C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Bigger is not always better!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2007, 11:05 PM
  #21  
63mako
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

This post is not meant to insult anyone. I admire the builders that put together a 600 HP small block or a 800 HP big block and street drive them. That would be a blast. Just shedding some light on a recurring situation that I noticed. Streetability, durability of the drivetrain, ease of maintanance, tuning and longevity on a tight budget is sometimes better served with modest, well matched improvements.
Old 01-26-2007, 11:39 PM
  #22  
ram82fire
Burning Brakes
 
ram82fire's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: spring city pa
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A truly sensible topic , with a great deal of helpful input .


Gman
Old 01-26-2007, 11:41 PM
  #23  
ford4play
Intermediate
 
ford4play's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Elmer NJ
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

63mako- i find this to be a great post. When i built my first motor(pontiac 400) i had my choices ripped apart. I could have bought so much more for almost the same money, but for me it was a matter of tuning. Why buy the big single plane intake that pulls to 7000 when the cam i was gonna use maxed out at 5500. Its all a matter of choices, and having the bigger picture in mind. The big carbs are impressive, but if it doesn't match what you have, then why run it? It just doesn't make much sense. I think most people have a $ in their head on what they would pay for a big hp motor, then buy the best stuff they can for the money without ever realizing the nothing matches.
I'll end here since I really don't want to rant. BTW- the pontiac I built, ended up knocking off 2 sec. on my 1/4 mile time. I ran a 14.4 but with the factory 2.41 rear gears.(i now have 3.73's but never ran at the track) I really don't think that was bad considering the gear, and it was very reliable, and so easy to maintain. It's all a matter of good decisions,and has nothing to do with how much money you have or how much hp your motor makes in theory.
Old 01-26-2007, 11:50 PM
  #24  
TimAT
Le Mans Master
 
TimAT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Gladstone MO
Posts: 7,121
Received 424 Likes on 385 Posts
C3 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019

Default

I HAVE one of those PITA high HP big blocks. And it truly is a PITA*. Valve adjustments, tweaking here and there on the timing or carb, trying new this or that for a little more- it's a constant thing. For me, personally, I wouldn't change a thing. I'm at the point I'm looking seriously at an aluminum block to go with my aluminum heads.

It's therapy. I'd never advise anyone to do the same thing.

If you want a little more, go a little bit more. But be prepared to get a bit more aggressive with your maintenance. And be ready to lose a little reliability. The combinations GM originally produced were designed so they didn't have a ton of warranty claims, but still enough to keep the dealers in business.

Old 01-27-2007, 12:15 AM
  #25  
MotorHead
Race Director
 
MotorHead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Posts: 17,569
Received 156 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SmokedTires
Geez,that's pretty close to describing my sbc I will admit, this was not my first buildup. I started with a very reliable 355 based upon Edelbrocks RPM formula which was a fun engine.
He must be talking about you Mike, cause while my Vic Jrs are 220cc, I run 11:1CR and have a big single plane intake, my Race Demon flows 975cfm not 900cfm

Seriously though I agree with some of what you say, I don't think it is a good idea to jump from a stock L48 to a 600HP roller motor unless you really know your way around under the hood. I didn't do that either. It was done in steps, starting after I could shake a 92 Cavalier with my stock L48. First it was a rebuild with a HP cam. Then came heads, headers, bigger carb and on and on. It was alot of fun doing it that way as money would allow. Bolting on parts and seeing how much power they made. Got the ol' L48 up to 300 RWHP and 330RWT.

Finally after eight years of owning my Vette I went a little radical and built the 406ci solid roller motor which is now in my Vette. If I had put this motor in my Vette when I first got it, it probably wouldn'y have lasted more than six months because I didn't know what I know now about small blocks. It is a hobby for me, I am currently building a 427ci small block. If someone asks me how to make some power, I will tell them, that's what they are asking. I will also warn them about the downside of big HP motors too.

63 Mako, I remember posting something similar to what you posted many years ago here, can't remember exactly what I said but it was something about the fact that all these big HP numbers were being thrown around and 400HP was nothing and that 13 seconds in the quarter mile seemed slow these days because of all the BS being posted. I think I said that 13 seconds in the 1/4 mile was smoking fast and how many had actually gone that fast, any way starting to ramble here, good post
Old 01-27-2007, 02:05 AM
  #26  
Ironcross
Race Director
 
Ironcross's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: Taylor Michigan
Posts: 12,142
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by turtlevette
I take exception to that. Bigger is always better. Damn straight.
sort of anyway as I constantly change to the bigger but I also have some small ones I guess. Beginning with these mild to wild numbers including LT1, L72, L78, L88, LS7, and even a A990 for the hemi group. Topping it off in an obnoxious manner for those who love the smell and noise of nitro, a supercharged fuel Donovan. A toy for every occasion. No here. The three SS baby Vettes have all the good big stuff as you can see. Also note the "Iron Cross" clearly visable on the roadsters fuel tank.

"Winning isn`t everything, its the only thing"





Old 01-27-2007, 03:51 AM
  #27  
Oldguard 7
Melting Slicks
 
Oldguard 7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

YOUR cars, YOUR money, do whatever YOU WANT to do to and with YOUR cars.
Old 01-28-2007, 01:01 AM
  #28  
63mako
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by Oldguard 7
YOUR cars, YOUR money, do whatever YOU WANT to do to and with YOUR cars.
My comments were concerning advice to use fairly extreme race type parts given to people looking for moderate street performance gains. I am shooting for around 500 HP plus a 150 HP nitrous shot with my setup but am building with well matched high performance parts and drivetrain upgrades thoughout. Dyno sheets coming soon!
Originally Posted by turtlevette
I take exception to that. Bigger is always better.

Damn straight.
I give up!

Last edited by 63mako; 01-28-2007 at 01:05 AM.
Old 01-28-2007, 01:23 AM
  #29  
Oldguard 7
Melting Slicks
 
Oldguard 7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I understand what you're saying. I read your threads all the time.
Old 01-28-2007, 08:37 AM
  #30  
zaphodbebullbrox
Instructor
 
zaphodbebullbrox's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default my 1 cent

i have never been drag racing,
i have never been autocrossing,
but i have taken my 1980 corvette, with a basiclly stock low hp engine (from the factory) removed all smog and emmisions, added small cam and dual plane intake with aftermaket carb, to the road track and out drove the 400hp and 500hp drivers.

you can have all the hp in the world but it you don't know how to handle it its worthless. learn to drive fast with less hp and then move up. theres a reason more people are wrecking new corvette faster than ever and that why the factory came up with "active handling".

my 1 cent, hope it make cents to you.
Old 01-28-2007, 09:16 AM
  #31  
Budman68
Le Mans Master
 
Budman68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 9,078
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Cruise-In VII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

I blame car mags for most of this. Hot Rod just published an article about a 600+hp 383 and didn't say a thing about it being a full out race motor. They give you the part#, etc and send you on the way to misery. The only good thing that came out of the article was some new better flowing heads for larger cubic inch motors.

You ever try to tool around town in a loose stall convertor and high lift cam? It's not the easiest ride and you will play hell trying to get your wife to ride along.

BTW - Some of the baddest rides I have ever riden in have been stock. The baddest being a 73 SD455 4-speed TA, 70 1/2 Z28 Camaro, and Buick GN on cold night. All stock and the all will scare the crap out of you.
Old 01-28-2007, 09:21 AM
  #32  
73-84 IMSA Widebody
Drifting
 
73-84 IMSA Widebody's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Youngstown Ohio
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good advice Mako......but the wife ain't buyin' it
Old 01-28-2007, 09:40 AM
  #33  
Yellow73SB
Le Mans Master
 
Yellow73SB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07
Default

My ~450 hp 355 is a perfect combination to my car. With the tires I have it won't spin the tires at all , but this is nice becuase you don't get caught up doing burnouts and getting trouble.

Also people bs about there motors hp way too much. Or im under estimating mine. Some guy said he has 425 hp with a .486 cam and 9.8:1 compression on his 350. Mine has a .550 lift 236* cam and 11:5 compression and I estimate 450. Sorry got carried off.

And my motor is kind of a pita to drive becuase of the 2200 stall converter. Atleast it helps me not break parts.
Old 01-28-2007, 09:46 AM
  #34  
Little Mouse
Le Mans Master
 
Little Mouse's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,396
Received 94 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

I saw that artical in hot rod lowest torque they showed was at 4,600
rpm 499 lb ft, 528 lb ft at 5200. I wonder what my old 302 Z/28
put out for torque good thing they offered no auto trans for it.
That thing below 4000 rpm would do nothing probably had 150
lb ft below 4000 rpm and had to pull a 3450 lb car.
Old 01-28-2007, 09:56 AM
  #35  
red money pit
Heel & Toe
 
red money pit's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am probably a perfect example of what this thread is about. I am newbie, almost no mechanical experience, and have never had a car that could be considered performance. I bought a mostly stock 79 L-82 two years ago and have been monitoring this site ever since. I have posted questions about how to get more HP, got some books, and found a good mechanic.

It took awhile, but it started to become obvious what I wanted to get out of my car but I read a thousand posts to get there. Last fall I purchased Edlebrocks package of intake manifold, heads, and cam. Also installed headers, rebuilt clutch and transmission. I am very lucky that I was able to find a trustworthy mechanic who not only does good work for a reasonable price but also kept me in-line and from doing something stupid. I am now a firm beliver that if you don't know what your are doing (me!!) buy components matched and engineered by someone who does.

The car runs great. I don't know how much HP or torque, and don't really care. However, it is it is a kick to to drop the clutch at 3 grand and slam through the gears. My second childhood only this time I have money!

I just recently purchased a 73 Nova that someone has put a 454 into, it is fast now. I am still thinking on what to do with this car.
Old 01-28-2007, 10:12 AM
  #36  
Edzred72
Le Mans Master
 
Edzred72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Wildwood IL
Posts: 5,943
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default


Well said and right on target Kevin.
I too asked for recommendations for my 406 build a while back and got numerous wild NHRA Pro Stock part numbers.
I had some previous build expierence so was able to dismiss/ignore the solid 600lift 230cc advise and choose the components suited for MY REQUIREMENTS. Much of that radical component advise came from those that IGNORED the beginning of my post that clearly stated my desire for well mannered low maintenance street motor. I have the skill to maintain those "tinker all day" motors, but just don't want to. many here did give good solid avise, (especially you) and i used that info. Thanks to all who helped!!
Knowledge is power, so I spent tons of time reading every engine build book I could find. This helped me to make educated selections for components that suit the intended purpose. I highly recommend RESEARCH for all those contemplating an engine build.
WAY too many DIY guys wanting power, just want to sit back behind the computer and be told what to buy, without any desire to know how it works or why it works.
My rant is over.....
Eddie

Last edited by Edzred72; 01-28-2007 at 10:18 AM.
Old 01-28-2007, 02:17 PM
  #37  
MotorHead
Race Director
 
MotorHead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Posts: 17,569
Received 156 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

You did buy the correct bigger heads though didn't you.. AFR 210's ?

Just a observation on my part to add to this thread. Some of the advice given about building bigger inch small block engines has to be info that was read or someone told them.

Way too much misinformation and myths out there. You don't put 180cc heads on 406+ci motors period, you won't get more torque like one of the myths promises.

When building these motors you need to look at where the advice is coming from and look to see if the person giving this advice has actually built a motor that is similar to the one you want build.

Get notified of new replies

To Bigger is not always better!

Old 01-28-2007, 02:18 PM
  #38  
76project
Pro
 
76project's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 538
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

OK, I have been thinking some what along the same lines for My 76. It is a dog, you hit the gas and get out an push. My son has a 70 roadrunner with a 383 that screams. I would like something in the middle. I want it to run good, throw me back into the seat a little, but I am not trying to be the fastest car in town. So what is a good horsepower to shoot for? 300? 350HP? I really don't want to reinvent the wheel, just a good seat of the pants feel.
What are you middle of the HP pack running (cam, heads, carb, Intake, Etc...what brand)?
I am about to start on Mine.
Thanks
Old 01-28-2007, 02:41 PM
  #39  
63mako
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by MotorHead
You did buy the correct bigger heads though didn't you.. AFR 210's ?

Just a observation on my part to add to this thread. Some of the advice given about building bigger inch small block engines has to be info that was read or someone told them.

Way too much misinformation and myths out there. You don't put 180cc heads on 406+ci motors period, you won't get more torque like one of the myths promises.

When building these motors you need to look at where the advice is coming from and look to see if the person giving this advice has actually built a motor that is similar to the one you want build.
Eddie's 406 will probably be a good, stong runner and pull hard up to his 6000 RPM goal! He bought the AFR 210 heads and I agree that a 180 head is NOT a good option for a 406. But he does have a 3.08 gear and a ST 10 4 speed, He said he does not ever expect to run past 6000 RPM. He also wanted good grunt at low and midrange RPM for his mostly in town driving. AFR heads flow better than other heads with the same intake runner size especially at lower lifts. Taking all this into account he may have gotten better performance at his chosen working RPM range with the AFR 195 eliminator heads due to better port velocity. We will never know! This is EXACTLY what I am talking about. Properly matched components also have to take into account the intended use and drivetrain ratios. With a TKO 500 or TKO 600 and the better ratios that come along with that upgrade or going to a 3.55 or 3.73 gear the 210 heads may be a better choice due to getting into the higher RPM's quicker and I believe one of those upgrades is also in Eddie's future!

Last edited by 63mako; 01-28-2007 at 02:59 PM.
Old 01-28-2007, 02:52 PM
  #40  
63mako
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by 76project
OK, I have been thinking some what along the same lines for My 76. It is a dog, you hit the gas and get out an push. My son has a 70 roadrunner with a 383 that screams. I would like something in the middle. I want it to run good, throw me back into the seat a little, but I am not trying to be the fastest car in town. So what is a good horsepower to shoot for? 300? 350HP? I really don't want to reinvent the wheel, just a good seat of the pants feel.
What are you middle of the HP pack running (cam, heads, carb, Intake, Etc...what brand)?
I am about to start on Mine.
Thanks
www.ryanscarpage.50megs.com/combos1.html Check this site. Over 100 dyno tested street combinations. 9.5 to 10 to 1 compression, A 383 stroker kit, hydraulic roller, good dual plane intake, headers, properly curved distributor and well built quadrajet will get you where you want to be and be streetable, dependable and low maintainance. Best off starting a new post for this and specify your trans, rear end ratios and goals!


Quick Reply: Bigger is not always better!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 PM.