C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Carb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2018, 12:33 PM
  #1  
Justin97
8th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Justin97's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Carb

Hello,

Looking for some advice on replacing the carburetor on my 75 stingray. What brand etc. Looking for a little better fuel efficiency and power. Thanks!
Old 04-12-2018, 01:11 PM
  #2  
KenSny
Melting Slicks

 
KenSny's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Olmsted Falls, Ohio
Posts: 3,399
Received 276 Likes on 201 Posts

Default

A Qjet is pretty efficient if setup correctly. Maybe you need a quick rebuild.
Don't look for a carb change to give you a power boost.
Old 04-12-2018, 02:54 PM
  #3  
7T1vette
Team Owner
 
7T1vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Crossville TN
Posts: 36,600
Received 2,715 Likes on 2,273 Posts

Default

If you have a Q-Jet on the engine now, spending money for a "better" carb with more potential for power and better efficiency would be a total waste of your funds. Rebuild the carb or send it to Lars to rebuild it.

There is NO CARB MADE that will outperform the Q-Jet for smooth transitions, power, or efficiency. They may be easier to work on; but once the Q-Jet it tuned properly, you won't have to touch it again.
Old 04-12-2018, 03:03 PM
  #4  
dochorsepower
Drifting
 
dochorsepower's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Laguna Niguel California
Posts: 1,412
Received 50 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 7T1vette
If you have a Q-Jet on the engine now, spending money for a "better" carb with more potential for power and better efficiency would be a total waste of your funds. Rebuild the carb or send it to Lars to rebuild it.

There is NO CARB MADE that will outperform the Q-Jet for smooth transitions, power, or efficiency. They may be easier to work on; but once the Q-Jet it tuned properly, you won't have to touch it again.
I agree. If the Q-jet is original to your 75, save yourself a lot of grief and have a competent source like Lars rebuild it. You can make better improvements in other places, like getting rid of the emissions crap and revising the timing.
Old 04-13-2018, 11:06 PM
  #5  
7T1vette
Team Owner
 
7T1vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Crossville TN
Posts: 36,600
Received 2,715 Likes on 2,273 Posts

Default

You don't even have to strip off the emissions stuff. (And you don't want to if your state requires emissions testing of your vintage car.)

But, you DO want to move the vacuum hose for the distributor advance can over to a manifold vacuum source on your Q-Jet (instead of the 'timed' /ported vacuum line as it came from the factory). Doing so will put vacuum advance back on the engine at idle, which will improve idle quality, let engine run cooler, and reduce fuel usage at idle.
Old 04-14-2018, 08:15 AM
  #6  
pigfarmer
Burning Brakes
 
pigfarmer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Dutchess county New York
Posts: 750
Received 295 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Justin97
Hello,

Looking for some advice on replacing the carburetor on my 75 stingray. What brand etc. Looking for a little better fuel efficiency and power. Thanks!
I'd rebuild what's on there - it's been there a long time. No idea what you have but rebuilding a Holley 4160 cost about $30 and was straightforward. Feels like a new pair of sneakers.

I looked through replacements and like some of the Holley Quick Fuel Slayer carbs. At least with the rebuild I didn't have to fool with different cables, brackets, etc. Minor.

Last edited by pigfarmer; 04-14-2018 at 08:15 AM.
Old 04-14-2018, 08:37 AM
  #7  
Cavu2u
Melting Slicks
 
Cavu2u's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 2,561
Received 125 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

Justin,

My 383 lost over 30 HP on the Dyno by swapping out a Q-Jet with a Holley 6210. And one could tell the difference in road performance too.

Steve
Old 04-14-2018, 08:41 AM
  #8  
Pa'svette
Racer
 
Pa'svette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2015
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 490
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts
St. Jude Donor '16-'17-'18,'19
Default

Originally Posted by 7T1vette
If you have a Q-Jet on the engine now, spending money for a "better" carb with more potential for power and better efficiency would be a total waste of your funds. Rebuild the carb or send it to Lars to rebuild it.

There is NO CARB MADE that will outperform the Q-Jet for smooth transitions, power, or efficiency. They may be easier to work on; but once the Q-Jet it tuned properly, you won't have to touch it again.


Just send to Lars. He did mine and it runs great.
Old 04-14-2018, 09:38 AM
  #9  
REELAV8R
Le Mans Master
 
REELAV8R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Location: Hermosa
Posts: 6,057
Received 1,034 Likes on 852 Posts

Default

Q-jet for sure. Done right that carb is fantastic!

I'm at 440 HP and get 19 MPG @ 80 MPH with a Th350 and a 3.55 Rear diff.
Old 04-14-2018, 05:47 PM
  #10  
mrmagrath
Burning Brakes
 
mrmagrath's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 803
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Rebuilt my own Q-Jet using Lars' papers. Awesome.
Old 04-15-2018, 10:08 AM
  #11  
REELAV8R
Le Mans Master
 
REELAV8R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Location: Hermosa
Posts: 6,057
Received 1,034 Likes on 852 Posts

Default

If you are a DIY kind of guy I rebuilt and modified mine using this book from Cliff Ruggles. Turned out great.

Amazon Amazon
Old 04-15-2018, 01:06 PM
  #12  
Black$heep
Drifting
 
Black$heep's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Conroe Texas
Posts: 1,496
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Pa'svette

Just send to Lars. He did mine and it runs great.
Anyone have Lars contact info or page link? What does it run? Considering a rebuild!👍🏼
Old 04-15-2018, 05:29 PM
  #13  
lars
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
lars's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 13,658
Received 4,928 Likes on 1,933 Posts

Default

Just drop me an e-mail for info.

Lars
V8FastCars@msn.com
Old 04-15-2018, 08:38 PM
  #14  
Inca32x
Instructor
 
Inca32x's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Grosse Pointe Michigan
Posts: 111
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 7T1vette
You don't even have to strip off the emissions stuff. (And you don't want to if your state requires emissions testing of your vintage car.)

But, you DO want to move the vacuum hose for the distributor advance can over to a manifold vacuum source on your Q-Jet (instead of the 'timed' /ported vacuum line as it came from the factory). Doing so will put vacuum advance back on the engine at idle, which will improve idle quality, let engine run cooler, and reduce fuel usage at idle.
If the carburetor is the correct qjet for 75 automatic (7045222) the correct vacuum port for distributor is the upper port on driver side of carb and it’s full vacuum at idle.
The only ported vacuum port is on lower throttle plate on passenger side of carb but it is modulated meaning the amount of vacuum tapers off as the throttle plates continue to open because it’s used for the EGR valve. I just went through this with Cliff Ruggles.
Old 04-15-2018, 09:16 PM
  #15  
lars
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
lars's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 13,658
Received 4,928 Likes on 1,933 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Inca32x
If the carburetor is the correct qjet for 75 automatic (7045222) the correct vacuum port for distributor is the upper port on driver side of carb and it’s full vacuum at idle.
The only ported vacuum port is on lower throttle plate on passenger side of carb but it is modulated meaning the amount of vacuum tapers off as the throttle plates continue to open because it’s used for the EGR valve. I just went through this with Cliff Ruggles.
That's correct.

Lars

Get notified of new replies

To Carb




Quick Reply: Carb



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 PM.