Tetraethel lead additive...availability? Necessity?
#1
Pro
Thread Starter
Tetraethel lead additive...availability? Necessity?
When I bought my '68 7 years ago, I was able to order a case of Lead Supreme (now called Octane Supreme 130) online, and was in the habit of adding a pint or two to each tank of 93 octane gas for extra protection against knocking and to help cushion him my valve seats. I finally ran out, and when I searched online yesterday, the stuff is "temporarilly out of stock" everywhere, even direct from the manufacturer. Is there another real lead based additive out there? Does it even really matter? Are the 'lead substitute' octane boosters of any use in valve seat protection, and do they have any potential negative effects on my engine and fuel delivery system? If all else fails, I can go to our little municipal airport and get a few gallons of leaded aviation fuel to add to each tank, but that is kind of a pain. On my fresh rebuild the compression ratio is now down to just below 10:1, and the cam has significant overlap, so I may be good to use plain old premium gas, but I'd feel better confirming this somehow. Who knows enough to help me out here?
#2
Race Director
There really is no need for TEL. When you had the engine rebuilt, did they install hardened seats? If they did, TEL serves no function at all. If they did not, I still wouldn't bother. By the time you get any significant valve seat recession it will be time for another engine rebuild anyway. Only time TEL really helped was for small engines pulling heavy loads for long times (like towing).
Yes, there are many negatives with TEL. First of all it is HIGHLY toxic and has been proven to cause brain damage, especially in young people (keep far away from kids!!!!). It also leaves deposits on your spark plugs and will make them misfire earlier (you have to change plugs more often).
Yes, there are many negatives with TEL. First of all it is HIGHLY toxic and has been proven to cause brain damage, especially in young people (keep far away from kids!!!!). It also leaves deposits on your spark plugs and will make them misfire earlier (you have to change plugs more often).
#3
Pro
Thread Starter
There really is no need for TEL. When you had the engine rebuilt, did they install hardened seats? If they did, TEL serves no function at all. If they did not, I still wouldn't bother. By the time you get any significant valve seat recession it will be time for another engine rebuild anyway. Only time TEL really helped was for small engines pulling heavy loads for long times (like towing).
Yes, there are many negatives with TEL. First of all it is HIGHLY toxic and has been proven to cause brain damage, especially in young people (keep far away from kids!!!!). It also leaves deposits on your spark plugs and will make them misfire earlier (you have to change plugs more often).
Yes, there are many negatives with TEL. First of all it is HIGHLY toxic and has been proven to cause brain damage, especially in young people (keep far away from kids!!!!). It also leaves deposits on your spark plugs and will make them misfire earlier (you have to change plugs more often).
Sounds like I should be okay to forget about it and have fun driving. I should note that in probably 5 000 miles on the old plugs, I never needed to replace them, so perhaps I wasn't adding enough lead to make much difference anyway.
#4
Race Director
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Cape Cod, Mass.
Posts: 18,774
Received 4,573 Likes
on
2,165 Posts
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C8 of the Year Finalist Unmodified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
2019 C1 of Year Winner (performance mods)
2017 Corvette of the Year Finalist
2016 C2 of Year
2015 C3 of Year Finalist
You don't need a lead additive for your 68. I have been running my 61 (10.25:1 383), 65 (327/350 11.0:1), and 68 (427/390 10.25:1) for years with no problems on 93 octane pump gas.
#5
Team Owner
The only reason to use TEL in your car would be to alleviate "spark knock"...pre-ignition. If you can run no-lead fuel in your car and not get any knocking, you don't need it at all. If you DO get pre-ignition knock, you can try de-tuning your engine or put in other additives which emulate higher octane performance.
If you don't have 11:1 or higher compression ratio, you probably don't need more than 93 octane fuel. If you do have a high-compression engine, you might consider putting a thick head gasket under the heads or changing to some aluminum heads.
If you don't have 11:1 or higher compression ratio, you probably don't need more than 93 octane fuel. If you do have a high-compression engine, you might consider putting a thick head gasket under the heads or changing to some aluminum heads.
#6
Team Owner
There really is no need for TEL. When you had the engine rebuilt, did they install hardened seats? If they did, TEL serves no function at all. If they did not, I still wouldn't bother. By the time you get any significant valve seat recession it will be time for another engine rebuild anyway. Only time TEL really helped was for small engines pulling heavy loads for long times (like towing).
Yes, there are many negatives with TEL. First of all it is HIGHLY toxic and has been proven to cause brain damage, especially in young people (keep far away from kids!!!!). It also leaves deposits on your spark plugs and will make them misfire earlier (you have to change plugs more often).
Yes, there are many negatives with TEL. First of all it is HIGHLY toxic and has been proven to cause brain damage, especially in young people (keep far away from kids!!!!). It also leaves deposits on your spark plugs and will make them misfire earlier (you have to change plugs more often).
RONG!!! i'ts a flat out lie, dunno your information source but it's pure
What in hell you think?? ever tinkerer and kid from the 40's++ is brain dead after handling leaded gas?? much less doing engineering work landing us on the MOON???
what sort of green weenie propaganda are you reading man???
don't mean to thread hijack, but I simply can NOT let this go by....
#7
[/SIZE][/COLOR]
RONG!!! i'ts a flat out lie, dunno your information source but it's pure
What in hell you think?? ever tinkerer and kid from the 40's++ is brain dead after handling leaded gas?? much less doing engineering work landing us on the MOON???
what sort of green weenie propaganda are you reading man???
don't mean to thread hijack, but I simply can NOT let this go by....
RONG!!! i'ts a flat out lie, dunno your information source but it's pure
What in hell you think?? ever tinkerer and kid from the 40's++ is brain dead after handling leaded gas?? much less doing engineering work landing us on the MOON???
what sort of green weenie propaganda are you reading man???
don't mean to thread hijack, but I simply can NOT let this go by....
#8
Drifting
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Springfield Illinois
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
If you do not have hardened valve seats... I would keep adding the lead.. Not trying to knock any of you guys who posted not to worry about........ but, if chevy along with all the other car manufacturers thought it was necessary to add hardened seats because of the unleaded fuel then obviously there is a reason. Just think about the extra work that goes into putting those hardened seats in, that slightly raises the cost per engine(or per car) and when you are building millions of cars a year that becomes pretty expensive.
Google - Max Lead 2000 (this is also a tetra-ethal lead additive)
Mr.Vette - I, too, agree with you. You can spot an old carb'd engine anywhere today because they usually run soo damn'd rich... now if you imagined every single car being carb'd, pollution would be out the @$$. Add lead to the mix... Im sure EVERYONE today, from their late 40's on up would all have neurological damage..
Google - Max Lead 2000 (this is also a tetra-ethal lead additive)
Mr.Vette - I, too, agree with you. You can spot an old carb'd engine anywhere today because they usually run soo damn'd rich... now if you imagined every single car being carb'd, pollution would be out the @$$. Add lead to the mix... Im sure EVERYONE today, from their late 40's on up would all have neurological damage..
Last edited by FRSTR90; 05-25-2010 at 02:25 PM.
#9
Team Owner
If you do not have hardened valve seats... I would keep adding the lead.. Not trying to knock any of you guys who posted not to worry about........ but, if chevy along with all the other car manufacturers thought it was necessary to add hardened seats because of the unleaded fuel then obviously there is a reason. Just think about the extra work that goes into putting those hardened seats in, that slightly raises the cost per engine(or per car) and when you are building millions of cars a year that becomes pretty expensive.
Google - Max Lead 2000 (this is also a tetra-ethal lead additive)
Mr.Vette - I, too, agree with you. You can spot an old carb'd engine anywhere today because they usually run soo damn'd rich... now if you imagined every single car being carb'd, pollution would be out the @$$. Add lead to the mix... Im sure EVERYONE today, from their late 40's on up would all have neurological damage..
Google - Max Lead 2000 (this is also a tetra-ethal lead additive)
Mr.Vette - I, too, agree with you. You can spot an old carb'd engine anywhere today because they usually run soo damn'd rich... now if you imagined every single car being carb'd, pollution would be out the @$$. Add lead to the mix... Im sure EVERYONE today, from their late 40's on up would all have neurological damage..
I well remember reading none other than the Wash Post rag back then that it took 10% more crude/gallon on refined gas for the elimination of lead....10% more crude over 40 years now is a total boatload of crude oil....
and what did we gain for all that increased import?? 9/11??.....
play the % game here now....10% when we pumping X% of our own crude oils...and then they want a 10% SURcharge?? where do we think that stupid move comes from.....
show me ONE POSITIVE thing that eliminating lead from gasoline has done for this or any other country....but I demand SOLID SCIENTIFIC PROOF, not some green weenie/Huff post site...
The ONLY thing that has been a positive development on engine/fuel management has been DPFI, and that has nothing to do with fuels so much as ELECTRONICS.....
as in chips, and transistors....
and we could run at 17-18 to one A/F ratios, apparently, according to a old poster here ...Norval.....
but not with the EPA over our shoulders.....at any rate, FI is obviously the way to go....some of you may know that my old '72 shark is a more modern FI car...with overdrive...
#10
Race Director
Rate of violent crime started decreasing a few years after leaded gas was eliminated and has continued to decrease as the damaged kids died off.
#11
Team Owner
Hmmmmm.... A strong desire to revert back to 'leaded' gas... No concern about the environmental effects or for brain damage to 'gas sniffers'... Prone to tirades and unsolicited rage... I think I'm seeing some pattern here.
#12
If you do not have hardened valve seats... I would keep adding the lead.. Not trying to knock any of you guys who posted not to worry about........ but, if chevy along with all the other car manufacturers thought it was necessary to add hardened seats because of the unleaded fuel then obviously there is a reason. Just think about the extra work that goes into putting those hardened seats in, that slightly raises the cost per engine(or per car) and when you are building millions of cars a year that becomes pretty expensive.
.
.
Corvettes never suffered from valve recession due to lack of lead, not back then, not now. Dump trucks and Dad's wagon pulling a house trailer up a mountain did. Since the foundry had no idea which engine a head was going to end up on, all of them got induction hardened.
#13
#14
Drifting
TEL can be simply ingested in to the body by just spilling on to the skin - you will then suffer from lead poisoning - just as many people would have done ingesting other heavy and toxic materials in the engineering/automotive/marine/plumbing/electrical/in fact ALL industries many years ago before health and safety laws took off - and just like developing countries are doing NOW.
#15
All the toxic shock talk aside...........I would recommend adding at least a fuel stabilizer. The ethanol in today's gas really draws the water in, and since many of us don't run our cars a lot, that is one measure that I think is almost a necessity to help prevent rusty tanks and lines.
#16
Corvettes never suffered from valve recession due to lack of lead, not back then, not now. Dump trucks and Dad's wagon pulling a house trailer up a mountain did. Since the foundry had no idea which engine a head was going to end up on, all of them got induction hardened.
and the other drawback to TEL was that it was not added to gas as pure TEL - it had alkyl halides added to the HC formulation. When they burned they generated, amoung other things, HCl and HBr which corroded the sh8t out of the exhaust pipes / mufflers. Before I swithched to unleaded in the '80s I had to replace my whole exhaust system every 3 years! My father in law worked for Texaco refining for 35 years and explained this to me.
The beauty of TEL (from the refiner's point of view) is that it it is a catalytic octane improver so a little does a lot. To get the same increase in octane in a gallon of gas you need a lot more branched HCs (like i-Oct) and that cost a lot more for the refinery to produce.
#17
Pro
Thread Starter
whoa!
I didn't mean to ignite a firestorm hear about the environmental and health effects of lead! I'm a physician, I am familiar with the effects of lead on the system, and I have not desire to get on a rant. The only two solid pieces of information I'll drop in are that back in the 70's, the average blood lead level in kids in the US was 15 ppm...today it averages less than 3ppm. Some of that could have been due to lead paint and other lead sources I suppose. Lead is definitely neurotoxic among other things, but you're not going to die from spilling a little lead additive on your skin
I am not going to worry about lack of lead additive, but I may try and track down some of that max lead 2000 stuff.
Thanks all!
I am not going to worry about lack of lead additive, but I may try and track down some of that max lead 2000 stuff.
Thanks all!
#19
Team Owner
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Posts: 39,570
Received 549 Likes
on
376 Posts
If you can't find TEL, can you buying racing gasoline in your locality? Drag racers are a prime customer. I can buy it locally, I think the last I bought was 110 octane. Higher octanes are available. Also, the high octane gasoline is available either leaded or non-leaded. But ...........its' $$$$$. I think I paid $10 a gallon. (And that's with no road taxes!) One or two gallons in a tank of pump gas may give you the boost you want.
My 68 350/327 10.5:1 ran OK on 91 pump gas.
#20
Drifting
Another symptom is that lead poisoned people write angry, ranting and raving posts.
If you can't find TEL, can you buying racing gasoline in your locality? Drag racers are a prime customer. I can buy it locally, I think the last I bought was 110 octane. Higher octanes are available. Also, the high octane gasoline is available either leaded or non-leaded. But ...........its' $$$$$. I think I paid $10 a gallon. (And that's with no road taxes!) One or two gallons in a tank of pump gas may give you the boost you want.
My 68 350/327 10.5:1 ran OK on 91 pump gas.
If you can't find TEL, can you buying racing gasoline in your locality? Drag racers are a prime customer. I can buy it locally, I think the last I bought was 110 octane. Higher octanes are available. Also, the high octane gasoline is available either leaded or non-leaded. But ...........its' $$$$$. I think I paid $10 a gallon. (And that's with no road taxes!) One or two gallons in a tank of pump gas may give you the boost you want.
My 68 350/327 10.5:1 ran OK on 91 pump gas.