1969 L-88??? at Barrett-Jackson
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
1969 L-88??? at Barrett-Jackson
I thought this car was interesting and worth sharing. I know there are others on here with a wealth of L-88 information and lists of authenticated cars. This particular car was listed on the C3 Registry back in 2008 (although anyone can put anything on there), is listed as having documentation and being the 'real deal'. However, Barrett-Jackson really didn't advertise this as such and I'm sure as a result it only sold for 85k + buyers fee. Anyone know anything about this car? Has it been refuted as truly being a 'real deal' car? Sounds to be well done if it's a clone though. Interested in thoughts from the experts.
https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Even...E-COUPE-272924
https://www.c3registry.com/index.php?job=ShowCorvette&car_id=Zml4ZW Rfc3RyaW5nZml4ZbZPRQE1zaLdfM4mLYVeyj0n/AnBjDokjq90cOIsEbSo6GmVh8hkaN2e{RM3CHVO8 g==
https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Even...E-COUPE-272924
https://www.c3registry.com/index.php?job=ShowCorvette&car_id=Zml4ZW Rfc3RyaW5nZml4ZbZPRQE1zaLdfM4mLYVeyj0n/AnBjDokjq90cOIsEbSo6GmVh8hkaN2e{RM3CHVO8 g==
#2
Melting Slicks
I don’t know anything about this car but will say that if it sold at Barrett-Jackson for $85k it is most certainly NOT an original L-88. Anybody who knows anything about L-88s knows that genuine 68-69 cars sell for in the neighborhood of $500k.
#3
Instructor
Member Since: Oct 2021
Posts: 215
Received 220 Likes
on
95 Posts
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
I would think if he was going to pass it off as an original L88 car he would have at least removed the ignition shielding around the distrib. Agree, I think it was just a wannabe clone.
#4
Melting Slicks
Lots of obvious things wrong looking at the engine picture. As noted earlier, shielding around distributor. Also has a fan shroud, wrong plug wires, missing seal for air cleaner base, incorrect diverter valve, hoses, and clamps, a coolant tank cap.
#5
Car sold at Mecum Indy for $197k supposedly. Listed in the C3 Registry: https://www.c3registry.com/index.php?job=ShowCorvette&car_id=PiCs0n x8XWyS%7Bq415xC9FjBF6M/BKTkxS9Ay9Cw3ioGUNp/9VZmkigpk3l5xNKVak0tQE7TKULBgtQZKVbNIHA= =
#6
Instructor
Car sold at Mecum Indy for $197k supposedly. Listed in the C3 Registry: https://www.c3registry.com/index.php?job=ShowCorvette&car_id=PiCs0n x8XWyS%7Bq415xC9FjBF6M/BKTkxS9Ay9Cw3ioGUNp/9VZmkigpk3l5xNKVak0tQE7TKULBgtQZKVbNIHA= =
#7
Melting Slicks
It was interesting to get the new owner’s take on it as well. Apparently, he thought it was real (although the sale price should have been a tip off if nothing else).
Regards,
Stan Falenski
#8
Instructor
I saw that Pat… I guess Roy knows a little more about the car than the rest of us. Still, there was enough that you could see in the photos that would have you asking questions.
It was interesting to get the new owner’s take on it as well. Apparently, he thought it was real (although the sale price should have been a tip off if nothing else).
Regards,
Stan Falenski
It was interesting to get the new owner’s take on it as well. Apparently, he thought it was real (although the sale price should have been a tip off if nothing else).
Regards,
Stan Falenski
#9
Team Owner
All the more reason to build the Registry. Less chance of fraud if the Vins are known. Why I started that Registry thing of mine in C2, I have a bunch of C3s listed, hope to get back to adding more.
#10
Unfortunately the new owner bought the car thinking it was a real L88 at a bargain with the hopes of having an expert validate it or sue the consignor or BJ for misrepresentation. There is no recourse for the buyer at an auction like this with the way BJ and Mecum make you sign a bidders agreement holding them harmless for representation of the vehicle. In the end IMHO if you are going to spend nearly $100k on a 69 Corvette I would bring an expert to look a the car, do you homework to understand what items should be correct for an L88 Corvette and at a minimum google the vin. I have seen some correctly restored L88 clones bring $100k, but this car isn't there with it originally starting as a small block and missing a lot of the big block/L88 components.
#11
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,072
Received 6,980 Likes
on
4,800 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist
I saw that Pat… I guess Roy knows a little more about the car than the rest of us. Still, there was enough that you could see in the photos that would have you asking questions.
It was interesting to get the new owner’s take on it as well. Apparently, he thought it was real (although the sale price should have been a tip off if nothing else).
Regards,
Stan Falenski
It was interesting to get the new owner’s take on it as well. Apparently, he thought it was real (although the sale price should have been a tip off if nothing else).
Regards,
Stan Falenski
I looked at this car, no dual pin brakes, no M22, small block rear, no HD suspension parts, totally unrestored chassis and small block fuel lines. It’s not a factory L88.
#12
The new owner of the car posted this on the NCRS website:
I bought the car that everyone is talking about. The auction magazine indeed describes the car as "This Can-Am White 1969 Corvette L88 is powered by a matching-numbers 427/430hp V8 engine that features open-chambered aluminum heads, a performance camshaft, a 12.0:1 compression ratio and 4-barrel Holley Carb" It goes on to list the other features including heavy duty suspension and 7-leaf rear springs. Whether or not it's real, I couldn't let it go when it was stuck at $75,000 and if it isn't real, I have a pretty good lawsuit against the consignor or whomever wrote the description. It doesn't say its a Corvette with an L88 and it doesn't say it's an L88 clone. The description under the photo and below it says "1969 Chevrolet Corvette L88". Yes, you can talk semantics all day long, but in the moment, and for that kind of money, it was worth the risk to me. If it turns out to be a clone, then I have a very nice car with an L88 motor and maybe...... a lawsuit. I'll update everyone, once I have it verified by a Corvette expert.
I bought the car that everyone is talking about. The auction magazine indeed describes the car as "This Can-Am White 1969 Corvette L88 is powered by a matching-numbers 427/430hp V8 engine that features open-chambered aluminum heads, a performance camshaft, a 12.0:1 compression ratio and 4-barrel Holley Carb" It goes on to list the other features including heavy duty suspension and 7-leaf rear springs. Whether or not it's real, I couldn't let it go when it was stuck at $75,000 and if it isn't real, I have a pretty good lawsuit against the consignor or whomever wrote the description. It doesn't say its a Corvette with an L88 and it doesn't say it's an L88 clone. The description under the photo and below it says "1969 Chevrolet Corvette L88". Yes, you can talk semantics all day long, but in the moment, and for that kind of money, it was worth the risk to me. If it turns out to be a clone, then I have a very nice car with an L88 motor and maybe...... a lawsuit. I'll update everyone, once I have it verified by a Corvette expert.
#13
Race Director
Doesn't this raise any questions?
**VIN NOTICE: DEPENDING ON THE STATE OF REGISTRATION OF THE BUYER, THE VEHICLE MAY REQUIRE AN
INSPECTION AND BE SUBJECT TO A STATE-ISSUED VIN AND/OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF THAT STATE.**
**VIN NOTICE: DEPENDING ON THE STATE OF REGISTRATION OF THE BUYER, THE VEHICLE MAY REQUIRE AN
INSPECTION AND BE SUBJECT TO A STATE-ISSUED VIN AND/OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF THAT STATE.**
#14
BJ adds that to all their descriptions now. They are protecting themselves against the issue of people restoring cars and washing titles. A title maybe clear in one state but have a salvage title status in another and sometimes buyers don't know until they go to register the car.
#15
The car was discussed on this forum in 2017 here:
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-737632-a.html
It includes a pic of the engine pad.
People need to read this to understand what they're up against when buying a used car without due diligence beforehand.
https://jalopnik.com/the-curious-cas...tte-1721955795
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-737632-a.html
It includes a pic of the engine pad.
People need to read this to understand what they're up against when buying a used car without due diligence beforehand.
https://jalopnik.com/the-curious-cas...tte-1721955795
The following users liked this post:
DKM-106 (01-31-2024)
#16
Melting Slicks
The car was discussed on this forum in 2017 here:
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-737632-a.html
It includes a pic of the engine pad.
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-737632-a.html
It includes a pic of the engine pad.
People need to read this to understand what they're up against when buying a used car without due diligence beforehand.
https://jalopnik.com/the-curious-cas...tte-1721955795
https://jalopnik.com/the-curious-cas...tte-1721955795
Regards,
Stan Falenski
#17
I thought I remembered the car, thanks for posting the old link. The engine stamping is a bad restamp. There is no way I would have paid almost $100k for this car with a bad restamped engine, small block rear end and incorrect parts. This car should sold in the $45-60k range.
#18
Lots of issues with the stamped pad information... Even if you take away the issues with character configuration, you still have to deal with broadcast code as the elephant in the room. We know from recently presented information that the MR broadcast code was assigned to L-88/M-40 closed chamber head cars... Not a very late, L-88/M-22 open chamber head car. This alone might have saved the auction purchaser if he had done some homework or asked for assistance.
The auction companies hold all the cards... Anyone that goes into an auction purchase thinking that they have a law suit as a potential method of resolution to misrepresentation is sorely mistaken.
Regards,
Stan Falenski
The auction companies hold all the cards... Anyone that goes into an auction purchase thinking that they have a law suit as a potential method of resolution to misrepresentation is sorely mistaken.
Regards,
Stan Falenski
"The Court of Appeals ultimately determined that there were no representations made by Barrett-Jackson that pertained to the vehicle that might otherwise support a consumer fraud claim. The Court’s finding was based in large part on the Bidder Agreement that the purchaser signed prior to successfully bidding on the vehicle. In that Agreement, the purchaser acknowledged that Barrett-Jackson made no representations about any of the vehicles in the auction."
#19
Safety Car
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: PHOENIX AZ. WHAT A MAN WON"T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE
Posts: 3,680
Received 306 Likes
on
220 Posts
I looked at the Corette & it was NOT even close to a real L-88. No J-56 & small block everything under it. Bet the bidder just saw the big book listing & not what BJ says about every car. Here is a updated listing . Guy said he just saw it was under the money for a L-88 & put in a bid. Everyone else new it was not real & he got stuck with the bid. Should be a lesson for everyone to check for yourself & dont just buy a story.
The following users liked this post:
DKM-106 (01-31-2024)