Why does running lean burn pistons? (Warning: Chemistry involved)
#1
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Why does running lean burn pistons? (Warning: Chemistry involved)
It's a fact that running lean can lead to burnt pistons while running rich is generally considered "safer." Now what is mystifying me is, whether you are running rich or lean you have less combustion (than the perfect mixture) and so less heat released by the reactants. What is it about having more air that leads to higher temperatures?
Ponder that
-Chris
Ponder that
-Chris
#2
Instructor
Member Since: Jul 2003
Location: Lake Anna Virginia
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see you have way too much time on your hands.
Originally Posted by LiveandLetDrive
It's a fact that running lean can lead to burnt pistons while running rich is generally considered "safer." Now what is mystifying me is, whether you are running rich or lean you have less combustion (than the perfect mixture) and so less heat released by the reactants. What is it about having more air that leads to higher temperatures?
Ponder that
-Chris
Ponder that
-Chris
#3
Le Mans Master
Originally Posted by LiveandLetDrive
It's a fact that running lean can lead to burnt pistons while running rich is generally considered "safer." Now what is mystifying me is, whether you are running rich or lean you have less combustion (than the perfect mixture) and so less heat released by the reactants. What is it about having more air that leads to higher temperatures?
Ponder that
-Chris
Ponder that
-Chris
#4
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
I'm actually in an Automotive Powerplants class in college right now. (No this isn't a homework question, just something that came up in class that the instructor told us to seek out an answer for, for our own knowledge.) While he was talking about this conundrum another student suggested fuel cooling things... as I remember he didn't say "no" exactly... I think that guy might have been saying the fuel itself splashes the piston and cools it. Maybe it is the expansion of the fuel from liquid to vapor that cools the charge? (Just like NO2 does)
?
-Chris
?
-Chris
#5
Le Mans Master
Cool link on the internal combustion engine and history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_combustion_engine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_combustion_engine
#6
Chris,
Fuel being vapourised in the chamber sucks up a lot of heat (latent heat of vapourisation), so maybe that's what he was talking about? Less fuel = less heat removed. I was under the impression that lean mixtures promote detonation which is a big killer of pistons (had to fix a lot of engines with piston crowns blown out due to running lean). Detonation, apparently, blasts small particles of metal from the crown until it's so weakened that a hole opens up. Most of the particles (which are very small) are lost out of the exhaust, but some get by the rings & several engines I've worked on have shown bad scoring of piston skirts/bores even though the oil was changed regularly & they were running decent filters. Investigation (usually asking the owner about it down the pub over a beer ) invariably came up with the fact that the engine had been running lean for a while & had been pinging (it was a major problem here with certain engines when leaded fuel was withdrawn). Maybe it's the detonation that's the major cause?
I'm not sure of the details, I just know that uncontrolled lean mixtures are dangerous. Controlled ones are good as they produce more power (hence the performance of computer controlled lean burn engines being so much better than traditional ones that were always set up slightly rich for "safety").
If you do find the reason then can you post it? I've spent so much time fixing blown pistons it'd make sense to understand exactly what caused it
edit:
Shot in the dark here, but I remember that lean mixtures burn slower. Could it be that combustion is still occuring during the valve overlap period, so some incoming fuel is immediately burnt & pushed out of the exhaust as it burns? This may sound a bit dumb at first, but it's a common occurance on old bikes where the mixture is set extremely lean (or it's running out of gas) - more than one bike has toasted it's riders nether regions after a backfire (spit-back) through the carb has set the carb on fire
Fuel being vapourised in the chamber sucks up a lot of heat (latent heat of vapourisation), so maybe that's what he was talking about? Less fuel = less heat removed. I was under the impression that lean mixtures promote detonation which is a big killer of pistons (had to fix a lot of engines with piston crowns blown out due to running lean). Detonation, apparently, blasts small particles of metal from the crown until it's so weakened that a hole opens up. Most of the particles (which are very small) are lost out of the exhaust, but some get by the rings & several engines I've worked on have shown bad scoring of piston skirts/bores even though the oil was changed regularly & they were running decent filters. Investigation (usually asking the owner about it down the pub over a beer ) invariably came up with the fact that the engine had been running lean for a while & had been pinging (it was a major problem here with certain engines when leaded fuel was withdrawn). Maybe it's the detonation that's the major cause?
I'm not sure of the details, I just know that uncontrolled lean mixtures are dangerous. Controlled ones are good as they produce more power (hence the performance of computer controlled lean burn engines being so much better than traditional ones that were always set up slightly rich for "safety").
If you do find the reason then can you post it? I've spent so much time fixing blown pistons it'd make sense to understand exactly what caused it
edit:
Shot in the dark here, but I remember that lean mixtures burn slower. Could it be that combustion is still occuring during the valve overlap period, so some incoming fuel is immediately burnt & pushed out of the exhaust as it burns? This may sound a bit dumb at first, but it's a common occurance on old bikes where the mixture is set extremely lean (or it's running out of gas) - more than one bike has toasted it's riders nether regions after a backfire (spit-back) through the carb has set the carb on fire
Last edited by UKPaul; 10-05-2006 at 11:48 AM.
#7
I would like to know why combustion temperatures rise with a leaner A/F mixture... anyways, with higher combustion chamber temps you are more likely to get premature ignition (engine knocking) which can damage your pistons.
#8
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 13,652
Received 4,917 Likes
on
1,929 Posts
Actually, the temperature curve is a bell curve: Combustion temperature rises as you lean out towards 14.7. Combustion temp drops on both sides of this ratio, so you can actually run extreme lean and have the excess air run you cooler. However, power output drops dramatically when using this technique, whereas power will actually increase as you richen up below 14.7 down to about 12.5, when power, again, starts dropping. The over-lean air-cool technique is actually used in light carbureted aircraft, where you can pull the mixture control **** during cruise and lean the mixture up to max EGT (exhaust gas temp) and then keep leaning just a tad until EGT drops. You can get really good fuel economy that way without burning pistons. But it does not work well for good power or throttle response, so the over-lean air cool method does not work well in an automitive application where you are constantly accelerating and decelerating.
#9
Safety Car
A lean A/F mixture ignites much more readily, thus any residual heat or 'hot spots' in a cylinder under load will pre-ignite ('knock'/detonation) before the timed spark. Cylinder pressure and temp both rise dramatically when this happens as the piston continues to rise in the cylinder. Can also smoke an exhaust valve with ease.
This is why I run a slightly 'wet' engine on the street, even with modern cams that bleed off cylinder pressure on the compression stroke. I can run stock static compressions and still have a minimum of pre-ignition that is easily managed.
The down side is I have to change oil more frequently due to increased combustion residues, but thats fine with me.
Hans
This is why I run a slightly 'wet' engine on the street, even with modern cams that bleed off cylinder pressure on the compression stroke. I can run stock static compressions and still have a minimum of pre-ignition that is easily managed.
The down side is I have to change oil more frequently due to increased combustion residues, but thats fine with me.
Hans
#10
Hi Lars,
Yes, I've heard about that method on aircraft, but some of us nutters are running old (ancient) motorcycles using the same method You lean it out until it starts running rough (spluttering) & then richen it up. Quite often, just before it starts running really badly there's a point at which it smooths out. Get it in this area and it seems to go for ever on a thimble of fuel, but there's very little power for acceleration & not enough for higher cruising speeds ("higher" being a relative term for something made while steam was still in vogue!!! ). To accelerate, or cruise at a higher speeds, it needs to be richened up. In fact, when it's richened it's probably running at about the same ratio as a normal carb would give, it's just that being able to lean it off seems to make it run nicer at low speed.
So, are you saying that the combustion temp bell curve peaks at the ideal stoic ratio? My experience of engines set up lean is that they actually do get hotter (air cooled engines - maybe water cooled would mask the condition?). Why is this? Detonation? Combustion during the valve overlap period?
Yes, I've heard about that method on aircraft, but some of us nutters are running old (ancient) motorcycles using the same method You lean it out until it starts running rough (spluttering) & then richen it up. Quite often, just before it starts running really badly there's a point at which it smooths out. Get it in this area and it seems to go for ever on a thimble of fuel, but there's very little power for acceleration & not enough for higher cruising speeds ("higher" being a relative term for something made while steam was still in vogue!!! ). To accelerate, or cruise at a higher speeds, it needs to be richened up. In fact, when it's richened it's probably running at about the same ratio as a normal carb would give, it's just that being able to lean it off seems to make it run nicer at low speed.
So, are you saying that the combustion temp bell curve peaks at the ideal stoic ratio? My experience of engines set up lean is that they actually do get hotter (air cooled engines - maybe water cooled would mask the condition?). Why is this? Detonation? Combustion during the valve overlap period?
#11
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Posts: 18,342
Received 766 Likes
on
548 Posts
Originally Posted by Wrencher
A lean A/F mixture ignites much more readily, thus any residual heat or 'hot spots' in a cylinder under load will pre-ignite ('knock'/detonation) before the timed spark. Cylinder pressure and temp both rise dramatically when this happens as the piston continues to rise in the cylinder.............
Hans
Hans
First, lean mixtures are generally harder to ignite, as there are fewer fuel molecules residing in/near the spark plug gap. This is why wider plug gaps are generally called out for in lean burn emission controlled engines. The wider gap increases the chances of sufficient initial ignition occuring.
Second, preignition and detonation are two different things. Preignition is generally caused by combustion chamber hot spots, and are very dangerous and expensive as they generally show up prior to TDC, and the piston has to work against the building pressure. Detonation, on the other hand, is caused by high localized gas temperatures in the cylinder and occurs well past TDC.
#12
Racer
Originally Posted by 69427
Yes and no.
First, lean mixtures are generally harder to ignite, as there are fewer fuel molecules residing in/near the spark plug gap. This is why wider plug gaps are generally called out for in lean burn emission controlled engines. The wider gap increases the chances of sufficient initial ignition occuring.
Second, preignition and detonation are two different things. Preignition is generally caused by combustion chamber hot spots, and are very dangerous and expensive as they generally show up prior to TDC, and the piston has to work against the building pressure. Detonation, on the other hand, is caused by high localized gas temperatures in the cylinder and occurs well past TDC.
First, lean mixtures are generally harder to ignite, as there are fewer fuel molecules residing in/near the spark plug gap. This is why wider plug gaps are generally called out for in lean burn emission controlled engines. The wider gap increases the chances of sufficient initial ignition occuring.
Second, preignition and detonation are two different things. Preignition is generally caused by combustion chamber hot spots, and are very dangerous and expensive as they generally show up prior to TDC, and the piston has to work against the building pressure. Detonation, on the other hand, is caused by high localized gas temperatures in the cylinder and occurs well past TDC.
I agree with 69 437 i would add in that the lean air/fuel mixtures at light throttle cruise mixtures in most cases will not burn a piston (because cylinder pressure is low), but at wide open throttle or high load driving conditions a lean air/fuel mixture can and often will burn a piston. a 14.7 to 1 a/f mixture is chemically ideal for light load/cruise mixture but a power mixture of 12.5 to 1 for mostengine designs to as lean as 13.5 to 1 for a race designed engine with modern combustion chamber design such as NHRA Pro-Stock or a NASCAR Nextel cup engine is as lean as should be run to avoid the damage a lean air/fuel mixture can cause.
henry @ oles carb
Last edited by olescarb; 10-05-2006 at 02:47 PM.
#13
Now what is mystifying me is, whether you are running rich or lean you have less combustion (than the perfect mixture) and so less heat released by the reactants. What is it about having more air that leads to higher temperatures?
#14
Team Owner
This is a picture of a lean burnt piston. It just flash burns right through like a cutting torch.
#16
Team Owner
Originally Posted by gerry72
Looks like the piston went plastic. Must have been making a lot of power when it went lean.
this is out of an alki motor. I have a collection of pistons and parts like this that I have personally made or worked on the engine that made them.
#17
Drifting
Originally Posted by S489
could it be that running rich burns less lb/hr of fuel (reaction limited by too little air), therefore less heat released, while running lean burns more total lb/hr of fuel due to more "complete" combustion with the excess air?
Anyway It is a bell curve and peak power usual occurs just rich of stoich. How you deliver the fuel is an application specific thing....
Anybody here ever tried to start a Twin Comanche when the engines were not warm or cold ?
With an airplane you learn to just keep crankin cause it sucks the FIRE and Fuel into the Engine...
#18
Originally Posted by gkull
The computer monitering graph. showed a .008 second lean out spike where the injector might have hickuped. The cylinder temp also spiked over 1600 for an instant.
When you say "cylinder temp" do you mean "exhaust gas temp"? That makes more sense...if I remember right alcohol burns at about 1900. The exhaust would be much lower.
Geez, I hope I'm making sense here - I'm half asleep.
#19
Race Director
Originally Posted by Boofers
I would like to know why combustion temperatures rise with a leaner A/F mixture... anyways, with higher combustion chamber temps you are more likely to get premature ignition (engine knocking) which can damage your pistons.
#20
Team Owner
Originally Posted by 45ACP
And aluminum goes liquid at around 1220 degrees F. It isn't hard to imagine a hot spot developing well above what the piston can conduct away.
When you say "cylinder temp" do you mean "exhaust gas temp"? That makes more sense...if I remember right alcohol burns at about 1900. The exhaust would be much lower.
Geez, I hope I'm making sense here - I'm half asleep.
When you say "cylinder temp" do you mean "exhaust gas temp"? That makes more sense...if I remember right alcohol burns at about 1900. The exhaust would be much lower.
Geez, I hope I'm making sense here - I'm half asleep.