Corvette Forum  


Go Back   Corvette Forum > C4 Corvettes, 1984 - 1996 > C4 Scan & Tune
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Vendors Buy a Vette Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ PhotosGarage

C4 Scan & Tune
C4 Corvette Performance Chips, ECM/PCM Modifications, Dyno Tuning, Fuel Management, Tuning Software

Corvette Store
 
 
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
 
Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2005, 09:24 PM   #1
qwiketz
CF Senior Member

 
qwiketz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Fullerton CA
Default interpreting the O2's. What does it mean?

I hooked up datamaster and now have measurements of my o2's. I have a basic knowledge of where my car should be air/fuel wise. How do I figure out how my car is doing using the o2's.

I see super low numbers when putting around town and I have seen super high #'s when my I would get on the throttle from a stop.

I know that I should be about 850 for my combo at wot, but how rich is 900, 950, 1000, 1050, and 1100 for that matter? How lean is 800, 750 and 700?

thanks!
__________________
2004 Jaguar S type R. 4.2L V8 w/ Stiegemeier Snakebite Eaton M112 w/Alky Injection. H&R springs...

92 383, CNC'd LT4 top end, auto, custom vortech YSI trim, progressive alky kit, brembo 13.5's, magnesium speedline 18"'s with 275/335s, 7.30's@97 in the 1/8 (old combo)... The build up of an Low 10 second daily driver.

89 Saleen Clone with a 335" T trim'd blower motor. DFI, CNC'd victor jr's, vic 5.0. Was shooting for high 9's and 740 rwhp. Gone, but definately not forgotten...
qwiketz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 01:24 AM   #2
Alvin
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '05
 
Alvin's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Charlotte NC
Default

On a LT1/4 car I shoot for late 800 mv at wide open. On the L98's its much harder to get accurate O2 readings. That has been my experience.
Alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 06:39 AM   #3
qwiketz
CF Senior Member

 
qwiketz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Fullerton CA
Default

but what does it really mean? Is there any correlation between o2 reading and afr?
qwiketz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 12:43 PM   #4
Alvin
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '05
 
Alvin's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Charlotte NC
Default

late 800's is typically a hair less a than 13.0
Alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 12:56 PM   #5
qwiketz
CF Senior Member

 
qwiketz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Fullerton CA
Default

cool. Thanks for the info. I was told to shoot for 850's by a couple people for my blown app.
qwiketz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 01:30 PM   #6
Alvin
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '05
 
Alvin's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Charlotte NC
Default

you definately don't want 850 for a blower car, you want about 920.
Alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 01:50 PM   #7
tjwong
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
tjwong's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Portland Oregon
Send a message via AIM to tjwong
Default

Ideally if you can afford a WBO2 system for your tuning needs, that is the best way to do it. Not to mention the safest way
tjwong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2005, 04:25 PM   #8
Alvin
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '05
 
Alvin's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Charlotte NC
Default

agreed, blwoer cars are sensitive to tuning both in AFR and spark.. its harder to fudge (about right) types of fueling into them and have them run 100%
Alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 01:16 PM   #9
gbody5
CF Senior Member
 
gbody5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Stuck in the 80's
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin
On the L98's its much harder to get accurate O2 readings. That has been my experience.
I'll do several part throttle and WOT scans and will get different O2's each time. Sometimes upper 800's other times low 900's. Very load sensitive from what I can tell, I pretty much rely on BLM's and knock retard to tune.
__________________
Mark

1988 Convertible Z52.

1985 442
1985 Monte Carlo SS
1987 Grand National
http://webpages.charter.net/gbody5/
gbody5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 08:52 AM   #10
Atok
CF Senior Member
 
Atok's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Send a message via MSN to Atok
Default

Here's a chart that may help:



Unless you use a wide band O2 sensor, the accuracy of the typical O2 sensor like ours is not good out at each end of its range. As you can see it's not a linear sensor and it's designed to be most accurate around 14.5 - 14.7 AFR to help control emissions.

For power tuning I think a wide band O2 is the only way to go. You can buy one complete or build one using a Honda sensor if you're comfortable with electronics. 92-95 Honda Civic, 1.5 VTEC, part # 36531-P07-003. If you're interested, I've got full schematics of a DIY system using this sensor.

Here are some links:

http://www.techedge.com.au/vehicle/wbo2/wbfmd.htm

http://lists.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/wbo2

Look at the "WB" files here:
ftp://ftp.diy-efi.org/uploads/

Last edited by Atok; 07-19-2005 at 09:10 AM. Reason: Improve chart image
Atok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 11:42 AM   #11
scorp508
CF Senior Member
 
scorp508's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2000
Default

I also believe (and I'm sure Alvin would agree) that there is no perfect science that a given ### O2 mv = ##.# AFR. You can get it close, but it isn't dead on. This is especially true with the narrow band junk we're stuck with by default.

It is best to learn what your car's values mean. You can kind of do this on a dyno with a wideband O2, but understand that real world conditions will make things leaner once you're dealing with wind resistance & the weight of the car against the drivetrain.
scorp508 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2005, 02:55 AM   #12
Mo_Bandy
CF Senior Member
 
Mo_Bandy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: San Bernardino CA
Default

running alky water injection too it will skew the o2's a bit also I have seen cars perform better "fatter" as compared to another.. in CA we have the luxury of 91 octane :P

MO
__________________
96 Black Coupe, Electric, Netgain 11HV electric motor 300v 2000A Zilla controller, 300v 2400a XS Power Batteries, ZF6 6 speed, QA1 Coil Overs,www.ndneyes.com/or for non electric www.ndneyes.com/mo
Mo_Bandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2005, 08:18 AM   #13
Atok
CF Senior Member
 
Atok's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Send a message via MSN to Atok
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scorp508
I also believe (and I'm sure Alvin would agree) that there is no perfect science that a given ### O2 mv = ##.# AFR. You can get it close, but it isn't dead on. This is especially true with the narrow band junk we're stuck with by default.


Yes, WB is the only method accurate enough. The chart I posted above is typical, not exact for all sensors.
Atok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2005, 08:21 PM   #14
Alvin
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '05
 
Alvin's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Charlotte NC
Default

Yep,

Like I said, I've notice them being quite a bit more consistant and relieable in the dual sensor LT1's.
Alvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 10:09 PM   #15
Dan Parker '96
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Lake Ozark, MO
Default

You have such limited information with narrow range O2s that the only thing you'll be able to tell is if you're above or below 14.7 air to fuel.

This is consistent with the design of the sensor. It is basically a switch (off/on). Not a lot of play in between.

For instance, the last time I was at the dyno (with new O2s) the sensors read 980mV at 12.8 AFR (according to the wideband). They also read 980mv at 9.5 AFR.

For comparison there was another buddy there with almost exactly the same setup I had and his O2 readings were significantly different than mine at similar wideband readings. They were "in the ballpark" but nothing you could reasonably use for fine tuning or comparison.

I guess you could use a narrow band O2 reading of 800-1000mV to say you're in the 13:1 all the way to 1:1 AFR range. You can't tell reliably.

The design of the narrow range O2 acts like a switch. And it performs that function very well.

You really need a wide band O2 setup to truly fine tune.
Dan Parker '96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2005, 10:09 PM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > C4 Corvettes, 1984 - 1996 > C4 Scan & Tune
Reload this Page interpreting the O2's. What does it mean?
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
accuracy, datamaster, dyno


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help interpreting DataMaster file - Source of knock? black_89_vette C4 Scan & Tune 19 08-29-2005 12:20 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Emails & Password Backup