C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

side pipes or no???

Old 07-09-2003, 04:13 PM
  #1  
stingray_76
Racer
Thread Starter
 
stingray_76's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Muskoka ontario
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default side pipes or no???

i need to do some exhaust work and was wondering what the difference in flow would be between stock replacement side pipes and a dual exhaust with 2.5" pipes and high flow mufflers without cats.:confused:
i'm building a streetable car with mild performance(mild cam, performer intake,stock carb, stock exhaust manifolds,etc...) :chevy
any opinions would be helpful :)
Old 07-09-2003, 04:25 PM
  #2  
camaroneil
Racer
 
camaroneil's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2003
Location: texas,, at last
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: side pipes or no??? (stingray_76)

i've currently got sidepipes and am gonna change to dual setup, there's gotta be an advantage,
surely??????
i've ordered my headers and habe 2 1/2 inch pipe to go on with hedman turbo mufflers out back,
i'll let ya know how it feels when they are on,
do i really need a cross over pipe????

neil



[Modified by camaroneil, 11:03 PM 7/9/2003]
Old 07-09-2003, 04:54 PM
  #3  
Stewart's74
Safety Car
 
Stewart's74's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Florham Park NJ Port Credit Ontario
Posts: 3,943
Received 42 Likes on 21 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (camaroneil)

I like sidepipes+wife hates burns on leg=Chambered pipes. I love the sound @ WOT :reddevil
Old 07-09-2003, 05:15 PM
  #4  
flynhi
Le Mans Master
 
flynhi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,254
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (stingray_76)

Several guys I have talked to say they love the sidepipes for about five minutes. After that they are so loud they are no fun anymore. A friend is wrestling right now with trying to reduce the noise level while retaining stock sidepipe look. Without much success.

For street use I prefer a good set of headers with smallish primaries and a 4-2-1 collector configuration. Then use 2" pipes (2.5" for larger displacement such as 383) with mandrel bends and a X crossover. Finish them off with good mufflers such as Walker Dynomax or Edelbrock RPM. This setup will be loud enough to satisfy you, quiet enough for your wife and neighbors and will perform very well.
Old 07-09-2003, 05:25 PM
  #5  
Alwyn678
Team Owner
 
Alwyn678's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Thomson Georgia
Posts: 43,085
Received 141 Likes on 124 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (flynhi)

Sidepipes look cool and allow easy access to under the car....But are LOUD LOUD LOUD and will burn you even if you are careful...I would think a full exhaust system would be beneficial to performance
Old 07-09-2003, 08:59 PM
  #6  
tnt76vette
Drifting
 
tnt76vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: side pipes or no??? (Alwyn678)

Give this a thought: Chambered Pipes that exit out the back (Mid-American and others have them). They have the same sweet sound at WOT but are not 3 feet or so away from your ear all the time.....I can easily hear my radio while cruizin, and conversation is NOT a problem, but its the same sound as side pipes when ya stand on it.......just much easier to live with. :yesnod:
Old 07-09-2003, 09:19 PM
  #7  
stingray_76
Racer
Thread Starter
 
stingray_76's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Muskoka ontario
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (tnt76vette)

as cool as side pipes sound, that is not my main reason for wanting them. :steering:
but rather i'm looking for increased flow over my stock cat-back system :)
the reason side pipes are being considered is the look and increased flow i would get as well as the cooooooooolllll sound they make.
but back to the original question, what is the difference in flow???
what would be best for a mild performance car??? :confused:
Old 07-09-2003, 10:06 PM
  #8  
garagedweller2
Le Mans Master
 
garagedweller2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (stingray_76)

Sidepipes allow larger pipes, but you have that 90 degree bend
Old 07-09-2003, 10:17 PM
  #9  
427V8
C6 the C5 of tomorrow
Support Corvetteforum!
 
427V8's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (garagedweller2)

Side pipes does not == more flow!!!

Go out the back if you want flow
Old 07-09-2003, 10:25 PM
  #10  
tnt76vette
Drifting
 
tnt76vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: side pipes or no??? (427V8)

My 2nd attempt: If you have the stock 2 Y-Pipe system that '76s came with from the factory, believe me Sir, ANYTHING will be a HUGE improvement in flow over that system. That being said, you have to decide what sound you want, how much you can afford, etc. Side pipes do not flow well, they just sound like they do. Strongly suggest you check out Flowmasters Web Site or other systems of your consideration if flow is such an issue......... :cheers:
Old 07-09-2003, 10:37 PM
  #11  
Diode
Advanced
 
Diode's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2003
Location: Smithtown NY
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: side pipes or no??? (tnt76vette)

Side pipes aren't all that loud after about 10 minutes...that's how long it takes for your ear drums to get numb. Ask me how I know...
Old 07-10-2003, 02:59 AM
  #12  
Rockn-Roll
Melting Slicks
 
Rockn-Roll's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: Carmichael CA
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (stingray_76)



These do NOT get hot even in 100ºF CA temps after driving around. They WILL get hot if you just sit and idle for several minutes because there's no air flow to cool them off. These are the stock 69 style GM sidepipes which are chambered. The covers are mounted to the body, not the pipes. The pipes are mounted to the frame, not the body. They sound awesome. I think these pipes are about the only thing not stock in my power train, and I'm getting about 50% more power (measured 203RWHP with estimated 250BHP above the measured stock 165BHP with cats). I'm not sure a larger pipe will help much more than that...perhaps maybe 10% more. But, since I've got an L48 and not expecting much I'm happy. :)



[Modified by Rockn-Roll, 12:00 AM 7/10/2003]
Old 07-10-2003, 07:52 PM
  #13  
Chuck Harmon
Melting Slicks
 
Chuck Harmon's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: San Jose California
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (stingray_76)

stingray-76,

This is really a question of priorities and taste. I have side pipes even though I would probably prefer an underneath exhaust system for a number of reasons.

Pros: 1) Side pipes give me much more ground clearance. I can lower the car giving me 2) better handling and 3) better looks. 4) The trans and differential are cooler for not having the pipes right next to them. 5) Much easier to work under car, especially clutch changes. 6) My side pipes and baffles are lighter than an under car system. 7) I have not found any under the car system with 2.5" pipes that can give me the performance of Hooker side pipes with JCL baffles, there is virtually no power loss on my L88. Surely larger under car systems could, but ground clearance I would be reduced even more. 7) The sound with the uncapped JCL's is about the same as 40 series Flowmasters, but not as tinny. 8) They make the car look much more aggressive

Cons: 1) I prefer the sound of a joined (x pipe) system out the back. 2) I prefer the looks of an underneath system better. 3) They make more noise inside the car. 4) leg burns are a problem if you don't use heat shields and/or long pants. 5) They make the car look less discreet. To me, the underneath systems look classier, more discreet.

As you can see, I am torn between the two, but chose the side pipes because they had a few more advantages important to me. But before I found the JCL's I was so frustrated I was ready to back to an underneath system. The perfect answer would simply be to have one C3 of each! In a way, I have done that. I can use my C5 for more professional environments, and the L88 when I want to stand out from the crowd. I don't think the power difference will amount to that much if you intend to make an honest 350 or less gross horse power. It is simply a matter of taste.

Chuck
Old 07-10-2003, 09:37 PM
  #14  
tippi58
Racer
 
tippi58's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: wellington N Zealand
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: side pipes or no??? (stingray_76)

Great post chuck.. :iagree:

:cool: :cool: :cool:
Old 07-11-2003, 05:14 AM
  #15  
Nomad78SA
Drifting
 
Nomad78SA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Clarksville,Tn,USA TN
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (tippi58)

I am a sidepipe fan really and think all corvettes were just made for them and that it should of been an option. I am also running the JCL baffles in mine and love the sound of them. Mine is not a daily driver but I wouldn't change if it were. I took a 93 supercharged vette on the Power Tour and the sidepipes were not a issue in the least. Pure music to the ears and the whine of the supercharger didn't hurt either..
Neil in Tenn





[Modified by Nomad78SA, 9:09 PM 7/11/2003]
Old 07-11-2003, 08:33 AM
  #16  
flynhi
Le Mans Master
 
flynhi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 6,254
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (Chuck Harmon)

Chuck,
What is your source for JCL baffles?
Old 07-11-2003, 08:55 AM
  #17  
Alwyn678
Team Owner
 
Alwyn678's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Thomson Georgia
Posts: 43,085
Received 141 Likes on 124 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (stingray_76)

As a caveat I really think sidepipes "look best" on bumper cars...The chrome really sets it off nice..Of couse they look even better on 67's :cheers:

Get notified of new replies

To side pipes or no???

Old 07-11-2003, 09:24 AM
  #18  
MassVette
Le Mans Master
 
MassVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: side pipes or no??? (stingray_76)

Sidepipes NOW...........and sidepipes FOREVER!
:yesnod: :lol: :lol: :yesnod:
Gotta LOVE 'em!
Old 07-11-2003, 09:36 AM
  #19  
Ganey
Race Director
 
Ganey's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. TEXAS
Posts: 11,520
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default Re: side pipes or no???

See what many refer to as my Exhaust topic. http://www.corvettefaq.com/c3/ganeyexhaust.htm

Under- Max. power & quieter sleeper setup.

:cool:
Old 07-11-2003, 09:40 AM
  #20  
bloodvette80
Pro
 
bloodvette80's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: winnipeg MB
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: side pipes or no??? (Ganey)

who said pipes are annoying! far from it. The first thing i get complimented on is usually the pipes and how they sound. Your in a Corvette guy, not a lexas, you want a quiet with a smooth ride go buy a bmw. I'll keep my stiff suspension, louder than #$%@ C3. ps, I say go with the sidepipes.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: side pipes or no???



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 AM.