Go Back   Corvette Forum > C3 Corvettes, 1968 - 1982 > C3 Tech/Performance
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Albums Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ
Search
C3 Tech/Performance
V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette Sponsored by
VBP

Welcome to Corvetteforum.com!
Welcome to Corvetteforum.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Corvetteforum.com today!


Corvette Store
 
 
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
  
Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-30-2009, 01:41 PM   #1
delgal
CF Senior Member
 
delgal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: marcinelle hainaut
Default big block 454 vs 427

hello,

which is the difference enters, L88 427ci - L71 427ci- LS5 - LS7 454ci,
(year 1969 - 1971) power, starting torke, reliability, lightness???

thank you with you all:chee rs:


david
delgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 02:46 PM   #2
TimAT
CF Senior Member

 
TimAT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Gladstone MO
Default

Factory horsepower ratings L-88 427 is 430HP, the L-71 427 is 435, and the LS-7 454 is 460. The 454 will have a bit more torque (longer stroke). The reliability and weight is close enough to the same on all 3 to not be a factor.
TimAT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 02:33 AM   #3
OzzyTom
CF Senior Member
 
OzzyTom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimAT View Post
Factory horsepower ratings L-88 427 is 430HP, the L-71 427 is 435, and the LS-7 454 is 460. The 454 will have a bit more torque (longer stroke). The reliability and weight is close enough to the same on all 3 to not be a factor.

Seeing as the original poster is a newbie, it should be stated that the L88 was in reality much higher in horsepower... it was a high compression (12:1) racing engine with over 500 hp!!!
Not ideal for street use today due to lower octane fuels, but definitely much more powerful than the factory rating of 430hp!
__________________
OzzyTom, from the Land DownUnder
OzzyTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 04:39 AM   #4
baxsom
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Rockledge FL
Default

dont forget that all pre72 rating were the one that was without accessories.
i think it was the gross reading, in 72 they switched to net which dropped the numbers but indicated a more real one. like the 71 454 vs 72 454. big rated numbers difference most of it was because of the scale.
baxsom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 09:58 AM   #5
joewill
CF Senior Member
 
joewill's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Noblesville Indiana
Default

people wil swear by the 427 and the way it revs due to shorter stroke.. but if all else is the same... then there is no replacement for displacement... the more displacement, the more torque.. especially at the lower end of the rpm range
joewill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 02:05 PM   #6
FRSTR90
CF Senior Member
 
FRSTR90's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Springfield Illinois
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baxsom View Post
dont forget that all pre72 rating were the one that was without accessories.
i think it was the gross reading, in 72 they switched to net which dropped the numbers but indicated a more real one. like the 71 454 vs 72 454. big rated numbers difference most of it was because of the scale.
It was all a game... Whether you take the numbers from 1970 or the numbers from 1973 in reality its all the same. Those factory ratings are just as irrelevant as the typical guy across your street with a 350 that has 500+ HP.
FRSTR90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 02:26 PM   #7
Jims66
CF Senior Member
 
Jims66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Lexington Park Maryland
Default

Didn't the L88 have aluminum heads ?
Jims66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 04:11 PM   #8
MelWff
CF Senior Member

 
MelWff's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Danbury CT
Default

Yes, the L88 had aluminum heads
MelWff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 04:11 PM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > C3 Corvettes, 1968 - 1982 > C3 Tech/Performance
Reload this Page big block 454 vs 427
 
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big Block ...vs... Small Block..What Do You Think..??? Viet Nam Vett C1 & C2 Corvettes 47 03-20-2004 04:36 PM
Big block C4? neat C4 Tech/Performance 20 03-15-2003 09:48 PM
Big Block Overheat First owner C1 & C2 Corvettes 86 03-09-2003 06:16 AM
big block vs small block road2xs C3 Tech/Performance 9 10-13-2002 09:35 PM
old 454 vs new 454, i need help deciding on motor for my c3 originally a 427 vcole@metrocast.net Engine Mods 14 03-25-2002 07:22 PM
440 Chrysler vs. Big Block Chevy: marky mark C3 Tech/Performance 205 01-13-2002 10:51 PM
Small Block vs. Big Block Vettelaw C3 Tech/Performance 53 12-17-2001 01:20 AM
big block vs small block tp85 C3 Tech/Performance 10 10-04-2001 01:53 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Emails & Password Backup

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2