C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3:73 vs. 3:08 Rear End

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2015, 05:48 PM
  #21  
80Baby
Burning Brakes
 
80Baby's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: Surrey British Columbia
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

TKO 5-speed with a 3.08 rear in my '80. The car has been resto-modded as a highway cruiser. I'm way past the age of smoking tires so this is the best arrangement for truly enjoying my baby.
Old 06-27-2015, 06:02 PM
  #22  
ddawson
Le Mans Master
 
ddawson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 5,655
Received 599 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

I have 3.36 with a wide ratio.

70MPH is just at 3K. Not bad but at 85MPH thing sound a little more hurried.

I looked at doing a TKO and with the .82 overdrive it just didn't seem to be enough.

1:1 @ 70MPH is 2927
.82 @ 70MPH is 2400

.64 would have been too low at 1873 but with better rear gearing like 3.73 it would be perfect.
Old 06-27-2015, 08:36 PM
  #23  
69427
Tech Contributor
 
69427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Posts: 18,391
Received 774 Likes on 555 Posts

Default

My factory setup was an M21 and 3.70s in the rear. I was young and stupid at the time, and the higher cruising RPM didn't bother me much. I eventually put a 5 spd and 3.08 in it. Nice cruising RPM and lots of torque off the line. However, I recently put the M21 back in the car (to take 30# off the car, as I like to do track days with it), but kept the 3.08 rear gears. Even with a lightweight 10.5" flywheel & clutch setup the car is easy to drive off from a stop (it's a big block though).
Old 06-27-2015, 09:12 PM
  #24  
68/70Vette
Team Owner
 
68/70Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Posts: 39,568
Received 549 Likes on 376 Posts

Default

My 69 BB and my 70 BB each came stock with 3.08:1 differentials. This worked out well with the extra torque of the BB's. When I replaced the BB in my 69 with a clone L88, the 3.08:1 and the L88 cam shaft were not a happy couple. A lot of fuss getting the 69 rolling. I replaced the Muncie in the 69 with a Richmond 5 speed. The Richmond had a 1:1 fifth gear, but a lower (numerically higher) first gear...happiness. The 70 currently has a 3.73:1 diff and a TKO600 five speed.

The Richmond 5 speeds have 1:1 fifth gears, the TKO600's have overdrive 5th gears.
Old 06-27-2015, 09:16 PM
  #25  
labhound
Racer
 
labhound's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Jamestown Ohio
Posts: 361
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

My '74 454 with a close ratio 4 speed runs 3k rpm at 77 mph, I don't do much highway driving, it'll do burnouts when I dump the clutch though!, it's fun to drive though.
I'm building a low rpm big power motor for it now, but, if you want to trade rears then let me know........
Old 06-27-2015, 09:42 PM
  #26  
Priya
Le Mans Master
 
Priya's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan
Posts: 6,397
Received 640 Likes on 463 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bj1k
What transmission are you running ? I have a close ratio with 3:73 rears and skip second gear and go straight to third . Second gear is useless.
Whaaaat??? I have a close ratio and 3.70 rear gears and I never find second gear useless or think it would be anything but a bad idea to go from 1st to 3rd.
Old 06-27-2015, 10:37 PM
  #27  
bj1k
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
bj1k's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh suburbs (Cabot ) Pa.
Posts: 5,743
Received 375 Likes on 293 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Priya
Whaaaat??? I have a close ratio and 3.70 rear gears and I never find second gear useless or think it would be anything but a bad idea to go from 1st to 3rd.
You have 3:70's not 3:73's There is a difference. And just so you know it doesn't hurt anything to go from 1st to third , it just feels like a normal wide ratio transmission .
Old 06-27-2015, 10:41 PM
  #28  
Priya
Le Mans Master
 
Priya's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan
Posts: 6,397
Received 640 Likes on 463 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bj1k
You have 3:70's not 3:73's There is a difference.
LOL, yes, that's a huge difference.
Old 06-27-2015, 10:50 PM
  #29  
Sunstroked
Melting Slicks
 
Sunstroked's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: S Nevada
Posts: 2,071
Received 146 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

I go 1st to 3rd, even 1st - 4th. M20-3:55-383. Lots of low end grunt. If I feel like rowing the gears, I'll do that too. Our freeway speeds are 65 mph in town and 75 mph at the city limits. I see an overdrive in my future.
Old 06-27-2015, 11:22 PM
  #30  
Mod75
Le Mans Master

 
Mod75's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Danville Illinois
Posts: 9,317
Received 570 Likes on 286 Posts
Finalist 2021 C3 of the Year - Modified
C3 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019

Default

I have a mild 350 with mods, TB 400 and a 3:08 gear

If my tack was working it would read about 2,300 rpm at 60 i think.
Old 06-28-2015, 02:25 AM
  #31  
cagotzmann
Melting Slicks
 
cagotzmann's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,962
Received 520 Likes on 358 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bj1k
It's definitely not being able to afford the 5 speed it's not willing to spend the money on it. Besides what's different ? Am I wrong thinking that all top gears are 1 to 1 ratio ( straight through ) ? How does that give you lower rpm's without changing the rear ?
A 5 speed has a single over drive gear in the range of .82 - .64

A 6 speed has 2 over drive gears 5th ~ .8 and 6th .64 - .5

4th is still a 1:1 like what you have.
Old 07-05-2015, 08:54 PM
  #32  
bj1k
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
bj1k's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh suburbs (Cabot ) Pa.
Posts: 5,743
Received 375 Likes on 293 Posts

Default

Now I'm getting somewhere. When I bought my car I was told that they thought the rear end gears were 3:73's but over the weekend I was talking to a guy that knew the car and the guy a couple owners back that changed the gears and he said that they were definitely 3:90's instead of 3:73's so it's even worse than I thought and explains why it seems so low. The numbers on the rear housing say it was originally a 3:36 gear rear so I decided that is what I want to go back to. The same guy was telling me that if going from a 3:90 to 3:36 that there might be a difference in the size of the carrier maybe needing shims between the carrier and the gear. Can someone enlighten me on this and recommend what I will need to order.
Old 07-05-2015, 09:43 PM
  #33  
BKbroiler
Le Mans Master
 
BKbroiler's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Lebanon Township New Jersey
Posts: 5,005
Received 706 Likes on 401 Posts

Default

This thread is driving me crazy. I'm not looking to offend anyone and I've been criticized for doing this in the past but I have to point out that the correct terminology for gear ratios is 3.08, 3.36, 3.55, etc., NOT 3:08, 3:36, 3:55. This is a number, not a time of day. It is derived from dividing the number of teeth on the ring gear by the number of teeth on the pinion gear. Like 37/12 = 3.08 or 41/10 = 4.10. Some confusion probably results from the full mathematical terms for a gear ratio as in 4.10:1. There the ":" is short for the word "to". But we normally talk about gear ratios in shortened terms so 4.10:1 becomes just 4.10, hopefully.
Old 07-05-2015, 10:01 PM
  #34  
bj1k
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
bj1k's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh suburbs (Cabot ) Pa.
Posts: 5,743
Received 375 Likes on 293 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BKbroiler
This thread is driving me crazy. I'm not looking to offend anyone and I've been criticized for doing this in the past but I have to point out that the correct terminology for gear ratios is 3.08, 3.36, 3.55, etc., NOT 3:08, 3:36, 3:55. This is a number, not a time of day. It is derived from dividing the number of teeth on the ring gear by the number of teeth on the pinion gear. Like 37/12 = 3.08 or 41/10 = 4.10. Some confusion probably results from the full mathematical terms for a gear ratio as in 4.10:1. There the ":" is short for the word "to". But we normally talk about gear ratios in shortened terms so 4.10:1 becomes just 4.10, hopefully.
Sorry to confuse you but I didn't think it is that important to worry about. A result from "Qwikke " typing.
Old 07-05-2015, 10:24 PM
  #35  
bashcraft
Le Mans Master
 
bashcraft's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Butler Pa
Posts: 6,391
Received 109 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bj1k
over the weekend I was talking to a guy that knew the car and the guy a couple owners back that changed the gears and he said that they were definitely 3:90's instead of 3:73's so it's even worse than I thought and explains why it seems so low. The numbers on the rear housing say it was originally a 3:36 gear rear so I decided that is what I want to go back to. The same guy was telling me that if going from a 3:90 to 3:36 that there might be a difference in the size of the carrier maybe needing shims between the carrier and the gear. Can someone enlighten me on this and recommend what I will need to order.
There are 3 carriers and 4 carriers. All 3.XX gears fit in a 3 carrier and all 4.XX gears require a 4 carrier.

As far as 3.90 gears, there may have been some aftermarket sets but no factory 3.90 gears that i know of.

Are you sure you have an M-21 trans and not an M-20?
Old 07-05-2015, 10:45 PM
  #36  
lowbuck72
Drifting
 
lowbuck72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Chino Hills CA
Posts: 1,900
Received 468 Likes on 274 Posts

Default

I run a T5 with a .63 overdrive in my C3 which is great and you should consider something like that. On the other hand, many years ago, I had a '63 Biscayne with a 409, an M21 and 4:11's. It was fun, but ridiculous as an everyday driver. So I put in a set of 3:08's and it solved the problem. Kept the 4:11's for racedays. Those old third members could be swapped out in a hour.
Old 07-05-2015, 10:46 PM
  #37  
BKbroiler
Le Mans Master
 
BKbroiler's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Lebanon Township New Jersey
Posts: 5,005
Received 706 Likes on 401 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bj1k
Sorry to confuse you but I didn't think it is that important to worry about. A result from "Qwikke " typing.
I'm not the one who is confused. Also, it is quicker to type a . than a :

Get notified of new replies

To 3:73 vs. 3:08 Rear End

Old 07-06-2015, 09:51 AM
  #38  
loup68
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
loup68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: myrtle beach sc
Posts: 2,846
Received 428 Likes on 323 Posts

Default

For years I would skip second gear, first to third and then fourth. I had my M-20 rebuilt and third gear was really worn badly. I was told to use second gear, that it is a lot beefier gear than third gear. Been using second gear ever since. Lou.
Old 07-06-2015, 10:15 AM
  #39  
bj1k
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
bj1k's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh suburbs (Cabot ) Pa.
Posts: 5,743
Received 375 Likes on 293 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bashcraft
There are 3 carriers and 4 carriers. All 3.XX gears fit in a 3 carrier and all 4.XX gears require a 4 carrier.

As far as 3.90 gears, there may have been some aftermarket sets but no factory 3.90 gears that i know of.

Are you sure you have an M-21 trans and not an M-20?
Thanks for the information . That will help. I did check all of the numbers when I had the transmission out and it appears to be a close ratio M-21.
Old 07-06-2015, 10:18 AM
  #40  
bj1k
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
bj1k's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh suburbs (Cabot ) Pa.
Posts: 5,743
Received 375 Likes on 293 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BKbroiler
I'm not the one who is confused. Also, it is quicker to type a . than a :
Sew I tipe funee butt youz boyz frum joyze tok funee !


Quick Reply: 3:73 vs. 3:08 Rear End



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 AM.