Help me with my '73 L82 engine!
#1
Cruising
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jul 2014
Location: Estevan Saskatchewan
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Help me with my '73 L82 engine!
Hello everyone, I just signed up today but have been a loyal thread reader for over a year!
I purchased a 1973 L82 about 6 months ago and absolutely love it. I've been thinking of adding some performance parts to give her some go, or debating just pulling the motor and dropping in a crate engine.
So today I was doing some research and have hit a road block that has me baffled. I was told when I bought the car that it had the original engine. However the engine number makes no sense to me.
The only thing stamped on the pad in front of the passenger side valve cover is: "CE3278 0 9" Does this make sense to anyone? No other markings are visible. I did a search online and came across "CE" being a 1956 Impala 265 ci engine code which again makes no sense.
The casting numbers on the back of the block by the transmission show "3970010" which would be a 350. Plus the numbers for the exhaust manifold, intake and carb all go along with the L82 numbers.
Can someone shed some light? I'll try to figure out how to attach a picture and I'll show you what I'm looking at.
Thanks again!
I purchased a 1973 L82 about 6 months ago and absolutely love it. I've been thinking of adding some performance parts to give her some go, or debating just pulling the motor and dropping in a crate engine.
So today I was doing some research and have hit a road block that has me baffled. I was told when I bought the car that it had the original engine. However the engine number makes no sense to me.
The only thing stamped on the pad in front of the passenger side valve cover is: "CE3278 0 9" Does this make sense to anyone? No other markings are visible. I did a search online and came across "CE" being a 1956 Impala 265 ci engine code which again makes no sense.
The casting numbers on the back of the block by the transmission show "3970010" which would be a 350. Plus the numbers for the exhaust manifold, intake and carb all go along with the L82 numbers.
Can someone shed some light? I'll try to figure out how to attach a picture and I'll show you what I'm looking at.
Thanks again!
#2
Race Director
The "CE" in the format that's stamped on your block, indicates that it is a GM warranty, or "over the counter" service replacement block.
The "3" after the CE, would be the year 1973, so the engine was probably damaged while still under warranty, and the new CE short block was installed.
The engine is not the original engine, or at least the block isn't, sorry.
If it had been a 1956 engine, the CE would be found in a format similar to this: F0521CE, with the "F" indicating the Flint engine plant, the first 2 numbers being the month of assembly, the second 2 numbers being the day of the month, and then the CE at the end would be the engine suffix code.
The "3" after the CE, would be the year 1973, so the engine was probably damaged while still under warranty, and the new CE short block was installed.
The engine is not the original engine, or at least the block isn't, sorry.
If it had been a 1956 engine, the CE would be found in a format similar to this: F0521CE, with the "F" indicating the Flint engine plant, the first 2 numbers being the month of assembly, the second 2 numbers being the day of the month, and then the CE at the end would be the engine suffix code.
#4
Cruising
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jul 2014
Location: Estevan Saskatchewan
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks!
The "CE" in the format that's stamped on your block, indicates that it is a GM warranty, or "over the counter" service replacement block.
The "3" after the CE, would be the year 1973, so the engine was probably damaged while still under warranty, and the new CE short block was installed.
The engine is not the original engine, or at least the block isn't, sorry.
If it had been a 1956 engine, the CE would be found in a format similar to this: F0521CE, with the "F" indicating the Flint engine plant, the first 2 numbers being the month of assembly, the second 2 numbers being the day of the month, and then the CE at the end would be the engine suffix code.
The "3" after the CE, would be the year 1973, so the engine was probably damaged while still under warranty, and the new CE short block was installed.
The engine is not the original engine, or at least the block isn't, sorry.
If it had been a 1956 engine, the CE would be found in a format similar to this: F0521CE, with the "F" indicating the Flint engine plant, the first 2 numbers being the month of assembly, the second 2 numbers being the day of the month, and then the CE at the end would be the engine suffix code.
Is there any link, guide, etc. that would tell me what the other numbers mean? And also, would this still be considered a "numbers matching" car if the block was replaced under warranty?
#5
Melting Slicks
CE stands for "Chevrolet Engine." Since yours is a '73 it is very likely it was put in as a warranty motor. It is still likely that someone just bought it over the counter and installed it themselves.
CE motors were recorded with a 6-digit serial number. The first digit after CE is for the year, so in your case 1973. For the Flint plant, where the corvette motors were assembled, the sequence went from 20000 to 49999, then from 90000 to 99999. So your lies there at the beginning with 27809.
I have postulated that the "CE" and the first 4 digits were stamped after the block casting as a gang stamp and then the final two characters are individually stamped at the time of build-out of the motor.
Depending on the reason for replacement, you typically received a new block with rotating assembly. From here, any usable parts from your original motor were transferred to the replacement shortblock.
Unfortunately, this would not be considered a "matching numbers" block. That disappeared when your original block with the VIN and assembly stamping was replaced.
But, enjoy it for what it is!
EDIT: I wanted to clarify, there is no paper trail that ties your CE number to what is inside that motor or any further documentation that I am aware of.
Last edited by LeMans Pete; 07-25-2014 at 09:10 PM.
#6
Sorry.
#7
Glade your enjoying your ride.
If the replacement block is not buggered up badly or over bored already, I'd just rebuild to the power level desired , with in reason .
A 3:70 rear or 3:55 rear axle gear , will perk up a base car .
Compression was the issue with post 1970 engines.
There is adequate hp available over the counter, you can build your block since it is not matching numbers, without spending a fortune .
11:1 compression or so will really wake up a Chevy small block . Just plan on using hi octane fuel
Good luck
If the replacement block is not buggered up badly or over bored already, I'd just rebuild to the power level desired , with in reason .
A 3:70 rear or 3:55 rear axle gear , will perk up a base car .
Compression was the issue with post 1970 engines.
There is adequate hp available over the counter, you can build your block since it is not matching numbers, without spending a fortune .
11:1 compression or so will really wake up a Chevy small block . Just plan on using hi octane fuel
Good luck
#8
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,468 Likes
on
1,247 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
#9
Cruising
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jul 2014
Location: Estevan Saskatchewan
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks everyone! I appreciate your quick responses and your wealth of knowledge.
The only reason I was considering the crate motor was because I didn't want to mess with "original engine". Seeing as how that's not the case anymore, can anyone steer me in the direction of best bang for my buck regarding performance upgrades?
I'm thinking headers, intake, and K & N air filter to start.
Then maybe this winter I can pull the motor ( I have to anyways to fix that leaky rear seal ) at that time maybe different heads, and cam.
Any tips or pointers or advice? Thanks in advance!
The only reason I was considering the crate motor was because I didn't want to mess with "original engine". Seeing as how that's not the case anymore, can anyone steer me in the direction of best bang for my buck regarding performance upgrades?
I'm thinking headers, intake, and K & N air filter to start.
Then maybe this winter I can pull the motor ( I have to anyways to fix that leaky rear seal ) at that time maybe different heads, and cam.
Any tips or pointers or advice? Thanks in advance!
#10
Racer
Thanks everyone! I appreciate your quick responses and your wealth of knowledge.
The only reason I was considering the crate motor was because I didn't want to mess with "original engine". Seeing as how that's not the case anymore, can anyone steer me in the direction of best bang for my buck regarding performance upgrades?
I'm thinking headers, intake, and K & N air filter to start.
Then maybe this winter I can pull the motor ( I have to anyways to fix that leaky rear seal ) at that time maybe different heads, and cam.
Any tips or pointers or advice? Thanks in advance!
The only reason I was considering the crate motor was because I didn't want to mess with "original engine". Seeing as how that's not the case anymore, can anyone steer me in the direction of best bang for my buck regarding performance upgrades?
I'm thinking headers, intake, and K & N air filter to start.
Then maybe this winter I can pull the motor ( I have to anyways to fix that leaky rear seal ) at that time maybe different heads, and cam.
Any tips or pointers or advice? Thanks in advance!
#11
Seeing as how that's not the case anymore, can anyone steer me in the direction of best bang for my buck regarding performance upgrades?
I'm thinking headers, intake, and K & N air filter to start.
Then maybe this winter I can pull the motor ( I have to anyways to fix that leaky rear seal ) at that time maybe different heads, and cam.
Any tips or pointers or advice? Thanks in advance!
I'm thinking headers, intake, and K & N air filter to start.
Then maybe this winter I can pull the motor ( I have to anyways to fix that leaky rear seal ) at that time maybe different heads, and cam.
Any tips or pointers or advice? Thanks in advance!
Without a teardown, there's no way of knowing what's inside the engine. Intakes and headers won't do much for what might be a low HP smog motor.
#13
Race Director
I agree with you on the intake and disagree with you strongly on the headers. A set of 1 5/8" long tube headers will work wonders on these cars. I'm pretty sure the exhaust manifolds were designed by plumbers trying to get the job done...
#15
Cruising
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jul 2014
Location: Estevan Saskatchewan
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is definitely a 73 engine. As I said before, all other numbers point to it being a replacement block L82. I haven't pulled a valve cover yet to get to the heads numbers, any other way?
VIN # says its an L82, aluminum L82 valve covers, tach is correct, carb from L82, I haven't driven an L48 so I'm not sure on the difference in "feel", but I'm pretty sure its got an L82 350 under the hood.
Another question: How do I know what I have for rear gears? Did the L82 come with a certain gear ratio? I know there were options, but how can I tell whats in this car?
VIN # says its an L82, aluminum L82 valve covers, tach is correct, carb from L82, I haven't driven an L48 so I'm not sure on the difference in "feel", but I'm pretty sure its got an L82 350 under the hood.
Another question: How do I know what I have for rear gears? Did the L82 come with a certain gear ratio? I know there were options, but how can I tell whats in this car?
#18
It is definitely a 73 engine. As I said before, all other numbers point to it being a replacement block L82. I haven't pulled a valve cover yet to get to the heads numbers, any other way?
VIN # says its an L82, aluminum L82 valve covers, tach is correct, carb from L82, I haven't driven an L48 so I'm not sure on the difference in "feel", but I'm pretty sure its got an L82 350 under the hood.
VIN # says its an L82, aluminum L82 valve covers, tach is correct, carb from L82, I haven't driven an L48 so I'm not sure on the difference in "feel", but I'm pretty sure its got an L82 350 under the hood.
Given that you've got the L82 exhaust pipes, swapping to headers from the stock rams horn manifolds won't do much. It's still a low compression 250HP smog engine.
#19
Having something higher than a 3 .08 highway axle will help with the acceleration.
If you have the bottom end pieces of the old L82 , crank etc ....it a good start for an old school engine build to add an extra 100 hp.
I like old school simple chit .....myself ......I'm not racing anybody these days .
If you have the bottom end pieces of the old L82 , crank etc ....it a good start for an old school engine build to add an extra 100 hp.
I like old school simple chit .....myself ......I'm not racing anybody these days .
#20
Burning Brakes
[QUOTE Another question: How do I know what I have for rear gears? Did the L82 come with a certain gear ratio? I know there were options, but how can I tell whats in this car?[/QUOTE]
Stamped on the underside of the differential, on the flange, where the cover attaches, is a code that identifies the gear ratio among other info.
First two letters indicate the ratio:
AX, LR - 3.36
AC - 4.11
AB - 3.70
AA - 3.55
AW - 3.08
Fran
Stamped on the underside of the differential, on the flange, where the cover attaches, is a code that identifies the gear ratio among other info.
First two letters indicate the ratio:
AX, LR - 3.36
AC - 4.11
AB - 3.70
AA - 3.55
AW - 3.08
Fran