C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

First time at the track...confused about R/T

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2004, 02:52 AM
  #1  
desi
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
desi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: Engineers do it better.
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default First time at the track...confused about R/T

Last night I went to the track for the first time. Here is my best and worst runs for the night.


Run # 1 has a much higher R/T, yet much lower 1/4. How does that work? Car is automatic, so all I had to do is floor it.

If ran with G-Tech, does it mean I would get a (15.891-0.791) = 15.1 sec? That would make more sense as last year I was running 15.5 when the car was completly stock.

Car simply does not pull from idle to 2500 RPM. 2500 - 4500 it pulls good. Time to finally change the heads.

BTW, had a great time at the track.....even though had to drive for 2+ hours to get there
Old 09-26-2004, 02:57 AM
  #2  
comp
Team Owner
 
comp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: eville in
Posts: 88,393
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

R/T is the time it take's you to leave ..ET is the time it take you to get there
Old 09-26-2004, 03:01 AM
  #3  
desi
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
desi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: Engineers do it better.
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Is R/T included in the E/T?
Old 09-26-2004, 03:36 AM
  #4  
biff85ta
Advanced
 
biff85ta's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Mount Vernon IL
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No your reaction and et are two seperate things.
Old 09-26-2004, 03:43 AM
  #5  
desi
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
desi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: Engineers do it better.
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Me gonna go try the G-Tech tomorrow.

I should have taken it to the track when I first bought it. That would have given me a good base line. Now I will never know how much improvement there has been since the upgrades
Old 09-26-2004, 03:51 AM
  #6  
biff85ta
Advanced
 
biff85ta's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Mount Vernon IL
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You need to get some vortec heads and a better cam. You could really wake it up. The 260h isn't much bigger than the stock cam on my 305 in my 85 TA.
Old 09-26-2004, 06:44 AM
  #7  
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 10,734
Received 561 Likes on 349 Posts

Default

Reaction time is the time it takes you to "break the beam/start the timer" from the time the light turns "green".

ET is just that, your time in the quarter mile from the time you break the beam at the starting line till you break the beam at the finish line.

Theoretically, you could be staged, the light could turn green, and you could sit on the line for one minute and smoke a cigarette. You could then "start" and break the beam.

Your RT would be 60 seconds, your ET would still be in the 15 sec bracket. Make sense? Chuck
Old 09-26-2004, 07:42 AM
  #8  
Jvette73
Safety Car
 
Jvette73's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Severna Park Md
Posts: 4,004
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Put a 2500rpm stall convertor in it. That will help it launch better and be pulling right out of the hole. It will make a big difference. It should improve your et by at least a 1/2 second, (5 tenths). Were you shifting it or just leaving it in D and letting the tranny shift when it wanted? If the tranny was doin the shifting, what rpm did it upshift?
Old 09-26-2004, 09:28 AM
  #9  
WA 2 FST
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
WA 2 FST's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Allen TX
Posts: 4,074
Received 556 Likes on 359 Posts

Default

FWIW, the G-tech is a decent gadget, but it is not nearly as accurate as track timers. From what I've seen the G-tech typically reads a bit quick in ET and MPH is also a bit higher.

And the others are 100% correct. RT is independent of ET. You could have a 2.xxx second RT and still run the same ET as on another run.
Old 09-26-2004, 09:52 AM
  #10  
American Boy
Pro
 
American Boy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Quebec
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by desi
Me gonna go try the G-Tech tomorrow.

I should have taken it to the track when I first bought it. That would have given me a good base line. Now I will never know how much improvement there has been since the upgrades
You just started the phenomenon of need to go faster.

Next thing you know, you're comptemplating the 502 cu. in. and blowers with coming out of your mouth... It never end...

That's so much fun

Stephan
Old 09-26-2004, 09:57 AM
  #11  
American Boy
Pro
 
American Boy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Quebec
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WA 2 FST
FWIW, the G-tech is a decent gadget, but it is not nearly as accurate as track timers. From what I've seen the G-tech typically reads a bit quick in ET and MPH is also a bit higher.

And the others are 100% correct. RT is independent of ET. You could have a 2.xxx second RT and still run the same ET as on another run.
A close friend of mine put is G-Tech on at the track and the difference between the two was within 0.2 sec always. The reason for the MPH to be quicker is that the G-Tech give the speed at the end of the quarter vs the average of the final 60 ft or so at the track.

It's close enough in my book.

Stephan
Old 09-26-2004, 01:43 PM
  #12  
SuperFast80
Race Director
 
SuperFast80's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

desi, 2 important things I think you may have missed:

1. You should have launched with a brake stand for stronger launch. You have a factory (1800) stall and 3.08s (or 3.07s I think) - you need to hold the brake down to the floor and load the converter for launch.

2. You have cammed the engine to make its peak power higher than where your TH400 shifts if you leave it in D. You should have launched in 1 and then shifted at the top of the band.

Before you do anything else, you should try these. I swear to you that if you didn't do either, you left at least a 1/2 second on the track. I was running similar power to yours when I last went 2 years ago and with a 2600 stall and 3.55s to help launch, I ran 14.6x/94.x all day.
Old 09-26-2004, 01:47 PM
  #13  
SuperFast80
Race Director
 
SuperFast80's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

BTW, your 60' times of 2.5 and 2.6 secs were awful, but clear indications that your launch is killing you. ~92-93mph is about 8-10 mph faster than most guys who normally run 15.9/16.0.

Keep trying. I am guessing you are set up for about 14.9-15.2.
Old 09-26-2004, 01:52 PM
  #14  
SuperFast80
Race Director
 
SuperFast80's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

BTW, in run #1, what/who was running beside you? He was 0.7 better than you but running the same trap speed.
Old 09-26-2004, 05:16 PM
  #15  
desi
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
desi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: Engineers do it better.
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well guys, I am changing the heads this winter to Sportsman IIs. Putting a bigger cam (whatever MotorHead recommends, possibly solid lifters) in and chambered pipes.

First cam I did was just for ****s and giggles (wanted to learn). I bet my stock mufflers don't help either One guys shaved off 1/2 sec just by taking his baffles out!! Mine is probably worse.

Superfast80, I did not shift manually either, nor did hold the brakes. The combo of TH400, 1800 stall and 3.08 is obviously not the best

It's gonna be a busy winter
Old 09-26-2004, 05:19 PM
  #16  
desi
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
desi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: Engineers do it better.
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SuperFast80
BTW, in run #1, what/who was running beside you? He was 0.7 better than you but running the same trap speed.

It was a Rustang.....some ole guy. Faster car, but the crowd liked the Vette better
Old 09-27-2004, 02:00 PM
  #17  
Stewart's74
Safety Car
 
Stewart's74's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Florham Park NJ Port Credit Ontario
Posts: 3,943
Received 42 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Way to go Amir.... Now you have a baseline. With your winter upgrades you should have a pretty strong performer next summer.
Also...you have a great wife...Mine wont let me go to the track
I guess I'll have to send her on a shopping spree with her girlfriends to get her out of town for a weekend.

Get notified of new replies

To First time at the track...confused about R/T

Old 09-27-2004, 03:20 PM
  #18  
75 Stingray!
Drifting
 
75 Stingray!'s Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Barrie
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by desi
It was a Rustang.....some ole guy. Faster car, but the crowd liked the Vette better
My car doesn’t rust and I'm 22!
Old 09-27-2004, 05:06 PM
  #19  
desi
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
desi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: Engineers do it better.
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stewart's74
...you have a great wife...Mine wont let me go to the track
I won't argue that one bit.

For you, give her a choice of drag strip or strip joint....see which one she picks
Old 09-27-2004, 07:14 PM
  #20  
Paul L
Team Owner
 
Paul L's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: Ontario
Posts: 30,995
Received 93 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

Chuck,
So the 1/4 mile time has nothing to do with the reaction time? In other words I could have a cigarette on the line and still post a better 1/4 mile time than the car next to me. Would I win? The question begs the next question: why bother being quick off the line if the reaction time is not factored in?


Quick Reply: First time at the track...confused about R/T



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 PM.