's correlated to a mechanical issue (air leak cuz my idle is stumbling and IAC is continually opening and closing to compensate).
Old 05-05-2014, 08:01 AM
  #43  
MrWillys
Drifting
 
MrWillys's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 1,736
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tunedport85inject
great guy MRWillys ,i have to work on my 85 she has the opposite issue she's very rich at all rpm range idle, mid, and highway speed 108 blms,i've lowered my fuel pressure and now she went to 114 -116,and 118 idle.FP was in the 40-41 psi (a little bit high for an 85 she runs 35-38 psi stock cuz 24lb injcs).i suspect this rich condition it's correlated to a mechanical issue (air leak cuz my idle is stumbling and IAC is continually opening and closing to compensate).
I do not know a lot about 85, because it is a weird UV chip, and it does not have a injector flowrate number to adjust. However, I think you can modify the Injector pulse width VS Load value table. For example.

if LV8 256 = 9384 and you want 5% less?

9384 x .95 = 8915, or your new value.

Try this and post results.
Old 05-05-2014, 02:40 PM
  #44  
tunedport85inject
Drifting
 
tunedport85inject's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Thanks MRWILLYS i know 870 it's a bad animal.I've ordered a new spare ecm cuz i've to solder a zif socket on it to have an easy plug in of my Ostrich ribbon cable header

[IMG][/IMG]
Old 05-06-2014, 11:28 AM
  #45  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,983
Received 465 Likes on 368 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MrWillys
I do not know a lot about 85, because it is a weird UV chip, and it does not have a injector flowrate number to adjust. However, I think you can modify the Injector pulse width VS Load value table. For example.

if LV8 256 = 9384 and you want 5% less?

9384 x .95 = 8915, or your new value.

Try this and post results.
This table is used to adjust for injector changes. If you have 23lb injectors stock and change to 30lb injectors you would modify this table by the percentage of change 1- ((30-23)/23) = .6957, take the whole table and multiply it by .6957, and that will correct for the larger injectors.
Old 05-06-2014, 12:29 PM
  #46  
MrWillys
Drifting
 
MrWillys's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 1,736
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bjankuski
This table is used to adjust for injector changes. If you have 23lb injectors stock and change to 30lb injectors you would modify this table by the percentage of change 1- ((30-23)/23) = .6957, take the whole table and multiply it by .6957, and that will correct for the larger injectors.
Are you saying this equation works solely in the LV8 = 256 portion of this table? Would we then use a % to calculate the remainder? part divided by the whole, or 6957 / 9384 = 74.137%?

Therefore, were LV8 = 240 in the adjacent table with a value of 8774 we would then use 8774 x .74137 = 6505 for our new value in the LV8 = 240 value?

I guess I just don't understand how your equation applies to each value in the table without changing it to a %.
Old 05-06-2014, 12:43 PM
  #47  
Christian95
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Christian95's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Fairland Oklahoma
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry I'm taking so long on trying that new burn, It's finals week and I've been overwhelmed with school. Should have it burned and a report later today though.
Old 05-06-2014, 01:18 PM
  #48  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,983
Received 465 Likes on 368 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MrWillys
Are you saying this equation works solely in the LV8 = 256 portion of this table? Would we then use a % to calculate the remainder? part divided by the whole, or 6957 / 9384 = 74.137%?

Therefore, were LV8 = 240 in the adjacent table with a value of 8774 we would then use 8774 x .74137 = 6505 for our new value in the LV8 = 240 value?

I guess I just don't understand how your equation applies to each value in the table without changing it to a %.
.6957 is a percentage, that is what you multiply each value in the table by for each load position 9384 x .6957 = 6528 new number for 256, use this percentage of change for every load number. That is why I listed multiply this number (.6957) by the entire table.

Last edited by bjankuski; 05-06-2014 at 01:27 PM.
Old 05-06-2014, 02:25 PM
  #49  
MrWillys
Drifting
 
MrWillys's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 1,736
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bjankuski
.6957 is a percentage, that is what you multiply each value in the table by for each load position 9384 x .6957 = 6528 new number for 256, use this percentage of change for every load number. That is why I listed multiply this number (.6957) by the entire table.
Understood, thank you!
Old 05-06-2014, 07:41 PM
  #50  
Christian95
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Christian95's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Fairland Oklahoma
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Alright just about to take the latest burn for a test. I didn't have time to read how to use datamaster so I'll be using tunerpro again. I checked my timing with a light and it shows 6 degrees but when I looked at tunerpro it showed a spark advance around 30. Whats that about?



Quick Reply: Experienced tune help needed



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 PM.