C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone Tried #2357 Bulbs Instead of #1157?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2011, 07:59 PM
  #1  
Paul L
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Paul L's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: Ontario
Posts: 30,995
Received 93 Likes on 91 Posts

Default Anyone Tried #2357 Bulbs Instead of #1157?

The brake/turn filament is supposed to be brighter than #1157 but park/tail is the same. Only drawback seems to be about half the life (400 hours compared to 1,000). It wouldn't hurt to have a brighter brake light.

(I don't want to go the LED route.)
Old 04-17-2011, 08:37 PM
  #2  
ToddG
Instructor
 
ToddG's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Caldwell Idaho
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wonder what the extra heat from the bulb will do to the lens after an extended operating time...might wanna check that out seeing a set is a pretty penny now a days..

c-ya
ToddG
Old 04-18-2011, 11:39 AM
  #3  
Barry's70LT1
Drifting
 
Barry's70LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,871
Received 853 Likes on 247 Posts

Default

Paul, I've been using 2357 bulbs, front and rear, for over five years now. I have not had a bulb burn out or any heat related problems.
The signal lights flash faster now, I assume from the increased current draw from the bulbs. Barry
Old 04-18-2011, 11:51 AM
  #4  
redman76
Melting Slicks
 
redman76's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 2,510
Received 347 Likes on 253 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09

Default

Originally Posted by Barry's70LT1
Paul, I've been using 2357 bulbs, front and rear, for over five years now. I have not had a bulb burn out or any heat related problems.
The signal lights flash faster now, I assume from the increased current draw from the bulbs. Barry
Are they noticeably brighter?
Old 04-18-2011, 11:39 PM
  #5  
Barry's70LT1
Drifting
 
Barry's70LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,871
Received 853 Likes on 247 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redman76
Are they noticeably brighter?
Yes, they are brighter. Nothing dramatic, however for what little they cost, it's a good investment.
Old 05-07-2011, 09:01 PM
  #6  
Paul L
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
Paul L's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: Ontario
Posts: 30,995
Received 93 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

I installed them yesterday in the rear along with some re-routing of the rear harness that Bubba tried. But he just tried with no cuts and so no permanent damage ensued.

I am pretty impressed. They are bright. The normal 2357 bright filament life is 400 hours but the 2357LL (Long Life) version is available at WalMart for about $3.00 a pair.

Blinkers and four-ways are functionally perfectly.

Heat? I had the brake pedal held down for about 3 minutes with a stick to seat and monitored the heat buildup. The rear lenses were warm but not hot. I am sold and will use.

Why people go fancy LED or halogen is beyond my understanding. Your choice: buy an electronic flasher with the former or burn your lenses with the latter. Or spend $3.00 on the #2357s.

Last edited by Paul L; 05-07-2011 at 09:10 PM.
Old 05-09-2011, 09:20 AM
  #7  
condor7
Instructor
 
condor7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 184
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Thanks

Originally Posted by paul 74
I installed them yesterday in the rear along with some re-routing of the rear harness that Bubba tried. But he just tried with no cuts and so no permanent damage ensued.

I am pretty impressed. They are bright. The normal 2357 bright filament life is 400 hours but the 2357LL (Long Life) version is available at WalMart for about $3.00 a pair.

Blinkers and four-ways are functionally perfectly.

Heat? I had the brake pedal held down for about 3 minutes with a stick to seat and monitored the heat buildup. The rear lenses were warm but not hot. I am sold and will use.

Why people go fancy LED or halogen is beyond my understanding. Your choice: buy an electronic flasher with the former or burn your lenses with the latter. Or spend $3.00 on the #2357s.
Thanks for this thread. I was considering LED stuff for my 68 but did not want to spend the $$$$ for a set of taillights. This bulb sounds like the answer I have been looking for. I'll try it.
Old 05-09-2011, 05:53 PM
  #8  
Duane4238
Burning Brakes
 
Duane4238's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: Western New York
Posts: 1,124
Received 140 Likes on 93 Posts

Default

You can buy your bulbs even cheaper by asking for a 10 or 12 pack. They're in a box and not fancy shrink wrap. Auto parts stores sell them to service stations like that. I bought a box of 1157's a while back for the same price as a 2 bulb pack. Try Autozone and Advance Auto Parts.
Duane
Old 05-10-2011, 07:12 AM
  #9  
spikebot 81
Racer
 
spikebot 81's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver washington
Posts: 334
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

I have a 06 chevy van that is a company daily driver and it has the 2357 bulbs. This van eats light bulbs for lunch. Seems I'm always changing one out. Cant remember the last time I changed a 1157 in the vette or my 85 el camino. But then again these cars are not on the road daily

Get notified of new replies

To Anyone Tried #2357 Bulbs Instead of #1157?




Quick Reply: Anyone Tried #2357 Bulbs Instead of #1157?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.