Vacuum or Mechanical secondaries
#1
Vacuum or Mechanical secondaries
Hi all,I purchased an edelbrock 650 with vacuum secondaries,I,ve got a 4 speed and when I kick it down it does not feel like I,ve got any secondaries at all.I,m thinking now that I should have went with maybe a holly with mechanical secondaries and if so would I get that seat of the pants pull when they kick in.Personally I,d rather have the secondaries come in when I want them to rather than by vacuum.Any thoughts on this .Thanx in advance J.S.H.
#2
Had a 1976 L-82, 4-sp
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: Some days your the dog and some days your the hydrant.
Posts: 5,338
Received 1,199 Likes
on
925 Posts
Royal Canadian Navy
Hi all,I purchased an edelbrock 650 with vacuum secondaries,I,ve got a 4 speed and when I kick it down it does not feel like I,ve got any secondaries at all.I,m thinking now that I should have went with maybe a holly with mechanical secondaries and if so would I get that seat of the pants pull when they kick in.Personally I,d rather have the secondaries come in when I want them to rather than by vacuum.Any thoughts on this .Thanx in advance J.S.H.
#4
Le Mans Master
Truth is, you can't just pull a carb out of the box, and expect it to be properly set up for your application. Carb tuning can be a lengthy process to get right, but well worth it. I always use vacuum secondary Q-Jets on the street, and when set up right, nothing will touch these. Instant throttle response everywhere, and pretty good fuel economy when cruising.
#6
Melting Slicks
When properly set up a vacuum-secondary carb can feel like a rocket sled when the secondaries come in. That said, a correctly-jetted Holley double pumper is almost always a better choice for performance in a manual-transmission car simply because the driver has control over secondary actuation. As said before, though, some tuning is still almost always going to be necessary to get it running perfectly...
#10
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Oxford MA-----You just lost the game!!!!
Posts: 5,948
Likes: 0
Received 62 Likes
on
52 Posts
You're not really supposed to feel the secondaries "kick in". When you can feel the secondaries "kick in", it's because there is an ever-so-slight stumble when they first come on. people who know how to tune a carb usually can't help but be amused when they hear people talking about "...feeling the secondaries kick in!"
That being said, it's your car, and if that's what floats your boat, then who is anybody else to criticize it, right? AVS stands for Adjustable Valve Secondary. Have you tried Adjusting the Secondary Valve opening rate? Adjust them to open sooner, until you get a bog, then slowly, a tiny bit at a time, adjust the Secondary Valve to open a little later, until you have juuuuust enough of a bog to be able to feel those babies kickin' in! Let us know how it works out for ya, and good luck!
Keep the shiny side up!
Scott
That being said, it's your car, and if that's what floats your boat, then who is anybody else to criticize it, right? AVS stands for Adjustable Valve Secondary. Have you tried Adjusting the Secondary Valve opening rate? Adjust them to open sooner, until you get a bog, then slowly, a tiny bit at a time, adjust the Secondary Valve to open a little later, until you have juuuuust enough of a bog to be able to feel those babies kickin' in! Let us know how it works out for ya, and good luck!
Keep the shiny side up!
Scott
#11
Before you dump that AVS, you need to adjust the secondary opening. Edelbrock made them easy to adjust and that's why they have the AVS model. If it's a daily driver, I have found that AVS carb is actually a pretty dependable running 650.
#12
Safety Car
Ran a Holley 670 SA with vacuum secondary on a ZZ4 and now a Holley 750 double Pumper mechanical on a 383. Both performed great after much tuning with jet sizes and squirters on the DP.
As someone said above, it takes proper tuning whichever kind you run.
As someone said above, it takes proper tuning whichever kind you run.
#14
Had a 1976 L-82, 4-sp
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: Some days your the dog and some days your the hydrant.
Posts: 5,338
Received 1,199 Likes
on
925 Posts
Royal Canadian Navy
Mech'l secondaries leaves no doubt if they are working - just look down and blip the throttle. If the VS are not working, you'll probably begin to notice a lack of power above 4000 rpm no matter how hard you mash the accelerator.
Last edited by resdoggie; 07-28-2012 at 09:25 AM.
#15
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 13,658
Received 4,927 Likes
on
1,933 Posts
...and you're right - I've shown several times through dyno testing numbers that it's tough to beat the performance of a Q-Jet on a street-driven car:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c3-t...-question.html
Lars
V8FastCars@msn.com
Last edited by lars; 07-28-2012 at 12:24 PM.
#16
Le Mans Master
Lars,
Is it possible that using a smaller Holley (e.g., 650) could create a stronger signal across the venturies resulting in a fatter curve and more torque in the 3,500-4,000 range, maybe at the expense of a couple hp on the top end? My 600 dp certainly doesn't show a similar dip in that area.
Is it possible that based on their design, you can't strickly compare the two carbs of the same rated CFM?
Wouldn't an advantage of the Holley be that they offer a wider range of flow ratings than the Q-jet to better taylor the torque curve to the engine and driving style, assuming you have the time and expertise?
Is it possible that using a smaller Holley (e.g., 650) could create a stronger signal across the venturies resulting in a fatter curve and more torque in the 3,500-4,000 range, maybe at the expense of a couple hp on the top end? My 600 dp certainly doesn't show a similar dip in that area.
Is it possible that based on their design, you can't strickly compare the two carbs of the same rated CFM?
Wouldn't an advantage of the Holley be that they offer a wider range of flow ratings than the Q-jet to better taylor the torque curve to the engine and driving style, assuming you have the time and expertise?
Last edited by toddalin; 07-28-2012 at 02:24 PM.
#17
Racer
Member Since: Apr 2004
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New England Events Coordinator
Scottyp, and/or Lars, I have a 70 350/300 with the Qjet, I do not have any issues with the carb but, I question if the secondaries open. Should I notice a huge kick at say 70MPH when I stomp on it, or hear a big sucking noise or surge in speed. What is the simplest way to test if the secondaries open at WOT?
#18
Instructor
Member Since: May 2012
Location: Warren MI
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scottyp, and/or Lars, I have a 70 350/300 with the Qjet, I do not have any issues with the carb but, I question if the secondaries open. Should I notice a huge kick at say 70MPH when I stomp on it, or hear a big sucking noise or surge in speed. What is the simplest way to test if the secondaries open at WOT?
#19
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 13,658
Received 4,927 Likes
on
1,933 Posts
Scottyp, and/or Lars, I have a 70 350/300 with the Qjet, I do not have any issues with the carb but, I question if the secondaries open. Should I notice a huge kick at say 70MPH when I stomp on it, or hear a big sucking noise or surge in speed. What is the simplest way to test if the secondaries open at WOT?
Lars
V8FastCars@msn.com
#20
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes
on
2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
Just fix what you got. If adjusted properly the motor only uses what it needs anyway. Should be a nice smooth transition and pull like the others say. If its a sudden lurch something isnt tuned right.