Notices
C4 General Discussion General C4 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech

No more " Will my [insert C4 engine rpo here] take a new mustang: 5.0 returns

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2010, 05:40 PM
  #1  
1985 Corvette
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
1985 Corvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 5,167
Received 387 Likes on 236 Posts

Default No more " Will my [insert C4 engine rpo here] take a new mustang: 5.0 returns

Anyone else check the numbers from the latest car mags? Impressive output from the 5.0. Even the V6 is getting in on the action with a 5.1 second 0-60 mph time. 5.0 was putting down early ZR-1 times and mph traps in the quarter. I for one welcome it, good to see the big 3 are continue to offer such cars.

Also noted the interior options for aluminum trim. Probably the fake plastic painted aluminum but if it's the real thing then props to Ford for offering these options on the side. I've never been an "interior makes or breaks the car" guy, but I was impressed by the option if it is indeed real brushed aluminum trimmings offered throughout the interior.
Old 05-05-2010, 12:28 PM
  #2  
90EXPVette
Safety Car
 
90EXPVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: Grovetown Georgia
Posts: 4,249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

My wife and I were watching V and saw the commercial on the new 'stang last night. Pretty impressive numbers V6, over 300 hp and 31 mpg, looked pretty nice too. I wouldn't mind having one...
Old 05-05-2010, 12:48 PM
  #3  
96 Vette CE
Banned Loser
Support Corvetteforum!
 
96 Vette CE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: They say you learn from your mistakes, I must be a genius
Posts: 52,807
Received 248 Likes on 114 Posts
2017 Corvette of the Year
2016 C4 of Year Finalist
Creator of the "Original" whining and crying thread
St. Jude Donor '14-'15-'16-'17

Default

ALL the car/truck manufacturers have been boosting the horsepower in their vehicles the last couple of years because that's what's selling right now. The Hemi in the new Dodge pickup is now producing 390 horsepower and 407ft of torque compared to 345 horse just a couple of years ago. It is amazing how the horsepower has increased but at the same time so has the miles per gallon.
Old 05-05-2010, 02:09 PM
  #4  
kylebuck89
Race Director
 
kylebuck89's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Lafayette LA
Posts: 10,202
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09

Default

i think the times are exaggerated.
Old 05-05-2010, 02:20 PM
  #5  
Frizlefrak
Race Director
 
Frizlefrak's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: El Paso Texas
Posts: 17,551
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

TODAY is the golden age of the Muscle / Pony / Sports car......not the 60's. Today's products are putting down performance the stuff 40 years ago could only dream of.....and they're doing it while putting down 30 mpg with the A/C blasting and a smooth idle.

These are great days we're living folks......
Old 05-05-2010, 02:23 PM
  #6  
96 Vette CE
Banned Loser
Support Corvetteforum!
 
96 Vette CE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: They say you learn from your mistakes, I must be a genius
Posts: 52,807
Received 248 Likes on 114 Posts
2017 Corvette of the Year
2016 C4 of Year Finalist
Creator of the "Original" whining and crying thread
St. Jude Donor '14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Originally Posted by Frizlefrak
TODAY is the golden age of the Muscle / Pony / Sports car......not the 60's. Today's products are putting down performance the stuff 40 years ago could only dream of.....and they're doing it while putting down 30 mpg with the A/C blasting and a smooth idle.

These are great days we're living folks......
Old 05-05-2010, 03:18 PM
  #7  
pologreen1
Team Owner
 
pologreen1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Posts: 20,974
Received 260 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

Ford offers a Cobra Jet now too. i seen one on mecum

Old 05-05-2010, 03:54 PM
  #8  
mike100
Safety Car
 
mike100's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 4,344
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PureChaosLOL
31mpg with the auto, 29 with the manual.

V6 cars run mid 13's in the 1/4 mile, so I'd beware of any new mustang in pretty much any C4 unless its modded. The V6's are dohc motor with variable cam timing. This would the "i" that Honda added to vtec motors in 2001. Vtec being variable valve lift and duration, "i" meaning intelligent, allowing a inner sliding cam gear to use pressurized oil injection to move the cam timing up to 50 degrees on the exaust side to vary overlap. The Ford system uses variable timing ability on both cams which led to a 10% increase in power.

Ford will do it and everyone calls it genius, Honda's done it for years and people make fun of it.
I heard lotus had sold honda the patent for part of the vtec scheme originally slated for the Mercury made ZR-1 motor (with the lotus heads). At any rate, nobody is laughing at cam phasing...especially not when it is coming on high feature 5 liter v8's.


I think people are laughing at the bean cans that the Japanese makes used to offer- not the engine tech.

Last edited by mike100; 05-05-2010 at 03:57 PM.
Old 05-05-2010, 04:15 PM
  #9  
redrose
Melting Slicks
 
redrose's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: backwoods upstate ny
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

haven't seen a car yet that can outrun my neighbor's hound in the first 100 yds, that does not mean i want to drive a pooch...stangs are geared
for 1/4 mile, that does not etc.
Old 05-05-2010, 04:20 PM
  #10  
Vette Fast
Racer
 
Vette Fast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Zolton NJ
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 1985 Corvette
I for one welcome it, good to see the big 3 are continue to offer such cars.
Old 05-05-2010, 04:29 PM
  #11  
lushdrunk
Burning Brakes
 
lushdrunk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Ive owned 3 mustangs over the years a 95 gt 5spd, 97 4.6 DOHC cobra, and a 2001 GT convertible 5 spd and all 3 where slow as ****. The cobra was of course the fastest but my stock 97 trans-am would run all over it any day of the week. Ive tired and tired and tried to like mustangs and can't do it.

Out of all three mustangs I owned I can only say 2 good things about them. #1 They sound great, #2 they are cheep as hell to build up. Performance parts can be picked up new and used EVERYWHERE.

Some imports would easily keep up with my mustangs if not take them. Mustangs are over hyped by redneck boys that have never drove a real car. I watched a old 1993 car & driver video on youtube that had Mario Andriette (sp) test drive a new 1994 z/28, 94 corvette, 94 Trans-am, and a 94 Mustang.
At the end of the test drive he commented that the biggest disappointment of the day was the Mustang. He said it had no power to it and felt like a family car. to quote "It was just a car, Nothing exciting about the drive"

The ONLY mustang worth owning is the 2003 Cobra.
4.6L DOHC with a twin screw supercharger, T56 6-speed and full IRS. Finally ford made a sports car it just took 39 years
Even the new "Super snake" is just gay. (best redneck voice) Yea boy I drive's me a Supper Snake Now, ittl take a vet.

BTW: Every person I bought my mustangs from all said the same thing "It will keep up with a vette"

Last edited by lushdrunk; 05-05-2010 at 04:33 PM.
Old 05-05-2010, 04:34 PM
  #12  
dogfish246
Safety Car
 
dogfish246's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: North New Jersey
Posts: 3,588
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

If a V6 mustang is pulling 305 hp and 280 ft-lb of torque, imagine what the C7 V8 is gonna do!!!!!

I know the C4 (LT1) can still take the stang due to the weight and gearing differences, but I am impressed!
Old 05-05-2010, 04:48 PM
  #13  
Jon Hekking
Race Director
 
Jon Hekking's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 14,371
Received 241 Likes on 128 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C3 of Year Finalist (stock)

Default

Originally Posted by PureChaosLOL
31mpg with the auto, 29 with the manual.

V6 cars run mid 13's in the 1/4 mile, so I'd beware of any new mustang in pretty much any C4 unless its modded.
Nuts, I better upgrade to a C5..... oh, wait..........
Old 05-05-2010, 05:22 PM
  #14  
Eakster
Safety Car
 
Eakster's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 4,129
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not worried here..
Stock 14 yr old LT4
Old 05-05-2010, 05:24 PM
  #15  
pologreen1
Team Owner
 
pologreen1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Posts: 20,974
Received 260 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dogfish246
If a V6 mustang is pulling 305 hp and 280 ft-lb of torque, imagine what the C7 V8 is gonna do!!!!!

I know the C4 (LT1) can still take the stang due to the weight and gearing differences, but I am impressed!
Nothing, chevy is still abusing the after market crowd.
Imagine 40 years ago carb 427 could make 500hp. All this technology, and we still don't have an affordable v8 that makes an awesome amount of power.

The cars of the 90's should have all been putting out what the zr1 was.
Old 05-05-2010, 05:32 PM
  #16  
mike100
Safety Car
 
mike100's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 4,344
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pologreen1
Nothing, chevy is still abusing the after market crowd.
Imagine 40 years ago carb 427 could make 500hp. All this technology, and we still don't have an affordable v8 that makes an awesome amount of power.

The cars of the 90's should have all been putting out what the zr1 was.
I will agree that technology could have entered the automotive scene more quickly, but certain tech like computer processing power and the expertise to program them could only follow the hi-tech industry. epa legislation killed compression ratios for a couple of decades until there was motivation to redesign combustion chambers to compliment electronic fuel injection. At anyrate, current engine tech has almost every pedestrian mom-mobile making 1hp per cubic inch, which was really high, even in the days before catalytic converters (special engines like the big block 427 and 426/440 mopars etc aside). dipping into the cubic inches well isn't exactly high tech. we'd all go broke if you had to drive a minivan with a 440 in it.

Also: I got to ask, what isn't affordable and highly supported about the LSx series of V8? You can build a truck engine into a 500hp 6 liter for not too much. You can buy a C6 that does 190 mph for less than the price of a duramax pickup.

Last edited by mike100; 05-05-2010 at 05:35 PM.
Old 05-05-2010, 05:36 PM
  #17  
Eakster
Safety Car
 
Eakster's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 4,129
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't think there was as much pressure in the US to make engines more efficient, as there was say in Europe with much higher gas prices. So nowadays German V8s for example seem much more efficient. I think what America achieved was affordability and to some extent reliability. Look how many people are driving around in torquey V8s. You don't see that in many other places

Get notified of new replies

To No more " Will my [insert C4 engine rpo here] take a new mustang: 5.0 returns

Old 05-05-2010, 05:43 PM
  #18  
alterchristopher
Instructor
 
alterchristopher's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

crap time for some longtube and a top end kit hell might as well run some n2o just to be safe ill be danmed if a stock v6 stang is going to beat me
Old 05-05-2010, 06:38 PM
  #19  
mike100
Safety Car
 
mike100's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: San Marcos CA
Posts: 4,344
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by alterchristopher
crap time for some longtube and a top end kit hell might as well run some n2o just to be safe ill be danmed if a stock v6 stang is going to beat me
think outside the box and buy the mustang. I have little to no loyalty to any brand these days. I will say that I really do like my C4 a lot and in the real world, it would be hard for those 300 hp v6 pony cars to keep up with it in every situation, but 6 speed automatics do keep engines in the sweet spot.
Old 05-05-2010, 06:52 PM
  #20  
Paul Workman
Le Mans Master
 
Paul Workman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes on 395 Posts

Default Couldn't agree more!!

Originally Posted by Frizlefrak
TODAY is the golden age of the Muscle / Pony / Sports car......not the 60's. Today's products are putting down performance the stuff 40 years ago could only dream of.....and they're doing it while putting down 30 mpg with the A/C blasting and a smooth idle.

These are great days we're living folks......
These ARE the days!!

And, you shoulda heard the screaming that came from an LS6 driver when I dared to give cudos to Ford for their continued development of the DOHC V8s. As I said then, GM better revisit the DOHC concept in the Corvette, or risk getting left behind in the performance game as they have in the past! And, again...being a ZR-1 driver, I hate having to pour over Ford product web sites to pick up info and nuances regarding 4-valve, DOHC engine development!

What ever happened to that 465 hp supercharged Northstar????

P.


Quick Reply: No more " Will my [insert C4 engine rpo here] take a new mustang: 5.0 returns



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.