For those of you who have upgraded from 84-89 to 90-96?
#21
Team Owner
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Riverside County Southern California
Posts: 34,988
Received 501 Likes
on
342 Posts
Co-winner 2020 C4 of the Year - Modified
2018 Corvette of Year Finalist
2017 C4 of Year
2016 C7 of Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20
Nope. Nader. The Corvair will 'roll over easily and kill you' (paraphrasing).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed
figure that one out.
#22
Melting Slicks
I when from a 89 to a 90.
But it wan't because of the dash.
The 90 feels more like a cockpit.
But it wan't because of the dash.
The 90 feels more like a cockpit.
Last edited by Coupe89; 10-19-2010 at 05:56 PM.
#23
Racer
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson Arizona
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nope. Nader. The Corvair will 'roll over easily and kill you' (paraphrasing).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed
The Corvair was introduced in 1960 to compete against the Ford Falcon and Plymouth Valiant. The Falcon, being 100% conventional in design, outsold the Corvair by a large margin. Chevrolet responded by taking the Corvair upmarket by introducing the Monza and in 1962, it introduced the Corvair convertible, the Spyder turbocharged engine, and four on the floor. The 1962 Corvairs introduced the sporty compact. In addition, Chevrolet introduced the Chevy II, a completely conventional car to compete with the Falcon.
The upmarket Corvairs paved the way for the sporty compact. Lee Iacocca saw the success of the Corvair and modified the Falcon chassis to create the Mustang in early 1964. The Mustang was a total success and had significant power advantages over the Corvair for straight line performance. The Mustang was also cited in later chapters of "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Nader for poor handling but most people never got that far in the book.
Chevrolet's response to the Mustang was the Camaro in 1967. There are indications from Chevrolet memorandoms that Chevrolet wanted to kill the Corvair in 1966 to avoid internal competition with the Camaro. Chevrolet did kill the Corvair performance options (Corsa model, turbocharged engine, 140 HP engine became a Central Production Office Option, COPO) for 1967.
In the 1965-1966 time frame Chevrolet was trying to dis-credit Nader (by illegal methods in some cases). The theory is that Chevrolet continued production of the Corvair through 1969 to avoid the appearance of capitulation to Nader. Production numbers did not justify Corvair continuance with only 30,00 produced in 1967, 15,000 produced in 1968, and 6,000 produced in 1969.
The 1960 through 1964 Corvair's handling was not atypical of a rear engine, swing axle car (like a Porsche). Chevrolet countered the oversteer tendency by specifying 15 psi in the front tires and 26 psi in the rear tires. Problem is that people did not pay attention to tire pressures and put 30 psi all around. The result, heavy oversteer. I've seen early model Corvairs (including vans) put through their paces on autocross tracks. I've seen the camber change and I've seen the spins but I've never seen one roll. Again, if somebody had READ "Unsafe at Any Speed" they would find that Nader praises the handling of the 1965 Corvair that uses a C2/C3 style suspension.
So, Nader prolonged the life of the Corvair and Iacocca was the cause of death.
Steve
Corvair owner since 1976
Last edited by azrocketman; 10-19-2010 at 06:31 PM.
#24
Instructor
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Port St Lucie FL
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
breadbox is a poor mans airbag..
actually, its there so that when you get into an accident, the ER will know what kind of car you were driving..
the word "CORVETTE" will be embedded in your forehead backwards...
actually, its there so that when you get into an accident, the ER will know what kind of car you were driving..
the word "CORVETTE" will be embedded in your forehead backwards...
#25
Le Mans Master
#26
Safety Car
You mean I've been shoving loaves of bread in mine every few days for nothing? I like the feel and power of my 85 just fine. Plenty comfortable for me even though I'm a bigger guy (not fat ) Probably everyone here feels the same about the particular year of C4 they own. Every year newer they are, the more refinements and power they had. Plain and simple facts. It does'nt make them superior to me, just newer and different than mine. I'll keep mine.
#28
Burning Brakes
Breadbox was designed to be an airbag, but they didn't have to do it so they didn't.
#29
Safety Car
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: OC Calif
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10
No, it was Ford and Iacocca.
The Corvair was introduced in 1960 to compete against the Ford Falcon and Plymouth Valiant. The Falcon, being 100% conventional in design, outsold the Corvair by a large margin. Chevrolet responded by taking the Corvair upmarket by introducing the Monza and in 1962, it introduced the Corvair convertible, the Spyder turbocharged engine, and four on the floor. The 1962 Corvairs introduced the sporty compact. In addition, Chevrolet introduced the Chevy II, a completely conventional car to compete with the Falcon.
The upmarket Corvairs paved the way for the sporty compact. Lee Iacocca saw the success of the Corvair and modified the Falcon chassis to create the Mustang in early 1964. The Mustang was a total success and had significant power advantages over the Corvair for straight line performance. The Mustang was also cited in later chapters of "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Nader for poor handling but most people never got that far in the book.
Chevrolet's response to the Mustang was the Camaro in 1967. There are indications from Chevrolet memorandoms that Chevrolet wanted to kill the Corvair in 1966 to avoid internal competition with the Camaro. Chevrolet did kill the Corvair performance options (Corsa model, turbocharged engine, 140 HP engine became a Central Production Office Option, COPO) for 1967.
In the 1965-1966 time frame Chevrolet was trying to dis-credit Nader (by illegal methods in some cases). The theory is that Chevrolet continued production of the Corvair through 1969 to avoid the appearance of capitulation to Nader. Production numbers did not justify Corvair continuance with only 30,00 produced in 1967, 15,000 produced in 1968, and 6,000 produced in 1969.
The 1960 through 1964 Corvair's handling was not atypical of a rear engine, swing axle car (like a Porsche). Chevrolet countered the oversteer tendency by specifying 15 psi in the front tires and 26 psi in the rear tires. Problem is that people did not pay attention to tire pressures and put 30 psi all around. The result, heavy oversteer. I've seen early model Corvairs (including vans) put through their paces on autocross tracks. I've seen the camber change and I've seen the spins but I've never seen one roll. Again, if somebody had READ "Unsafe at Any Speed" they would find that Nader praises the handling of the 1965 Corvair that uses a C2/C3 style suspension.
So, Nader prolonged the life of the Corvair and Iacocca was the cause of death.
Steve
Corvair owner since 1976
The Corvair was introduced in 1960 to compete against the Ford Falcon and Plymouth Valiant. The Falcon, being 100% conventional in design, outsold the Corvair by a large margin. Chevrolet responded by taking the Corvair upmarket by introducing the Monza and in 1962, it introduced the Corvair convertible, the Spyder turbocharged engine, and four on the floor. The 1962 Corvairs introduced the sporty compact. In addition, Chevrolet introduced the Chevy II, a completely conventional car to compete with the Falcon.
The upmarket Corvairs paved the way for the sporty compact. Lee Iacocca saw the success of the Corvair and modified the Falcon chassis to create the Mustang in early 1964. The Mustang was a total success and had significant power advantages over the Corvair for straight line performance. The Mustang was also cited in later chapters of "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Nader for poor handling but most people never got that far in the book.
Chevrolet's response to the Mustang was the Camaro in 1967. There are indications from Chevrolet memorandoms that Chevrolet wanted to kill the Corvair in 1966 to avoid internal competition with the Camaro. Chevrolet did kill the Corvair performance options (Corsa model, turbocharged engine, 140 HP engine became a Central Production Office Option, COPO) for 1967.
In the 1965-1966 time frame Chevrolet was trying to dis-credit Nader (by illegal methods in some cases). The theory is that Chevrolet continued production of the Corvair through 1969 to avoid the appearance of capitulation to Nader. Production numbers did not justify Corvair continuance with only 30,00 produced in 1967, 15,000 produced in 1968, and 6,000 produced in 1969.
The 1960 through 1964 Corvair's handling was not atypical of a rear engine, swing axle car (like a Porsche). Chevrolet countered the oversteer tendency by specifying 15 psi in the front tires and 26 psi in the rear tires. Problem is that people did not pay attention to tire pressures and put 30 psi all around. The result, heavy oversteer. I've seen early model Corvairs (including vans) put through their paces on autocross tracks. I've seen the camber change and I've seen the spins but I've never seen one roll. Again, if somebody had READ "Unsafe at Any Speed" they would find that Nader praises the handling of the 1965 Corvair that uses a C2/C3 style suspension.
So, Nader prolonged the life of the Corvair and Iacocca was the cause of death.
Steve
Corvair owner since 1976
#33
Advanced
My fiancee summed it up pretty well. When she drove my 84 she wasn't impressed, just another car to her. The first time she drove my 94 to work, she came home and said "we always have to have one of those".
#34
Race Director
#35
"Rather obvious for the passenger is the large lump thing called the "breadloaf" because of its shape. At the time it was anticipated that federal regulations would include a safety impact for the passenger, not unlike the collapsable steering column in front of the driver. The breadloaf was designed to meet this requirement which ultimately did not materialize. "
#36
#37
#38
Burning Brakes
We had an 86; it was a fixer upper at least 15 years ago. I loved that car, but the first thing I replaced was the wheels. I remember it riding fairly rough.
Got my wife a 06 C6 vert with F55 which I modded the poop out of. I had idle hands so I recently got myself a 94 C4, it brought back memories of the 86 ride, but seemed much more refined. The interior is a major upgrade. Now comparing the two to the C6....not even close. I love the rawness of the 94 but the C6 with magnetic select ride is smooth as silk and pulls like a rocket, either way it's hers and I'm extremely happy with the 94.
Got my wife a 06 C6 vert with F55 which I modded the poop out of. I had idle hands so I recently got myself a 94 C4, it brought back memories of the 86 ride, but seemed much more refined. The interior is a major upgrade. Now comparing the two to the C6....not even close. I love the rawness of the 94 but the C6 with magnetic select ride is smooth as silk and pulls like a rocket, either way it's hers and I'm extremely happy with the 94.
#39
Le Mans Master
Any links to pictures?
To the OP, I had an '87 and now a '90. The digital dash is pretty cool. The gauges are much more accurate. But I prefer the later style of the whole interior, especially the center stack. I also much prefer the ZF6 to the 4+3.
To the OP, I had an '87 and now a '90. The digital dash is pretty cool. The gauges are much more accurate. But I prefer the later style of the whole interior, especially the center stack. I also much prefer the ZF6 to the 4+3.
Last edited by Aurora40; 10-20-2010 at 06:49 PM.
#40
Drifting
I remember the big stink Ralphie made about the car. People who should have listened to both sides and didn't (Nader's Raiders), bad-mouthed Corvair incessantly without mercy! The loudest wins.... After awhile you couldn't look at a Corvair without thinking of Nader, even if you thought he was full of BS. The connection was made and sales dropped like a rock. Ralphie did it.. When people see a Corvair, they don't think of the competing cars back then, they think of nader and roll-overs.......go figure.
Last edited by SQUIRMIN VERMIN 84; 10-20-2010 at 07:59 PM.