Notices
C4 General Discussion General C4 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech

For those of you who have upgraded from 84-89 to 90-96?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2010, 05:49 PM
  #21  
PLRX
Team Owner

 
PLRX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Riverside County Southern California
Posts: 34,988
Received 501 Likes on 342 Posts
Co-winner 2020 C4 of the Year - Modified
2018 Corvette of Year Finalist
2017 C4 of Year
2016 C7 of Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20


Default

Originally Posted by socalman
Nope. Nader. The Corvair will 'roll over easily and kill you' (paraphrasing).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed
The one car accident

figure that one out.
Old 10-19-2010, 05:54 PM
  #22  
Coupe89
Melting Slicks
 
Coupe89's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Livermore Ca
Posts: 3,490
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05-'06

Default

I when from a 89 to a 90.
But it wan't because of the dash.

The 90 feels more like a cockpit.

Last edited by Coupe89; 10-19-2010 at 05:56 PM.
Old 10-19-2010, 06:28 PM
  #23  
azrocketman
Racer
 
azrocketman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson Arizona
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by socalman
Nope. Nader. The Corvair will 'roll over easily and kill you' (paraphrasing).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed
No, it was Ford and Iacocca.

The Corvair was introduced in 1960 to compete against the Ford Falcon and Plymouth Valiant. The Falcon, being 100% conventional in design, outsold the Corvair by a large margin. Chevrolet responded by taking the Corvair upmarket by introducing the Monza and in 1962, it introduced the Corvair convertible, the Spyder turbocharged engine, and four on the floor. The 1962 Corvairs introduced the sporty compact. In addition, Chevrolet introduced the Chevy II, a completely conventional car to compete with the Falcon.

The upmarket Corvairs paved the way for the sporty compact. Lee Iacocca saw the success of the Corvair and modified the Falcon chassis to create the Mustang in early 1964. The Mustang was a total success and had significant power advantages over the Corvair for straight line performance. The Mustang was also cited in later chapters of "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Nader for poor handling but most people never got that far in the book.

Chevrolet's response to the Mustang was the Camaro in 1967. There are indications from Chevrolet memorandoms that Chevrolet wanted to kill the Corvair in 1966 to avoid internal competition with the Camaro. Chevrolet did kill the Corvair performance options (Corsa model, turbocharged engine, 140 HP engine became a Central Production Office Option, COPO) for 1967.

In the 1965-1966 time frame Chevrolet was trying to dis-credit Nader (by illegal methods in some cases). The theory is that Chevrolet continued production of the Corvair through 1969 to avoid the appearance of capitulation to Nader. Production numbers did not justify Corvair continuance with only 30,00 produced in 1967, 15,000 produced in 1968, and 6,000 produced in 1969.

The 1960 through 1964 Corvair's handling was not atypical of a rear engine, swing axle car (like a Porsche). Chevrolet countered the oversteer tendency by specifying 15 psi in the front tires and 26 psi in the rear tires. Problem is that people did not pay attention to tire pressures and put 30 psi all around. The result, heavy oversteer. I've seen early model Corvairs (including vans) put through their paces on autocross tracks. I've seen the camber change and I've seen the spins but I've never seen one roll. Again, if somebody had READ "Unsafe at Any Speed" they would find that Nader praises the handling of the 1965 Corvair that uses a C2/C3 style suspension.

So, Nader prolonged the life of the Corvair and Iacocca was the cause of death.

Steve
Corvair owner since 1976

Last edited by azrocketman; 10-19-2010 at 06:31 PM.
Old 10-19-2010, 07:16 PM
  #24  
delphipgmr
Instructor
 
delphipgmr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Port St Lucie FL
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

breadbox is a poor mans airbag..

actually, its there so that when you get into an accident, the ER will know what kind of car you were driving..

the word "CORVETTE" will be embedded in your forehead backwards...

Old 10-19-2010, 07:34 PM
  #25  
ch@0s
Le Mans Master
 
ch@0s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 9,758
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by delphipgmr
breadbox is a poor mans airbag..

actually, its there so that when you get into an accident, the ER will know what kind of car you were driving..

the word "CORVETTE" will be embedded in your forehead backwards...

Old 10-19-2010, 08:38 PM
  #26  
FOURSPEEDVETTE
Safety Car
 
FOURSPEEDVETTE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,397
Received 224 Likes on 156 Posts

Default

You mean I've been shoving loaves of bread in mine every few days for nothing? I like the feel and power of my 85 just fine. Plenty comfortable for me even though I'm a bigger guy (not fat ) Probably everyone here feels the same about the particular year of C4 they own. Every year newer they are, the more refinements and power they had. Plain and simple facts. It does'nt make them superior to me, just newer and different than mine. I'll keep mine.
Old 10-19-2010, 08:52 PM
  #27  
Bronze85
Pro
 
Bronze85's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Vernon Hills Ill
Posts: 679
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by socalman
Don't leave me in suspense- what's the Bread box for?
To keep bread fresh?
Old 10-19-2010, 09:06 PM
  #28  
shawn 84&92
Burning Brakes
 
shawn 84&92's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,097
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SQUIRMIN VERMIN 84
I think the Bread Box was actually a Nader-FaceBumper thing, not an airbag thing. The '84 had it but airbags didn't come untill later models(1990 or so), when the steering wheels had those larger hubs to house the bag.
Breadbox was designed to be an airbag, but they didn't have to do it so they didn't.
Old 10-19-2010, 09:35 PM
  #29  
socalman
Safety Car
 
socalman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: OC Calif
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10

Default

Originally Posted by azrocketman
No, it was Ford and Iacocca.

The Corvair was introduced in 1960 to compete against the Ford Falcon and Plymouth Valiant. The Falcon, being 100% conventional in design, outsold the Corvair by a large margin. Chevrolet responded by taking the Corvair upmarket by introducing the Monza and in 1962, it introduced the Corvair convertible, the Spyder turbocharged engine, and four on the floor. The 1962 Corvairs introduced the sporty compact. In addition, Chevrolet introduced the Chevy II, a completely conventional car to compete with the Falcon.

The upmarket Corvairs paved the way for the sporty compact. Lee Iacocca saw the success of the Corvair and modified the Falcon chassis to create the Mustang in early 1964. The Mustang was a total success and had significant power advantages over the Corvair for straight line performance. The Mustang was also cited in later chapters of "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Nader for poor handling but most people never got that far in the book.

Chevrolet's response to the Mustang was the Camaro in 1967. There are indications from Chevrolet memorandoms that Chevrolet wanted to kill the Corvair in 1966 to avoid internal competition with the Camaro. Chevrolet did kill the Corvair performance options (Corsa model, turbocharged engine, 140 HP engine became a Central Production Office Option, COPO) for 1967.

In the 1965-1966 time frame Chevrolet was trying to dis-credit Nader (by illegal methods in some cases). The theory is that Chevrolet continued production of the Corvair through 1969 to avoid the appearance of capitulation to Nader. Production numbers did not justify Corvair continuance with only 30,00 produced in 1967, 15,000 produced in 1968, and 6,000 produced in 1969.

The 1960 through 1964 Corvair's handling was not atypical of a rear engine, swing axle car (like a Porsche). Chevrolet countered the oversteer tendency by specifying 15 psi in the front tires and 26 psi in the rear tires. Problem is that people did not pay attention to tire pressures and put 30 psi all around. The result, heavy oversteer. I've seen early model Corvairs (including vans) put through their paces on autocross tracks. I've seen the camber change and I've seen the spins but I've never seen one roll. Again, if somebody had READ "Unsafe at Any Speed" they would find that Nader praises the handling of the 1965 Corvair that uses a C2/C3 style suspension.

So, Nader prolonged the life of the Corvair and Iacocca was the cause of death.

Steve
Corvair owner since 1976
Nader did it. He was 'the word' back then. The public wasn't buying the car. GM can twist it anyway they wanna.
Old 10-20-2010, 12:52 AM
  #30  
mgafun
Melting Slicks
 
mgafun's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,558
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Breadbox

Originally Posted by socalman
Don't leave me in suspense- what's the Bread box for?
Here's what mine is for ('88 Vert):



Old 10-20-2010, 01:47 AM
  #31  
H P Bushrod
Moderator

 
H P Bushrod's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Maryville Tn
Posts: 46,071
Received 109 Likes on 84 Posts
CI 5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23
NCM Sinkhole Donor


Default

Originally Posted by kiwi1
Here's what mine is for ('88 Vert):



Now that's a first! Never seen that set-up before.
Old 10-20-2010, 08:04 AM
  #32  
delphipgmr
Instructor
 
delphipgmr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Port St Lucie FL
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Where/how did you get that?

Im assuming its sold somewhere since the front of the breadbox is soft, that one looks molded.
Old 10-20-2010, 08:32 AM
  #33  
RichsC4Vette
Advanced
 
RichsC4Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

My fiancee summed it up pretty well. When she drove my 84 she wasn't impressed, just another car to her. The first time she drove my 94 to work, she came home and said "we always have to have one of those".
Old 10-20-2010, 09:01 AM
  #34  
RedLS1GTO
Race Director

 
RedLS1GTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2003
Location: Color my life with the chaos of trouble.
Posts: 12,742
Received 42 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kiwi1
The glove box is a cool idea but why is it that I see anything in the cup holders being turned into a projectile the first time you hit a bump?
Old 10-20-2010, 09:12 AM
  #35  
darrylg
Racer
 
darrylg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shawn 84&92
Breadbox was designed to be an airbag, but they didn't have to do it so they didn't.
From http://www.web-cars.com/corvette/1984-5.php:

"Rather obvious for the passenger is the large lump thing called the "breadloaf" because of its shape. At the time it was anticipated that federal regulations would include a safety impact for the passenger, not unlike the collapsable steering column in front of the driver. The breadloaf was designed to meet this requirement which ultimately did not materialize. "
Old 10-20-2010, 02:02 PM
  #36  
mgafun
Melting Slicks
 
mgafun's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,558
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by delphipgmr
Where/how did you get that?

Im assuming its sold somewhere since the front of the breadbox is soft, that one looks molded.
Was made in CA, but no longer made after the producer died. I found it for sale on another forum by a former C4 owner in Denver.
Old 10-20-2010, 02:04 PM
  #37  
mgafun
Melting Slicks
 
mgafun's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,558
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedLS1GTO
The glove box is a cool idea but why is it that I see anything in the cup holders being turned into a projectile the first time you hit a bump?
Hasn't happened yet.

Get notified of new replies

To For those of you who have upgraded from 84-89 to 90-96?

Old 10-20-2010, 03:44 PM
  #38  
jsims002
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jsims002's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

We had an 86; it was a fixer upper at least 15 years ago. I loved that car, but the first thing I replaced was the wheels. I remember it riding fairly rough.

Got my wife a 06 C6 vert with F55 which I modded the poop out of. I had idle hands so I recently got myself a 94 C4, it brought back memories of the 86 ride, but seemed much more refined. The interior is a major upgrade. Now comparing the two to the C6....not even close. I love the rawness of the 94 but the C6 with magnetic select ride is smooth as silk and pulls like a rocket, either way it's hers and I'm extremely happy with the 94.
Old 10-20-2010, 06:45 PM
  #39  
Aurora40
Le Mans Master
 
Aurora40's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 6,413
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by azrocketman
Owner of two 1966 Monza 2dr. coupes
Any links to pictures?

To the OP, I had an '87 and now a '90. The digital dash is pretty cool. The gauges are much more accurate. But I prefer the later style of the whole interior, especially the center stack. I also much prefer the ZF6 to the 4+3.

Last edited by Aurora40; 10-20-2010 at 06:49 PM.
Old 10-20-2010, 07:57 PM
  #40  
SQUIRMIN VERMIN 84
Drifting
 
SQUIRMIN VERMIN 84's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Supreme Soviet Peace-Loving Pipple's Kollektive of Seattle Wa
Posts: 1,908
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by socalman
Nader did it. He was 'the word' back then. The public wasn't buying the car. GM can twist it anyway they wanna.
I remember the big stink Ralphie made about the car. People who should have listened to both sides and didn't (Nader's Raiders), bad-mouthed Corvair incessantly without mercy! The loudest wins.... After awhile you couldn't look at a Corvair without thinking of Nader, even if you thought he was full of BS. The connection was made and sales dropped like a rock. Ralphie did it.. When people see a Corvair, they don't think of the competing cars back then, they think of nader and roll-overs.......go figure.

Last edited by SQUIRMIN VERMIN 84; 10-20-2010 at 07:59 PM.


Quick Reply: For those of you who have upgraded from 84-89 to 90-96?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM.