C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Bigger is not always better!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2007, 02:56 PM
  #41  
Little Mouse
Le Mans Master
 
Little Mouse's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,396
Received 94 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

GMs 383 fast burn crate engine has 210 runner heads makes 425 hp
at 5400 rpm 460 lb ft torque. cams with too much duration are the
true killers of lower end torque.

Last edited by Little Mouse; 01-28-2007 at 03:01 PM.
Old 01-28-2007, 03:06 PM
  #42  
63mako
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by Little Mouse
GMs 383 fast burn crate engine has 210 runner heads makes 425 hp
at 5400 rpm 460 lb ft torque. cams with too much duration are the
true killers of lower end torque.
Check the flow numbers on those GM heads vs the AFR 195 eliminator.
Old 01-28-2007, 03:12 PM
  #43  
Little Mouse
Le Mans Master
 
Little Mouse's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,396
Received 94 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

my guess would be they are edelbrock heads. the price was about
$509 per head not a bad buy for the money.

Last edited by Little Mouse; 01-28-2007 at 03:21 PM.
Old 01-28-2007, 04:13 PM
  #44  
Edzred72
Le Mans Master
 
Edzred72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Wildwood IL
Posts: 5,943
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MotorHead
You did buy the correct bigger heads though didn't you.. AFR 210's ?
:
Yeah I did See...I was listening to educated, constructive responses of those who took my intended useage as a criteria. You and Kevin are my mentors....
Eddie
P.S. 406 is off to the dyno this week. I'll post results.
Old 01-28-2007, 04:15 PM
  #45  
gdh
Le Mans Master
 
gdh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,697
Received 86 Likes on 69 Posts

Default

I would hasten to add that with the huge increases in hp that $ can buy some of those $$ should be spent on suspension upgrades, wheel/tires and make sure that the frame is solid. I have seen a few too many vettes with rotten or severely patched frames that the owners continue to add hp upgrades and nice shiney things but the car is a bloody death trap. A friend of mine had just finished installing a new high hp motor in a C3 and warned the guy that the $ should be spent on putting a new frame under the car. Owner spent over $12k on engine and paint made it about 20 miles before allowing a tree to stop him.
I can be put into the stock to high hp category when 5 yrs. ago MountainMotor designed my current 383 stroker. My only caveate was to keep it under 500 hp to help me from not being part of the forest. The guy has a solid track record building NASCAR and 1/4 mile dragboat engines so I lucked out and got all the parts at his costs with any machine work being done for $0. He put a fairly mild cam into it to keep it under my 500hp request, now I'm ready to beef up the cam a little (and yes I did take it to the track a few times for a save run to test my depends out). There are plenty of down sides to a lot of power but my wife and I are still alive due to being able to quickly accelerate out of the way of another vehicle. The same guy killed a family of 3 a few miles down the road from where he nearly hit us.
Old 01-28-2007, 04:21 PM
  #46  
Edzred72
Le Mans Master
 
Edzred72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Wildwood IL
Posts: 5,943
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 63mako
I agree that a 180 head is NOT a good option for a 406. .......going to a 3.55 or 3.73 gear the 210 heads may be a better choice due to getting into the higher RPM's quicker and I believe one of those upgrades is also in Eddie's future!
180cc is what I had at the time, and it took working much overtime and saving to purchase the 210's.

YUP...rear gear is down the road.
Eddie
Old 01-28-2007, 04:23 PM
  #47  
turtlevette
Melting Slicks
 
turtlevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,053
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03,'11

Default

i would think because the LS engines run so good we should try and emulate their design as much as possible.

High flowing heads. Similar camshafts ect.
Old 01-28-2007, 04:24 PM
  #48  
Edzred72
Le Mans Master
 
Edzred72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Wildwood IL
Posts: 5,943
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gdh
when 5 yrs. ago MountainMotor designed my current 383 stroker.
Good guy...wish he was still around.
Eddie
Old 01-28-2007, 04:53 PM
  #49  
MotorHead
Race Director
 
MotorHead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Posts: 17,569
Received 156 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

Eddie, can't wait for the dyno results
Old 01-28-2007, 05:20 PM
  #50  
panic
Team Owner
 
panic's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Sorrento Italy
Posts: 20,189
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

i wonder why not very many ask about dropping their c3 weight before increasing their engine's power...C3 first step toward upgrading (and i mean the car as a whole, not only its power) is making it firstly a good turning around bends and braking performer THEN you should go into engine power and driveline uprating...

it would be useless to have 500 hp under the hood and not beeing able to stop in time at a crosslight or in a panic situation, same as it would be a nightmare to drive a car with plenty of power and go out of the road at the first sharp bend...

key iussue in our C3's is weight, dropping its weight makes the car easier to drive and to stop and mainly makes the driveability easier to be improved.

i can't even imagine how a 3.600 lbs could be driven or uprated without spending a small fortune, but if you get down to 2.900/3.000 lbs everything becomes easier and more affordable.

english got this point clear, that's why they've always built cars like caterhams or tvr's that with reduced weights from around 1.200 to 2.200lbs and powers from about 200 to 360 hp can easily get the $...t out of nearly any supercar around sharp bends and on 0 to 60 mph...

Last edited by panic; 01-28-2007 at 05:22 PM.
Old 01-28-2007, 05:22 PM
  #51  
BigBlockk
Drifting
 
BigBlockk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: North Bend Ohio
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 76project
OK, I have been thinking some what along the same lines for My 76. It is a dog, you hit the gas and get out an push. My son has a 70 roadrunner with a 383 that screams. I would like something in the middle. I want it to run good, throw me back into the seat a little, but I am not trying to be the fastest car in town. So what is a good horsepower to shoot for? 300? 350HP? I really don't want to reinvent the wheel, just a good seat of the pants feel.
What are you middle of the HP pack running (cam, heads, carb, Intake, Etc...what brand)?
I am about to start on Mine.
Thanks
What is your budget? If the bottom end is stock and you don't want to change heads I would put headers on it and get the stock heads ported. Get an aluminum intake from a '78 to '81 'Vette and match it to the heads. Get a mild camshaft (212 to 216 degrees at .050" lift) and tune up the Quadrajet.

If you want to change the heads you could get some Edelbrock 60879 aluminum ones to take some weight off the front of the car.

If you have to pass smog you could do headers into a single 3" exhaust and the largest "universal" fit Dynomax cat you can find.

BigBlockk

Later.....
Old 01-28-2007, 05:58 PM
  #52  
Yellow73SB
Le Mans Master
 
Yellow73SB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07
Default

Originally Posted by turtlevette
i would think because the LS engines run so good we should try and emulate their design as much as possible.

High flowing heads. Similar camshafts ect.
Also the cam that switches the firing order

I want to try one out
Old 01-28-2007, 07:04 PM
  #53  
Budman68
Le Mans Master
 
Budman68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 9,078
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Cruise-In VII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

Originally Posted by Yellow73SB
My ~450 hp 355 is a perfect combination to my car. With the tires I have it won't spin the tires at all , but this is nice becuase you don't get caught up doing burnouts and getting trouble.

Also people bs about there motors hp way too much. Or im under estimating mine. Some guy said he has 425 hp with a .486 cam and 9.8:1 compression on his 350. Mine has a .550 lift 236* cam and 11:5 compression and I estimate 450. Sorry got carried off.

And my motor is kind of a pita to drive becuase of the 2200 stall converter. Atleast it helps me not break parts.
If you can spin the tires with 450hp, you don't have 450 hp. Maybe like 250. You need to tune that motor. 450hp will run 11 second quarter miles and break the tire loose at 50 mph. Not trying to flame you, just the hard facts.
Old 01-28-2007, 07:15 PM
  #54  
gdh
Le Mans Master
 
gdh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,697
Received 86 Likes on 69 Posts

Default

Eddie if I can talk Anne into taking the vette to Chicago this summer we'll have some fun once again!!

Last edited by gdh; 01-28-2007 at 07:18 PM.
Old 01-28-2007, 08:52 PM
  #55  
Fastguy
Team Owner
 
Fastguy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 1999
Location: This vette goes to 11 Milford MA
Posts: 26,679
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03-'05

Default

Combo combo combo combo, intended use, combo combo, what you're willing to compromise, combo combo, budget, combo combo.
That about sums it up.
Old 01-28-2007, 09:04 PM
  #56  
rcread
Race Director
 
rcread's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 10,621
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts

Default

When I asked for input on my head choice for the 355 I'm building, a lot of people second guessed my cam choice. I even went back to Crane and asked them again if the cam I had chosen was big enough for me application, and the AFR 180 heads I had chosen. They assured me that they had originally helped me choose would be good for my application. My '71 convertible will never see the track, I want good torque a decent idle. Something that will be nice for cruises down to Napa, etc.

My '78 Firebird, on the other hand, is getting a 455, big heads, big cam, a TKO600, with the hopes of running 11s while still being somewhat streetable. But that's a whole 'nother story.
Old 01-28-2007, 09:21 PM
  #57  
Yellow73SB
Le Mans Master
 
Yellow73SB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07
Default

Originally Posted by Budman78
If you can spin the tires with 450hp, you don't have 450 hp. Maybe like 250. You need to tune that motor. 450hp will run 11 second quarter miles and break the tire loose at 50 mph. Not trying to flame you, just the hard facts.
I run slicks, and do thequarter @110 mph I think 450 is right.

Stock converter makes the car alot slower. var's not made for drag racing anyways. for drag racing anyways.

Last edited by Yellow73SB; 01-28-2007 at 09:24 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To Bigger is not always better!

Old 02-03-2007, 03:02 PM
  #58  
63mako
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default Independent test on street 195 CC heads!!

Ok Check this out: Tests NOT DONE BY AFR!! http://www.adperformance.com/index.p...duct s_id=208 Check out the flow numbers, Engine build specs,Torque curve and peak HP. These are AFR 195 Street heads for under $1500 that outflow the old 210's. This power comes from using well matched components!!!THAT IS MY POINT!!!
Old 02-03-2007, 03:04 PM
  #59  
turtlevette
Melting Slicks
 
turtlevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,053
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03,'11

Default

whats the intake runner size on LS1 and LS6 heads?

i bet a lot bigger than 165cc


these engines are very mild mannored.
Old 02-03-2007, 03:09 PM
  #60  
63mako
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by turtlevette
whats the intake runner size on LS1 and LS6 heads?

i bet a lot bigger than 165cc


these engines are very mild mannored.
Yes, I bet they are bigger than 165 CC's and some are very mild mannered. They are producing big power with well matched components and still have great street manners! And I thought we were going to argue.

Last edited by 63mako; 02-03-2007 at 03:11 PM.


Quick Reply: Bigger is not always better!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 AM.